In 1975, ablation was initially used to treat chronic back pain and sciatica of unknown etiology as an alternative to the prior treatment of severing the dorsal rami via the intertransverse ligaments. It is a minimally-invasive procedure that involves coagulation necrosis of afferent nociceptive signals via high-frequency waves (300 to 500 Hz).
Currently, ablation is most commonly used to destroy the medial branches of the dorsal rami which are responsible for facet-joint-mediated back pain. Ablative nerve blocks are commonly used in the treatment of chronic low back pain, however, their efficacy is mixed at best. The most benefit is the short term within the first four weeks following the procedure. However, significant relief of pain has been shown to last up to a year. Many studies do not show superiority over placebo for either pain relief or functional improvement. There is also evidence for its use for chronic discogenic back pain.
However, the ablation of peripheral nerves that have a primary role in nociception for the treatment of pain is supported by the recent literature, particularly when symptomatology has been refractory to conservative management but is relieved with targeted blocks using short-acting anesthetic agents.
Facet-mediated pain is due to facet arthropathy or facet arthritis which arise during the degenerative process of the spinal column. A single facet joint is composed of the inferior articulating process of one vertebra and the superior articulating process of the vertebra directly inferior.
Medial branches from the dorsal rami of spinal nerve roots at the same level and one level above provide sensory innervation to the facet (for example, the L4-L5 facet joint is innervated by the medial branches of L3 and L4). The medial branches typically course over the lateral border of the superior articulating process.
An insulated electrode with a non-insulated tip is advanced toward the concavity that is formed between the superior articulating process and the adjacent transverse process, which is in proximity to the nerve that is suspected of causing the symptoms. It is in this region where the use of high-frequency or radiofrequency energy is generated to produce a lesion via coagulative necrosis, thereby disrupting afferent pain signals. In Pain Medicine, the use of radiofrequency ablation most commonly involves targeting the specific medial branches of the dorsal rami that innervate pain-producing facet joints under fluoroscopic guidance. However, further investigations regarding the efficacy of ablation in other common pain syndromes continue to diversify its use.
Nerve ablation has typically been used in the treatment of facet-mediated axial back pain of the cervical and lumbar spine that has failed conservative therapy.
Additionally, it has other uses such as relief of chronic neck pain after whiplash and chronic headache syndromes due to occipital and trigeminal neuralgia. Ablation is performed after successful analgesia of the suspected trouble-causing nerve with a local anesthetic. There continue to study investigating the role of ablation in peripheral nerve-mediated pain outside of the spinal column, particularly in knee osteoarthritis and plantar fasciitis. Ablative nerve blocks, with cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerve, have been shown to be an effective pain reliever for refractory osteoarthritis of the knee. Furthermore, it has been shown to improve knee function for up to six months following the procedure.
Absolute contraindications for ablative nerve blocks are few, but these include active local infection at the site of needle insertion and elevated intracranial pressure. The use of anti-coagulants provides a unique challenge for practitioners, as the clinical judgment must be used following accepted guidelines. Current guidelines put forth by ASRA (American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine) recommend that:
Other relative contraindications that the clinician must consider before the procedure include:
The procedure is routinely done in a sterile procedure suite, with the patient lying prone on a procedure table.
Key components of the procedure include:
The active electrode delivers the high-frequency current which is dissipated through a ground electrode that is attached to the patient.
As with other interventional spinal procedures, only physicians specifically trained in fluoroscopically guidance procedures should perform radiofrequency ablation. Qualified physicians typically undergo residency training in the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Psychiatry, or Neurosurgery. This is followed by an interventional pain or spine fellowship that allows adequate training under an experienced interventionalist prior to performing the procedure independently. Support staff for the procedure can include an assistant to draw up medications and operate the radiofrequency generator and radiology technician to operate the C-arm, under the guidance of the practicing physician.
The destruction of tissue via radiofrequency must occur after successful diagnostic anesthetic nerve blocks have located the target nerve. During the procedure, the patient should receive little to no sedation, as they must define what they are experiencing during stimulation and lesioning of the nerve.
Nerve ablation is a minimally invasive, relatively low-risk procedure. There is a limited side effect profile to ablative nerve blocks. However, adverse events may occur during the placement of the introducer needle or during the ablative process. Advancement of the introducer needle has the potential to cause vascular or neural insult along the trajectory that it is traveling, while the process of thermal ablation may lead to burns (due to errors in ground pad placement), worsened pain, sensory loss or new-onset neuropathic pain.
Complications are most common after intracranial ablation of the trigeminal ganglion, which may manifest as facial numbness, dysesthesia, anesthesia dolorosa, corneal anesthesia, keratitis, and trigeminal motor dysfunction.
Adverse events from ablation of lumbar medial branches are far and few between with transient postoperative pain dominating as the premier adverse event.
As with any invasive technique, the risk of allergy to materials or anesthetic, hematoma formation, and infection must be considered.
One hundred million Americans suffer from some form of chronic pain that results in more than $100 billion in expenses annually. Furthermore, 84% of American adults will suffer from chronic, low-back pain at some point in their lifetime. While the causes of low-back pain are often multifactorial and can be due to many causes, the degenerative cascade that affects the spine plays a significant role. Destruction of cartilage that comprises the spinal facet joints results in severe discomfort when placed under stress, typically in extension or rotation of the spine. The sensory nerves responsible are the medial branches of the dorsal rami, which are the most common target in ablative procedures. Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to be efficacious in reducing the severity of back pain for extended periods of time (ranging from 6 months to 24 months in duration) but also has utility in the treatment of trigeminal and occipital neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, hip and knee osteoarthritis, and plantar fasciitis. As with other interventional procedures that provide pain relief, ablation aims to play a significant role in the reduction of opiates and other habit-forming pain medications.
This review focuses on the use of conventional radiofrequency ablation, which utilizes a continuous energy source causing coagulative thermal necrosis. Other forms of ablation used in pain management include:
Cases of the use of ablative nerve blocks have been used for intercostal neuralgia with success. Ablative nerve blocks of the genicular nerve for chronic new pain, have also been shown to be an effective pain reliever for chronic, refractory knee pain. Patients who undergo ablation of the genicular nerve have been shown to have proved pain for up to six months following the procedure. Furthermore, studies have been done regarding the effectiveness of ablative techniques on cancer pain as well. Results have shown blocks to be effective for upper abdominal cancers such as gastric or pancreatic cancer. Chronic pericranial headache pain has also been studied and shows evidence of the use of radiofrequency ablation of the pericranial nerves. One promising 2016 study looked at radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures as well. However, more studies need to be done. There is limited effectiveness for the use of ablative nerve blocks for facet joint osteoarthritis compared to placebo.
Nerve ablation for back pain is commonly done as an outpatient, but still requires the efforts of an interprofessional team. While the actual ablation is done by a physician, patient monitoring is frequently done by a dedicated nurse/nurse anesthetist. The patient must have the vital signs monitored at regular intervals and if any sedation is used, the pulse oximeter must be continuously monitored; these duties will often fall to the nursing staff, to report any incongruities promptly. Intravenous access should be in place in case the patient develops hypotension or requires more sedation. Finally, if conscious sedation is used, the antidotes to the medications used must be in the room. After the procedure, the patient should be monitored in the recovery room for several hours by the post-anesthesia recovery nurse. Before discharge, the patient should be informed about the possible side effects of the procedure and when to return to the hospital. Interprofessional teamwork will result in improved patient outcomes. [Level 5]
|||Leclaire R,Fortin L,Lambert R,Bergeron YM,Rossignol M, Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain: a placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy. Spine. 2001 Jul 1 [PubMed PMID: 11458140]|
|||Cohen SP,Hurley RW,Buckenmaier CC 3rd,Kurihara C,Morlando B,Dragovich A, Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug [PubMed PMID: 18648237]|
|||van Wijk RM,Geurts JW,Wynne HJ,Hammink E,Buskens E,Lousberg R,Knape JT,Groen GJ, Radiofrequency denervation of lumbar facet joints in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, sham lesion-controlled trial. The Clinical journal of pain. 2005 Jul-Aug [PubMed PMID: 15951652]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 26495910]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 14668658]|
|||Choi EJ,Choi YM,Jang EJ,Kim JY,Kim TK,Kim KH, Neural Ablation and Regeneration in Pain Practice. The Korean journal of pain. 2016 Jan [PubMed PMID: 26839664]|
|||Zakrzewska JM,Akram H, Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011 Sep 7 [PubMed PMID: 21901707]|
|||Saedi N,Hamilton HK,Arndt KA,Dover JS, How to prepare patients for ablative laser procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2013 Aug [PubMed PMID: 23866890]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 29300971]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 17575493]|
|||Djebbar S,Rossi IM,Adler RS, Ultrasound-Guided Cryoanalgesia of Peripheral Nerve Lesions. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. 2016 Nov [PubMed PMID: 28002868]|
|||Toukhy ME,Campkin NT, Severe diarrhea following neurolytic coeliac plexus block: case report and literature review. The American journal of hospice [PubMed PMID: 21422068]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 29559878]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 30271194]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 28339444]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 29975804]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 29559871]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 27548307]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 29847426]|
|||Zakrzewska JM,Linskey ME, Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ clinical evidence. 2009 Mar 12 [PubMed PMID: 19445753]|