Evaluation and Treatment of Snake Envenomations

Article Author:
Michael Tednes
Article Editor:
Todd Slesinger
Updated:
9/22/2020 9:57:19 AM
PubMed Link:
Evaluation and Treatment of Snake Envenomations

Introduction

Snakebites are responsible for a significant degree of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low resource countries. There are over 600 identified species of venomous snakes worldwide, with the majority belonging to the Viperidae and Elapidae families. Common names among the Viperidae family are vipers, pit vipers, and adders. Distinguishing features of the Viperidae family include long, retractable fangs, triangular heads, elliptical pupils, and small scales on their tails. The pit vipers also have a heat-sensing pit adjacent to their nares for movement detection to aid in hunting prey.

Common names among the Elapid family are cobras, coral snakes, mambas, and copperheads. The Elapids can be distinguished from the Viperids as they have fixed, short fangs, less triangular heads, circular pupils, and larger scales on their tails. The remainder of the venomous snake species belongs to the Atractaspididae, Colubridae, and Hydrophidae families.

Etiology

Snake envenomation worldwide is primarily related to occupational exposure, such as in farmers and hunters, but is also seen among tourists exploring the outdoors. When snake envenomation occurs in humans, the initial damage is local around the site of the bite and may spread to systemic toxicity depending on the species.

Snakes primarily use their venom production for targeting prey, but it is also a form of self-defense. Some species can selectively release their venom leading to the occurrence of “dry bites,” in which there is the delivery of no venom. When venom gets released with their bite, the overall toxicity is dependent on both the volume of the venom released and the median lethal dose (LD50) of the venom.

Epidemiology

There are an estimated 1.2 to 5.5 million people affected by snake bites worldwide each year, with as many as 94,000 of these leading to death. The regional variation is quite staggering with only five snakebite related deaths occurring in the United States in comparison to India, which has one of the world’s largest number of snake bites annually, with an estimated 50,000 snakebite related death.[1][2] The cause of this variation is twofold. The first being a higher prevalence of venomous snakes in a more densely populated region with poorer living conditions. The second factor is that the access to healthcare in these regions is limited with long travel times to reach a suitable treatment center and lack of antivenom availability. Within the United States, the vast majority of snake envenomations occur in the southwest states with envenomations from the Viperidae family. Children only comprised 28% of envenomations, and males were more likely to be victims at 59%.[3]

Pathophysiology

The symptoms seen from snake envenomations are mainly due to the toxic components in their venom. The exact composition ranges from species to species and can vary significantly from localized tissue destruction to profound coagulopathies. The clinical effect on humans is related to both the potency and the volume of the toxin released during the snake bite. The venom released by the inland Taipan from Australia is the most potent in the world with a lethal dose of only 0.01 mg/kg with an average envenomation of 44 mg. Their envenomations have greater than 80% mortality. 

Toxicokinetics

The composition of snake venom from a single species of venomous snake can consist of up to 100 different toxic elements. Local tissue destruction is primarily due to hyaluronidase and proteolytic enzymes in the snake venom, which can lead to local tissue edema, blistering, and tissue necrosis. Phospholipase A2 is a common component of snake venom and causes local tissue damage. This compound has both local effects of the surrounding tissues as well as systemic effects on the vascular system and nerve endings. There are a variety of other proteins and polypeptides with toxic effects, such as neurotoxins and hemotoxins.

Most of the neurotoxic effects are secondary to damage at both the presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals of the neuromuscular junction. Presynaptic neurotoxins, such as phospholipase A2, damages the terminal axon, which prevents the release of acetylcholine, causing diffuse paralysis. In contrast, the postsynaptic neurotoxins, such as alpha neurotoxin, responds well to antivenom and anticholinesterase administration as the toxin binds directly to the acetylcholine receptor.[4]

There are a wide variety of hemotoxins with effects on the coagulation cascade, platelet activation, and fibrin clot formation. Most of the toxins lead to an increased bleeding tendency secondary to a consumptive coagulopathy and defibrination. There are, however, some hemotoxins that promote clotting and thrombosis.

History and Physical

A detailed history of a patient suspected of having a snakebite is essential to delineate treatment options moving forward. Information to obtain includes the timing and location of the bite, the onset of any symptoms the patient has been experiencing, and any first aid administered in the field. Gathering a past medical history with detail to which medications they are on, specifically anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications, and any allergies that would prohibit them from receiving an antivenom, such as horses. If possible, information on the offending snake should be gathered. This information should be compared to the local database of venomous snakes located on the WHO website to see if a local antivenom exists. Factors that contribute to the severity of the bite include size of the victim, with larger patients doing better, part of the body bitten, exertion following the bite, depth of the bite, species of snake causing the bite, time to the presentation at the hospital, and initial first aid given at the scene [5].

The physical exam may or may not reveal fang marks at the injury site. There could be local tissue damage, such as ecchymosis, blistering, or even tissue necrosis. Neurotoxic effects will initially present with generalized weakness, ptosis, and ophthalmoplegia; this may progress to paralysis of the facial muscles, and eventually, respiratory failure secondary to obstruction or paralysis of the diaphragm. Significant bleeding from the puncture site, epistaxis, or evidence of spontaneous bleeding could indicate a hemotoxic effect. Patients may present with signs of shock secondary to venom-induced vasodilation, hypovolemia, or even anaphylaxis in some patients [6].

The physical exam could help indicate the species of snake inflicting the bite. In general, Elapid bites are associated with minimal local tissue damage and have a neurotoxic syndrome with systemic toxicity. Viperid bites are associated with profound local tissue damage and have a hemotoxic syndrome with systemic toxicity.

Symptoms that may suggest systemic effects of the envenomation include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, lethargy, muscle weakness, muscle fasciculation, and severe headache. It is important to recognize these symptoms early to prompt initiation of antivenom administration.

Evaluation

Ancillary study testing should target the suspected toxin envenomation. In the case of unknown exposure and signs of systemic toxicity, a broad initial workup should take place. Laboratory testing would include a complete blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen in the case of suspected hemotoxin and a creatinine kinase, basic electrolytes, and urinalysis for possible developing hematuria or proteinuria. For cases of neurotoxicity, the patient requires end-tidal CO2 monitoring, or serial arterial blood gases to evaluate for developing respiratory acidosis. They should also undergo frequent neurologic checks to monitor the progression of the toxicity. There has been the development of rapid venom testing within some centers (mostly Australia), but the data shows that these are only useful to confirm the suspected species of envenomation and that a negative result cannot exclude a particular species.

Additionally, the wound site should be monitored carefully for the spread of edema, development of blisters, or signs of compartment syndrome. If compartment syndrome becomes a concern clinically, the definitive diagnosis is possible by obtaining a direct compartment pressure. If this is greater than 30 mmHg of pressure, it is consistent with the early development of compartment syndrome. 

Treatment / Management

The initial first aid at the scene should be minimal and aim at getting the patient to the nearest treatment center quickly. Varying opinions exist regarding the usefulness of placing the affected extremity in a splint and keeping it at heart level. Therefore, this should only occur if it will not delay transportation. Removal of jewelry and any constrictive clothing on the affected limb is necessary due to the possibility of swelling and circulatory compromise. The patient should be kept calm and encouraged not to exert themselves as this could increase the snake venom absorption. Pressure bandages are another controversial topic. If the identity of the snake species is known to cause neurotoxicity and no local tissue damage, the application of a pressure bandage could slow the spread of the venom. However, if the venom is known to cause local tissue damage, the implementation of the pressure bandage may worsen the damage inflicted to the extremity. Application of a tourniquet proximal to the bite results in higher morbidity without any improvement in outcomes, so this practice has been discouraged. The use of venom extractors has also demonstrated to be ineffective. Local wound manipulation, such as incision or washout, is generally not suggested.[7][8]

Measurement of the progression of swelling form Crotalidae envenomation is essential to decide if antivenom is indicated. Place ink mark on the proximal edge of the bite swelling as a baseline for serial measurements. Mark the progression of swelling with a skin marker, noting the time. Measure the circumference of affected extremity at the same level each time (i.e., mid-forearm or mid-shin). Measure the swelling extension and record circumference every 15-30 minutes. Once there has not been any progression of edema after four consecutive measurements, then decrease measurements frequency to every hour.Antivenom is indicated if swelling progressed beyond the bite site.

Identification of the offending snake species will help determine the appropriate antivenom treatment. There are two antivenoms against Crotalidae approved in the United States. Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab is an antivenom approved for use in the United States and has antivenom components for four species of Crotalids.

Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab - Initial Controlling Dose.

Infuse 4-6 vials (the pediatric dose is the same as an adult) for usual envenomations.

Infuse 8-12 vials for cases with shock, airway involvement, or envenomation on the face or neck

Each vial of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab is reconstituted with 18 mL of 0.9% NS and mixed by continuous inversion until no solid particles are noted. Do not shake. Further, dilute all reconstituted vials to a total volume of 250 mL with 0.9% normal saline. Start infusion at 25-50 mL/hr. for the first 10 minutes and monitor for allergic reaction. If no acute reaction noted, infuse the remainder of 250 cc over 1 hr. Once initial control is achieved by the cessation of proximal swelling, give 2 vials of antivenom IV every 6 hrs for 3 additional doses.

Crotalidae immune F(ab)2 Equine is the second antivenom product approved in the United States for Crotalidae envenomation. It is derived from two snakes, from North and South America, and is a F(ab)2 derivative of the immunoglobulin, which has a longer duration of activity than the Fab fragment used in Crofab®. Once it is decided than envenomation has occurred, and Crotalidae immune F(ab)2 is the agent available for use, infuse 10 vials (the pediatric dose is the same as an adult). Each vial of Anavip® is reconstituted with 10 mL of 0.9% normal saline and mixed by continuous gentle swirling. Combine the contents of reconstituted vials promptly and further dilute to a total volume of 250 mL with sterile normal saline. Start infusion at 25-50 mL/hr. for the first 10 minutes and monitor for allergic reaction. If no acute reaction noted, infuse the remainder of 250 cc over 1 hr.

In countries like India and Australia, with a more significant variation in venomous snake species, there are multiple targeted antivenoms. In high prevalence areas, these antivenoms are stored at a central facility to aid in proper storage and distribution as needed. Antivenom should be administered within four hours, or as soon as possible thereafter, from the snakebite for optimal effect. Antivenom administration is intravenous, as a local subcutaneous injection has not proven to result in improved outcomes. There have been reported cases of recurrent neurotoxic envenomation after the initial dosing of a proper antivenom, which may be secondary to manipulation at the bite site, releasing a non-neutralized toxin into the bloodstream. All these cases improved after re-administration of the proper antivenom.

The primary treatment should also include resuscitation of the patient, including intubation for those with respiratory distress or paralysis and IV fluids for those exhibiting signs of shock. Some patients may require the use of vasopressors to counteract the vasodilatory effects of the envenomation. It is essential to recognize the systemic toxicity may progress rapidly, so early recognition and treatment are paramount.

Some patients will develop severe coagulopathies from their snake envenomations. Treat life-threatening bleeding with direct pressure. There is no evidence on the empiric use of blood products, such as platelets or fresh frozen plasma. Transfuse packed red blood cells in cases of severe blood loss.

There have been some studies that demonstrate the benefit of edrophonium and other long-acting anticholinesterase medications to counter the effects of the neurotoxic components of the venom.

Differential Diagnosis

In the absence of an observed snake bite, alternative envenomation, such as scorpion, tick, or spider bite, should be considered based on the region. For patients with a neurotoxic syndrome, one must consider Guillain-Barre as an alternative. Tick paralysis can also produce similar symptoms.

Those with coagulopathies should undergo evaluation for an underlying hereditary abnormality or an acquired disease, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Local tissue destruction can be related to trauma to that area or a soft tissue infection, such as cellulitis, abscess formation, or necrotizing fasciitis.

Treatment Planning

In areas with known snakes, hospitals should maintain and adequate supply to treat at least 2 victims of snakebite, and order more antivenom as supplies are used or expire.

Prognosis

The majority of morbidity and mortality from snake bites are secondary to the toxin production associated with the bite. Patients who seek proper medical attention within the first 6 hours after the bite have significantly lower morbidity and mortality.  Patients who are monitored and given supportive treatment during this period typically do not have any long-term side effects. Those with significant local tissue injury secondary to the snake envenomation may develop longstanding paresthesia, muscle damage, or even amputation in severe cases.

Complications

The primary complications from snake envenomations are due to the direct toxic effects. The localized tissue damage may require debridement or even amputation in severe cases. Reports exist of massive coagulopathies leading to profound blood loss. These coagulopathies usually resolve within 48 hours of the snake envenomation. Profound neuromuscular blockade can also occur, leading to pulmonary insufficiency if the diaphragm is involved. These symptoms also typically resolve within 72 hours of envenomation.

The administration of snake antivenom requires monitoring for signs of adverse reactions. These include an anaphylactic reaction that may occur within the first few minutes of administration and up to two hours.  If a severe anaphylactic response is suspected, the infusion should stop, and the administration of epinephrine and an anti-histamine should follow. Patients may also develop a hypersensitivity reaction leading to pruritus, hives, nausea, and mild hypotension. This reaction may occur at any time during the antivenom administration and will dissipate once the infusion is complete. There are also documented cases of serum sickness as a side effect that may occur up to two weeks after administration. This usually presents as an influenza-like illness with a rash, and possible microhematuria. This condition responds well to a short course of antihistamines and oral corticosteroids.[9][10]

Deterrence and Patient Education

When a snake bite is suspected, it is essential to present to the nearest emergency center for prompt evaluation. There should be no attempt at local wound exploration or irrigation, and a tourniquet should not be applied. It is important to remain calm following the snake bite and to keep the affected extremity still. Although most snake bites, even when from a venomous species, do not lead to systemic toxicity, the systemic effects have significant morbidity and mortality. The emergency medicine team will monitor the snake bite and any progression to systemic toxicity. The decision to administer an antivenom depends on the development of systemic toxicity as there are some side effects of the antivenom itself. Expect to remain in the hospital for up to 48 hours to monitor symptom progression. Those that do well throughout the observation period typically do not have any long-term effects relating to the snake envenomation. Consultation with a regional poison center or medical toxicologist can assist in the decision of whether to administer antivenom, which agent to use, and when if necessary to repeat dosing.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The proper evaluation and management of a snake envenomation depend on an interprofessional team approach. This type of management starts from the emergency medical service team gathering information regarding the snake species and rapidly transporting the patient to the hospital. The emergency medicine physician will begin the initial resuscitation, preferably while being in contact with a toxicologist and poison center. The nursing staff will continuously monitor the patient for any progression of systemic toxicity. The pharmacist will be coordinating the preparation, mixing, and administration of antivenom, if available, as well as preparing to assist clinical staff in the event of anaphylaxis. Early consultation with an intensivist should be considered for optimal monitoring and may need to assist in the treatment of the patient. Only in rare cases where a fasciotomy is the only option in a situation where there is no access to antivenom, surgical consultation is needed. These interprofessional strategies are crucial in managing snake envenomation. [Level 5]


References

[1] Kasturiratne A,Wickremasinghe AR,de Silva N,Gunawardena NK,Pathmeswaran A,Premaratna R,Savioli L,Lalloo DG,de Silva HJ, The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS medicine. 2008 Nov 4;     [PubMed PMID: 18986210]
[2] Mohapatra B,Warrell DA,Suraweera W,Bhatia P,Dhingra N,Jotkar RM,Rodriguez PS,Mishra K,Whitaker R,Jha P, Snakebite mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2011 Apr 12;     [PubMed PMID: 21532748]
[3] Ruha AM,Kleinschmidt KC,Greene S,Spyres MB,Brent J,Wax P,Padilla-Jones A,Campleman S, The Epidemiology, Clinical Course, and Management of Snakebites in the North American Snakebite Registry. Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology. 2017 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 28975491]
[4] Ranawaka UK,Lalloo DG,de Silva HJ, Neurotoxicity in snakebite--the limits of our knowledge. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013;     [PubMed PMID: 24130909]
[5] Gerardo CJ,Vissoci JRN,Evans CS,Simel DL,Lavonas EJ, Does This Patient Have a Severe Snake Envenomation?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA surgery. 2019 Apr 1;     [PubMed PMID: 30758508]
[6] Ahmed SM,Ahmed M,Nadeem A,Mahajan J,Choudhary A,Pal J, Emergency treatment of a snake bite: Pearls from literature. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. 2008 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 19561988]
[7] Alberts MB,Shalit M,LoGalbo F, Suction for venomous snakebite: a study of     [PubMed PMID: 14747805]
[8] Cheng AC,Currie BJ, Venomous snakebites worldwide with a focus on the Australia-Pacific region: current management and controversies. Journal of intensive care medicine. 2004 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 15358944]
[9] Mong R,Ng VCH,Tse ML, Safety profile of snake antivenom (use) in Hong Kong - a review of 191 cases from 2008 to 2015. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2017 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 28657429]
[10] Khobrani M,Huckleberry Y,Boesen KJ,Aljabri A,Alharthi M,Patanwala AE, Incidence of allergic reactions to Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2019 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 30260274]