The antiarrhythmic medications have typically been categorized according to the Vaughan-Williams (VW) classification system. The system classifies the medications according to the main mechanism of action (although several of the agents retain properties from multiple classes). The VW classification is traditionally broken down into four main categories, with some references adding a fifth.
Beta-blockers are indicated for rate control in patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF and atrial flutter. Oral beta-blockers are useful for ongoing management in patients with symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Because of their excellent safety profile and effectiveness in treating ventricular arrhythmias, beta-blockers are often first-line antiarrhythmic therapy. Therapy with beta-blockers is associated with a reduction in adverse cardiac events for long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. In patients with symptomatic (PVCs) in an otherwise normal heart, treatment with a beta-blocker is useful to reduce recurrent arrhythmias and improve symptoms.
Potassium channel blockers decrease potassium efflux out of the cell and prolong the QTc interval.
Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) decrease conduction velocity, slow conduction through the AV node, and are used for ventricular rate control in both acute and chronic AF and atrial flutter. Diltiazem and verapamil can be used in the acute treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with SVT, focal, and multifocal atrial tachycardias. 
Other antiarrhythmic drugs
The cardiac action potential is the cycle of ion movement, which leads to successive depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocyte leading to muscle contraction. The resting phase of the cardiac myocyte has a resting membrane potential of negative 80 to negative 90 mV at baseline. The antiarrhythmic medications essentially slow ion movement in various phases of the cardiac action potential and get broken down as follows.
Class, I antiarrhythmics are fast sodium channels blockers. They are responsible for phase 0 of fast-response cardiac action potentials. The three subclasses differ in their efficacy for reducing the slope of phase 0, with Ic drugs having the greatest and Ib drugs having the smallest effect on phase 0. Sodium-channel blockade: Ic > Ia > Ib. Class Ia prolongs the duration of action potential (AP), leading to an increase in QTc interval. Class Ib decreases the duration of AP, causing a shortening of QTc interval, and class Ic has no effect on AP duration; thus, no effect on the QTc interval.
Class II antiarrhythmics inhibit beta-adrenergic activation of adenylate cyclase, reduces intracellular cAMP levels, and hence reduces Ca2+ influx resulting in decreased sinoatrial node (SAN) pacing and triggered activity and increase in atrioventricular node (AVN) conduction time and refractoriness.
Class III antiarrhythmics block potassium channels resulting in prolonged atrial, Purkinje, and ventricular myocyte action potential recovery, increased ERP, reduced repolarization reserve, and prolonged QT intervals. Amiodarone also exerts sympatholytic, sodium, and calcium antagonistic properties that decrease conduction through the AV and sinus node. Sotalol shares class II and class III antiarrhythmic properties.
Class IV antiarrhythmics inhibit slow Ca2+ channels and decreases the slope of phase 0 and 4, resulting in inhibition of SAN pacing, inhibition of AVN conduction, prolonged ERP, and PR interval.
Adenosine causes a transient AVN block that terminates SVT via hyperpolarization by increasing K+ efflux and inhibiting Ca2+ current.
Digoxin is a Na/K-ATPase inhibitor. By binding with the sodium pump, it increases intracellular Na+ concentration that will drive Ca2+ influx. That will lead to increase contractility of the heart and prolongation of phase 4 and phase 0 of the cardiac action potential, thus slowing down conduction through the AVN.
Most of the antiarrhythmic medications may be administered intravenously and orally, depending on the acuity of condition. Among class I antiarrhythmics, procainamide, and lidocaine are drugs that administered intravenously since it is majorly used in acute treatment. Mexiletine is an oral analog of lidocaine. Quinidine is available in both intravenous and oral forms. Disopyramide is administered in capsules and controlled-release capsules. Oral administration of flecainide or propafenone is feasible and safe and appears to be effective in converting atrial fibrillation of recent onset to sinus rhythm. Adenosine should be administered via proximal IV as a rapid bolus infusion, followed by a saline flush. Digoxin may be used via oral, intravenous route, and as an intramuscular injection. Intravenous administration of antiarrhythmic drugs should be performed with continuous cardiac monitoring.
Antiarrhythmic medications have several areas of concern. First and foremost, most agents also have some degree of pro-arrhythmic potential. Practically speaking, while trying to suppress arrhythmias with the medications, the medications themselves, can lead to other (potentially more dangerous) arrhythmias. For example, the class Ia sodium channel blockers (quinidine, procainamide, and disopyramide) all effectively prolong the QTc interval and thus increase the risk of ventricular tachycardia (torsades de pointes). Other side effects of class Ia antiarrhythmics are more drug-specific. Procainamide may induce lupus erythematosus that is reversible after discontinuation of the offending drug. An adverse effect caused by treatment with quinine is called cinchonism and includes nausea, dizziness, headache, tinnitus, and visual changes. Disopyramide has an anticholinergic effect and accounts for many adverse side effects, such as flushed and dry skin, thirst, hyperthermia, mydriasis, confusion, agitation, and urinary retention. Due to arrhythmogenic effect class Ic antiarrhythmics are contraindicated in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Therapy with beta-blockers may have cardiovascular side effects such as bradycardia and AV block. Noncardiac side effects of beta-blockers include exacerbation of asthma and COPD, lethargy, and dyslipidemia.
All K+ channel blockers share this potential side effect. The reason for this is quite simple if one compares the phases of the action potential to the ECG. The T wave on the ECG represents ventricular repolarization. Phase 3 of the action potential represents repolarization. If a K+ channel blocker is given, this prolongs phase 3 of the action potential due to the slow efflux of K+ ions. If the repolarization phase of the action potential is prolonged, the T-wave on the corresponding ECG also gets prolonged, which creates an elongated QTc interval. Amiodarone side effects are wide-ranging and include corneal microdeposits of amiodarone, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary fibrosis, elevated liver function tests, nausea, and myopathy. Drodenadrone should not be used in a patient with severe heart failure or decompensated heart failure; it should not be used in permanent atrial fibrillation (see Pallas trial).
Along with its needed effects, verapamil may cause some unwanted effects such as AV block, bradycardia, and constipation. The most commonly reported side effects of diltiazem include edema, headache, and dizziness.
Minor adenosine adverse effects include flushing, sense of impending doom, and sweating are usually transient due to short half-life of the drug. More severe side effects include hypotension, chest pain, AV block, and asystole. The adverse effect as bronchospasm makes it contraindicated in asthmatic patients. Adenosine should be avoided in patients with SVT involving accessory pathways (WPW, antidromic AVRT) due to the risk of tachycardia exacerbation.
Atrial tachycardia with AV block is arrhythmia specific for digoxin toxicity. Digoxin toxicity is also characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, confusion, and color vision alterations. 
Nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare workers who look after patients with heart disease should be very familiar with the different antiarrhythmic agents. All antiarrhythmic drugs are also potentially pro-arrhythmic. Intravenous administration should be performed only under cardiac monitoring.
Each agent in the Vaughn-Williams classification includes distinctive side effect profiles that require individual consideration. For example, procainamide may induce a lupus-like syndrome, while quinidine is known to produce cinchonism. The benefit of the classification is in the primary mechanism of action, and the broad, predictable side effects brought about by the primary mechanism. An example would include the class III K+ channel blockers or "repolarization" blockers producing a prolonged phase 3 of the action potential and, by definition, also leading to a prolonged QT interval on the corresponding ECG. Amiodarone is an excellent antiarrhythmic agent, but long term use has correlations with corneal opacities, thyroid problems, and lung infiltrates. That is why amiodarone is not preferred in young patients and preferred choice in the old population. Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index. The therapeutic serum digoxin levels range is 0.5–2 ng/mL. Serum concentrations of cardiac glycosides should be monitored closely to avoid digitalis toxicity. Amiodarone, verapamil, quinidine, and diltiazem increases the serum levels of digoxin and can lead to toxicity. It is recommended to reduce digoxin dose by 25%-50% with close monitoring of digoxin levels weekly for several weeks. Electrolytes evaluation should be performed periodically. Hypokalemia may make the patient more susceptible to digitalis toxicity. Only by being aware of the adverse effects can one reduce the morbidity associated with these agents. 
The cardiologist, or more specifically, electrophysiologist, is generally responsible for starting the patient on an antiarrhythmic medication, but the patient requires monitoring by the primary care provider, nurse, and pharmacist. These medications are not benign, and all healthcare workers who look after patients on antiarrhythmic agents should be very familiar with the different antiarrhythmic agents. Cardiology specialty nurses are especially helpful in monitoring since they have the training to recognize adverse events and understand treatment goals, and can inform the specialist or other clinicians of any concerns. The pharmacist can also be a board-certified cardiology specialist and can assist in agent selection as well as ongoing monitoring, checking for drug interactions, and maintaining communication with the prescriber. All these are examples of interprofessional team dynamics that can drive positive outcomes for patients. [Level V]Each agent in the Vaughn-Williams classification includes distinctive side effect profiles that require individual monitoring. If there is ever a doubt about the medication, the clinician should seek a cardiology consult.
|||Shanmugasundaram M,Lotun K, Refractory Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Current cardiology reviews. 2018 [PubMed PMID: 29737259]|
|||Noss K,Aguero SM,Reinaker T, Assessment of Prescribing and Monitoring Habits for Patients Taking an Antiarrhythmic and Concomitant QTc-Prolonging Antibiotic. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland). 2017 Nov 1 [PubMed PMID: 29104235]|
|||Lai E,Chung EH, Management of Arrhythmias in Athletes: Atrial Fibrillation, Premature Ventricular Contractions, and Ventricular Tachycardia. Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine. 2017 Oct 9 [PubMed PMID: 28990149]|
|||Al-Khatib SM,Stevenson WG,Ackerman MJ,Bryant WJ,Callans DJ,Curtis AB,Deal BJ,Dickfeld T,Field ME,Fonarow GC,Gillis AM,Granger CB,Hammill SC,Hlatky MA,Joglar JA,Kay GN,Matlock DD,Myerburg RJ,Page RL, 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: Executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart rhythm. 2018 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 29097320]|
|||Gersh BJ,Maron BJ,Bonow RO,Dearani JA,Fifer MA,Link MS,Naidu SS,Nishimura RA,Ommen SR,Rakowski H,Seidman CE,Towbin JA,Udelson JE,Yancy CW, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2011 Dec [PubMed PMID: 22093723]|
|||Fuster V,Rydén LE,Cannom DS,Crijns HJ,Curtis AB,Ellenbogen KA,Halperin JL,Kay GN,Le Huezey JY,Lowe JE,Olsson SB,Prystowsky EN,Tamargo JL,Wann LS, 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011 Mar 15 [PubMed PMID: 21392637]|
|||January CT,Wann LS,Alpert JS,Calkins H,Cigarroa JE,Cleveland JC Jr,Conti JB,Ellinor PT,Ezekowitz MD,Field ME,Murray KT,Sacco RL,Stevenson WG,Tchou PJ,Tracy CM,Yancy CW, 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014 Dec 2 [PubMed PMID: 24682348]|
|||Page RL,Joglar JA,Caldwell MA,Calkins H,Conti JB,Deal BJ,Estes NA 3rd,Field ME,Goldberger ZD,Hammill SC,Indik JH,Lindsay BD,Olshansky B,Russo AM,Shen WK,Tracy CM,Al-Khatib SM, 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2016 Apr 5 [PubMed PMID: 26399662]|
|||Amjad W,Qureshi W,Farooq A,Sohail U,Khatoon S,Pervaiz S,Narra P,Hasan SM,Ali F,Ullah A,Guttmann S, Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Antiarrhythmic Medications: A Review of Current Literature. Cureus. 2017 Sep 3 [PubMed PMID: 29142794]|
|||Irizarry-Alvarado JM, Perioperative Management of Beta Blockers and Other Antiarrhythmic Medications. Current clinical pharmacology. 2017 [PubMed PMID: 28847276]|
|||Long VP III,Carnes CA,Vecchiet J,Houmsse M,Hirsch A,Snider MJ, Evaluation of a pharmacist-managed electrolyte protocol in outpatients on antiarrhythmic medications. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. 2017 Jul - Aug [PubMed PMID: 28610942]|
|||MacIntyre CJ,Sapp JL, Treatment of persistent ventricular tachycardia: Drugs or ablation? Trends in cardiovascular medicine. 2017 Oct [PubMed PMID: 28625728]|
|||Beaty RS,Moffett BS,Hall S,Kim J, Evaluating the Safety of Intraoperative Antiarrhythmics in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients. Pediatric cardiology. 2015 Oct [PubMed PMID: 25981562]|