Back To Search Results

Tinetti Gait and Balance Test

Editor: Sunil Munakomi Updated: 11/20/2022 8:41:03 AM

Introduction

Elderly patients have greater morbidity and mortality associated with falls versus their younger peers. Estimates are that greater than 30% of individuals over the age of 65 and approximately 50% of individuals over the age of 85 will fall each year. Approximately 12 to 42% of those who fall will have an injury.[1] Further, once individuals fall, they are 50% more likely to have a second fall. In this population, a fall is associated with restricted mobility, a decline in activities of daily living (ADLs), hip fracture and other musculoskeletal injuries, dehydration, pneumonia, and long-term hospitalization.[2] Moreover, a fear of falling compromises the patient’s independence and mobility, affecting overall physical and mental health.[3] Fortunately, many falls are preventable using appropriate screening modalities and prevention interventions.

Falls are often multi-factorial, considering there is usually a disturbance in gait and balance. Some causes include sarcopenia, muscle atrophy and imbalance, improper bio-mechanics, poor-blood pressure control, home environment, and polypharmacy. The pathologies on this list can be identified through screening modalities.[4][5]

One screening modality that can be used in many different settings such as outpatient primary care, inpatient hospital ward, or physical therapy office is the Tinetti gait and balance assessment, also known as the performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA).[6] This test is useful because it can be applied to different patient populations, including the elderly, patients with Parkinson disease or multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and stroke patients. The test assesses a patient’s balance and gait using a standardized scoring system.

Procedures

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Procedures

The examination is subdivided into two assessments: balance and gait. It is important to note that the examiner should be near the patient at all times to provide support if the patient harbingers the risk of falling. The examination should take approximately ten to fifteen minutes to perform. The scoring system is ordinal with a range of zero to two. A score of zero means severe impairment versus a score of two, which would indicate independence. A lower total score means that there is more impairment.[7]

Materials required: a stable, hard, and armless chair; a stopwatch; a 15-foot hallway with a smooth surface.

First, the examiner will begin with the balance assessment. The patient will start seated in a hard, armless, stable chair. The patient will be asked to rise from the seated position without using their arms or hands. Next, while the patient is standing, the examiner will ask the patient to move their feet as close together as possible. The examiner will then press on the patient’s sternum with the palm of the hand three times. This will be done once with the patient’s eyes open and then with the eyes closed. Lastly, the patient will be asked to make a 360 degree turn and sit back down in the chair. The scoring system for this portion is broken down into ten standardized scoring subsets for a total score of sixteen.

The second part of the evaluation assesses the patient’s gait. The examiner must walk alongside the patient at all times to provide support. The patient can use an assistive device if they use one regularly. The patient will start this aspect of the examination from the standing position. The patient should be told the complete set of instructions prior to initiating the test. It is also appropriate to provide cues throughout the exam if needed. For example, the patient will be told to walk about fifteen feet at a regular pace and then turn around to walk back to the starting point at a quick but safe pace. The scoring system for this portion is broken down into seven standardized scoring subsets for a total score of twelve.

The scores from both portions of the examination will be added together for a total score.  

Maneuvers (Score) Gait Observations (Score)
Sitting balance (0-1) Initiation of gait (0-2)
Rising from a chair (0-4) Step Length (0-2)
Immediate standing balance (0-2) Step height (0-2)
Prolonged standing balance (0-2) Step continuity (0-2)

Withstanding nudge on chest (0-2)

Step symmetry (0-1)
Standing balance with eyes closed (0-1) Walking distance (0-1)
Turning balance, 360-degrees (0-2) Walking stance (0-1)
Sitting down (0-1) Amount of trunk sway (0-1)
  Path deviation (0-2)

Scoring categories and score allotment.[8][7]

Indications

This test should be performed on patients over the age of 65 and those with sarcopenia, frailty syndrome, dementia, hearing or vision impairments, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, stroke, urinary incontinence, diabetes, cardiovascular pathologies, peripheral vascular disorders, anxiety, sleep disorders, people receiving hemodialysis and other previously identified risk factors for fall. Furthermore, it should be performed on any patient deemed to possess fall risk.[9][10]

Potential Diagnosis

All scoring sections and the three total scores from this assessment (balance, gait, and total scores) should be considered when creating a differential diagnosis for the patient. The utility of this assessment is not only in evaluating a patient's fall risk, but it can also elude to various underlying pathologies through the interpretation of each category and subcategory.[7][11][12]

Normal and Critical Findings

If a patient scores less than or equal to eighteen, the patient is at high risk for fall incidents. Conversely, patients who score between nineteen to twenty-three have a moderate fall risk, and those scoring greater than or equal to twenty-four are at a statistically low risk.

Patient Total Score Fall Risk

≤18

High
19-23 Moderate

≥24

Low

An average value of 26.21 can be found in men aged between 65 and 79 years, whereas an average value of 25.16 can be found in women aged between 65 and 79 years. The average recordable value for men above 80 is 23.29, while for women, the average value is 17.20.[13]

Interfering Factors

The outcome of this assessment is primarily affected by patient comorbidities and exercise tolerance.[7] This test cannot be undertaken for assessing unstable patients.

Complications

There are not many complications associated with this assessment. The examiner acts as a spotter to reduce complications related to fall.[4] Additional complications could include musculoskeletal complaints such as sprains and strains.

Patient Safety and Education

This test is used to assess the odds of falls in a high-risk population. Thus, the examiner acts as a spotter, standing next to the patient and ready to provide assistance and support at all times.[6]

Clinical Significance

For the Tinetti Gait and Balance assessment, the interrater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting fall vary in the literature. This is primarily due to the patient populations selected in the various studies and slight variations in the assessment performed. Faber et al. suggest that the interrater reliability for the balance assessment and total score was good with an R score of 0.4 to 0.93. However, the interrater reliability for the gait assessment was lower, with an R score of 0.72 to 0.89. The sensitivity and specificity in predicting falls were 62.5 to 66.1% for the total score.[14] 

Another study suggested a sensitivity between 64 to 95.5% and specificity between 60 to 100%.[15] Although the assessment may not capture all patients who have risks of falls, it is cheap, simple, reproducible. It may shed light on underlying pathologies pertaining to its impact on the gait or balance.[16]

This test is a screening tool to identify a patient's fall risk. If the patient has a high total score but a low score in one of the scoring categories, then that aspect needs to be addressed as it can be a risk factor for a future fall. Furthermore, if the patient has a low total score, the practitioner should identify any underlying pathology and govern appropriate management strategies. Moreover, the practitioner should ensure these patients have appropriate support and a safe environment at home against fall risks.[17][18] However, this test needs to be validated among cohorts of high-risk populations with specific gait and balance disorders.

References


[1]

Medical Advisory Secretariat., Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario health technology assessment series. 2008;     [PubMed PMID: 23074507]


[2]

Schmitt K,Kressig RW, [Mobility and balance]. Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique. 2008 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 18677690]


[3]

Vaishya R,Vaish A, Falls in Older Adults are Serious. Indian journal of orthopaedics. 2020 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 32257019]


[4]

Robbins AS,Rubenstein LZ,Josephson KR,Schulman BL,Osterweil D,Fine G, Predictors of falls among elderly people. Results of two population-based studies. Archives of internal medicine. 1989 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 2742437]


[5]

Curcio F,Basile C,Liguori I,Della-Morte D,Gargiulo G,Galizia G,Testa G,Langellotto A,Cacciatore F,Bonaduce D,Abete P, Tinetti mobility test is related to muscle mass and strength in non-institutionalized elderly people. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands). 2016 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 27566307]


[6]

Köpke S,Meyer G, The Tinetti test: Babylon in geriatric assessment. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2006 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 16900448]


[7]

Tinetti ME, Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1986 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 3944402]


[8]

Tinetti ME,Williams TF,Mayewski R, Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. The American journal of medicine. 1986 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 3953620]


[9]

Borowicz A,Zasadzka E,Gaczkowska A,Gawłowska O,Pawlaczyk M, Assessing gait and balance impairment in elderly residents of nursing homes. Journal of physical therapy science. 2016 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 27799676]


[10]

Tinetti ME,Speechley M,Ginter SF, Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. The New England journal of medicine. 1988 Dec 29;     [PubMed PMID: 3205267]


[11]

Avdić D,Pecar D, Significance of specificity of Tinetti B-POMA test and fall risk factor in third age of life. Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences. 2006 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 16533180]


[12]

Zackowski KM, Gait and Balance Assessment. Seminars in neurology. 2016 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 27704504]


[13]

Baloh RW,Corona S,Jacobson KM,Enrietto JA,Bell T, A prospective study of posturography in normal older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1998 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 9560065]


[14]

Faber MJ,Bosscher RJ,van Wieringen PC, Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Physical therapy. 2006 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 16813475]


[15]

Schülein S, [Comparison of the performance-oriented mobility assessment and the Berg balance scale. Assessment tools in geriatrics and geriatric rehabilitation]. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2014 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 23619708]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Raîche M,Hébert R,Prince F,Corriveau H, Screening older adults at risk of falling with the Tinetti balance scale. Lancet (London, England). 2000 Sep 16;     [PubMed PMID: 11041405]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[17]

Lipsitz LA,Jonsson PV,Kelley MM,Koestner JS, Causes and correlates of recurrent falls in ambulatory frail elderly. Journal of gerontology. 1991 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 2071832]


[18]

Guirguis-Blake JM,Michael YL,Perdue LA,Coppola EL,Beil TL, Interventions to Prevent Falls in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;     [PubMed PMID: 29710140]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence