3-3-2 Rule

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

The airway is one of the most critical elements of patient safety, and difficult intubations commonly cause morbidity and mortality. To decrease morbidity and mortality associated with intubation, interprofessional team members must properly evaluate risks and recognize which patients are most likely to be difficult to intubate. This will allow the interprofessional team to prepare accordingly, thereby reducing the risk of complications and improving patient outcomes. This activity reviews the 3-3-2 rule, an assessment tool used to predict difficult intubations based on characteristics of difficult airways, and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in evaluating patients who may need intubation.


  • Summarize the 3-2-2 rule.
  • Identify components of the Mallampati scoring.
  • Review the importance of evaluating for airway obstruction.
  • Explain the 3-3-2 rule to the interprofessional team and employ a well-coordinated, team approach to assisting in the preparation and intubation of patients.


The airway is one of the most important components in the body to be protected regardless of why a patient is in a hospital, whether for outpatient surgery or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation and therapy. For this reason, when a physician considers intubation, they must evaluate the risk of failure to intubate and optimize variables for success. 1% to 3% of the patient population that requires endotracheal intubation has difficult airways. Recognizing these patients is crucial as it allows the clinician to prepare accordingly to minimize complications. The 3-3-2 rule is an assessment tool for the prediction of difficult intubations in the unexpected difficult airway.[1][2][3]

According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, intubation is determined to be difficult to secure when an appropriately trained and experienced anesthesiologist requires more than three attempts or longer than 10 minutes for successful endotracheal intubation. Similarly, ventilation is determined to be difficult when a trained clinician is unable to maintain an oxygen saturation of more than 90% when using a facemask for ventilation, and 100% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) is in use for oxygenation.

The airway should be managed in a very time-sensitive way as poor oxygenation or ventilation can lead to hypoxia and hypercapnic abnormalities; this can be detrimental at the cellular level. Hypoxic brain injury can lead to permanent neuronal damage and acidosis due to hypoxia and hypercapnia, which together can lead to cardiac arrest or death.


The 3-3-2 rule functions to estimate whether the anatomy of the neck will allow for appropriate opening of the throat and larynx. It serves to roughly estimate if the alignment of the openings for direct visualization of the larynx is possible given anatomical findings.[3]

3: A measurement of three fingers between the upper and lower teeth of the open mouth of a patient indicates the ease of access to the airway through the oral opening. A typical patient can open their mouth sufficiently to permit placement of three of their fingers between the incisors. Adequate mouth opening facilitates both insertions of the laryngoscope and obtaining a direct view of the glottis.

3: A measurement of three fingers from the anterior tip of the mandible to the anterior neck provides an estimate of the volume of the submandibular space. A typical patient can place three fingers on the floor of the mandible between the mental angle and the neck near the hyoid bone. Normally this distance should measure close to 7 cm. If this distance is less than three finger-widths, the laryngeal axis will be at a more acute angle with the pharyngeal axis, indicating that alignment of the oral opening to the pharyngeal opening will be difficult. It also indicates that there will be less space to displace the tongue within the throat. The rule has limitations as the distance can vary according to height and ethnicity. For this reason, an alternative in the form of a ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) has been suggested.

2: A measurement of two fingers between the floor of the mandible to the thyroid notch on the anterior neck identifies the location of the larynx relative to the base of the tongue. A typical patient can place two fingers in the superior laryngeal notch. If the larynx is too high in the neck, measuring less than two fingers, direct laryngoscopy will be difficult and potentially impossible; this is because the angle between the base of the tongue to the larynx is too acute to be negotiated for direct visualization of the larynx easily.

A likely indication of difficult intubation is present if the inter-incisor or hyoid-mental distance is less than three fingers or the hyoid-thyroid cartilage distance is less than two fingers. Depending on the patient population, reports of difficult intubation occur in 1.5% to 13% of patients. When combined with the Mallampati score in evaluating an airway, the positive predictive value for determining a difficult airway increases.

Additional estimations to be considered in preparing for intubation of a patient should include:

Assessment of Atlantooccipital Extension: It is performed by asking the patient to look at the floor and the wall after fully flexing and fixing the neck. Flexion movement of the cervical spine is assessed by asking the patient to touch the manubrium sterni with the chin. If successful, this indicates that the flexion and extension range of motion is sufficient to help in aligning the oral pharyngeal and laryngeal axis in a straight line, thus indicating easier intubation.

A Combined Assessment of the Mandibular Space: This assessment with the 3-3-2 rule and atlantooccipital extension will further determine how easily the laryngeal and pharyngeal axis will fall in line with the atlantoaxial joint during extension of the neck.

The Warning Sign of Delilkan: It is performed by placing the index finger of each hand, one submental, under the chin, and the other under the inferior occipital prominence with the head in the neutral position. The patient is then asked to extend their head and neck fully. If the submental finger is seen to be higher than the inferior occipital prominence finger, there should be no difficulty with intubation. If the finger on the inferior occipital prominence is still higher than the submental finger, the clinician can anticipate a difficult airway.

Prayer Sign: It is positive when the patient cannot approximate the palmar surfaces of the phalangeal joints while pressing the hands together. This sign presents in advanced diabetes and has a very high positive predictive value for cervical spine immobility and thus difficult endotracheal intubation.

Clinical Significance

Recognizing that a patient’s airway will be difficult allows the clinician to plan for and minimize the risks of airway-related morbidity. A prospective observational study of 156 patients undergoing intubation in the emergency department found the LEMON scale evaluation accurately stratified patients according to the risk of difficult intubation. The 3-3-2 rule plays a crucial role in planning as a component of the LEMON scale.[4] LEMON stands for:

L: Look Externally

Look for external indicators of difficult endotracheal intubation. Which can include the abnormal shape of the face, extreme cachexia, poor dentition, edentulous mouth, morbid obesity, high arching palate, short neck, large front teeth, surgical scar indicating previous tracheostomy scar, indicating patient might have tracheomalacia, narrow mouth, face, or neck pathology.

E: Evaluate

This is where the 3-3-2 rule is important. It is the estimated measurement of 3 separate distances on the patient using the examiner's fingers.

3: Measurement of the Inter-incisor space, which should be greater than three fingers distance between the upper and lower teeth of the open mouth of a patient.

3: Measurement of the hyoid-mental distance, which should be greater than three fingers from the anterior tip of the mandible to the anterior neck on the hyoid bone.

2: Measurement of the hyoid-thyroid cartilage distance, which should be greater than two fingers between the floor of the mandible at the hyoid bone to the thyroid notch on the anterior neck.

M: Mallampati Scoring

Mallampati scoring is a system based on the anatomy of the mouth and the view of various anatomical structures when one opens his or her mouth as wide as possible. The scoring is done in a sitting position and is not performable in an emergency. A class 1 score is interpreted as easy, and class 4 is the most difficult.[5][6][7]

  • Class 1: Structures visualized- soft palate, uvula, fauces, anterior and posterior pillars
  • Class 2: Structures visualized- soft palate fauces and uvula 
  • Class 3: Structures visualized- soft palate and the base of the uvula
  • Class 4: Soft palate is not visible

O: Obstruction

One should assess if the airway could be obstructed with the foreign body, abscess, tumor, soft tissue swelling such as in a burn victim or expanding hematoma in a trauma patient.

N: Neck Mobility

In alert and awake patients, see if the patient can place their chin on their chest and how far back are they able to tilt their head. Decreased neck mobility is a negative predictor of intubation complications.

Other Issues


  • It is essential to anticipate when a difficult airway may occur. Many patients that otherwise appear normal/easy to intubate may prove difficult. The 3-3-2 rule can help to anticipate complications.
  • The 3-3-2 rule is useful, but its significance is greater when combined with the Mallampati score.
  • The 3-3-2 rule, along with other estimations, does not play a role in emergent intubations.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The airway is one of the most critical components in the body to be protected regardless of whether a patient is in a hospital, undergoing outpatient surgery, or has admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation and therapy. While most intubations are straightforward, there are some difficult airways, which, if not handled appropriately, can lead to the death of the patient.

For this reason, when a clinician considers intubation, they must evaluate the risk of failure to intubate and optimize variables for success. Besides anesthesiologists, physicians in many specialties and nurse anesthetists, as well as the clinical pharmacist, are often called upon to assist in the preparation and intubation of a patient, but they should be fully aware of the 3-3-2 rule. A difficult airway cart should be kept at the bedside when intubating a difficult airway. All physicians with intubation skills in the hospital should be informed as a backup before difficult intubation. The reversal agent of sedation and paralytics should be kept at the bedside in case if the physician is not able to intubate the patient.

ED nurses are often called upon to secure the tubes or assist in their placement, as well as monitoring patient vitals following intubation, and communicate any concerns to the physician on duty. Failure to intubate on a timely basis is a very common cause of cardiac arrest. Given this, an anesthesiologist consult is always in order if anticipating a difficult airway. Sometimes, oral intubation may not be possible, and an emergent tracheostomy may be required. The nursing staff should be prepared to assist the clinician in this procedure, often assisting with patient alignment and control of the head position. The nursing staff should monitor the patient and immediately report any changes in oxygen saturation or evidence of breathing difficulty to the clinician after intubation. Nurses should place signs outside of the room "difficult intubation" This keeps the medical team aware of it in case of self-extubation.[8][9][10]

Employing the 3-3-2 rule is not the purview of any single healthcare discipline; all members of the interprofessional team with exposure to intubation should know the rule, how to employ it, and communicate openly with other interprofessional team members if issues arise. This collaborative approach is essential for advancing patient outcomes in cases of intubation. [Level 5]

Article Details

Article Author

Sandeep Sharma

Article Author

Roshan Patel

Article Author

Muhammad F. Hashmi

Article Editor:

Rotem Friede


10/3/2022 8:45:34 PM



Sankar D,Krishnan R,Veerabahu M,Vikraman BP,Nathan JA, Retrospective evaluation of airway management with blind awake intubation in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients: A review of 48 cases. Annals of maxillofacial surgery. 2016 Jan-Jun     [PubMed PMID: 27563608]


Yu T,Wang B,Jin XJ,Wu RR,Wu H,He JJ,Yao WD,Li YH, Predicting difficult airways: 3-3-2 rule or 3-3 rule? Irish journal of medical science. 2015 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 25740093]


Mahmoodpoor A,Soleimanpour H,Nia KS,Panahi JR,Afhami M,Golzari SE,Majani K, Sensitivity of palm print, modified mallampati score and 3-3-2 rule in prediction of difficult intubation. International journal of preventive medicine. 2013 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 24130949]


Ji SM,Moon EJ,Kim TJ,Yi JW,Seo H,Lee BJ, Correlation between modified LEMON score and intubation difficulty in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2018     [PubMed PMID: 30061919]


Ilper H,Franz-Jäger C,Byhahn C,Klages M,Ackermann HH,Zacharowski K,Kunz T, [Update Mallampati : Theoretical and practical knowledge of European anesthetists on basic evaluation of airways]. Der Anaesthesist. 2018 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 30171286]


Rao KVN,Dhatchinamoorthi D,Nandhakumar A,Selvarajan N,Akula HR,Thiruvenkatarajan V, Validity of thyromental height test as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective evaluation comparing modified Mallampati score, interincisor gap, thyromental distance, neck circumference, and neck extension. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2018 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 30166655]


Siriussawakul A,Maboonyanon P,Kueprakone S,Samankatiwat S,Komoltri C,Thanakiattiwibun C, Predictive performance of a multivariable difficult intubation model for obese patients. PloS one. 2018     [PubMed PMID: 30161197]


Ahmad I,Onwochei DN,Muldoon S,Keane O,El-Boghdadly K, Airway management research: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2018 Nov 20     [PubMed PMID: 30460982]


Gosavi K,Dey P,Swami S, Airway Management in Case of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2018 Oct-Dec     [PubMed PMID: 30459912]


Tsukamoto M,Hitosugi T,Yokoyama T, Awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation for patients with difficult airway. Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine. 2018 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 30402550]