Perioperative Vision Loss

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Perioperative vision loss is a rare but devastating complication following nonocular surgery. It includes the clinical manifestations of various ophthalmologic conditions. Prevention is paramount, given the poor prognosis in the majority of cases. Prompt recognition is critical as rare subtypes are treatable within a time-sensitive window. This topic reviews the patient-specific and perioperative factors that place patients at risk of developing perioperative vision loss and highlights the interprofessional team in prevention and prompt recognition of POVL.

Objectives:

  • Identify the proposed pathophysiology that contributes to perioperative vision loss and identify how certain patient and perioperative factors influence the pathophysiology.

  • Determine the differential diagnosis for perioperative vision loss subtypes and identify which subtype is the most common in prone spine surgery.

  • Determine how common comorbidities influence the risk of developing perioperative vision loss.

  • Communicate the importance of care coordination with the interprofessional team in managing perioperative factors that place patients at higher risk of developing perioperative vision loss.

Introduction

Perioperative vision loss (POVL) is defined as either partial or complete vision loss following a nonocular surgical procedure. It includes the clinical manifestations of various ophthalmologic conditions. POVL was first reported in 1948 involving a patient with a suspected optic globe injury secondary to sustained increased pressure from improper positioning on the headrest.[1] It is a rare but devastating complication typically recognized as the patient is awakening from anesthesia but may be recognized in the early postoperative period.

Etiology

The risk of POVL has consistently been shown to be highest during cardiac and spine surgery. However, it can occur in non-spine orthopedic surgeries and abdominal surgery.[2] The estimated incidence of POVL is around .03% for spine fusion and .09% for cardiac surgery.[3] Spine surgery from a posterior approach may have the highest rate of POVL. Spine surgery for scoliosis correction and posterior lumbar fusion have rates of POVL around (0.28%) and (.14%) respectively.[4] 

Ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) is the most common subtype of POVL for prone spine surgery, the estimates of which range from (0.017%) to (0.1%). Statistically significant risk factors other than patient-related characteristics associated with ischemic optic neuropathy following prone spine surgery include the use of the Wilson frame, anesthesia duration (as a surrogate for the surgical duration), estimated blood loss, and a lower ratio of colloid to crystalloid in administered nonblood perioperative fluid.[5]

Epidemiology

The majority of patients diagnosed with POVL following spine surgery were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, indicating a low risk of anesthesia-related complications.[6] Therefore, the anesthesia risk assessment strategy for POVL is distinct from that of typical anesthesia risk stratification.

There is a gender predilection for males without a clear, identifiable explanation.[3] POVL can occur at all ages. However, it is uncommon in patients under 12 years of age.[7] Overall, ION is the most common specific diagnosis associated with POVL. The risks of the other subtypes of POVL vary by age. In the pediatric population (<18 years of age), cortical blindness is the most common etiology. Patients over 50 may be at higher risk for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).[3]

Reports on obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m, are conflicting. In theory, increased intraabdominal pressure leading to increased central venous pressure in the prone position should affect eye circulation; however, there are some reports where BMI did not significantly increase the risk of POVL.[7]

Regarding preoperative comorbidities, the risk of POVL is twice as high in patients with peripheral vascular disease.[4] Evidence for preoperative hypertension and smoking have yielded contradictory results for POVL risk.[7][8] Other common medical conditions, including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, prior ischemic stroke, hyperlipidemia, and kidney disease, are associated with an elevated risk of POVL.[7][6] Further studies are needed to delineate if preexisting eye disease is a risk factor for POVL.

Pathophysiology

The proposed common underlying mechanism among the causes of POVL is insufficient vascular perfusion to critical components of the visual pathway. In many patients, there is insufficient vascular perfusion to the essential structures of the eye itself. Insufficient vascular perfusion in the perioperative setting can be related to increased venous pressure and subsequent development of interstitial edema. The prone position places patients at risk for decreased venous return and stroke volume secondary to increases in intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressure. Larger abdominal girth, as seen in obesity, can further increase central venous pressure due to increased intraabdominal pressure.

In addition to body habitus, surgical positioning can also affect vascular perfusion to the visual pathways. The Wilson frame is used widely in lumbar spine surgery, positioning patients with the benefit of flexing the lumbosacral spine, widening the interspinous spaces, and providing easier access to pathology.[9] Due to the associated thoracic elevation with the Wilson frame, the headrests are considerably lower than the heart. This may result in increased venous pressure within the head.

Increased anesthetic time, particularly after five to six hours, leads to accumulated interstitial edema due to a prolonged decrease in venous return. POVL is also associated with higher blood loss.[10] Higher blood loss is associated with a reduction in cardiac output and perfusion. Additionally, higher blood loss leads to increased inflammation, fluid shifts, capillary leak, and lowering oncotic pressure when replaced with crystalloid, increasing the risk of ischemic optic neuropathy. Replacement of blood loss with colloid causes a smaller decrease in oncotic pressure with theoretically less edema formation. This may explain why anemia alone is not an independent risk factor, as anemia may instead serve as a surrogate marker for low oncotic pressure.[10] The underlying pathophysiology of POVL is not entirely understood and requires further research for validation.

History and Physical

Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

Patients may initially have normal vision after awakening from anesthesia for a few days, followed by painless, unilateral, or bilateral progressive vision loss. Relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) if unilateral or absent pupillary reflexes of involved optic nerves. Visual complaints may include scotoma, absent light perception, or altitudinal field cuts. On early funduscopic examination, there is an edematous optic disc with a background of attenuated vessels and peripapillary hemorrhages. On late funduscopic examination, the edema has resolved, the vessels appear normal, and there is no evidence of optic nerve pallor.

Posterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

In posterior ischemic optic neuropathy, patients experience painless and typically bilateral vision loss present immediately after awakening from anesthesia. RAPD if unilateral or absent pupillary reflexes of involved optic nerves. Visual complaints may include scotoma, absent light perception, or altitudinal field cuts.[10] On early funduscopic examination, the fundus is normal, with evidence of optic nerve pallor on a late funduscopic exam.

Orbital Compartment Syndrome

Patients complain of painful visual loss present upon awakening from anesthesia, which may progress over the following days. The painful vision loss is associated with acute periocular edema, conjunctival swelling, and proptosis.

Corneal Abrasion

Patients complain of painful unilateral or bilateral vision loss present upon awakening from anesthesia accompanied by tearing, the sensation of a foreign body, and photophobia. Visible abrasion or a foreign body may be visible on the inspection with fluorescein staining.

Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Patients experience unilateral vision loss present upon awakening from anesthesia—sluggish or absent pupillary light reflex. On early funduscopic examination, patients may have a cherry-red spot at the macula in the background of the whitened ischemic retina. On late funduscopic examination, patients may have optic nerve pallor in the setting of a reperfused retina.[10]

Cortical Blindness

Cortical blindness involves vision loss upon awakening from anesthesia. If a unilateral cerebral hemisphere is involved, contralateral homonymous hemianopsia may be present with or without macular sparing. If bilateral cerebral hemispheres are involved, expect complete vision loss with or without macular sparing. In posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), altered consciousness presenting as agitation, confusion, or coma may be present.[11] Nausea, vomiting, and seizures may also be present.

Pituitary Apoplexy

In pituitary apoplexy, the vision loss, if present, is present upon awakening from anesthesia. The typical pattern is bitemporal hemianopsia or a junctional scotoma. In addition to visual loss, headache, nausea, vomiting, meningeal signs, altered mental status, and ophthalmoplegia may be present.[12]

Evaluation

Prevention and immediate recognition of POVL are paramount. Most delays are likely due to delayed recognition rather than deterioration following initially normal postoperative vision. Emergent ophthalmologic consultation is recommended for a more thorough ocular examination and to localize the anatomic lesion along the visual pathway.[12] 

If there is a concern for cortical visual loss, neurology consultation and stroke activation should be initiated, which may begin with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) of the head to rule out an intracranial hemorrhage, possibly followed by CT angiography of the head to rule out large vessel occlusion and ultimately magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain to delineate the extent of ischemic stroke.

Regarding intraoperative evaluation, real-time flash visual evoked potentials (VEP) are currently under investigation as a potentially useful tool for monitoring visual function during prone spine surgery.[13] The anesthetic regimen used during surgery can influence the stability of intraoperative VEP recording. A small study found that total intravenous (TIVA) is associated with higher VEP amplitude and shorter latencies than balanced anesthesia. This suggests that TIVA could be the most efficient anesthesia regimen when using VEP monitoring.[14]

Treatment / Management

Unfortunately, no treatment is effective for central retinal artery occlusion or ischemic optic neuropathy. Suppose the perioperative vision loss is secondary to cortical visual loss and on imaging. In that case, the patient is found to have occlusion of a cerebral artery contributing to deficits within the defined time-sensitive window. If not contraindicated, intravascular clot retrieval or thrombolysis may play a role.[15] 

Due to the inherent risk of POVL occurring more frequently in patients with prolonged operations greater than five or six hours, it is unlikely that many patients would be candidates for thrombolysis within the defined 3- to 4-hour window. In major surgery, such as posterior spine surgery, the risk of thrombolysis must also be weighed with the elevated risk of surgical site hemorrhage, which may lead to cord compression and paralysis.

Management of cortical vision loss secondary to PRES includes prompt control of seizures and blood pressure and discontinuation of possible responsible medications and other contributing factors.[16] If pituitary apoplexy is recognized on cranial imaging, prompt neurosurgical consultation is recommended, as urgent surgical evacuation within 48 hours can improve visual outcomes.[17] For suspected corneal abrasion, the treatment is to remove the foreign body if present and supportive ocular care.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnoses for perioperative vision loss include the following:

  • Ischemic optic neuropathy: Classified as either anterior or posterior ischemic optic neuropathy if ischemia is to the optic nerve head or posterior portion of the optic nerve, respectively.
  • Orbital compartment syndrome: Seen in conjunction with traumatic injury to the eye; direct eye compression may cause venous congestion with associated elevation in orbital pressure, compromising circulation to the orbit and adjacent intraocular structures.[18]
  • Corneal abrasion: May occur if the eye sustains direct trauma intraoperatively
  • Central retinal artery occlusion: A retinal stroke due to decreased retinal perfusion, typically related to direct eye compression; the severity of vision loss depends on the occluded vessel territory, but in most patients, it is extensive.[19]
  • Cortical blindness: Can result from ischemic stroke involving the cerebral visual cortex or subcortical edema within the parietooccipital regions, resulting from a condition referred to as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES); cerebral ischemia may result from an altered hemodynamic state or embolism.[20][21] The hypothesized etiology of PRES is endothelial damage resulting in dysregulation of cerebral vasculature with transplant medications, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, increasing the risk.[22]
  • Pituitary apoplexy results from spontaneous infarction or hemorrhage into a pituitary tumor or pituitary parenchyma. Although rare, it has been reported in the setting of spine surgery.[23] In the operative setting, it may be precipitated by anticoagulation, hemodynamic fluctuations, or the hemodilutional effect of fluid replacement.[8]

Prognosis

Ischemic optic neuropathy is the most common subtype of POVL in most patients. Consequently, most patients have not discovered an effective treatment, and the prognosis is poor.[24][25] Prevention is, therefore, the most effective treatment strategy. Although rare, spontaneous, full vision recovery is possible and has been reported.[26] 

Subtypes of POVL with a more favorable outcome, unfortunately, include the less common causes of POVL, which include pituitary apoplexy, cortical blindness secondary to PRES, and corneal abrasion. Most patients with pituitary apoplexy who undergo surgery within 48 hours of the presentation will improve visual deficits.[17] 

The prognosis of cortical vision loss depends on the extent of cerebral ischemia. A typically reversible condition in PRES is not characterized by extensive ischemia but subcortical edema. Therefore, complete resolution results in most patients.[11] The prognosis for a corneal abrasion is also promising, with early recognition and appropriate supportive care.

Complications

POVL results in increased disability in patients who may already have a pre-operative disability, particularly within the spine population. Associated disability and decreased quality of life can significantly hinder rehabilitation and survival. Further studies are needed to quantify the impact of POVL on patient outcomes.

Deterrence and Patient Education

POVL should be included in the consent process for at-risk cardiac or spine surgery patients. At-risk patients may include those with at least one of the following risk factors: male, baseline peripheral vascular disease, patients undergoing posterior spine surgery, use of Wilson frame for prone positioning, anticipated prolonged operative time, or substantial blood loss.[3][5][4]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

A multidisciplinary team approach is essential for preventing and timely recognizing POVL. From a surgeon’s perspective, headrests that do not allow adequate assessment of the eyes during the procedure should be avoided, as should Wilson frames for prone spine surgery if not contraindicated for the surgical approach. The head should be positioned in the neutral position at or above the level of the heart.

A staged approach should be considered if an operation in the prone position is anticipated. Operating room staff and anesthesia should be directly involved and encouraged to voice concerns regarding patient positioning. Anesthesia staff should be encouraged to perform periodic ocular checks throughout the operation. Postoperatively, vision should be examined as soon as the patient has awoken from anesthesia for early detection of POVL.


Details

Editor:

William Thorell

Updated:

9/24/2022 7:36:29 PM

References


[1]

SLOCUM HC, O'NEAL KC, ALLEN CR. Neurovascular complications from malposition on the operating table. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 1948 Jun:86(6):729-34     [PubMed PMID: 18915944]


[2]

Kitaba A, Martin DP, Gopalakrishnan S, Tobias JD. Perioperative visual loss after nonocular surgery. Journal of anesthesia. 2013 Dec:27(6):919-26. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1648-y. Epub 2013 Jun 18     [PubMed PMID: 23775280]


[3]

Shen Y, Drum M, Roth S. The prevalence of perioperative visual loss in the United States: a 10-year study from 1996 to 2005 of spinal, orthopedic, cardiac, and general surgery. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2009 Nov:109(5):1534-45. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b0500b. Epub 2009 Aug 27     [PubMed PMID: 19713263]


[4]

Patil CG,Lad EM,Lad SP,Ho C,Boakye M, Visual loss after spine surgery: a population-based study. Spine. 2008 Jun 1;     [PubMed PMID: 18520945]


[5]

Postoperative Visual Loss Study Group. Risk factors associated with ischemic optic neuropathy after spinal fusion surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan:116(1):15-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d012a. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22185873]


[6]

Lee LA, Roth S, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Newman NJ, Domino KB. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Postoperative Visual Loss Registry: analysis of 93 spine surgery cases with postoperative visual loss. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct:105(4):652-9; quiz 867-8     [PubMed PMID: 17006060]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[7]

Holy SE, Tsai JH, McAllister RK, Smith KH. Perioperative ischemic optic neuropathy: a case control analysis of 126,666 surgical procedures at a single institution. Anesthesiology. 2009 Feb:110(2):246-53. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318194b238. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19194151]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[8]

Berg KT,Harrison AR,Lee MS, Perioperative visual loss in ocular and nonocular surgery. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2010 Jun 24;     [PubMed PMID: 20596508]


[9]

Benfanti PL, Geissele AE. The effect of intraoperative hip position on maintenance of lumbar lordosis: a radiographic study of anesthetized patients and unanesthetized volunteers on the Wilson frame. Spine. 1997 Oct 1:22(19):2299-303     [PubMed PMID: 9346152]


[10]

Kla KM, Lee LA. Perioperative visual loss. Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 2016 Mar:30(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 26     [PubMed PMID: 27036604]


[11]

Parasher A, Jhamb R. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Postgraduate medical journal. 2020 Oct:96(1140):623-628. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137706. Epub 2020 May 28     [PubMed PMID: 32467104]


[12]

Newman NJ, Perioperative visual loss after nonocular surgeries. American journal of ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 18358851]


[13]

Soffin EM, Emerson RG, Cheng J, Mercado K, Smith K, Beckman JD. A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaverâ„¢ photic visual stimulator. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 2018 Oct:32(5):889-895. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0092-1. Epub 2017 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 29264762]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[14]

Uribe AA, Mendel E, Peters ZA, Shneker BF, Abdel-Rasoul M, Bergese SD. Comparison of visual evoked potential monitoring during spine surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia versus balanced general anesthesia. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017 Oct:128(10):2006-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.420. Epub 2017 Aug 9     [PubMed PMID: 28837906]


[15]

Selim M. Perioperative stroke. The New England journal of medicine. 2007 Feb 15:356(7):706-13     [PubMed PMID: 17301301]


[16]

Lee LA, Perioperative visual loss and anesthetic management. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2013 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 23614957]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[17]

Seuk JW, Kim CH, Yang MS, Cheong JH, Kim JM. Visual outcome after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary apoplexy. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2011 Jun:49(6):339-44. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2011.49.6.339. Epub 2011 Jun 30     [PubMed PMID: 21887391]


[18]

Roth S. Perioperative visual loss: what do we know, what can we do? British journal of anaesthesia. 2009 Dec:103 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i31-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep295. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20007988]


[19]

Su AW, Lin SC, Larson AN. Perioperative Vision Loss in Spine Surgery and Other Orthopaedic Procedures. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2016 Oct:24(10):702-10. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00351. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27564793]


[20]

Nathan ST,Jain V,Lykissas MG,Crawford AH,West CE, Transient cortical blindness as a complication of posterior spinal surgery in a pediatric patient. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B. 2013 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 23407429]


[21]

Cheng MA, Sigurdson W, Tempelhoff R, Lauryssen C. Visual loss after spine surgery: a survey. Neurosurgery. 2000 Mar:46(3):625-30; discussion 630-1     [PubMed PMID: 10719859]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[22]

Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 1: fundamental imaging and clinical features. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2008 Jun:29(6):1036-42. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0928. Epub 2008 Mar 20     [PubMed PMID: 18356474]


[23]

Stevens WR, Glazer PA, Kelley SD, Lietman TM, Bradford DS. Ophthalmic complications after spinal surgery. Spine. 1997 Jun 15:22(12):1319-24     [PubMed PMID: 9201834]


[24]

Hayreh SS, Ischemic optic neuropathy. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2009 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 19063989]


[25]

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Practice advisory for perioperative visual loss associated with spine surgery: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb:116(2):274-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c104d. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22227790]


[26]

Lee LA, Lam AM. Unilateral blindness after prone lumbar spine surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001 Sep:95(3):793-5     [PubMed PMID: 11575556]