Developmental Disturbances Of The Teeth, Anomalies Of Structure

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Developmental disturbances in teeth can result in different clinical presentations, one being a change in the structure of teeth which may present in the primary and permanent dentition. This activity outlines and describes the evaluation and management of patients that present with developmental anomalies of the structure of teeth in the primary and permanent dentition and highlights the role of the multidisciplinary team in evaluating and managing patients with these conditions.

Objectives:

  • Describe dental developmental anomalies of structure.
  • Review common underlying etiologies of anomalies of dental structure.
  • Identify characteristic findings to aid in the diagnosis of dental anomalies of structure.
  • Summarize the healthcare team's role in managing patients with developmental dental anomalies of structure.

Introduction

Dental development is a highly regulated biological process and results from several specific and highly regulated sequences of steps. Teeth are comprised of many different internal and external structures with a variety of developmental and embryologic origins. If any of these developmental processes are disturbed or over-exaggerated, changes can occur within the developed tooth’s structure. These changes can be as simple as a slight overexpression of a singular tooth structure to the complete obliteration of dental tissue in final development. The developmental anomalies to be discussed in this article are as follows: dens evaginatus, dens invaginatus, amelogenesis imperfecta, and dentinogenesis imperfecta.

Etiology

Dens evaginatus, also known as a talon cusp, results from a developmental tubercle, often seen on the lingual aspect of the tooth structure; however, it can occur on the occlusal surface. A coronal anomaly, these accessory cusps typically project from the cingulum or cementoenamel junction of anterior teeth.[1] The etiology of this condition is attributed to genetic and/or environmental factors, such as trauma to the developing tooth bud or local factors influencing the morphodifferentiation during tooth development.[2]

Dens invaginatus, also known as dens in dente, is a dental malformation that results from an inward folding of the developing tooth germ. Dental anomalies have a multifactorial etiology, with genetic and environmental factors being the most common.[3] The etiology of this condition is not well understood; however, it is likely related to an additional invagination of the inner enamel epithelium into the interior aspect of the developing tooth bud before mineralization.[4] Several other suggested etiologies range from the rapid proliferation of part of the inner enamel epithelium into the dental papilla to trauma and an absence of signaling molecules for morphogenesis.[5]

Amelogenesis imperfecta is a developmental condition with a genetic etiology. It affects both the clinical and structural appearance of some or all of the dentition. Mutations in the amelogenin gene (AMELX) and enamelin gene (ENAM) are also responsible for this condition.[6]

Dentinogenesis imperfecta is a developmental condition that also has a genetic etiology. It is caused by mutations with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance that alters the structure of dentin.[7] Mutations are commonly found within the genes that encode for type 1 collagen (COL1A1 and COL1A2).[8]

Epidemiology

Dens evaginatus/talon cusps are relatively common, with a prevalence ranging between 1 and 6%, and are mostly seen in the permanent dentition. 

Dens invaginatus has no gender predilection and a prevalence between 0.3 to 10%, depending on the population studied.[9] This condition is mainly identified on the maxillary lateral incisors, followed by the maxillary central incisors. It is very rarely discovered in any other teeth.[10]

The incidence of amelogenesis imperfecta depends widely on the gene mutation of the population studied. Different studies have found that the incidence of amelogenesis imperfecta ranges from 1 in 700 to 1 in 14,000.[11][6]

Dentinogenesis imperfecta has an incidence ranging from 1 in 6,000 to 1 in 8,000 cases throughout the United States, with no gender predilection.[12]

Pathophysiology

The morphological changes seen in dens evaginatus are thought to occur early in odontogenesis, during the morphodifferentiation stage of tooth development.[13] It is suggested that proliferation and subsequent evagination of the inner enamel epithelium and the odontogenic mesenchyme into the enamel organ result in the “talon cusp” development.[14]

Dens invaginatus results from an alteration of the developing tooth structure during the proliferation and morphodifferentiation stage of tooth development.[4]

Amelogenesis imperfecta is a genetic alteration in the formation of enamel. This condition results from mutations of multiple genes, many of which code for enamel proteins, either structural or enzymatic, various transcription factors, cellular proteins, and calcium carriers.[15] This condition can range from affecting a single tooth to the entire dentition, depending on the combination of genetic mutations.

Dentinogenesis imperfecta is a genetic alteration in the formation of dentin. The formation of dentin (dentinogenesis) arises from an organic pre-dentin matrix calcified by the signal from the odontoblasts. As dentinogenesis progresses, these odontoblasts are responsible for multiple intricate processes that lead to the proper formation of dentin, which affects other dental structures. Mutation in the genes that encode protein constituents of dentin results in hereditary dentin defects.[8]

Histopathology

Dens evaginatus histologically appear as normal dental tissue, with reduced levels of enamel and dentin. Pulpal tissue may or may not be present, depending on the extent of the evagination from the affected tooth bud.[16]

Dens invaginatus histologically appears as normal dental tissue, with an inward folding of enamel and dentin.

Amelogenesis imperfecta histologically presents with normal dentin surrounded by lessened or obliterated enamel.

Dentinogenesis imperfecta histologically presents as a lessened or degenerated dentin surrounded by otherwise normal enamel.

History and Physical

Dens evaginatus, or a “talon cusp,” presents as an outcropped growth of normal tooth structure, commonly affecting the lingual aspect of an anterior maxillary tooth. Talon cusps have been classified into three categories with distinct clinical presentations.[17] Type 1 talon cusps are a morphologically well-differentiated additional cusp that extends half the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the incisal edge. Type 2 talon cusps, known as a “semi-talon,” measure at least one millimeter and extend half the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the incisal edge. Type 2 talon cusps often blend with the surface of the crown. Type 3 talon cusps, or “trace talons,” are enlarged or prominent cingula that can be conical, bifid, or tubercle. 

Dens invaginatus has various clinical presentations, which depend on the severity of the in-folding or the phase of morphodifferentiation where the invagination occurs. Several classifications exist to describe the extent of the in-folded tissue. The most utilized system is the Oehlers classification due to its ease of application.[18] In Type 1, the invagination ends as a blind sac and is limited to the coronal aspect of the tooth. Type 2 invagination extends beyond the CEJ and is retained within the main root canal of the tooth. Type 3 occurs when the invagination of dental tissue extends throughout the interior aspect of the root canal, sometimes even reaching the apical third of the tooth, potentially resulting in multiple apical foramina.[19]

The various clinical presentations of amelogenesis imperfecta depend on the gene that is mutated.[15] Hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta, or type I, presents with localized or generalized thinning of the enamel, resulting in the crown of the teeth appearing yellow or light brown in color. The surfaces of these teeth are often pitted or mottled in appearance. There is no pain associated with this subtype; however, thermal sensitivity has been reported.[20] Hypomature amelogenesis imperfecta, or type II, has a defect in matrix protein degradation. Enamel in this condition appears whitish to brown in color with no noted translucency, which commonly presents with enamel breakdown. Radiographic examination reveals a decreased enamel opacity, especially along the dentino-enamel junction. Type II is the mildest form, with the main concern being esthetics.[21] 

Hypominerazlied amelogenesis imperfecta, or type III, is the most severe form of amelogenesis imperfecta due to the reduced enamel mineral content. Teeth with this condition are very sensitive to temperature and tactile pressure, presenting clinically with dark yellow or brown enamel color. On radiographic examination, enamel and dentin may appear to have the same radiodensity.[22]

The clinical presentation of dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI) depends on the extent of the disruption during dentinogenesis. DI is classified into three types based on clinical and radiographic features.[23] DI Type 1 is syndromic and presents with osteogenesis imperfecta, a disorder that results in fragile bones. With this combination of syndromes, it is pertinent for healthcare providers to work together to ask appropriate medical history questions, such as fragile joints, short stature, hearing loss, joint hyperextensibility, and scleral hue (blue). DI Type II is present with or without other etiologically related clinical findings. While the clinical and radiographic findings are indistinguishable from DI Type I, this condition is less severe with fewer related clinical presentations.[24] DI Type III presents with very large pulp chambers and abnormalities in tooth color, size, as well as possible enamel pitting.[25]

Evaluation

Dens evaginatus/talon cusps are likely incidental findings during routine dental examinations. In cases where the outgrowth is less severe, patients may not even be aware of their presence. If patients have issues with the extra tooth structure, a multidisciplinary approach should be utilized for treatment.

Dens invaginatus is likely an incidental finding during a routine dental examination. In less severe cases, patients may be unaware of the presence of an in-folding in the surface of their tooth, while in more severe cases, patients may complain of pain or discomfort in the area, as these teeth can be more prone to trauma or sensitivity. Radiographic evaluation, ideally with a CBCT, should be utilized to determine the extent of the invagination, as the severity of the condition will dictate treatment.

Amelogenesis imperfecta is commonly identified on clinical examination. With this being an inherited condition, family history, clinical observation, and recording of any developmental disturbances will aid in diagnosis.[6]

Dentinogenesis imperfecta is identified on clinical examination. Teeth appear amber, brown/blue, or opalescent brown in color, depending on the extent of the dysplastic dentin.[26] Radiographically, crowns appear bulbous with small to obliterated pulp chambers, and roots are often narrow with small pulp canals.[27]

Treatment / Management

Dens evaginatus/talon cusps are managed with a multidisciplinary approach in mind. Treatment options from a recent consensus study by Smail-Faugeron et al. in 2016 stated the following modalities of treatment: complete reduction of the talon cusp in one appointment, periodic or gradual cuspal reduction, abstention, or the possibility of extraction.[1] Treatment strategies are dictated by the severity of the talon cusp, the patient's chief complaint, whether functionally or esthetically, or to mitigate potential dental complications before they occur.

Dens invaginatus should be evaluated radiographically with either a series of periapical radiographs from different angles or a CBCT to evaluate the internal structures. Depending on the complexity of the tooth's internal structure or the extent of the invagination, treatment and management strategies of these teeth can range from monitoring to surgical intervention. Treatment has phased into an endodontic approach compared to the previous oral surgery-driven approach with extractions due to the development of better diagnostic aids, such as the CBCT.[5]

Amelogenesis imperfecta ranges from mild to severe, which will dictate the extent of the treatment required. As far as management is concerned, treatment should be considered in symptomatic cases or cases where the patient expresses esthetic concerns. Treatment can range from composite fillings and veneers to full-coverage ceramic restorations depending on the severity of the condition.

Dentinogenesis imperfecta ranges from mild to severe, which will dictate the extent of the treatment required. Due to the esthetic changes in tooth coloration, patients may desire more esthetic restorations for anterior teeth, such as composite resin restorations or porcelain veneers. Associated enamel pits may require minimal intervention with esthetic, non-preparation facial composite restorations.

Differential Diagnosis

Dens Evaginatus/Talon Cusp

  • Gemination
  • Fusion
  • Enamel hyperplasia

Dens Invaginatus

  • Fusion
  • Enamel hypoplasia
  • Gemination 

Amelogenesis Imperfecta

  • Dental fluorosis
  • Chronological enamel hypoplasia
  • Molar-Incisal Hypomineralization (MIH)

Dentinogenesis Imperfecta

  • Dentin dysplasia
  • Osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Amelogenesis imperfecta

Prognosis

Dens evaginatus/talon cusps have a good prognosis with appropriate management. When less severe, patients may be unaware of their presence, while more severe cases may warrant more invasive intervention. As long as proper restorative or endodontic protocol is followed, teeth that present with dens evaginatus have a good prognosis. 

Dens invaginatus have a good prognosis with appropriate management. Due to the altered tooth structure, teeth with this condition should be regularly monitored for early signs of caries to prevent more invasive dental treatment measures.

Amelogenesis imperfecta, as well as dentinogenesis imperfecta, has a good prognosis with appropriate management. In cases where patients are asymptomatic or do not express an esthetic concern, most patients will have a good quality of life with no or little treatment. More involved cases may require more invasive or multi-disciplinary treatment, which can potentially change the prognosis.

Complications

Dens evaginatus/talon cusps may have additional pulpal tissue present, depending on the severity and when the developmental disturbance occurred during odontogenesis. With this complication, the restorative prognosis may be guarded without appropriate endodontic intervention. Additionally, these cusps are prone to traumatic fractures due to their unfavorable location in the plane of occlusion. If the traumatic fracture occurs, endodontic therapy may be warranted due to pulpal exposure. 

Dens invaginatus has a higher predilection for caries formation due to their “funnel shape” that allows food debris or bacteria to progress faster and deeper into the tooth.[28] These teeth should be monitored for early signs of caries. Patients should be counseled on proper oral hygiene measures to reduce their risk of developing carious lesions on these teeth and their entire dentition.

Amelogenesis imperfecta, with the different clinical presentations, often requires an interdisciplinary treatment approach. The generalized form of the condition is commonly associated with an underlying systemic syndrome, such as regional odontodysplasia, in which genetic counseling or genetic workup is indicated to manage any underlying syndrome appropriately.[29]

Dentinogenesis imperfecta, especially DI type II, presents with greater pulpal tissue, which may complicate restorative interventions due to the higher frequency of pulpal exposure during restorative treatment or as a result of parafunctional habits.

Deterrence and Patient Education

As all of the above conditions are genetic or developmental in origin, there is no true way to deter or prevent these conditions from occurring. Patients that present with generalized developmental defects affecting the entire dentition should be evaluated for an underlying syndrome. Treatment of the above-listed conditions is likely symptomatically or esthetically driven. Patients presenting with these conditions should be encouraged to self-monitor for new or worsening symptoms that dental professionals will evaluate and treat.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Developmental disturbances in tooth development that result in structural changes are routine findings on clinical examinations. Patients that present with these conditions can be identified by any member of the healthcare team. With generalized developmental disturbances noted throughout the dentition, appropriate referrals should be made for genetic counseling and a dental healthcare provider for the subsequent management of any symptomatic or esthetic cases.


Article Details

Article Author

Reed McKinney

Article Editor:

Heather Olmo

Updated:

11/1/2021 9:57:11 AM

References

[1]

Smail-Faugeron V,Picou Rollin J,Muller Bolla M,Courson F, Management of non-syndromic dens evaginatus affecting permanent maxillary central incisors: a systematic review. BMJ case reports. 2016 Oct 5;     [PubMed PMID: 27707761]

[2]

Hattab FN,Yassin OM,al-Nimri KS, Talon cusp--clinical significance and management: case reports. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 1995 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 7568721]

[3]

Gowans LJJ,Cameron-Christie S,Slayton RL,Busch T,Romero-Bustillos M,Eliason S,Sweat M,Sobreira N,Yu W,Kantaputra PN,Wohler E,Adeyemo WL,Lachke SA,Anand D,Campbell C,Drummond BK,Markie DM,van Vuuren WJ,van Vuuren LJ,Casamassimo PS,Ettinger R,Owais A,van Staden I,Amendt BA,Adeyemo AA,Murray JC,Robertson SP,Butali A, {i}Missense Pathogenic variants in KIF4A{/i} Affect Dental Morphogenesis Resulting in X-linked Taurodontism, Microdontia and Dens-Invaginatus. Frontiers in genetics. 2019;     [PubMed PMID: 31616463]

[4]

Barbosa Brandão EC,Aguiar Ribeiro A,Alto Seabra LM, Rare Condition of Dens Invaginatus in a Maxillary Primary Molar and a Birooted Maxillary Primary Canine diagnosed during Routine Examination. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2017 Apr-Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 28890622]

[5]

Hegde V,Morawala A,Gupta A,Khandwawala N, Dens in dente: A minimally invasive nonsurgical approach! Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2016 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 27656073]

[6]

Crawford PJ,Aldred M,Bloch-Zupan A, Amelogenesis imperfecta. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2007 Apr 4;     [PubMed PMID: 17408482]

[7]

de La Dure-Molla M,Philippe Fournier B,Berdal A, Isolated dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia: revision of the classification. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2015 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 25118030]

[8]

Barron MJ,McDonnell ST,Mackie I,Dixon MJ, Hereditary dentine disorders: dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentine dysplasia. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2008 Nov 20;     [PubMed PMID: 19021896]

[9]

Alani A,Bishop K, Dens invaginatus. Part 1: classification, prevalence and aetiology. International endodontic journal. 2008 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 19133103]

[10]

Hamasha AA,Alomari QD, Prevalence of dens invaginatus in Jordanian adults. International endodontic journal. 2004 May;     [PubMed PMID: 15086751]

[11]

Bäckman B,Holm AK, Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1986 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 3456873]

[12]

Witkop CJ Jr, Hereditary defects of dentin. Dental clinics of North America. 1975 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 162890]

[13]

Tulunoglu O,Cankala DU,Ozdemir RC, Talon's cusp: report of four unusual cases. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2007 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 17456971]

[14]

Gupta S,Tandon A,Chandra A,Gupta OP, Syndontia with talon cusp. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. 2012 May;     [PubMed PMID: 22923902]

[15]

Toupenay S,Fournier BP,Manière MC,Ifi-Naulin C,Berdal A,de La Dure-Molla M, Amelogenesis imperfecta: therapeutic strategy from primary to permanent dentition across case reports. BMC oral health. 2018 Jun 15;     [PubMed PMID: 29907114]

[16]

Güngör HC,Altay N,Kaymaz FF, Pulpal tissue in bilateral talon cusps of primary central incisors: report of a case. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2000 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 10673662]

[17]

Dinesh Rao B,Hegde S, A talon cusp on fused teeth associated with hypodontia: report of a unique case. European journal of dentistry. 2010 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 20046484]

[18]

Colak H,Tan E,Aylıkçı BU,Uzgur R,Turkal M,Hamidi MM, Radiographic study of the prevalence of dens invaginatus in a sample set of Turkish dental patients. Journal of clinical imaging science. 2012;     [PubMed PMID: 22919548]

[19]

Borges AH,Semenoff Segundo A,Nadalin MR,Pedro FL,da Cruz Filho AM,Sousa-Neto MD, Conventional Treatment of Maxillary Incisor Type III Dens Invaginatus with Periapical Lesion: A Case Report. ISRN dentistry. 2011;     [PubMed PMID: 21991460]

[20]

Wright JT,Robinson C,Kirkham J, Enamel protein in smooth hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta. Pediatric dentistry. 1992 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 1303537]

[21]

Wright JT,Lord V,Robinson C,Shore R, Enamel ultrastructure in pigmented hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. Journal of oral pathology     [PubMed PMID: 1432732]

[22]

El-Sayed W,Shore RC,Parry DA,Inglehearn CF,Mighell AJ, Hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta due to WDR72 mutations: a novel mutation and ultrastructural analyses of deciduous teeth. Cells, tissues, organs. 2011;     [PubMed PMID: 21196691]

[23]

Shields ED,Bixler D,el-Kafrawy AM, A proposed classification for heritable human dentine defects with a description of a new entity. Archives of oral biology. 1973 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 4516067]

[24]

WITKOP CJ, Hereditary defects in enamel and dentin. Acta genetica et statistica medica. 1957;     [PubMed PMID: 13469154]

[25]

Levin LS,Leaf SH,Jelmini RJ,Rose JJ,Rosenbaum KN, Dentinogenesis imperfecta in the Brandywine isolate (DI type III): clinical, radiologic, and scanning electron microscopic studies of the dentition. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 1983 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 6579461]

[26]

Kim JW,Simmer JP, Hereditary dentin defects. Journal of dental research. 2007 May;     [PubMed PMID: 17452557]

[27]

Hart PS,Hart TC, Disorders of human dentin. Cells, tissues, organs. 2007;     [PubMed PMID: 17627120]

[28]

Hülsmann M,Hengen G, Severe dens invaginatus malformation: report of two cases. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 1996 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 8899788]

[29]

Jalili IK,Smith NJ, A progressive cone-rod dystrophy and amelogenesis imperfecta: a new syndrome. Journal of medical genetics. 1988 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 3236352]