Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with multisystem involvement and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Genetic, immunological, endocrine, and environmental factors influence the loss of immunological tolerance against self-antigens leading to the formation of pathogenic autoantibodies that cause tissue damage through multiple mechanisms. This activity reviews the evaluation and management of systemic lupus erythematosus and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in caring for patients with this condition.


  • Explain when to consider systemic lupus erythematosus on the differential diagnosis.
  • Describe the evaluation of systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Explain the treatment options for systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Describe the importance of an interprofessional approach to enhance awareness, accurate diagnosis, and prompt treatment to enhance the care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.


Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease, with multisystemic involvement. The disease has several phenotypes, with varying clinical presentations in patients ranging from mild mucocutaneous manifestations to multiorgan and severe central nervous system involvement. Several immunopathogenic pathways play a role in the development of SLE. The lupus erythematosus (LE cell) was described by Hargraves in 1948. Several pathogenic autoantibodies have since been identified. Despite recent advances in technology and understanding of the pathological basis and risk factors for SLE, the exact pathogenesis of SLE is still not well known. Diagnosis of SLE can be challenging and while several classification criteria have been posed, their utility in the clinical setting is still a matter of debate. Management of SLE is dictated by organ system involvement, and despite several agents shown to be efficacious in the treatment of SLE, the disease still poses significant morbidity and mortality risk in patients. 


SLE is a multifactorial disease with unknown exact etiology, however, several genetic, immunological, endocrine, and environmental factors play a role in the etiopathogenesis of SLE.

Familial segregation and high concordance rates in identical twins suggest a strong genetic contribution in SLE, although there is no obvious pattern of inheritance. Concordant rates for identical twins have been reported to be as high as 50%.[1] More than 50 genes or genomic loci have been identified to be associated with SLE, most encoding proteins implicated in the function of the immune system.[2] These genes are associated with activation of the immune system in response to foreign antigens, self-antigen generation, and activation of innate and adaptive immune systems. Some gene mutations that are rare, but are considered very high risk for the development of SLE include deficiencies of early complement components C1q, C1r, C1s (>90% risk), C4 (50%), C2 (20%) and TREX1. Some of the other genes associated include HLA-DRB1, HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, HLA-DRX, TNFAIP3, STAT-4, STAT-1, TLR-7, IRAK1/MECP2, IRF5-TNPO3, ITGAM, etc. Women are at 10 times more risk of developing SLE than men, and the risk of SLE is 14 times more in Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY). This suggests an association with genes on the X-chromosome, however, despite several studies, the exact genes have not been identified. 

Female sex and hormonal influence is a significant risk factor for SLE. Estrogens and prolactin promote autoimmunity and increase the B-cell activation factor production and modulate lymphocyte and pDC activation. The use of estrogen-containing contraceptives and postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy can cause flares in patients with SLE and have been associated with a higher incidence of SLE. Elevated levels of prolactin are seen in patients with SLE. Androgens, on the other hand, are considered protective. 

Several environmental triggers of SLE have been identified. Several drugs have been implicated in causing a lupus-like phenomenon by causing demethylation of DNA and alteration of self-antigens.[3] While procainamide and hydralazine have the highest incidence of causing drug-induced lupus, more than 100 drugs have been associated with drug-induced lupus.[3] Further, several drugs such as the sulfa-drugs are well known to cause flares in patients with SLE. Ultraviolet rays and sun exposure leads to increased cell apoptosis and is one of the well-known triggers for SLE. Several viral infections have been implicated, the underlying mechanism thought to be molecular mimicry. Antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are more prevalent in children and adults with SLE compared to the general population. Smoking is also thought to be a risk, with a dose-response.[4] Other potential risk factors include silica exposure, other viral infections, vitamin D deficiency, alfalfa sprouts and foods containing canavanine.


Varying prevalence and incidence rates of SLE have been reported, with differences mostly attributes to the population differences. The Georgia and Michigan lupus registries reported prevalence of 72.1 to 74.4 per 100,000 persons and incidence rates of 5.6 per 100,000 person-years in primarily Caucasian and African-American populations. African-Americans have the highest rates, and rates are higher among Asian and Hispanic populations compared to Caucasians. The disease tends to have an earlier age of onset and is more severe in African-Americans.

SLE predominantly affects women of childbearing age, with female to male ratio of 9 to 1. The risk, however, decreases after menopause in women although still is twice as compared to men. Studies have indicated that although rare, lupus in men tends to be more severe. 

Age plays an important role in SLE, and although the disease is more common in childbearing age in women, it has been well reported in the pediatric and elderly population. SLE is more severe in children while in the elderly, it tends to be more insidious onset and has more pulmonary involvement and serositis and less Raynaud's, malar rash, nephritis, and neuropsychiatric complications.[5]


The pathogenesis of SLE is complex, and the understanding of SLE pathogenesis is constantly evolving. A break in the tolerance in genetically susceptible individuals, on exposure to environmental factors, leads to the activation of autoimmunity. Cell damage caused by infectious and other environmental factors exposes the immune system to self-antigens leading to activation of T and B cells which become self-sustained by a chronic self-aimed immune response. Cytokine release, complement activation, and autoantibody production then lead to organ damage.

Both innate and adaptive immune systems play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE. The innate immune system activation is either Toll-like receptor (TLR) dependent, or independent. The cell membrane-bound TLRs (TLR 2, 4, 6) are activated on exposure to the extracellular DNA and RNA from dying cells, which leads to downstream activation of the Interferon regulatory family (IRF-3), NF-κB and MAP-kinases, which serve as transcription factors for the production of proinflammatory mediators such as IFN-b. The endosomal TLRs (TLR 7, 9) are activated by single-stranded RNA and demethylated DNA and lead to the production of Interferon-alpha, and RNA binding autoantibodies such as antibodies against Ro, La, Sm, and RNP. The TLR-independent pathway is activated by intracytoplasmic RNA sensors (RIG-1, MDA-5) and DNA sensors (IFI16, DAI) and leads to activation of IRF3 and NF-κB. Both self DNA/RNA and foreign DNA/RNA such as from viruses can lead to this activation. NETosis has recently gained attention in the pathogenesis of SLE. Neutrophils, on activation by various factors such as cytokines, activated platelets and vascular endothelial cells systematically release their nuclear aggregates in the extracellular environment. These nuclear aggregates can then promote Interferon-alpha production by the dendritic cells, mediate thrombosis and vascular damage and serve as self-antigens for T-lymphocytes. 

T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes play a significant role in the pathogenesis of SLE. Apoptotic and damaged cell-derived antigens are presented to T-cells by antigen-presenting cells. T-cells in SLE display a distorted gene expression leading to the production of several cytokines. These T-cells produce less IL-2, which leads to altered regulatory T-cell production. Increased IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-23 increases mononuclear cell production while increased IL-17 and IL-21 leads to increased T-cel production. Increased Interfern-γ leads to defective T-cell production. T-cells lead to the activation of autoreactive B-cells by CD40L and cytokine production, which leads to autoantibody production, which is a hallmark of SLE. Toll-like receptors on interaction with DNA and RNA lead to activation of these B-cells, and the nucleic acid and protein-containing intranuclear complexes are the most prominent antigens leading to B-cel activation. These autoantibodies are pathogenic and cause organ damage by immune complex deposition, complement, and neutrophil activation, and altering cell function leading to apoptosis and cytokine production. Further, the autoreactive B-cells in SLE which are stimulated by self-antigens, are not readily eliminated due to a deficiency of the process involved in the functional neutralization of autoreactive B cells. The B-cells can also serve as antigen-presenting cells and can activate T-cells by presenting internalized soluble antigens to T-cells. This creates a loop where both B and T cells activate each other, both leading to more autoimmunity.


Tissue pathology is SLE can demonstrate a variety of aberrant immunologic mechanisms including immune complex formation, autoantibody formation, and immunologically mediated tissue injury.

LE body or hematoxylin body is a hallmark of SLE pathology. It is a homogeneous globular mass of nuclear material that stains bluish-purple with hematoxylin. It can be observed in the lungs, kidneys, spleen, heart, lymph nodes, and serous and synovial membranes. They contain immunoglobulins as well as DNA, and engulfment of LE body by phagocytes leads to the formation of the classic LE-cell.

Pathology from skin lesions in SLE demonstrates immune complex formation leading to tissue damage, vascular and perivascular inflammation and chronic mononuclear cell infiltration. Acute lesions demonstrate fibrinoid necrosis at the dermo-epidermal junction and the dermis along with liquefactive degeneration of the epidermis and perivascular inflammatory cell infiltration with a T-cell predominance. Chronic lesions can also demonstrate hyperkeratosis and follicular plugging. Edema and RBC extravasation can be seen in all SLE lesions. Immunofluorescence demonstrates deposition of IgG, IgA, and IgM immunoglobulins and complement components along the dermal-epidermal junction. 

Vasculitis is common in SLE and vascular lesions in SLE may demonstrate various different pathologies. Immune complex deposition with an inflammatory response is the most common lesion, although it may be seen without significant inflammatory response as well. Small and large vessel necrotizing vasculitis with fibrinoid necrosis is less common but can be seen and can be differentiated from other vasculitides by immune complex deposition in the vessel wall. Thrombotic microangiopathy can be seen in patients with SLE and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.[6]

Central nervous system pathology in SLE reveals small intracranial vessel involvement with thrombotic lesions with or without perivascular inflammation and endothelial proliferation. Necrotizing vasculitis can be seen rarely. Thromboembolism from Libman-Sacks endocarditis has been seen as well. 

Cardiac pathology may include valvular involvement leading to Libman-Sacks endocarditis which is sterile verrucous endocarditis. It tends to involve the mitral valve most commonly with vegetations seen on the forward flow side of the valve. Pathology reveals platelet thrombi, necrotic cell debris, proteinaceous deposits, and mononuclear cells. Pericarditis with fibrinous exudate is common and pathology reveals fibrinoid necrosis and perivascular infiltration with mononuclear cells. Myocarditis can be seen as well. SLE poses a very high risk for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, and vasculitis, immune complex deposition in addition to corticosteroid use and hypertension are thought to be contributory.

Lymphadenopathy is common in SLE, and pathology may reveal follicular hyperplasia with giant cells, plasma cells infiltration of the interfollicular zones, and necrosis of the paracortical T-cell zones. LE bodies may be rarely seen. The necrotic vessel wall shows immunoglobulin and Complement C3 deposition. Splenomegaly is also common in SLE, with pathology showing the classic onionskin lesion with has multiple concentric rings of perivascular collagen. Follicular hyperplasia and periarterial fibrosis are common. 

Lupus pneumonitis can be seen in up to 10% of lupus patients. Interstitial pneumonitis, alveolitis, alveolar wall injury, and edema and hemorrhage are commonly seen in these patients. Immunoglobulin and complement deposition is seen in the vessel wall. Chronic interstitial lung disease can occur in up to 50% of these patients and is characterized by interstitial lymphoid aggregates and fibrosis, septal thickening and type-2 pneumocyte hyperplasia. Medial hypertrophy and intimal fibrosis involving the branches of the pulmonary artery lead to pulmonary hypertension in SLE. Again, immunoglobulin and complement deposition can be seen in the vessel wall.

Lupus nephritis can involve the glomeruli, interstitium, tubules and the vessels with immune complex deposition in all four compartments. The World Health Organization classification criteria for lupus nephritis [7] describes 6 classes of lupus nephritis all with distinct pathological features and significant differences in clinical outcomes. This has lead to a different treatment approach for each class and knowing the class of lupus nephritis before initiating treatment is vital. 

  • Class I: Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis
  • Class II: Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis
  • Class III: Focal lupus nephritis
  • Class IV: Diffuse segmental or Diffuse global lupus nephritis
  • Class V: Membranous lupus nephritis
  • Class VI: Advanced sclerosing lupus nephritis

History and Physical

SLE is a multisystem disease with several phenotypes, and clinical features may vary from a very mild disease with only mucocutaneous involvement, to a very severe life-threatening disease with multiorgan involvement. All organ systems can be involved in SLE. An autoantibody profile can sometimes be helpful in predicting the disease course and clinical features. Several studies have indicated the development of serological abnormalities several years before the onset of clinical lupus. This is termed as pre-clinical lupus, where a patient may have serological abnormalities consistent with SLE and may have some clinical features, but still does not meet the criteria for SLE. There is evidence that a significant percentage of these patients with pre-clinical lupus that include those with incomplete lupus, or undifferentiated connective tissue disease may transition to clinical lupus and fulfill the SLE criteria later in life.

Constitutional symptoms

Constitutional symptoms are seen in more than 90% of patients with SLE and are often the initial presenting feature. Fatigue, malaise, fever, anorexia and weight loss are common. While more than 40% of patients with SLE may have lupus flare as a cause of fever, infections must always be ruled out first given the immunocompromised state of these patients. Further, SLE is a very rare cause of fever of unknown origin.

Mucocutaneous manifestations

More than 80% of patients with SLE suffer from mucocutaneous involvement, which is one of the most well known and identified clinical features. SLE skin lesions may be lupus specific, while several non-specific lesions are also seen in SLE. Lupus specific lesions include (1). Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE), which includes localized, malar and generalized, (2). Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), which includes annular and papulosquamous, and (3). Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), which includes classic discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), hypertrophic/verrucous, lupus panniculitis/profundus, lupus tumidus, chilblains lupus, mucosal discoid lupus, and lichenoid discoid lupus.

Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) may be localized or generalized. The hallmark ACLE lesion is the malar rash or the butterfly rash, which is an erythematous raised pruritic rash involving the cheeks and nasal bridge. The rash may be macular or papular and spares the nasolabial folds (photoprotected). It usually has an acute onset, but may last several weeks, and may cause induration and scaling. The malar rash may also fluctuate with lupus disease activity. Other rashes in this location that must be differentiated from ACLE malar rash include rosacea, erysipelas, seborrheic dermatitis, and perioral dermatitis. Generalized ACLE leads to widespread maculopapular or macular rash in a photosensitive pattern. ACLE lesions usually heal without scarring.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) rash is a photosensitive, widespread, nonscarring, nonindurated rash. SCLE may be either papulosquamous resembling psoriasis or an annular/polycystic lesion with central clearing and peripheral scaling. SCLE lesions may last several months but usually, heal without scarring. SCLE rash is seen in patients with a positive Anti-Ro (SSA) antibody in up to 90% of the cases. SCLE can also be caused by some drugs such as hydrochlorothiazide. [3] It has also been reported in patients with Sjogren syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. [8]

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is the most common form of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). DLE may occur with or without SLE, and can be either localized (only head and neck) or generalized (above and below the neck). The lesions are disk-shaped erythematous papules or plaques with adherent scaling and central clearing. DLE heals with scarring, and when present on the scalp, can be associated with permanent alopecia. Mucosal DLE lesions can be seen in the oral cavity, and these tend to be painful erythematous round lesions with white radiating hyperkeratotic striae. Hypertrophic DLE may mimic squamous cell carcinoma histologically. Lupus panniculitis can occur above the waist and is less likely to be associated with SLE. The lesions result in depressed areas, and when associated with DLE lesions overlying them, are known as lupus profundus. Chilblains lupus presents with erythematous tender plaques on fingers and toes. Lupus tumidus lesions are erythematous edematous smooth plaques without epidermal involvement. 

Oral and nasal ulcers are common in SLE, and acutely, often are painless. They may present as gradual onset erythema, macule, petechiae, erosions or ulcers involving any part of the oral cavity with most common locations being the hard palate, the buccal mucosa, and the vermilion border. Photosensitivity is present in SLE in more than 90% cases and is characterized by abnormal skin reaction on exposure to Ultraviolet A/B and visible light, a reaction that may last weeks to months. These patients also experience worsening of their systemic symptoms on sun exposure. Alopecia in SLE may be due to DLE (scarring), or the brittle, easily breaking lupus hair (non-scarring) in the temporal/parietal area. 

Several other skin manifestations are seen in SLE that are not specific for SLE. These include cutaneous vasculitis (leukocytoclastic or urticarial), vasculopathy (livedo reticularis, superficial thrombophlebitis, Raynaud's phenomenon, erythromelalgia, periungual telangiectasia), sclerodactyly, rheumatoid nodules, calcinosis cutis, bullous lesions, urticaria, erythema multiforme, acanthosis nigricans, lichen planus, and leg ulcers.[9]

Musculoskeletal manifestations

Approximately 80% to 90% of patients with SLE suffer from musculoskeletal involvement at some point during their disease course and may range from mild arthralgias to deforming arthritis. Lupus arthritis is typically a non-erosive, symmetrical inflammatory polyarthritis affecting predominantly the small joints of the hands, knees, and wrists, although any joint can be involved. Jaccoud arthropathy is the result of the joint capsule and ligament laxity leading to non-erosive deformities of the hands including ulnar deviation and subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joints, that may mimic rheumatoid arthritis. Usually, these deformities are reducible, although rarely, they may become fixed. Avascular necrosis (with or without steroid use) can occur in up to 10% of patients with SLE and is usually bilateral and involves the hip joints. Inflammatory myopathy with histopathological features similar to but less striking than polymyositis has been seen in less than 10% of SLE cases. Patients with SLE are at high risk for the development of fibromyalgia with incidences as high as 20% reported. Rheumatoid nodules have been reported in patients with SLE.  

Hematologic and reticuloendothelial manifestations

Anemia is present in more than 50 % of patients with SLE and most commonly is anemia of chronic disease. Other causes of anemia in SLE may include iron deficiency anemia, coomb's positive autoimmune hemolytic anemia, red blood cell aplasia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia which may be associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Leukopenia secondary to neutropenia or lymphopenia is also very frequent and can be severe. Thrombocytopenia can be mild or severe and may be associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and autoantibodies against platelets, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa or thrombopoietin receptor. Pancytopenia is not infrequent and may occasionally be associated with myelofibrosis. Soft non-tender lymphadenopathy is common in SLE, although rare cases of histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis have been reported (Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease). Splenomegaly is common in SLE, while splenic atrophy and asplenism have been reported.

Neuropsychiatric manifestations

Both central (CNS) and peripheral (PNS) nervous systems may be involved in SLE in addition to several psychiatric manifestations, although the diagnosis can be difficult. The most common CNS manifestation is intractable headaches, reported in more than 50% cases.[10] Focal or generalized seizures may be seen, and are associated with disease activity, although they carry a favorable prognosis. Other CNS manifestations include aseptic meningitis, demyelinating syndrome including optic neuritis and myelitis, movement disorders such as chorea and cognitive dysfunction. Patients with SLE are also at high risk for ischemic strokes. Cranial and peripheral (sensorimotor, axonal) neuropathies, mononeuritis multiplex, autonomic neuropathies, and syndromes mimicking Guillain-Barré syndrome and Myasthenia gravis are the peripheral nervous system manifestations. Psychiatric manifestations are especially difficult to diagnose and manage and may range from depression and anxiety to frank psychosis. 

Renal manifestations

Lupus nephritis is a well-known and common complication of SLE. The involvement may range from mild subnephrotic proteinuria to diffuse progressive glomerulonephritis leading to chronic kidney damage. Lupus nephritis usually occurs early in the course of SLE. New-onset hypertension, hematuria, proteinuria, lower extremity edema, and elevation in creatinine shall raise suspicion for lupus nephritis. A biopsy is crucial in staging the lupus nephritis and ruling out other causes. The six classes of lupus nephritis are mentioned in the histopathology section of this article. The treatment of lupus nephritis is dictated by the biopsy findings and prognosis varies for each class with an excellent prognosis for classes I and II, and poor outcomes with classes III and IV. Class V usually carries a favorable prognosis except for complications of nephritis syndrome such as thromboembolism which are common in this class. Other renal manifestations may include thrombotic microangiopathy, interstitial nephritis, lupus vasculopathy, vasculitis, and arteriolosclerosis.

Pulmonary manifestations

Pleuritis is the most common pulmonary manifestation, and may not always be associated with pleural effusion. Other pulmonary manifestations include exudative pleural effusions, acute lupus pneumonitis with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, interstitial lung disease which may be nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) or usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), diffuse alveolar hemorrhage associated with capillaritis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary embolism (with or without antiphospholipid antibody syndrome) and shrinking lung syndrome.

Cardiovascular manifestations

SLE may involve any layer of the heart including the pericardium, myocardium, endocardium and even the coronary arteries. Pericarditis associated with exudative pericardial effusions is the most common cardiac manifestation. Cardiac tamponade is rare. Myocarditis is rare and is associated with anti-Ro (SSA) antibodies. Hydroxychloroquine associated cardiomyopathy shall be ruled out and this may occasionally require an endomyocardial biopsy. Valvular abnormalities including Libman-Sacks endocarditis involving the mitral valve are common and may be associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Patients with SLE are especially at high risk for coronary artery disease, either due to coronary vasculitis or more frequently due to generalized atherosclerosis.

Gastrointestinal manifestations

Any part of the gastrointestinal tract may be involved in SLE and these manifestations include esophageal dysmotility (especially the upper one-third part of the esophagus), mesenteric vasculitis, lupus enteritis, peritonitis and ascites, protein-losing enteropathy, pancreatitis, and lupoid hepatitis. Further, patients with SLE and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome can develop Budd-Chiari syndrome, mesenteric vessel thrombosis, and hepatic veno-occlusive disease.

Pregnancy complications

SLE patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies are at a high risk of spontaneous abortions and fetal loss, pre-eclampsia and maternal thrombosis. Anti-Ro (SSA) and Anti-La (SSB) antibodies can cross the placenta leading to fetal heart block and neonatal lupus presenting with a photosensitive rash, cytopenias, and transaminitis. The risk is 2% with the first pregnancy but increases to 20% if a history of neonatal lupus in past pregnancy. SLE usually flares in pregnancy, especially if the disease was uncontrolled in the 6 months preceding pregnancy. Lupus nephritis can be difficult to differentiate from pre-eclampsia although several clinical and laboratory features (low complements, positive Anti-Ds-DNA antibody, normal serum uric acid level, and active urinary sediment) may help. Patients with more severe SLE manifestations such as pulmonary hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular accident are especially at a very high risk of mortality during pregnancy.

Other manifestations

Eye involvement is common and keratoconjunctivitis sicca is frequently seen in SLE, in presence or absence of secondary Sjogren syndrome. Retinal vasculitis, optic neuritis, uveitis, scleritis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and episcleritis are other ocular manifestations. Patients with SLE are also more susceptible to drug-induced ocular damage including steroid-induced glaucoma or cataract and hydroxychloroquine induced maculopathy. Ear involvement may lead to sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Adrenal infarction secondary to adrenal vessel thrombosis may be seen in patients with SLE and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

Classification criteria

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) first developed the SLE classification criteria in 1971 and revised them in 1982 and 1997.[11] The 1997 ACR criteria were further revised by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group in 2012.[12]

The 1997 ACR criteria required the presence of 4 out of 11 criteria for the classification of SLE. The 11 criteria included were malar rash, discoid rash, photosensitivity, alopecia, Raynaud phenomenon, oral/nasal ulcers, arthritis (non-erosive arthritis involving 2 or more peripheral joints), serositis (pleurisy or pericarditis), renal disease (proteinuria greater than 500 mg daily or cellular RBC, granular, tubular, or mixed casts), hematologic disease (Hemolytic anemia with reticulocytosis, or leukopenia less than 4000/mm3 on 2 or more occasions or lymphopenia less than 1500/mm3 on 2 or more occasions, or thrombocytopenia less than 100,000/mm3 in the absence of medications known to decrease platelets), neurologic disease (seizures or psychosis in the absence of an alternative explanation), immunologic criteria (Antiphospholipid antibodies present based on either an abnormal serum level of IgM or IgG anticardiolipin antibodies or a tested positive result for lupus anticoagulant or anti-DNA antibody or anti-Sm antibody or false-positive syphilis test with VDRL or RPR) and antinuclear antibody positivity in the absence of drugs known to cause drug-induced lupus.

The SLICC criteria made some notable changes to the 1997 ACR to improve clinical relevance. It requires at least one of the 4 criteria to be clinical and at least one of the 4 criteria to be immunologic. Neurologic and immunologic criteria were expanded to include new information about the SLE immunology. Further, patients with biopsy-proven nephritis and positive ANA or anti-double-stranded DNA could be directly classified as SLE even if they lacked any other criteria. Compared to the 1997 ACR criteria, the SLICC criteria have an improvement in the sensitivity and are considered to be more valid and clinically relevant.

It must be noted that these criteria are developed for research studies for classification of patients, and may not always be valid in the clinical setting. While they can assist a physician in suspecting a diagnosis of SLE, they alone shall not be considered enough in confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of SLE, which is still a clinical diagnosis made by an expert while considering the whole clinical presentation along with serological and histopathological testing, and imaging.


The diagnosis of SLE can be challenging, and no single clinical feature or lab abnormality can confirm a diagnosis of SLE. SLE is diagnosed based on the constellation of signs, symptoms and appropriate laboratory workup. Imaging and histopathology may play a crucial role as well.

Several autoantibodies have been described in SLE, with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity. While some autoantibodies may be associated with a certain clinical subset of SLE, others may serve as a marker of disease activity.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are the hallmark of the disease and shall be the initial test performed. Immunofluorescence assay is considered the gold standard test for ANA, and although other methods of detection such as ELISAs and multiplex assays are widely available, they lack sensitivity. A positive ANA is seen in more than 97% of cases of SLE, although it can also be seen in several other disorders, as well as a significant proportion of the healthy population and have a specificity of only 20%. Hence, a positive ANA does not confirm the diagnosis of SLE, but a negative ANA makes it very less likely. ANA negative SLE has been rarely described, although it is considered to be mostly due to methodical error and those cases have either a positive ANA on immunofluorescence, or have a positive Anti-Ro (SSA) antibody. Several patterns of ANAs have been reported including speckled, homogenous, centromere, cytoplasmic, nucleolar, and dense fine speckled patterns. With the availability of more specific ANAs targeting specific antigens, the staining patterns of ANAs are not considered significant enough by themselves. ANAs with dense fine speckled pattern (Anti-DFS70) are considered least pathological and patients with ANAs with this pattern rarely develop systemic autoimmune diseases.[13] The speckled pattern is seen when ANAs are directed against the antigens such as SSA, SSB, Smith, Ribonucleoprotein. The homogenous pattern is associated with ANAs targeted at Histones, Chromatin, and Ds-DNA, while centromere pattern is associated with Anti-centromere antibodies seen in limited systemic sclerosis. 

Besides SLE, ANAs can be seen in several other conditions as noted above. More than 20% of the healthy normal population, especially females or relatives of patients with autoimmune diseases can have a positive ANA, although titers more than 1:320 are uncommon. Other rheumatological disorders associated with a positive ANA include drug-induced lupus, systemic sclerosis, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Raynaud's disease, cutaneous lupus, and fibromyalgia. Several other autoimmune diseases are associated with a positive ANA including autoimmune hepatitis, multiple sclerosis, Hashimoto thyroiditis, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Several infections and malignancies have also been reported to be associated with a positive ANA.

A positive ANA shall be followed by testing for more specific autoantibodies to detect the antigen responsible for the positive ANA. It must be noted that frequently, a positive ANA will not be associated with any of the known more specific autoantibodies. There are several possible targets for ANAs, with any peptide synthesized inside the nucleus of the cell serving as a potential antigen, however, so far, only a few have been identified as having clinical relevance. A positive ANA with negative testing for more specific autoantibody testing is less likely to be associated with systemic autoimmune disease. 

Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies have more than 95% specificity for SLE but are seen in only about 60% to 70% of SLE patients. Thus a negative Anti-Ds-DNA does not rule out the diagnosis of SLE. Notably, Anti-Ss-DNA antibodies are considered non-specific and may be seen either as a laboratory error, as well as in the healthy population. Farr radioimmunoassay test is considered the gold standard test for the detection of Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies although it is not frequently used. ELISA tests are available but they have a high risk of giving a false positive test. The immunofluorescence test by using the Crithidia Luciliae method can be used to confirm the presence of Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies. Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies can also be seen in drug-induced lupus especially secondary to anti-TNF agents and interferon-alpha. Rarely, low titers of Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies have been reported in rheumatoid arthritis and Sjogren syndrome. In SLE, Anti-Ds-DNA antibodies can correlate with disease activity and can correlate with the development of lupus nephritis.

Anti-Ro (SSA) and Anti-La (SSB) antibodies target ribonucleoprotein particles. Anti-Ro and Anti-La antibodies are seen in up to 90% of cases of Sjogren syndrome but can be seen in SLE as well (Anti-Ro in up to 50% and Anti-La in up to 20%). In SLE, they may be associated with secondary Sjogren syndrome and keratoconjunctivitis sicca, Subacute cutaneous lupus, photosensitivity, congenital heart block, and neonatal lupus. 

Anri-Smith antibodies are seen in less than 30% of SLE patients but have 99% specificity for SLE. They are observed more in African-American patients with SLE. Anti-Smith antibodies in SLE are usually always associated with Anti-U1-RNP antibodies which are seen in up to 30% of SLE patients. Anti-U1-RNP antibodies can also be seen in mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), although in MCTD, Anti-Smith antibodies are lacking. Anti-Ribosomal-P antibodies are very specific for SLE, although their prevalence in SLE is less than 5%, and they may correlate with neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. Anti-Histone antibodies are not specific for drug-induced lupus and can be seen in 50% to 70% of cases of SLE. Anti-Centromere and Anti-topoisomerase-I (SCL70) antibodies are seen in systemic sclerosis and rarely in SLE (less than 5%). Anti-Histidyl-tRNA-synthetase antibodies are seen in myositis. Patients with SLE may also have antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulants, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I antibodies) and are associated with more thrombotic events and adverse pregnancy-related outcomes.

Complements C3 and C4 shall be checked in patients with SLE or suspicion of SLE and low complement levels indicate complement consumption and may correlate with disease activity. Markers of inflammation such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein may be elevated. Complete blood counts, liver function tests and renal function tests including serum creatinine, urinalysis and urine protein quantification (24-hour urine protein, or spot urine protein/creatinine ratio) shall be checked to assess organ involvement. Synovial fluid aspiration reveals an inflammatory fluid. Joint radiographs may demonstrate peri-articular osteopenia, deformities or subluxation, but rarely show erosions. Chest imaging with CT-scan, cardiac workup including echocardiography (trans-esophageal when suspecting Libman-sacks endocarditis), CNS work up with MRI and/or lumbar puncture shall be pursued if specific organ involvement is suspected. Renal biopsy shall always be performed if suspicion of lupus nephritis. Skin biopsies can be considered especially if atypical presentation.

Treatment / Management

The goal of treatment in SLE is to prevent organ damage and achieve remission. The choice of treatment is dictated by the organ system/systems involved and the severity of involvement and ranges from minimal treatment (NSAIDs, antimalarials) to intensive treatment (cytotoxic drugs, corticosteroids).[14][15][16]

Patient education, physical and lifestyle measures and emotional support play a central role in the management of SLE. Patients with SLE shall be well educated on the disease pathology, potential organ involvement including brochures, and the importance of medication and monitoring compliance. Stress reduction techniques, good sleep hygiene, exercises, and use of emotional support shall be encouraged. Smoking can worsen SLE symptoms and patients shall be educated about the importance of smoking cessation. Dietary recommendations shall include avoiding alfalfa sprouts and echinacea and including a diet rich in vitamin-D. Photoprotection is vital, and all patients with SLE shall avoid direct sun exposure by timing their activities appropriately, light-weight loose-fitting dark clothing covering the maximum portion of the body and using broad-spectrum (UV-A and UV-B) sunscreens with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 30 or more.

Cutaneous manifestations: Mild cutaneous manifestations can usually be treated with topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus. Hydroxychloroquine is the drug of choice for most cutaneous manifestations and very efficacious. Quinacrine can be used if intolerance or adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine. Methotrexate can be used if no response to hydroxychloroquine. For severe or resistant disease, systemic corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and belimumab can be considered. Other alternatives include thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, IVIG and rituximab.

Musculoskeletal manifestations: Hydroxychloroquine is the initial drug of choice for lupus arthritis. If no response, methotrexate or leflunomide can be considered. Belimumab and rituximab can be considered in refractory cases.

Hematological manifestations: Drug-induced cytopenias shall be excluded. Mild cytopenias usually require no treatment. For moderate to severe cytopenias, corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, and azathioprine or cyclosporine-A can be used as a steroid-sparing agent. Severe refractory cytopenias may require intravenous pulse dose steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis, Recombinant G-CSF or splenectomy.

Cardiopulmonary manifestations: Serositis usually responds to NSAIDs or moderate to high dose oral corticosteroids. Hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate can be considered as steroid-sparing agents. Acute lupus pneumonitis requires high dose IV pulse corticosteroids while plasmaphereses and/or cyclophosphamide may be needed if diffuse alveolar hemorrhage present. Interstitial lung disease can e managed by low to moderate dose corticosteroids with immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Pulmonary arterial hypertension requires vasodilator therapy, while thrombotic complications such as pulmonary embolism require anticoagulation. High-dose corticosteroids are required for the management of myocarditis and coronary arteritis.

CNS manifestations: Accurate diagnosis, and ruling out other potential causes is critical before initiating treatment for neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. High dose corticosteroids with immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or rituximab are used for inflammation-related neuropsychiatric manifestations such as optic neuritis, aseptic meningitis, demyelinating disease, etc. Lifelong warfarin is indicated in cases of thromboembolic CNS events associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. High dose corticosteroids can be used in cognitive impairment, although there is no robust data on this.

Renal manifestations: Lupus nephritis (LN) shall be confirmed with a biopsy which serves not only to confirm the diagnosis, but also to rule out other causes, and helps to classify the disease. Class I and II LN shall be treated with the Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade. Immunosuppression with high dose corticosteroids followed by azathioprine is indicated only if proteinuria more than 1 gram/day. Membranous LN (Class V) shall also be treated with the Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade. If proteinuria of more than 1 gram/day is present (which is frequent in Class V LN), induction therapy with high dose corticosteroids and azathioprine (mild disease) or tacrolimus/cyclosporine-A/mycophenolate mofetil/IV cyclophosphamide (moderate to severe disease) followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine-A or tacrolimus shall be used. Corticosteroids shall be gradually tapered during maintenance therapy. Proliferative LN (Class III/IV) requires more aggressive therapy. Induction therapy is with IV pulse dose methylprednisolone followed by high dose oral steroids in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, IV cyclophosphamide or azathioprine (only in mild disease in whites). Maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine shall be continued for at least 3 years. IV pulse cyclophosphamide for 1 year can be considered as maintenance therapy for severe disease. Lupus nephritis patients need very close monitoring of their renal function and proteinuria in addition to other SLE disease activity markers. Flares and incomplete remission are common. Renal replacement therapy and transplant may be needed in some patients.

Pregnancy manifestations: Pregnancy shall be considered only if the disease was quiescent at the time of and 6 months prior due to an increased risk of flares otherwise. Contraception if needed, shall be used until then and shall be progesterone-only contraception. Hydroxychloroquine is considered safe in pregnancy, has been associated with a significant reduction in flares and disease activity, and shall be continued through pregnancy. Azathioprine and low dose corticosteroids can be used for mild manifestations. Other immunosuppressive agents including methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide are teratogenic and contraindicated in pregnancy. Rituximab and belimumab shall also be avoided during pregnancy. Patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome shall be transitioned from warfarin to low-molecular-weight heparin and aspirin before pregnancy. For females with positive Anti-Ro or Anti-La antibodies with a history of neonatal lupus in previous pregnancy close fetal heart monitoring with weekly or alternate-weekly fetal echocardiography is recommended during the second trimester. First or second-degree heart block shall be promptly treated with dexamethasone, although prophylaxis with dexamethasone is not recommended. A complete heart block is irreversible and requires a permanent pacemaker in the infant. Hydroxychloroquine decreases the risk of fetal heart block.

Other management considerations: Hydroxychloroquine shall be used in all patients with SLE given its benefits beyond just the management of active manifestations including anti-thrombotic properties, and preventing flares. Patients on hydroxychloroquine will require regular ophthalmology exams to monitor for the rare but irreversible maculopathy associated with this drug. Corticosteroids are very frequently used in SLE, with many patients unable to completely taper them. Long term adverse effects of corticosteroids shall be considered and monitored for including osteoporosis, glaucoma, cataract, and avascular necrosis. Patients on high dose corticosteroids will also need antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infections. Most immunosuppressive agents used in SLE have several potential adverse effects ranging from cytopenias and hepatotoxicity with most to an increased risk of urinary bladder cancer with cyclophosphamide. These patients shall be appropriately and closely monitored for adverse effects of these agents.

Differential Diagnosis

SLE is a systemic disease with multiorgan involvement, and several other diseases can mimic SLE.

  • Other autoimmune diseases.
    • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present with several extra-articular manifestations in addition to the classic polyarticular inflammatory arthritis and may be difficult to differentiate from SLE. Positive ANA, Anti-Ro, and Anti-La can also be seen in RA although other SLE specific autoantibodies and hypocomplementemia are rare. SLE can be associated with a positive rheumatoid factor, but the Anti-CCP is negative in SLE
    • Drug-induced lupus may be difficult to differentiate from SLE especially due to a significant overlap in the clinical and serological features. Drug-induced lupus is characterized by the resolution of symptoms after drug withdrawal, and lack of more severe manifestations although the autoantibodies may remain positive for several years.[3]
    • Adult-onset Still disease characterized by arthralgia, fever, lymphadenopathy, and splenomegaly but no malar rash or other organ manifestations and lacks the SLE specific autoantibodies.
    • Behcet disease presents with aphthous ulcers, uveitis, and arthralgia, but lacks the other systemic and serological features of SLE.[17]
    • Sarcoidosis presents with fever, cough, dyspnea, fatigue, night sweats, rash, and uveitis. It shows non-caseating granuloma on chest radiography and bilateral adenopathy, which is rarely present in SLE.[18]
  • Infections.
    • Several viral infections can mimic SLE. Parvovirus B19 infection can cause fever, rash, inflammatory arthritis and cytopenias. ANA and rheumatoid factor have been reported. Hepatitis B and C can be associated with arthralgia/inflammatory arthritis and positive ANA and rheumatoid factor. CMV and EBV viral infections can cause fever, fatigue, cytopenias, and transaminitis. HIV can cause fever, fatigue, oral ulcers, and cytopenias. More specific autoantibodies and systemic manifestations of SLE are absent in these viral infections. Further, positive viral serologies may help make the right diagnosis.
    • Infectious endocarditis characterized by fever, arterial emboli, arthralgia, myalgia, and a heart murmur; may be confused with cardiac manifestations of SLE, but can be differentiated by the absence of specific SLE associated autoantibodies and positive blood cultures.
  • Malignancies.
    • Lymphomas especially Non-Hodgkins lymphoma can present with fatigue, weight loss, fever, arthralgia, cytopenia, lymphadenopathy, and a positive ANA. The more specific SLE associated autoantibodies are absent. In elderly patients presenting with lupus-like symptoms, malignancy shall be rule out by cancer screening.


Despite the advancements in therapeutic options of SLE and a better understanding of the disease process, SLE patients suffer from significant morbidity and carry a high mortality. Survival rates are 85% to 90% during the first 10 years. Leading causes of mortality include cardiovascular disease, infections, and renal disease.[19] Early diagnosis with therapy aimed at preventing organ damage, monitoring and screening patients for cardiovascular disease and infections with early intervention may improve these outcomes.


Complications in patients with SLE may occur either from a result of organ damage by the disease or due to the adverse effects of the medications.

Disease process-related complications include but are not limited to accelerated atherosclerosis with a several-fold higher risk of coronary artery disease even in the younger population, end-stage renal disease, and neurological deficits including blindness secondary to neuropsychiatric manifestations. Patients with severe cutaneous lupus especially discoid lupus can suffer from permanent skin damage and alopecia. Anxiety and depression are more common in patients with SLE. Several pregnancy-related complications are well known including fetal loss, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, congenital heart block and neonatal lupus. 

Medication-induced complications are common and require close monitoring. Long-term corticosteroid use in SLE patients frequently leads to osteoporosis which is under-diagnosed and under-treated leading to osteoporotic fractures. Other complications of long-term use corticosteroid therapy include avascular necrosis, glaucoma, cataract, weight gain and poor control of Diabetes mellitus. High dose corticosteroid use can also be associated with opportunistic infections and acute psychosis. Long term use of hydroxychloroquine may rarely result in maculopathy and retinopathy that is irreversible, and close ophthalmology examinations are recommended. Cyclophosphamide use is associated with a significantly high risk of interstitial cystitis and bladder cancer even after drug discontinuation. SLE patients are immunocompromised and at a significantly high risk of infections which is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in SLE.

Deterrence and Patient Education

As noted above, patient education is vital in the management of SLE. Better education of patients about the potential signs and symptoms of organ involvement may lead to early recognition and intervention which may prevent organ damage. Further, patients shall be educated about the importance of compliance with medications, clinical and laboratory evaluations. Dietary and lifestyle modification including photoprotection and smoking cessation is important. Patients with SLE suffer from significant stress related to the disease and complications and have higher rates of anxiety and depression, and support groups, behavioral therapy and sometimes involvement of psychiatry may help.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Lupus is a chronic inflammatory disorder with no cure. It can affect many organs and leads to a very poor quality of life without appropriate management. Premature death is common from a variety of causes. To reduce morbidity and mortality, an interprofessional team should educate and manage patients with SLE.

The primary care provider and nurse practitioner should educate the patient on avoiding triggers that cause flare-ups. In addition, the patient should be told to avoid UV light and minimize exposure to the sun. When going out, appropriate garments, sunglasses, and a wide brim hat are recommended. The dietitian should educate the patient on the importance of a low-fat diet to prevent hyperlipidemia. In addition, because patients with lupus are told to avoid the sun, vitamin D supplements are recommended. The physical therapist should educate the patient on the importance of exercise. The pharmacist should educate the patient on the importance of medication compliance and avoiding smoking. The nurse practitioner should counsel the patient on family planning and contraception. Many drugs used to treat are teratogenic, and thus, contraception is highly recommended. Multispeciality involvement is often needed in managing and monitoring SLE. While the involvement of a rheumatologist is crucial, other specialties including dermatology, cardiology, neurology, pulmonology, ophthalmology, nephrology, gastroenterology and gynecology may be needed. Close communication between the providers and the patient and family, and consideration of patient preferences while deciding therapy is strongly recommended. [Level V]

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Contributed by DermNetNZ

(Click Image to Enlarge)
A 28 year old female under psychiatric treatment  of confusional state and altered cognition. Previous CT report mentions cerebral cortical atrophy. 
MRI Brain FLAIR with non contrast TOF MR Angiography of Brain and Neck shows: 
Diffusion cerebral cortical atrophy - mild but significant for their age. 
A Chronic infarct involving right medial temporal lobe - right cortical PCA territory. 
A Small right parietal cortical infarct. 
Multiple Chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts. 
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 
Imaging wise diagnostic clue is age significant atrophy cerebral cortical atrophy with multi focal cortical infarcts, chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts in white matter.
A 28 year old female under psychiatric treatment of confusional state and altered cognition. Previous CT report mentions cerebral cortical atrophy. MRI Brain FLAIR with non contrast TOF MR Angiography of Brain and Neck shows: Diffusion cerebral cortical atrophy - mild but significant for their age. A Chronic infarct involving right medial temporal lobe - right cortical PCA territory. A Small right parietal cortical infarct. Multiple Chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Imaging wise diagnostic clue is age significant atrophy cerebral cortical atrophy with multi focal cortical infarcts, chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts in white matter.
Contributed by and with permission from Dr. Balaji Anvekar (

(Click Image to Enlarge)
MRI Brain FLAIR with non contrast 3D TOF MR Angiography of Brain and Neck shows:
Diffuse cerebral cortical atrophy - mild but significant for age. 
A chronic infarct involving right medial temporal lobe - right cortical PCA territory.
A small right parietal cortical infarct.
Multiple chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts. 
No significant major vessel stenosis or occlusion on MR Angio.

Possibilities suggested in this case were SLE, Anti phospholipid Antibody syndrome.
Considering young female pt with psychiatric history goes in favor of SLE.
Patient responding well to Steroids and immuno suppressants.
Imaging wise diagnostic clue is age significant atrophy cerebral cortical atrophy with multi focal cortical infarcts, chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts in white matter.
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Syn: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NP SLE)
MRI Brain FLAIR with non contrast 3D TOF MR Angiography of Brain and Neck shows: Diffuse cerebral cortical atrophy - mild but significant for age. A chronic infarct involving right medial temporal lobe - right cortical PCA territory. A small right parietal cortical infarct. Multiple chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts. No significant major vessel stenosis or occlusion on MR Angio. Possibilities suggested in this case were SLE, Anti phospholipid Antibody syndrome. Considering young female pt with psychiatric history goes in favor of SLE. Patient responding well to Steroids and immuno suppressants. Imaging wise diagnostic clue is age significant atrophy cerebral cortical atrophy with multi focal cortical infarcts, chronic lacunes and lacunar infarcts in white matter. Systemic lupus erythematosus Syn: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NP SLE)
Contributed by and with permission from Dr. Balaji Anvekar (
Article Details

Article Author

Angel Justiz Vaillant

Article Author

Amandeep Goyal

Article Author

Pankaj Bansal

Article Editor:

Matthew Varacallo


8/11/2021 8:11:44 PM



Grennan DM,Parfitt A,Manolios N,Huang Q,Hyland V,Dunckley H,Doran T,Gatenby P,Badcock C, Family and twin studies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Disease markers. 1997 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 9160184]


Deng Y,Tsao BP, Advances in lupus genetics and epigenetics. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2014 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 25010439]


Solhjoo M,Bansal P,Goyal A,Chauhan K, Drug-Induced Lupus Erythematosus . 2020 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 28722919]


Costenbader KH,Kim DJ,Peerzada J,Lockman S,Nobles-Knight D,Petri M,Karlson EW, Cigarette smoking and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2004 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 15022327]


Boddaert J,Huong DL,Amoura Z,Wechsler B,Godeau P,Piette JC, Late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a personal series of 47 patients and pooled analysis of 714 cases in the literature. Medicine. 2004 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 15525847]


Bustamante JG,Goyal A,Bansal P,Singhal M, Antiphospholipid Syndrome (Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome, APS, APLS) . 2020 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 28613698]


Weening JJ,D'Agati VD,Schwartz MM,Seshan SV,Alpers CE,Appel GB,Balow JE,Bruijn JA,Cook T,Ferrario F,Fogo AB,Ginzler EM,Hebert L,Hill G,Hill P,Jennette JC,Kong NC,Lesavre P,Lockshin M,Looi LM,Makino H,Moura LA,Nagata M, The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2004 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 14747370]


Obermoser G,Sontheimer RD,Zelger B, Overview of common, rare and atypical manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and histopathological correlates. Lupus. 2010 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 20693199]


Sontheimer RD, The lexicon of cutaneous lupus erythematosus--a review and personal perspective on the nomenclature and classification of the cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 1997     [PubMed PMID: 9061656]


Mitsikostas DD,Sfikakis PP,Goadsby PJ, A meta-analysis for headache in systemic lupus erythematosus: the evidence and the myth. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2004 May     [PubMed PMID: 15047589]


Hartman EAR,van Royen-Kerkhof A,Jacobs JWG,Welsing PMJ,Fritsch-Stork RDE, Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria versus the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in adult and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmunity reviews. 2018 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 29366725]


Petri M,Orbai AM,Alarcón GS,Gordon C,Merrill JT,Fortin PR,Bruce IN,Isenberg D,Wallace DJ,Nived O,Sturfelt G,Ramsey-Goldman R,Bae SC,Hanly JG,Sánchez-Guerrero J,Clarke A,Aranow C,Manzi S,Urowitz M,Gladman D,Kalunian K,Costner M,Werth VP,Zoma A,Bernatsky S,Ruiz-Irastorza G,Khamashta MA,Jacobsen S,Buyon JP,Maddison P,Dooley MA,van Vollenhoven RF,Ginzler E,Stoll T,Peschken C,Jorizzo JL,Callen JP,Lim SS,Fessler BJ,Inanc M,Kamen DL,Rahman A,Steinsson K,Franks AG Jr,Sigler L,Hameed S,Fang H,Pham N,Brey R,Weisman MH,McGwin G Jr,Magder LS, Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2012 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 22553077]


Carter JB,Carter S,Saschenbrecker S,Goeckeritz BE, Recognition and Relevance of Anti-DFS70 Autoantibodies in Routine Antinuclear Autoantibodies Testing at a Community Hospital. Frontiers in medicine. 2018     [PubMed PMID: 29686987]


Binello N,Cancelli C,Passalacqua S,De Vito F,Lombardi G,Gambaro G,Manna R, Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy at Unconventional Doses in Refractory Fulminant Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. European journal of case reports in internal medicine. 2018     [PubMed PMID: 30756066]


Toko H,Tsuboi H,Umeda N,Honda F,Ohyama A,Takahashi H,Abe S,Yokosawa M,Asashima H,Hagiwara S,Hirota T,Kondo Y,Matsumoto I,Sumida T, Intractable Hemophagocytic Syndrome Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resistant to Corticosteroids and Intravenous Cyclophosphamide That Was Successfully Treated with Cyclosporine A. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2018 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 29780126]


Touzot M,Terrier CS,Faguer S,Masson I,François H,Couzi L,Hummel A,Quellard N,Touchard G,Jourde-Chiche N,Goujon JM,Daugas E,Groupe Coopératif sur le Lupus Rénal (GCLR)., Proliferative lupus nephritis in the absence of overt systemic lupus erythematosus: A historical study of 12 adult patients. Medicine. 2017 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 29310419]


Adil A,Goyal A,Bansal P,Quint JM, Behcet Disease . 2020 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 29262080]


Lam NC,Ghetu MV,Bieniek ML, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Primary Care Approach to Diagnosis and Management. American family physician. 2016 Aug 15     [PubMed PMID: 27548593]


Yurkovich M,Vostretsova K,Chen W,Aviña-Zubieta JA, Overall and cause-specific mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis care & research. 2014 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 24106157]