Cervical Subluxation

Article Author:
Sunil Munakomi
Article Editor:
Joe M Das
Updated:
7/4/2020 11:13:11 AM
PubMed Link:
Cervical Subluxation

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) accounts for multispectral neurological deficits and severely affects the dichotomous utilization of health resources, especially in low and middle-income nations.[1]

Nearly 80% of the victims are males, with almost 60% of them falling within the age group of 16 to 30 years. Moreover, as high as 60% of them are left unemployed following the incidents.[1]

Subluxation is an important entity of traumatic subaxial cervical spinal injuries. There is a varying degree of slippage of the body of one vertebra relative to the adjacent vertebra, owing to ligamentous injury and the jumped facets, with therefore a high predisposition for injury to the spinal cord.

Etiology

Road traffic accidents have been mostly implicated in the majority of cases of cervical subluxations.[2] One study found motor vehicle collisions accountable in 51% of such cases, followed by fall-related injuries in 41% such cohort study.[1]

The acceleration/deceleration injury and the direct impact at the neck account for such subluxation.[3]

Epidemiology

The traumatic subluxations accounted for 73/163 (44.78%) of cases among the cervical spinal injuries in a single tertiary care center.[1] Most of these patients had Meyerding Type 1 subluxation (35.6%) and presented with the neurological status of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) 'D' category. The most common location for the subluxation was at the C4/5 (28.76%) level.[1]

Pathophysiology

There is the interplay of various dynamic movements that can lead to multispectral patterns of associated injuries in conjunction with the cervical subluxations. The Allen and Ferguson classification system have categorized the principle loading forces with the resultant spinal injuries as[4]:

  1. Hyperflexion injury- unilateral or bilateral locked facets with associated injury to the interspinous ligaments, and teardrop fracture
  2. Hyperextension injury- fracture of the facets, lamina, and the posterior subluxation following disruption of the anterior longitudinal ligament
  3. Axial loading- leads to burst fracture and damage to all ligaments.

The principal mechanics behind the bilateral jumped facets include the hyperflexion injury in addition to the axial loading and the anterior shear.[5]

History and Physical

The management of such patients begins with the assessment of the airway, breathing, and circulation.

The neck of the patient should be immobilized with the application of hard collar to prevent further neurological deterioration from inadvertent neck movements during evaluation and transport.[6]

The primary and secondary survey needs to take place out to rule out potential evidence of polytrauma.

The neurological assessment of the patient needs to be done and documented as per the ASIA grading.[7] A quick localization of the lesion is necessary by assessing the pattern of motor weaknesses (quadriparesis vs. quadriplegic vs. central cord syndrome), level of motor weakness (C5- shoulder shrugging, C6- elbow flexion, C7- elbow extension, T1-hand grip), level of areflexia (at the level of injury), single breath count in the patient (phrenic nerve involvement at C3-4-5 level), and the presence of concurrent Horner syndrome (C7-T1).

Evaluation

After hemodynamic stabilization of the patient, the level, pattern, grade, associated bony ligamentous and vascular injuries, and the pattern of cervical cord injuries require evaluation through a series of radiological imaging. The algorithmic approach to be taken for radiological assessment of the injury is as follows:

  1. Plain-film X-ray of the spine: this helps in diagnosing, localizing the level of injury, and also to rule out other traumatic associated bony lesions such as chance fracture, vertebral body, and spinous process fractures. It is of prime help in managing patients in rural areas to correctly manage and transfer the patient to the tertiary spine center for the needful management of such patients. The dynamic X-ray is of prime importance to rule out subtle instability, particularly in grade 1 subluxation, that a clinician can easily overlook on standard X-rays.
  2. Computed tomogram (CT) spine- provides bony anatomic details. It is also helpful in diagnosing unilateral or locked facets, concurrent injury to the foremen transversarium (risk of vertebral artery injury), validating the integrity of the lateral mass, and the lamina (for screw fixation of appropriate length from the posterior approach). The Meyerding scoring system applies for grading the subluxation (Grade I -translation up to 25%, grade II up to 50%, grade III up to 75%, grade IV up to 100%, and grade V complete ptosis of one vertebral body over another).[8]
  3. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) spine- provides details on the pattern of soft tissue injury (ligaments), damage to the spinal cord (compression, transection, central cord syndrome). The use of tractography can also be applied to assess the integrity of the nerve for tracts to predict the neurological recovery in the patients. There may be a traumatic syrinx developing in a few patients with initially missed grade 1 traumatic subluxations.[3]
  4. Vertebral artery angiography: this modality is of prime importance, especially in patients with the extension of the fracture to the foramen transversarium and in patients with high grades of subluxation at C2-C6 levels. There may sometimes be concurrent dissection or occlusion of the vertebral artery as well.[1][6]

The locked facets will show specific findings in radio imaging. The overlap of more than 50% between the articulating surface of the facet joints is considered unstable.[6] The 'bow-tie' sign or the 'batwing' sign is characteristic of a unilateral jumped facet joint.[9] The CT scan specifically shows a reverse hamburger bun sign highly indicative of a facet dislocation.[10]

Various scoring systems have been developed for the classification of patients with cervical spine injuries. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system encompasses[11]:

  1. Injury morphology - compression, distraction, and translational patterns
  2. Status of the disco-ligamentous complex
  3. Neurological status of the patient.

The AO Spine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system, on the other hand, categorizes injury depending on[12]:

  1. Injury morphology- compression injury (A), posterior tension band injury (B), translational injury (C), which further subdivide into four subtypes
  2. Facet injury - divided into four subtypes
  3. Neurological status of the patient
  4. Case-specific modifiers - constituting the central disc, metabolic bone diseases, and vertebral artery injury.

The AO Spine classification system seems to be of paramount importance in managing patients with traumatic subluxations owing to its importance to the status of the facet joints, the pivotal factor determining the stability of the spine. The damage to the facet joints, therefore, provide a firm rationale for undertaking global fixation of the traumatic spine in a neurologically preserved patients.[12]

Treatment / Management

Regarding the flexion-distraction pattern of injury that plays a central role in traumatic subluxations, the injuries categorize based on the severity of the injury as[13]:

  1. Facet subluxation
  2. Unilateral facet dislocation/ facet fracture and dislocation
  3. Bilateral facet dislocations

The nondisplaced facet fracture or minimal diastasis of < 1mm can be managed with an orthosis. However, facet displacement and the concurrent ligamentous injury warrants surgical fixation.[13]

The initial aspects in management deals with the judicious application of cervical traction that helps in

  • Stabilization of the spine and
  • Reduction of the grade of the subluxation in cases of reducible locked facet joints

Care always needs to avoid traction of the cord due to heavy tractional weights.[1]

In cases with locked facets, the clinician should attempt a closed reduction under anesthesia, which is successful in almost 95% of cases.[14]

If there is no reduction and the preoperative MR images show the presence of disc prolapse, an anterior approach is a next step, with discectomy followed by open reduction with the aid of Casper distractor. The reduction can then take place by anterior only fusion. The failure of reduction needs the posterior reduction of the jumped facets, followed by 360-degree global fixations in neurologically preserved patients.[14]

The surgical plan in the management of the patient then varies accordingly as per the Meyerding grading and the ASIA neurological status, and the relevant scoring system of the patient.[1][12] The treatment algorithm is also determined by the patient's characteristics as well as the expertise of the team. The anterior approach is better suited to deal with the herniated disc, whereas the posterior approach helps in restoring the posterior tension band as well.[13]

If there is a good reduction following traction, the patients can receive an anterior approach with discectomy or median corpectomy followed by in-situ bony graft fusion or the usage of allograft spacers aided with plate and screw fixations.[1][13]

Sometimes, owing to financial barriers, simple graft placement can also be undertaken. In cases of failed reduction from traction, the clinician can attempt reduction following muscle relaxation after induction of anesthesia. If reduction still fails in patients with ASIA 'A' and 'B' status, posterior-only fixation by interspinous wiring is justified for anatomical fixation as to aid in early rehabilitation.[1] However, in patients with ASIA 'C' and 'D' status, the posterior approach is necessary to first to unlocking the jammed facet, and the anatomical fixation is carried out following lateral mass and translaminar screw and rod fixation.[1] This approach can be reinforced with fixation from the anterior approach as well. However, in neurologically stable patients, if there is significant disc prolapse, discectomy or corpectomy is carried out (to prevent cord injury when the patient is in the prone position), then the posterior approach to unlock the facets and posterior instrumentation is the appropriate procedure, followed again by the anterior approach to bony graft placement along with plate and screw fixation (360-degrees approach) is warranted.[15]

With regards to the AO Spine scale system, the recommended plan of management includes[13]:

  1. A0 - conservative
  2. A1 - conservative, if kyphosis >15 degrees- anterior monosegmental fusion
  3. A2 - conservative, if kyphosis >15 degrees- anterior bisegmental fusion
  4. A3 - anterior fusion mono/bisegmental fusion
  5. A4 - anterior bisegmental fusion
  6. B1 - posterior bisegmental
  7. B2 - approach and fusion length depends on the A component
  8. B3 - anterior mono segment, in ankylosis spondylitis- posterior long segment fixation
  9. C1 - approach and fusion length depends on the A component
  10. F1 - conservative 
  11. F2 - approach depends on the B and C components
  12. F3 - approach depends on the B and C components
  13. F4 - approach depends on the B and C components

The asymptomatic vertebral artery injury has not shown to hinder the operative management of the subluxations. The use of aspirin is recommended in the post-operative period. There is still no shared consensus for managing symptomatic vertebral artery injuries associated with traumatic cervical spine subluxations.[13][14]

Differential Diagnosis

Pseudo-subluxation associate with an absent cervical pedicle.[16]

Prognosis

The subluxation of the cervical spine and the associated complications can have negative impacts on patients’ functionality and their quality of life.[17] Most of the patients with poor neurological status are dependent upon their care-providers even for their activities of daily living.

There is a high risk of the need for repeated admissions owing to varied complications in these cohort groups and has shown to be as high as 27.5% in one study.[18]

Hospital-acquired pneumonia and pressure ulcers harbinger disability and lurk mortality, most often in subsets of patients with ASIA grades of A, B, and C.[19]

Complications

The complications can be categorized[1][2]:

  1. Neurological - quadriplegic, quadriparesis, central cord syndrome, and cruciate paralysis
  2. Phrenic nerve injury (C3-5 level)
  3. Vertebral artery injury (C2-6 level)
  4. Spinal cord injury-compression, transection, contusion, and traumatic syrinx
  5. Early complications of the surgery - hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, injury to a vertebral artery hematoma (especially in lateral mass fixation), graft extrusion, cord edema, and cord herniation
  6. Late complications of surgery - surgical site infection, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, implant failure, adjacent  segment disease, kyphotic deformity, and nonunion
  7. Secondary complications relating to spinal cord injuries - such as pneumonia, pressure ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infections, muscle atrophy, and spasticity
  8. Collateral impact on the care providers - heighten the caretaker burden scale in multispectral patterns (physical, economic, social, and emotional aspects).

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

There need to be provisions for:

  1. Early anatomic stabilization.
  2. Focusing on preserving the functionality of the cord. 
  3. Early mobilization and staged physiotherapy programs.
  4. The intuition of the patient care bundle approach in preventing secondary complications in the patient
  5. Opt for surviving, reviving, and then eventually thriving of such patients.

Deterrence and Patient Education

The pivotal basis in managing patients with traumatic subluxation is three-fold:

  1. Early reduction, spinal decompression and graft, and implant fixation
  2. Early intuition of graded physiotherapy to maximize neurological recovery
  3. Prevention of secondary complications in the patients

However, in patients with severe deficits, the caretakers have to look after them even for their activities of daily living. The management plan should, therefore, be targeted, focusing on the patient and the care provider together as a unit.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

There were no significant differences observed between approaches taken for the anatomical stabilization (anterior-only, posterior-only, and 360-degrees) with the pattern of ASIA recovery seen among the patients.[2]

The prime goals in managing these patients are early anatomical fixation with spinal decompression, followed by the strategies to survive, revive, and thrive these cohorts of patients through:

  • Specific care bundle approaches in minimizing secondary complications and
  • Swift implementation of the strategic long-term rehabilitative processes.


  • Munakomi S, Bhattarai B and Cherian I. Prospective observational research on the clinical profile and outcome analysis among a cohort of patients sustaining traumatic cervical spine and cord injury in a peripheral tertiary spine care centre in Nepal [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:1957 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12911.1) Open Access, Public Domain
    (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 13922 Not availableImage 13922 Not available
      Munakomi S, Bhattarai B and Cherian I. Prospective observational research on the clinical profile and outcome analysis among a cohort of patients sustaining traumatic cervical spine and cord injury in a peripheral tertiary spine care centre in Nepal [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:1957 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12911.1) Open Access, Public Domain

References

[1] Munakomi S,Bhattarai B,Cherian I, Prospective observational research on the clinical profile and outcome analysis among a cohort of patients sustaining traumatic cervical spine and cord injury in a peripheral tertiary spine care centre in Nepal. F1000Research. 2017;     [PubMed PMID: 29250317]
[2] Wong KE,Chang PS,Monasky MS,Samuelson RM, Traumatic spondyloptosis of the cervical spine: A case report and discussion of worldwide treatment trends. Surgical neurology international. 2017;     [PubMed PMID: 28607823]
[3] Demetrious J, Post-traumatic upper cervical subluxation visualized by MRI: a case report. Chiropractic     [PubMed PMID: 18093309]
[4] Kanagaraju V,Yelamarthy PKK,Chhabra HS,Shetty AP,Nanda A,Sangondimath GM,Dutta Das K,Bansal ML,Mohapatra B,Patel N,Abel R,Tuli S,Barros T,Tandon V, Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study. Spinal cord. 2019 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 30089891]
[5] Ivancic PC,Pearson AM,Tominaga Y,Simpson AK,Yue JJ,Panjabi MM, Biomechanics of cervical facet dislocation. Traffic injury prevention. 2008 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 19058109]
[6] Schleicher P,Pingel A,Kandziora F, Safe management of acute cervical spine injuries. EFORT open reviews. 2018 May     [PubMed PMID: 29951274]
[7] Kirshblum SC,Burns SP,Biering-Sorensen F,Donovan W,Graves DE,Jha A,Johansen M,Jones L,Krassioukov A,Mulcahey MJ,Schmidt-Read M,Waring W, International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2011 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 22330108]
[8] Hu SS,Tribus CB,Diab M,Ghanayem AJ, Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2008 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 18326106]
[9] Key A, Cervical spine dislocations with unilateral facet interlocking. Paraplegia. 1975 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 1208119]
[10] Daffner SD,Daffner RH, Computed tomography diagnosis of facet dislocations: the "hamburger bun" and "reverse hamburger bun" signs. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2002 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 12480021]
[11] Vaccaro AR,Hulbert RJ,Patel AA,Fisher C,Dvorak M,Lehman RA Jr,Anderson P,Harrop J,Oner FC,Arnold P,Fehlings M,Hedlund R,Madrazo I,Rechtine G,Aarabi B,Shainline M, The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine. 2007 Oct 1     [PubMed PMID: 17906580]
[12] Vaccaro AR,Koerner JD,Radcliff KE,Oner FC,Reinhold M,Schnake KJ,Kandziora F,Fehlings MG,Dvorak MF,Aarabi B,Rajasekaran S,Schroeder GD,Kepler CK,Vialle LR, AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2016 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 25716661]
[13] Torretti JA,Sengupta DK, Cervical spine trauma. Indian journal of orthopaedics. 2007 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 21139776]
[14] Sack JA,Etame AB,Shah GV,La Marca F,Park P, Management and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for traumatic cervical fracture-subluxation associated with an asymptomatic vertebral artery injury. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. 2009 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 19342928]
[15] Munakomi S,Bhattarai B,Cherian I, Traumatic Cervical Spondyloptosis in a Neurologically Stable Patient: A Therapeutic Challenge. Case reports in critical care. 2015;     [PubMed PMID: 26257966]
[16] Moon SJ,Lee JK,Seo BR,Kim SH, Traumatic subluxation associated with absent cervical pedicle: case report and review of the literature. Spine. 2008 Aug 15;     [PubMed PMID: 18708921]
[17] Jaglal SB,Munce SE,Guilcher SJ,Couris CM,Fung K,Craven BC,Verrier M, Health system factors associated with rehospitalizations after traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Spinal cord. 2009 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 19274059]
[18] Anson CA,Shepherd C, Incidence of secondary complications in spinal cord injury. International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 1996 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 8730544]
[19] Sezer N,Akkuş S,Uğurlu FG, Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World journal of orthopedics. 2015 Jan 18;     [PubMed PMID: 25621208]