Pressure injuries are defined as localized damage to the skin as well as underlying soft tissue, usually occurring over a bony prominence or related to medical devices. They are the result of prolonged or severe pressure with contributions from shear and friction forces. These skin and soft tissue injuries remain a significant problem within hospitals and long-term care facilities and result in decreased quality of life, high costs for both the patient and our health care system, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. As pressure injuries may be considered an indicator of the quality of care of a facility, inadequate steps in prevention or treatment can lead to litigation. Awareness of factors that may contribute to the pathogenesis of pressure injuries enables the identification of those patients at risk for their development, and preventive measures can be aimed towards these particular patients. As treatments for pressure injuries have been characterized and evaluated with variable degrees of completeness, there remains uncertainty regarding the best options for management.
The pressure of an individual’s body weight or pressure from a medical device above a certain threshold for a prolonged period is thought to be the cause of pressure injuries. In patients with sensory deficits, an absent pressure feedback response may result in sustained pressure for a prolonged period, leading to tissue injury. Many factors are identified in contributing to pressure ulcer and injury formation, such as increased arteriole pressure, shearing forces, friction, moisture, and nutrition status.
Pressure injuries of the skin and soft tissues affect an estimated 1 to 3 million people in the United States each year. The incidence differs based on the clinical setting. For example, the prevalence of pressure injuries among hospitalized patients is 5% to 15%, with the percentage considerably higher in some long-term care environments and intensive care units. Risk factors for developing pressure injuries, in general, include immobility, reduced perfusion, malnutrition, and sensory loss. Other patients at increased risk for pressure injury development include those with cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, recent fracture of a lower extremity, diabetes, and incontinence. Older patients are also at increased risk for the formation of pressure injuries due to skin changes associated with aging, including thinning of the dermis and epidermis, resulting in decreased resistance to shear forces.
Pressure injuries of the skin and soft tissue are formed when the pressure above a certain threshold causes prolonged tissue ischemia, eventually leading to necrosis. Injury from reperfusion is also a contributing factor, as the return of blood supply after a period of ischemia can cause the formation of reactive oxygen species triggering an inflammatory response. In patients positioned at an incline, internal structures such as bone and muscle are displaced downward due to gravity, which can lead to tissue hypoxia as blood vessels are distorted or flattened.
Obtaining specific information from a patient’s history can help determine any potential risk factors for wound development and nonhealing. Providers should ask regarding a patient’s prior history of wounds along with their etiology, location, duration, and treatment. Inquiring specifically about medical conditions such as diabetes and associated neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, immunocompromised states, impaired nutritional status may give providers more information about a patient’s healing potential.Patients may be able to provide qualitative information regarding their current wound history, including:
It can be important to assess certain locations for any signs of pressure injury during one’s physical exam. Pressure injuries commonly develop in these areas:
Characteristics of pressure injuries that should be assessed include but are not limited to:
It can also be important to document the presence of any of the following:
A staging system should be used to assess all pressure injuries. At this time, there is a lack of a universal classification system for pressure injuries, but the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel staging system is widely used as listed below :
The laboratory studies listed below can be obtained to assess for conditions that can lead to the formation of non-healing injuries, such as infection, anemia, poor nutritional status, and diabetes:
Wound cultures from superficial swabs may not be clinically useful as they usually reflect colonization rather than infection. Cultures from bone or deep tissue should not be used as a sole indicator of infection; they should be interpreted in the context of the clinical setting and other histopathological data.
General care for pressure injuries can include redistribution of pressure with the use of support surfaces and changes in positioning. Redistribution of pressure and appropriate patient positioning is required to prevent the development and worsening of pressure injuries, as these methods can reduce force from friction and shear. In patients with a high risk of developing pressure injuries, support surfaces to alleviate pressure can be used. This can include higher-speciation foam mattresses, medical-grade sheepskins, continuous low-pressure supports, alternating-pressure devices, low air loss therapy; however, the effectiveness of these devices compared to other surfaces in the treatment of existing pressure injuries has not been conclusively established. Based on ACP clinical practice guidelines from 2015, providers should select advanced static mattresses or mattress overlays consisting of foam, sheepskin, or gel in patients at increased susceptibility to the formation of pressure injuries. The guidelines also advise against the use of alternating-air mattresses or overlays in this patient population; however, only moderate quality evidence has been utilized to support these two recommendations. Although there is not adequate evidence to assess the effectiveness of repositioning patients on the healing rates of pressure injuries, it remains a practice with good face value to maintain patient positioning, which minimizes wound pressure.Part of treatment for pressure injuries also includes pain control and optimization of nutrition. Pain frequently occurs at dressing related procedures. Pain control can be achieved with individualized analgesic regimens as well as skilled wound management. It is important to optimize total caloric intake and protein intake in patients with pressure injuries, especially for patients with stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. ACP clinical guidelines from 2015 recommend the use of supplementation with protein or amino acids to reduce wound size in patients with pressure injuries; however, the evidence to support this recommendation is low quality.
Wound care, including maintaining a clean environment, debridement, application of dressings, monitoring, and various adjunctive therapies, is generally advised to facilitate the healing of pressure injuries. Options for treatment can be guided by the stage of the pressure injury. Stage 1 pressure injuries can be covered with transparent film dressings as needed. Stage 2 pressure injuries benefit from a moist wound environment. Occlusive dressings (foam, hydrogels, and hydrocolloids) and non-occlusive dressings (transparent films) can be used to achieve this. Treatment of stage 3 and 4 injuries is based on the presence of necrotic tissue. Pressure injury treatment also involves preventing contamination of the wound as well as maintaining a clean wound environment. Wounds with necrotic tissue or eschar require debridement, whether by sharp, mechanical, autolytic, or bio surgical method, to expose granulation tissue, facilitate healing and reduce the risk of infection prior to placement of moist to absorbent dressing.Dressings and topical agents are commonly used to treat pressure injuries, but it is unclear whether one dressing or topical agent is superior to another. Appropriate selection of dressings may be based on wound characteristics, cost, or patient preference and includes hydrocolloids, hydrogels, transparent films, foams, and alginates. ACP clinical practice guidelines from 2015 recommend the use of foam or hydrocolloid dressings to reduce the size of pressure injuries. Additional therapies such as negative-pressure wound therapy, electromagnetic therapy, phototherapy, therapeutic ultrasound, and reconstructive surgery are used to treat pressure injuries, but there is limited data regarding their efficacy in wound healing. Based on moderate-quality evidence, ACP clinical practice guidelines from 2015 recommend the use of electrical stimulation as a supplemental therapy to accelerate wound healing in patients with pressure injuries. In addition to the above treatments, monitoring to assess the healing of pressure injuries should be implemented, which can be done with the utilization of healing scales. The two most common instruments for this include the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing and the Pressure Sore Status Tool.
The differential diagnosis for pressure injuries is important to consider to appropriately treat this condition. This differential can include but is not limited to :
The presence of a pressure injury can be indicative of a poor overall prognosis for a patient. An increased risk of death in both elderly and intensive care patients has been associated with the presence of pressure injuries; however, pressure injuries may be a sign of the underlying severity of disease instead of an independent predictor of mortality. Additional clinical conditions that remain unmeasured may be contributing to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with pressure injuries.
Infection is a significant complication of pressure injuries, and the manifestations can be widely variable. This can include local wound infection as well as soft tissue infection, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia. Osteomyelitis can manifest as a wound with delayed healing and does not always include systemic signs such as sepsis or leukocytosis. Bacteremia is usually more apparent as it is typically accompanied by signs of a systemic inflammatory response. Evaluation of pressure injuries for infection can require a combination of clinical assessment and judgment, microbiological and histopathological evaluation, and imaging studies. The goals of infection control include preventing the spread of pathogens to other patients, staff, and the surrounding environment and to avoid selection of resistant microorganisms.
Deterrence of pressure injuries includes identification of patients at risk, improvement of overall health, reducing external forces, and promoting education about pressure injuries. American College of Physicians (ACP) clinical practice guidelines from 2015 advise performing a risk assessment to recognize patients at risk of pressure injury formation. Several scales have been created to predict the risk of pressure injuries in order to identify patients for whom prevention measures or early treatment should be considered. The most commonly used tools for this are the Braden and Norton scales. Reducing external forces includes minimizing extrinsic risk factors, such as friction, shear, pressure, and moisture, which is important for the deterrence of pressure injury formation. Evidence has demonstrated that the education of both providers and patients can lead to a decrease in the incidence of pressure injuries as well as an increase in the ability to manage them.
When pressure injuries develop, systems should be able to identify issues leading to their occurrence and implement methods for resolving these issues. There is increasing evidence that multidisciplinary interventions aimed to prevent pressure injuries in both long-term care facilities and acute care settings can have success in decreasing the prevalence or incidence rates of pressure injuries. This can include clinical staff becoming more involved at the patient care level, bundling of care practices, and incorporating them into routine care, making documentation of pressure injury prevention practices more visible and educating all staff on a regular basis. In terms of implementing these interventions, the more often new care practices are merged with usual care practices, the more likely staff will be to perform them on a consistent basis with better outcomes overall.
|||Mervis JS,Phillips TJ, Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2019 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 30664905]|
|||Lyder CH, Pressure ulcer prevention and management. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8; [PubMed PMID: 12517234]|
|||Smith ME,Totten A,Hickam DH,Fu R,Wasson N,Rahman B,Motu'apuaka M,Saha S, Pressure ulcer treatment strategies: a systematic comparative effectiveness review. Annals of internal medicine. 2013 Jul 2; [PubMed PMID: 23817703]|
|||Barbenel JC,Ferguson-Pell MW,Kennedy R, Mobility of elderly patients in bed. Measurement and association with patient condition. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1986 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 3734310]|
|||Takeda T,Koyama T,Izawa Y,Makita T,Nakamura N, Effects of malnutrition on development of experimental pressure sores. The Journal of dermatology. 1992 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 1491088]|
|||Preventing pressure sores. Lancet (London, England). 1990 Jun 2; [PubMed PMID: 1971379]|
|||Brandeis GH,Ooi WL,Hossain M,Morris JN,Lipsitz LA, A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1994 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 8144823]|
|||Allman RM,Laprade CA,Noel LB,Walker JM,Moorer CA,Dear MR,Smith CR, Pressure sores among hospitalized patients. Annals of internal medicine. 1986 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 3740674]|
|||Maklebust J, Pressure ulcer assessment. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 1997 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 9227939]|
|||Lazarus GS,Cooper DM,Knighton DR,Margolis DJ,Pecoraro RE,Rodeheaver G,Robson MC, Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Archives of dermatology. 1994 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 8166487]|
|||Podd D, Beyond skin deep: Managing pressure injuries. JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants. 2018 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 29517618]|
|||Livesley NJ,Chow AW, Infected pressure ulcers in elderly individuals. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2002 Dec 1; [PubMed PMID: 12439803]|
|||McInnes E,Jammali-Blasi A,Bell-Syer SE,Dumville JC,Middleton V,Cullum N, Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015 Sep 3; [PubMed PMID: 26333288]|
|||McInnes E,Dumville JC,Jammali-Blasi A,Bell-Syer SE, Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011 Dec 7; [PubMed PMID: 22161450]|
|||Qaseem A,Mir TP,Starkey M,Denberg TD, Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of internal medicine. 2015 Mar 3; [PubMed PMID: 25732278]|
|||Moore ZE,Cowman S, Repositioning for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015 Jan 5; [PubMed PMID: 25561248]|
|||Lyder CH,Ayello EA, Pressure Ulcers: A Patient Safety Issue 2008 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 21328751]|
|||Bauer J,Phillips LG, MOC-PSSM CME article: Pressure sores. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2008 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 18182959]|
|||Qaseem A,Humphrey LL,Forciea MA,Starkey M,Denberg TD, Treatment of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of internal medicine. 2015 Mar 3; [PubMed PMID: 25732279]|
|||Westby MJ,Dumville JC,Soares MO,Stubbs N,Norman G, Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Jun 22; [PubMed PMID: 28639707]|
|||Baba-Akbari Sari A,Flemming K,Cullum NA,Wollina U, Therapeutic ultrasound for pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006 Jul 19; [PubMed PMID: 16855964]|
|||Dumville JC,Webster J,Evans D,Land L, Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015 May 20; [PubMed PMID: 25992684]|
|||Aziz Z,Flemming K,Cullum NA,Olyaee Manesh A, Electromagnetic therapy for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010 Nov 10; [PubMed PMID: 21069672]|
|||Chen C,Hou WH,Chan ES,Yeh ML,Lo HL, Phototherapy for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Jul 11; [PubMed PMID: 25019295]|
|||Wong JK,Amin K,Dumville JC, Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016 Dec 6; [PubMed PMID: 27919120]|
|||Thomas DR, The new F-tag 314: prevention and management of pressure ulcers. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2006 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 17027631]|
|||Reddy M,Gill SS,Rochon PA, Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006 Aug 23; [PubMed PMID: 16926357]|
|||Reddy M, Pressure ulcers. BMJ clinical evidence. 2011 Apr 28; [PubMed PMID: 21524319]|
|||Berlowitz DR,Brandeis GH,Anderson J,Du W,Brand H, Effect of pressure ulcers on the survival of long-term care residents. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 1997 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 9060978]|
|||Robineau S,Nicolas B,Mathieu L,Duruflé A,Leblong E,Fraudet B,Gélis A,Gallien P, Assessing the impact of a patient education programme on pressure ulcer prevention in patients with spinal cord injuries. Journal of tissue viability. 2019 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 31288977]|
|||Niederhauser A,VanDeusen Lukas C,Parker V,Ayello EA,Zulkowski K,Berlowitz D, Comprehensive programs for preventing pressure ulcers: a review of the literature. Advances in skin [PubMed PMID: 22441049]|