Back To Search Results


Editor: Stuart Kesler Updated: 8/17/2023 8:47:51 AM


Sepsis is a clinical syndrome that is characterized by physiologic, biologic, and biochemical abnormalities caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis and the associated inflammatory response can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death. Urosepsis, as the name implies, is sepsis originating from the urogenital tract.[1][2]


Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care


The most common pathogen causing urinary tract infections (UTIs), and in turn urosepsis, is Escherichia coli (50%), followed by Proteus (15%), Enterobacter (15%), Klebsiella (15%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5%), and gram-positive bacteria (15%).[3][4]


In the United States, the number of sepsis cases appears to be increasing over the last 30 to 40 years, but the overall mortality of patients from sepsis has declined. It is estimated that the mortality rate from urosepsis is 30% to 40%. The severity of the disease also appears to be increasing and is typically associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute kidney injury, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC).[5][6]


A UTI begins with the colonization of the urethral meatus or vaginal introitus by either uropathogens or fecal flora that ascends via the urethra to the bladder. It may also ascend further up to the kidneys via the ureters and cause pyelonephritis. Pyelonephritis also can be caused by bacterial seeding of the kidneys via the lymphatics.[7][8]

While the bacterial pathogen causes the initiation of the disease process, the host response drives and defines sepsis and its severity. The immune response of the host is triggered when the proteins of the microbial pathogen interact with those of the host’s cell membrane. The severe pro-inflammatory response can lead to cell necrosis, an increase in neutrophil production that produces bactericidal substances, and increased permeability of endothelial cells that lead to edema formation. After this initial phase, there is an anti-inflammatory response that leads to immunosuppression in the body where neutrophils become dysfunctional and cause further damage to nearby cells. Other systems in the body affected by this inflammatory response include coagulation, autonomic, and endocrine systems.

History and Physical

Urosepsis can present with a varying spectrum of signs and symptoms, as infection in different parts of the urogenital tract may present differently, as mentioned below:

Cystitis presents with dysuria, urinary frequency and urgency, suprapubic pain, and hematuria. Patients may also have a fever or other systemic symptoms (including chills, rigors, or marked fatigue or malaise beyond baseline), which suggest that infection has extended beyond the bladder.[9]

Pyelonephritis classically presents with fever, chills, flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, and nausea/vomiting. It may also be associated with symptoms of cystitis. Atypical symptoms include pain in the epigastrium or lower abdomen.[10]

Acute bacterial prostatitis most commonly presents with fevers, chills, dysuria, pelvic or perineal pain, and noticeably cloudy urine. Obstructive symptoms, such as dribbling of urine, can also occur. On examination, the prostate is often firm, edematous, and markedly tender.[11]

Patients may also have recurrent UTIs, a history of renal stones, an immunocompromised state, or a chronic source of infection like an indwelling catheter.


The diagnosis of urosepsis requires both suspicion of sepsis as well as evidence of a UTI. SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) signs and symptoms are indicators of sepsis but are no longer required for the formal diagnosis. This includes abnormalities in body temperature (warm skin), heart rate (bounding pulses, tachycardia), respiratory rate, and white blood cell count (elevation or depression). In more severe forms, sepsis is diagnosed when there is evidence of organ dysfunction, including but not limited to kidney dysfunction evidenced by decreased urine output, encephalopathy with an abrupt change in mental status, or a low platelet count. The diagnosis of a complicated UTI in the setting of SIRS includes signs and symptoms (dysuria, flank pain), physical exam findings (costovertebral angle tenderness, evidence of urinary retention), radiologic features, and laboratory results showing bacteriuria and leucocyturia.[12][13]

If urosepsis is suspected, the laboratory workup should include a urinalysis with a urine culture. Providers should also order a complete blood cell count, a comprehensive metabolic panel, blood cultures, and a lactate level to look for evidence of end-organ dysfunction. Post-renal obstruction is one of the most common causes of urosepsis. Ultrasound can identify 93% of common contributing causes of urosepsis, such as hydronephrosis or prostate abscess. However, the dependence on an experienced ultrasonographer and their availability often limit the utilization of ultrasound for such patients. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is rapidly available at all hours and is easily reproducible without a need for technologist expertise. This often makes CT scan the diagnostic modality of choice when urosepsis is suspected. It can also identify subtle radiographic findings not easily visualized with ultrasound.[14]

Treatment / Management

Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in multi-drug resistant organisms causing UTIs, making treatment more complicated. This is thought to stem from the overuse of antibiotics to treat suspected UTIs as confirmation is not available for 2 to 3 days until a urine culture with antimicrobial susceptibility has resulted.[15][16](A1)

Research aimed at reducing mortality from sepsis via aggressive treatment modalities, including the original Rivers trial, has shown that early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) reduces mortality from sepsis. While some of the original recommendations of EGDT have been challenged recently, these overall treatment guidelines remain: (1) Rapid initiation of empiric antibiotics that are chosen to eliminate the suspected source of infection, (2) Supportive care, including hemodynamic and pulmonary stabilization, and (3) Adjunctive therapies. When choosing antibiotics, the goal is to have these infused into the patient within one hour of a confirmed diagnosis, but they should be given only after urine and blood cultures have been collected. Each hour antibiotics are delayed after the initial six hours is associated with an 8% decrease in survival. Local susceptibility patterns guide antibiotic choice but often includes a third-generation cephalosporin, piperacillin in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor, or a fluoroquinolone. It is important to remember in dosing these antibiotics that many patients with severe sepsis have end-organ dysfunction, including renal and liver impairment, which might affect the clearance of antibiotics.[2]

In addition to early antibiotics, there are other important parts of the management of sepsis. Initial fluid resuscitation with crystalloid is still recommended at a minimum of 30 mL/kg. Consider early administration of vasopressor support to maintain a mean arterial pressure greater than 65 mm Hg. The first choice for vasopressor support in sepsis is norepinephrine (with epinephrine and vasopressin 2 and 3). Tight glucose control is also recommended, with corticosteroids and blood products being more controversial in the literature.[17]

If the patient has a complicating factor in the urinary tract that is identified and warrants treatment, it should be performed as soon as possible (e.g., Foley catheter placement to relieve urinary retention or stent placement to bypass an obstructing ureteral calculus causing urosepsis).

Differential Diagnosis

Urosepsis, as mentioned above, includes a spectrum of urogenital tract infections, which may present differently, depending on the region and the extent of infection. It is important to probe the cause of infection, to treat them accordingly. Some of the causes are listed below:

  • Urinary tract infection
  • Cystitis
  • Pyelonephritis
  • Acute bacterial prostatitis
  • Prostatic abscess
  • Renal abscess
  • Urolithiasis


Urosepsis is a treatable condition. However, delayed management can lead to severe consequences, including renal failure, septic shock, and death.[18]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients with risk factors for UTIs should be encouraged to seek care promptly if they develop symptoms of a UTI. Patients should also be made aware of the importance of adhering to their prescribed medication regimen.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Urosepsis is best managed with an interprofessional team of health professionals that include a nephrologist, infectious disease expert, urologist, intensivist, a nurse, and a pharmacist. The key to preventing high morbidity is to prevent the condition that promotes infection. Any urological abnormality that is present needs to be corrected. The pharmacist should ensure that there is no delay in the administration of the antibiotics. The nurse should closely monitor the patient for signs of sepsis and communicate with the healthcare provider. Many of these patients require ICU care with close monitoring and frequent radiological studies. [Level 5][19][20]


The outcomes after urosepsis depend on the cause and severity of the infection. The prognosis also depends on the type of bacteria, antimicrobial resistance, and patient comorbidity. This is where the input of a board-certified infectious disease pharmacist can be very beneficial, helping select appropriate antimicrobial coverage, check for drug interactions, and verify all dosing, and report any concerns to the clinical team. If left untreated, the condition has a very high mortality. Even those who survive have a prolonged recovery period. Residual disturbance in renal function is not uncommon.[21][22] [Level 5]



Björck V, Påhlman LI, Bodelsson M, Petersson AC, Kander T. Morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with invasive group A streptococcus infection: an observational study. Critical care (London, England). 2020 Jun 6:24(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03008-z. Epub 2020 Jun 6     [PubMed PMID: 32505194]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Shimoni Z, Salah M, Kasem A, Hermush V, Froom P. Bacterial Resistance to Cephalosporin Treatment in Elderly Stable Patients Hospitalized With a Urinary Tract Infection. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2020 Sep:360(3):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 11     [PubMed PMID: 32482350]


Vikrant S, Gupta D, Singh M. Epidemiology and outcome of acute kidney injury from a tertiary care hospital in India. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia. 2018 Jul-Aug:29(4):956-966. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.239633. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30152435]


Scotland KB, Lange D. Prevention and management of urosepsis triggered by ureteroscopy. Research and reports in urology. 2018:10():43-49. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S128071. Epub 2018 Jul 5     [PubMed PMID: 30013956]


Liu YQ, Lu J, Hao YC, Xiao CL, Ma LL. [Predicting model based on risk factors for urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy]. Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences. 2018 Jun 18:50(3):507-513     [PubMed PMID: 29930421]


Kozyrakis D, Perikleous S, Chatzistamou SE, Kateris D, Soukias G, Karatzas A, Dimitriadis I. Is There a Role for Double J Stent Culture in Contemporary Urology? Urologia internationalis. 2018:100(2):203-208. doi: 10.1159/000486798. Epub 2018 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 29421810]


Sarhan M, von Mässenhausen A, Hugo C, Oberbauer R, Linkermann A. Immunological consequences of kidney cell death. Cell death & disease. 2018 Jan 25:9(2):114. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0057-9. Epub 2018 Jan 25     [PubMed PMID: 29371597]


Kodner CM, Thomas Gupton EK. Recurrent urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and management. American family physician. 2010 Sep 15:82(6):638-43     [PubMed PMID: 20842992]


Saade A, Styczynski J, Cesaro S, Infectious Disease Working party of EBMT. BK virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: An update on pathogenesis, immune responses, diagnosis and treatments. The Journal of infection. 2020 Sep:81(3):372-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 8     [PubMed PMID: 32526327]


Parlak E. A case of glomerulonephritis caused by brucellosis. Tropical doctor. 2020 Oct:50(4):360-361. doi: 10.1177/0049475520929505. Epub 2020 Jun 6     [PubMed PMID: 32508259]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Reddivari AKR, Mehta P. Prostatic Abscess. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31869127]


Vigil HR, Hickling DR. Urinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladder. Translational andrology and urology. 2016 Feb:5(1):72-87. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2016.01.06. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26904414]


Dreger NM, Degener S, Ahmad-Nejad P, Wöbker G, Roth S. Urosepsis--Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2015 Dec 4:112(49):837-47; quiz 848. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0837. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26754121]


Morin A, Bergevin M, Rivest N, Lapointe SP. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy: Compared efficacy of ciprofloxacin vs. the ciprofloxacin/fosfomycin tromethamine combination. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada. 2020 Aug:14(8):267-272. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6248. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32209218]


Caron F, Galperine T, Flateau C, Azria R, Bonacorsi S, Bruyère F, Cariou G, Clouqueur E, Cohen R, Doco-Lecompte T, Elefant E, Faure K, Gauzit R, Gavazzi G, Lemaitre L, Raymond J, Senneville E, Sotto A, Subtil D, Trivalle C, Merens A, Etienne M. Practice guidelines for the management of adult community-acquired urinary tract infections. Medecine et maladies infectieuses. 2018 Aug:48(5):327-358. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 May 16     [PubMed PMID: 29759852]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Wagenlehner FM, Tandogdu Z, Bjerklund Johansen TE. An update on classification and management of urosepsis. Current opinion in urology. 2017 Mar:27(2):133-137. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000364. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27846034]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Reynolds LF, Kroczak T, Pace KT, D'Arcy Honey RJ, Ordon M, Lee JY. Are Routine Laboratory Investigations Necessary Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? Urology. 2020 Sep:143():80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 May 27     [PubMed PMID: 32473206]


Grüne B, Viehweger V, Waldbillig F, Nientiedt M, Kriegmair MC, Rassweiler-Seyfried MC, Ritter M. Preoperative urine culture - Is it necessary to prevent infectious complications following ureterorenoscopy? Journal of microbiological methods. 2020 Jun:173():105933. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105933. Epub 2020 Apr 20     [PubMed PMID: 32325160]


Heppner HJ, Yapan F, Wiedemann A. [Urosepsis in Geriatric Patients]. Aktuelle Urologie. 2016 Feb:47(1):54-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-106184. Epub 2016 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 26916045]


Goveas B. Urosepsis: A simple infection turns toxic. The Nurse practitioner. 2017 Jul 15:42(7):53-54. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000520425.91534.b8. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28622259]


Pietropaolo A, Hendry J, Kyriakides R, Geraghty R, Jones P, Aboumarzouk O, Somani BK. Outcomes of Elective Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones in Patients with Prior Urosepsis and Emergency Drainage: Prospective Study over 5 yr from a Tertiary Endourology Centre. European urology focus. 2020 Jan 15:6(1):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 13     [PubMed PMID: 30219711]


Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, Li Y, Chen Z, Hequn C. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World journal of urology. 2019 May:37(5):921-929. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8. Epub 2018 Aug 17     [PubMed PMID: 30120500]