Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Disseminated intravascular coagulation is a complex condition characterized by a widespread hypercoagulable state in small and large blood vessels that can lead to microvascular and macrovascular clotting and compromised blood flow, ultimately resulting in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Commonly, life-threatening illnesses accompany disseminated intravascular coagulation, presenting a challenge in diagnosis and management. 

This activity reviews the evaluation and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation and provides guidance on identifying underlying causes and implementing appropriate treatments tailored to individual patients. Additionally, the significance of recognizing disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill patients is highlighted, as its presence significantly impacts mortality rates, particularly in conjunction with sepsis or severe trauma. Further, this activity emphasises the importance of an interprofessional approach to caring for affected patients. Interdisciplinary collaboration ensures timely diagnosis, appropriate management, and ongoing monitoring, thereby enhancing the quality of care and outcomes for patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation.

  • Assess the clinical manifestations of disseminated intravascular coagulation.

  • Implement management considerations for disseminated intravascular coagulation.

  • Explain the importance of utilizing an interprofessional team to manage patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Introduction

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can be defined as a widespread hypercoagulable state that can lead to micro- and macrovascular clotting and compromised blood flow, ultimately resulting in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome or MODS. As this process begins consuming clotting factors and platelets in a positive feedback loop, hemorrhage can ensue, which may be the presenting symptom of a patient with DIC. Disseminated intravascular coagulation typically occurs as an acute complication in patients with underlying life-threatening illnesses such as severe sepsis, hematologic malignancies, severe trauma, or placental abruption. Determining the consequences of DIC and the overall mortality rate of DIC remains difficult as patients with this condition also have additional diagnoses that can cause many of the signs and symptoms consistent with DIC, particularly if they also have acute or chronic liver failure. While concomitant disease states can obscure a patient’s prognosis, mortality rates have been shown to double in patients who are septic or those with severe trauma if they also have DIC.[1][2][3][4][5]

Etiology

Multiple medical conditions can lead to the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation through a systemic inflammatory response or the release of procoagulants into the bloodstream. The pathological process of DIC has been estimated to occur in up to 30% to 50% of cases of severe sepsis, which is the most common cause of DIC. Classically, DIC has been associated with gram-negative bacteria sepsis, though the prevalence of this disorder in sepsis due to gram-positive organisms may be similar. Other causes of sepsis, including parasites, can also lead to DIC.

Up to 20% of patients with metastasized adenocarcinoma or lymphoproliferative disease also have DIC, in addition to 1% to 5% percent of patients with chronic diseases like solid tumors and aortic aneurysms. Obstetrical complications such as placental abruption, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (eg, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets [HELLP] syndrome), and amniotic fluid embolism have also been known to lead to DIC. Other causes of DIC include trauma, pancreatitis, malignancy, snake bites, liver disease, transplant rejection, and transfusion reactions. About 15.5% of cases of DIC have also been linked to complications occurring after surgery.[6][7][8][9][10][11]

Epidemiology

Because DIC is a complication of other medical diagnoses, the prevalence of DIC remains greater in higher acuity settings as opposed to lower acuity settings. Almost invariably, a severe or life-threatening diagnosis is associated with the disease. A 1996 study in Japan found that a diagnosis of DIC complicated about 1.0% percent of admissions to university hospitals. Similarly, a 1992 study showed that DIC complicated 12% of cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia before starting chemotherapy, and DIC was detected in 78% of cases during remission induction. Furthermore, HELLP syndrome was associated with DIC in approximately 1 in 5 cases, according to a 1993 study. [12][13][14][15]

Pathophysiology

Also referred to as consumptive coagulopathy, DIC involves the homeostatic imbalance between coagulation and bleeding. Tissue factor (TF), which may be released into the circulation from vascular endothelial damage from trauma or certain cancer treatments, bacterial endotoxins, or cytokine exposure, activates coagulation factor VII to VIIa in the coagulation pathway. Via the extrinsic pathway, thrombin and fibrin are formed, forming clots in the circulation. As this process continues, thrombin and fibrin further impair the coagulation cascade through positive feedback loop stimulation and coagulation inhibitor consumption. Clotting factors, as a result, are consumed due to clotting, which can lead to excessive bleeding. Platelets may also become trapped and consumed during this process. Additionally, pathways, including the protein C system and antithrombin III, appear dysregulated in DIC. Furthermore, an increase in plasma activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) can prevent the inhibition of fibrinolysis.[5][11]

History and Physical

Components of a patient’s history that may be consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation include a recent history of severe infections or trauma as well as hepatic failure, obstetric complications, and malignancy. A remote history of deep vein or arterial thrombosis may also suggest DIC. Patients may experience bleeding from multiple sites, including the gingiva, areas of trauma or surgery, the vagina, the rectum, or through devices such as urinary catheters. Symptoms such as hematuria, oliguria, and anuria may be seen if concomitant renal failure from DIC results. Likewise, end-organ damage to the lungs may lead to dyspnea and hemoptysis if pulmonary hemorrhage or pulmonary embolism occurs, and a patient may have a mental status change if either thrombi or hemorrhage to areas of the brain arise. A patient could also experience chest pain if arterial occlusion of a coronary artery develops. Regarding signs of DIC on physical exam, obvious bleeding or frank hemorrhage in various areas of the body may be noted. Skin lesions, including ecchymosis, hematomas, jaundice from liver failure, necrosis, and gangrene, may also arise. Excessive coagulation may lead to widespread purpura, petechiae, and cyanosis. A patient in DIC may also experience acute respiratory failure or neurological deficits based on the location of bleeding or clots.[11][16][17]

Evaluation

No single history, physical exam, or laboratory component can lead to a diagnosis of or rule out DIC; therefore, a combination of subjective, objective, and laboratory findings should be utilized. Laboratory findings suggestive of DIC include an increased prothrombin time (PT) and an increased partial thromboplastin time (PTT), as well as a decreased fibrinogen level as widespread activation and consumption of the clotting cascade occurs. The overall platelet count and hematocrit level may be reduced as well. Schistocytes or fragmented erythrocytes are also commonly seen on a peripheral blood smear. The presence of fibrin split products additionally has a high sensitivity but low specificity for DIC. A specific scoring system to assess for the presence of DIC was established in 2007. This score includes platelet count, fibrin markers such as D-dimer, PT, and fibrinogen level, with a score over 5 indicating a high likelihood for overt DIC.[18][19][20][21]

Treatment / Management

The treatment for DIC centers on addressing the underlying disorder that ultimately led to this condition. Consequently, therapies such as antibiotics for severe sepsis, possible delivery for placental abruption, and consideration for exploratory surgical intervention in trauma-related cases represent the mainstays of treatment for DIC. Platelet and plasma transfusions should only be considered in patients with active bleeding or a high risk of bleeding or those patients requiring an invasive procedure. A common threshold utilized for platelet transfusions in this patient population is less than 50 x 109 platelets/L for actively hemorrhaging patients and 10-20 x 109 platelets/L for those not actively bleeding but at high risk of future bleeding. Likewise, fresh frozen plasma, typically at 15 mL/kg to 30 mL/kg, and cryoprecipitate can be transfused to replenish coagulation factors. Prothrombin complex concentrate may also be considered; however, this formulation only contains some coagulation factors and will only mildly correct a patient’s hemostasis. Heparin may also become necessary if a patient has extensive clotting, as this medication may prevent further activation of the clotting cascade. Patients with DIC who are not actively bleeding should receive prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).[5][11][19][20][22]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for disseminated intravascular coagulation includes:

  • Dysfibrinogenemia
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  • Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
  • Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)

Pearls and Other Issues

Disseminated intravascular coagulation can quickly lead to multiorgan failure and death, particularly if early recognition and treatment fail to occur. A high index of suspicion of this high-mortality disease in critically ill patients remains paramount to improve outcomes in patients with DIC.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The diagnosis and management of DIC are complex and challenging. The condition is best managed by an interprofessional team that could consist of a hematologist, surgeon, intensivist, infectious disease consultant, pathologist, and internist. The key is to address the underlying disorder that ultimately led to this condition developing. Consequently, therapies such as antibiotics for severe sepsis, possible delivery for placental abruption, and consideration for exploratory surgical intervention in trauma-related cases represent the mainstays of treatment for DIC. Platelet and plasma transfusions should only be considered in patients with active bleeding or a high risk of bleeding or those patients requiring an invasive procedure. Despite optimal treatment, DIC carries a very high mortality rate. Because DIC affects multiple organ systems, most survivors have a prolonged recovery period.[16][23]


Details

Editor:

Sara M. Nehring

Updated:

5/1/2024 12:03:10 AM

References


[1]

Passmore MR, Obonyo NG, Byrne L, Boon AC, Diab SD, Dunster KR, Fung YL, Spanevello MM, Fauzi MH, Pedersen SE, Simonova G, Anstey CM, Shekar K, Tung JP, Maitland K, Fraser JF. Fluid resuscitation with 0.9% saline alters haemostasis in an ovine model of endotoxemic shock. Thrombosis research. 2019 Apr:176():39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 12     [PubMed PMID: 30776686]


[2]

Gonzalez MG, Wei RM, Hatch KD, Gries LM, Hill MG. A Novel Treatment for Massive Hemorrhage after Maternal Trauma in Pregnancy. AJP reports. 2019 Jan:9(1):e27-e29. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678735. Epub 2019 Feb 13     [PubMed PMID: 30775107]


[3]

Nolan S, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Abenhaim HA. Obstetrical and newborn outcomes among women with acute leukemias in pregnancy: a population-based study. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2020 Oct:33(20):3514-3520. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1579188. Epub 2019 Feb 17     [PubMed PMID: 30773954]


[4]

Karakike E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. Macrophage Activation-Like Syndrome: A Distinct Entity Leading to Early Death in Sepsis. Frontiers in immunology. 2019:10():55. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00055. Epub 2019 Jan 31     [PubMed PMID: 30766533]


[5]

Levi M, Ten Cate H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. The New England journal of medicine. 1999 Aug 19:341(8):586-92     [PubMed PMID: 10451465]


[6]

Šibíková M, Živný J, Janota J. Cell Membrane-Derived Microvesicles in Systemic Inflammatory Response. Folia biologica. 2018:64(4):113-124     [PubMed PMID: 30724157]


[7]

Komo T, Kohashi T, Aoki Y, Hihara J, Oishi K, Tokumoto N, Kanou M, Nakashima A, Shimomura M, Miguchi M, Mukaida H, Hirabayashi N. Successful surgical management of non-perforating acute appendicitis with septic disseminated intravascular coagulation: A case report and review of the literature. International journal of surgery case reports. 2019:55():103-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 29     [PubMed PMID: 30716702]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Thachil J. The Elusive Diagnosis of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: Does a Diagnosis of DIC Exist Anymore? Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2019 Feb:45(1):100-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677042. Epub 2019 Jan 11     [PubMed PMID: 30634199]


[9]

Hashimoto D, Okawa T, Maruyama R, Matsumura F, Shibata Y, Kohrogi H. Anticoagulant Therapy for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation After Gastrointestinal Surgery. Anticancer research. 2019 Jan:39(1):25-31. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13076. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30591437]


[10]

Bone RC. Gram-positive organisms and sepsis. Archives of internal medicine. 1994 Jan 10:154(1):26-34     [PubMed PMID: 8267486]


[11]

Slofstra SH, Spek CA, ten Cate H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association. 2003:4(5):295-302     [PubMed PMID: 14502252]


[12]

Matsuda T. Clinical aspects of DIC--disseminated intravascular coagulation. Polish journal of pharmacology. 1996 Jan-Feb:48(1):73-5     [PubMed PMID: 9112631]


[13]

Okajima K, Sakamoto Y, Uchiba M. Heterogeneity in the incidence and clinical manifestations of disseminated intravascular coagulation: a study of 204 cases. American journal of hematology. 2000 Nov:65(3):215-22     [PubMed PMID: 11074538]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[14]

Sibai BM, Ramadan MK, Usta I, Salama M, Mercer BM, Friedman SA. Maternal morbidity and mortality in 442 pregnancies with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP syndrome). American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1993 Oct:169(4):1000-6     [PubMed PMID: 8238109]


[15]

Levi M. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Critical care medicine. 2007 Sep:35(9):2191-5     [PubMed PMID: 17855836]


[16]

Endo S, Shimazaki R, Antithrombin Gamma Study Group. An open-label, randomized, phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of antithrombin gamma in patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome. Journal of intensive care. 2018:6():75. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0339-z. Epub 2018 Nov 16     [PubMed PMID: 30473794]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[17]

Chen W, Qi J, Shang Y, Ren L, Guo Y. Amniotic fluid embolism and spontaneous hepatic rupture during uncomplicated pregnancy: a case report and literature review. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2020 May:33(10):1759-1766. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1526915. Epub 2018 Nov 4     [PubMed PMID: 30394159]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[18]

Gando S, Nanzaki S, Kemmotsu O. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and sustained systemic inflammatory response syndrome predict organ dysfunctions after trauma: application of clinical decision analysis. Annals of surgery. 1999 Jan:229(1):121-7     [PubMed PMID: 9923809]


[19]

Venugopal A. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2014 Sep:58(5):603-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.144666. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25535423]


[20]

Wada H, Thachil J, Di Nisio M, Mathew P, Kurosawa S, Gando S, Kim HK, Nielsen JD, Dempfle CE, Levi M, Toh CH, The Scientific Standardization Committee on DIC of the International Society on Thrombosis Haemostasis. Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of DIC from harmonization of the recommendations from three guidelines. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2013 Feb 4:():. doi: 10.1111/jth.12155. Epub 2013 Feb 4     [PubMed PMID: 23379279]


[21]

Toh CH, Hoots WK, SSC on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation of the ISTH. The scoring system of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: a 5-year overview. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2007 Mar:5(3):604-6     [PubMed PMID: 17096704]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[22]

Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, Watson HG. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. British journal of haematology. 2009 Apr:145(1):24-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07600.x. Epub 2009 Feb 12     [PubMed PMID: 19222477]


[23]

Yoshimura J, Yamakawa K, Kodate A, Kodate M, Fujimi S. Prognostic accuracy of different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2018 Dec 4:8(12):e024878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024878. Epub 2018 Dec 4     [PubMed PMID: 30518591]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence