Giant Condylomata Acuminata of Buschke and Lowenstein

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL) is a rare, slow-growing verrucous tumor of the penis and anogenital region which can grow up to twenty centimeters in size and can locally destroy contiguous structures. This activity outlines the evaluation and management of GCBL and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in improving care for patients with this condition.


  • Identify the etiology of giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL).

  • Review the appropriate evaluation of giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL).

  • Outline the management options available for giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL).

  • Summarize interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to enhance the delivery of care and improve outcomes for patients with giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL).


Giant condyloma of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL) is a type of verrucous carcinoma first described by Buschke and Löwenstein in 1925. It is a rare form of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that most commonly appears on the glans penis, foreskin, or perianal regions, but can also be found on other anogenital regions e.g., the vulva, vagina or the bladder.[1] In rare instances, GCBL has been found in the axilla. GCBL typically begins as a small keratotic growth on the penile foreskin or coronal sulcus and gradually, over several years, morphs into a cauliflower-like mass, often up to 10 to 15 cm, with cutaneous fistulas and a cobblestone surface.

GCBL is a slow-growing tumor, which in spite of its benign histopathology, is clinically malignant owing mostly to its locally destructive nature and its tendency to recur. GCBL ulcerates and invades deeper tissues, but does not generally metastasize. Malignant transformations of this tumor have been reported.[2]


Various causative risk factors of GCBL have been described. These include long-standing phimosis, unsatisfactory penile hygiene (mostly seen in uncircumcised males), immunosuppression (human immunodeficiency virus, immunosuppressive drug intake), prolonged irritation, e.g., from ulcerative colitis or perianal fistulas, diabetes, smoking, substance abuse, pregnancy and, poor socioeconomic status.[3]


GCBL occurs more frequently in males than in females. It is most common in uncircumcised males under the age of 50 years and rarely occurs in children.[4] To date, no racial predilections have been reported for this tumor. Incidence rates of GCBL are higher in men who have sex with men (MSM), homosexual, and bisexual men.[5] 

Out of all the reported penile tumors in the US, GCBL constitutes about 5% to 24%. Very few cases of GCBL outside the penis have been reported. While penile cancers have a much higher incident rate outside the US, reliable epidemiological data are still lacking about the international incidence rates of GCBL.


Most studies link GCBL to the low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 and 11.[6][7] The genome of these HPV strains encodes for DNA sequences that translate to produce E (early) 6 and E7 proteins. E6 and E7 bind the tumor suppressor protein, p53, leading to an accelerated degradation of p53, which, in turn, immortalizes epithelial cells that replicate unchecked and accumulate DNA mutations, causing chromosomal instability and eventually, abnormal growth in the form of GCBL.

Similarly, chronic irritation of the penile and anogenital skin from poor hygiene, ulcerative colitis, or perianal fistulas is also postulated to produce chromosomal instability, leading to GCBL development.[8]


GCBL lesions exhibit a densely keratinized and well-differentiated epithelium.[9] Microscopically, it exhibits papillary structures with distinct cores of a fibrovascular nature, prominent koilocytosis, and broad pushing basis – features quite similar to those seen in condyloma acuminata.[2] Compared to warts, however, GCBL’s histology is characterized by well-developed and distinct extrusion into the underlying tissue, often termed as an endophytic pattern by histopathologists.

Usually, GCBL tumor cells do not exhibit atypia, but, in the case of malignant transformation of GCBL, atypia may be seen on histopathological analysis. Both in situ and invasive SCC changes have been observed.[10]

History and Physical

In immunocompetent individuals, GCBL will normally start as a small, often keratotic, plaque usually on the foreskin of the penis and will gradually, over up to twenty years, change into a structure typically described as a ‘cauliflower-like growth’ approximately twenty centimeters in size. The tumorous growth often forms ulcers or horns and is usually malodorous. When found on the penis, it can extend into the penile urethra or the corpus cavernous and produce fistulas. Although lymphadenopathy (usually regional) is seen with this tumor, it is most often caused by secondary spread and not because of metastasis of the tumor, which is very uncommon.

In the case of perianal GCBL, the first presenting symptoms are usually in the form of a painful mass, bleeding, fistulations, or abscesses.[4][11] Perianal growth is normally circumferential, starting from the transitional zone between the anal mucosa and the cutaneous surface and slowly growing outwards, involving the anal canal in most cases.

In immunocompromised and pregnant patients, GCBL proliferates at a much more rapid pace compared to the proliferation rates seen in immunocompetent and nonpregnant individuals.[12]


A biopsy is the diagnostic procedure of choice for GCBL. While biopsying a suspected GCBL lesion, care must be taken to go deep and far enough to look for the characteristic broad basis extruding deeply into the underlying tissue. Special attention should also be paid to look for any possible foci of SCC because these usually make recurrence and metastasis more likely.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium contrast is used to look for tumor expansion while planning surgical removal.[13]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy should only be considered when sufficient clinical evidence points towards its need because GCBL generally does not metastasize into lymph nodes.

Treatment / Management

Factors like lesion size, number and location, immune status of the patient, personal preferences of the patient, and the type of treatment available at a particular healthcare facility dictate the chosen treatment.[14] Broadly speaking, a wide surgical excision is the treatment of choice for GCBL.[15][16] According to most experts, Mohs surgery is the preferred technique as it allows tissue sparing while simultaneously enabling the surgeon to ensure tumor-free margins and spotting any SCC foci.[17] If necessary, surgical defects can later be surgically reconstructed e.g., by using delayed split-thickness grafts.[18][19] In most cases, GCBL recurrences are dealt with by radical surgery. Carbon dioxide/argon laser resection has also been used for recurrences.[20]

Topical, intralesional, or oral chemotherapy with fluorouracil (5-FU), podophyllin, cidofovir, interferon, and imiquimod, as well as systemic chemotherapeutic drugs e.g., bleomycin, cisplatin, and leucovorin have been used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy and for treating tumor recurrences after surgery.[21][22][23] Chemotherapy alone, however, has not shown promising results.[24]

Radiation therapy, in spite of its neoadjuvant application in a limited number of GCBL cases, has largely been avoided, mostly because of the fear of causing further anaplastic transformations.[25][26]

Autologous vaccination therapy as a treatment for GCBL has also shown promising results.[27]

Differential Diagnosis

Lesions including condyloma acuminatum, cutaneous SCC (including papillary carcinoma, warty carcinoma, and carcinoma cuniculatum), primary rectal adenocarcinoma, Bowenoid papulosis, and lymphangiomas are important differentials for GCBL.[28][29]

Surgical Oncology

Treatment for giant condyloma of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL) often requires large excisions of the affected areas. This may pose a challenge for the reconstruction of tissue. Reconstructive surgery with a flap has been described in case reports to cover the defect left after the excision of GCBL.[30]


Untreated or inadequately treated GCBL has an invariably fatal course due to its locally destructive nature. It extends into and erodes pelvic organs and skeletal structures. Even with adequate treatment, the mortality rate is 21%, and the recurrence rate is approximately 68%.[31]

Up to 56% of GCBL lesions exhibit malignant transformations.[2]


Complications of GCBL, including treatment complications, are many. These include fistula formation, secondary infections, malodorous discharge, frequent recurrences, and malignant transformations.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Given the high prevalence rate of GCBL among uncircumcised males, it is imperative to educate parents about the important role of newborn circumcision in preventing the development of GCBL and other penile lesions.[32]

Patients should be counseled about condom use as it diminishes the transmission of HPV, which is associated with GCBL.

Similarly, the HPV vaccine should be given to individuals between nine and twenty-six years of age as it protects against infection with both HPV 9 and 11 – strains most strongly associated with GCBL.[33]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein (GCBL) frequently poses a diagnostic dilemma. These patients may exhibit non-specific signs and symptoms such as pain, bleeding, abscesses, and a penile/anogenital mass. The cause of such a mass may be a myriad of lesions, including condyloma acuminatum, cutaneous SCC (including papillary carcinoma, warty carcinoma, and carcinoma cuniculatum), primary rectal adenocarcinoma, Bowenoid papulosis, and lymphangiomas. While the physical exam may reveal that the patient has a cauliflower-like mass with fistulization, the cause is difficult to know with certainty without proper histopathological and imaging studies.[4] [Level V]

While the general surgeon is almost always involved in the care of patients with GCBL, it is important to consult with an interprofessional team of specialists that includes a primary care clinician, a radiologist, a histopathologist, and an oncologist. The nurses are also vital members of the interprofessional group as they will monitor the patient's vital signs and assist with the education of the patient and family. The radiologist and histopathologist play a vital role in determining the cause. Without the patient providing a proper history, the radiologist and histopathologist may not be sure what to look for or what additional radiologic exams may be needed. This problem gets even more complex when immunocompromised or pregnant patients present with a GCBL lesion, in which case an OB/GYN specialist and/or an immunologist will also be an integral part of the healthcare team.

To derive good outcomes, the goals and objectives of GCBL excision surgery have to be defined prior to taking the patient to the operating room. In some cases, a chronic infection may preclude definitive repair in a single stage - thus, the importance of incorporating assistance from an infectious disease specialist. As with any other complex procedure, the preoperative workup must be thorough, and the patient should be seen by a pulmonologist and cardiologist to optimize lung and cardiac function. Sometimes the lesion may be too extensive or involving the underlying soft tissues or bone, and an oncology consult may be required for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. When GCBL is extending into the penile urethra or the anal canal, a urology or colorectal consult is recommended. Plastic surgery may be consulted to reconstruct any surgical defects.[34] [Level V] In the postoperative period for pain and wound infection, the pharmacist will ensure that the patient is on the right analgesics and appropriate antibiotics.

With the ongoing and evolving debate about the best approach to GCBL management, there is no disputing the fact that with each attempt at GCBL treatment, there is presently a 68% risk of recurrence. Thus, further emphasizing the need for an interprofessional approach to the management of GCBL lesions. The need for meticulous planning and discussion with other professionals involved in the management of the patient is highly recommended to lower the morbidity and improve outcomes. At the same time, the role of a primary care clinician in educating patients about consistent condom use, newborn circumcision, and immunization against HPV as potential preventative strategies against giant condylomata acuminata of Bushke-Löwenstein must be emphasized.[32][33] [Level V]



Usama Irshad


Yana Puckett


4/14/2023 5:06:02 PM



Wiedemann A, Diekmann WP, Holtmann G, Kracht H. Report of a case with giant condyloma (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor) localized in the bladder. The Journal of urology. 1995 Apr:153(4):1222-4     [PubMed PMID: 7869506]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Chu QD, Vezeridis MP, Libbey NP, Wanebo HJ. Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Lowenstein tumor) of the anorectal and perianal regions. Analysis of 42 cases. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1994 Sep:37(9):950-7     [PubMed PMID: 8076499]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Nambudiri VE, Mutyambizi K, Walls AC, Fisher DC, Bleday R, Saavedra AP. Successful treatment of perianal giant condyloma acuminatum in an immunocompromised host with systemic interleukin 2 and topical cidofovir. JAMA dermatology. 2013 Sep:149(9):1068-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5160. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23824272]


Trombetta LJ, Place RJ. Giant condyloma acuminatum of the anorectum: trends in epidemiology and management: report of a case and review of the literature. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2001 Dec:44(12):1878-86     [PubMed PMID: 11742180]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Wells M, Robertson S, Lewis F, Dixon MF. Squamous carcinoma arising in a giant peri-anal condyloma associated with human papillomavirus types 6 and 11. Histopathology. 1988 Mar:12(3):319-23     [PubMed PMID: 2835300]


Gissmann L, deVilliers EM, zur Hausen H. Analysis of human genital warts (condylomata acuminata) and other genital tumors for human papillomavirus type 6 DNA. International journal of cancer. 1982 Feb 15:29(2):143-6     [PubMed PMID: 6277807]


Gissmann L, Wolnik L, Ikenberg H, Koldovsky U, Schnürch HG, zur Hausen H. Human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 DNA sequences in genital and laryngeal papillomas and in some cervical cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1983 Jan:80(2):560-3     [PubMed PMID: 6300854]


Kidd LC, Chaing S, Chipollini J, Giuliano AR, Spiess PE, Sharma P. Relationship between human papillomavirus and penile cancer-implications for prevention and treatment. Translational andrology and urology. 2017 Oct:6(5):791-802. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.06.27. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29184775]


Balázs M. Buschke-Loewenstein tumour. A histologic and ultrastructural study of six cases. Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology. 1986:410(2):83-92     [PubMed PMID: 3099460]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Bogomoletz WV, Potet F, Molas G. Condylomata acuminata, giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Loewenstein tumour) and verrucous squamous carcinoma of the perianal and anorectal region: a continuous precancerous spectrum? Histopathology. 1985 Nov:9(11):1155-69     [PubMed PMID: 4085991]


Papiu HS, Dumnici A, Olariu T, Onita M, Hornung E, Goldis D, Aiordachioae G, Vasca V. Perianal giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor). Case report and review of the literature. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). 2011 Jul-Aug:106(4):535-9     [PubMed PMID: 21991883]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Crespo R, Puig F, Lanzon A, Borell A. Buschke-Lowenstein tumor and pregnancy: a case report. European journal of gynaecological oncology. 2007:28(4):328-9     [PubMed PMID: 17713107]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Takezawa Y, Shimizu N, Kurokawa K, Suzuki K, Yamanaka H. Appearance on magnetic resonance imaging of Buschke-Lowenstein tumour. British journal of urology. 1996 Aug:78(2):308-9     [PubMed PMID: 8813938]


Fathi R, Tsoukas MM. Genital warts and other HPV infections: established and novel therapies. Clinics in dermatology. 2014 Mar-Apr:32(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.08.014. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24559567]


el Mejjad A, Dakir M, Tahiri M, Attar H, Cherkaoui A, Araki A, Aboutaieb R, Meziane F. [Giant condyloma acuminata -- Buschke Lowenstein tumor (report of 3 cases)]. Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 2003 Jun:13(3):513-7     [PubMed PMID: 12940210]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Renzi A, Giordano P, Renzi G, Landolfi V, Del Genio A, Weiss EG. Buschke-Lowenstein tumor successful treatment by surgical excision alone: a case report. Surgical innovation. 2006 Mar:13(1):69-72     [PubMed PMID: 16708158]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Parise P, Sarzo G, Finco C, Marino F, Savastano S, Merigliano S. Giant condyloma acuminatum of the anorectum (Buschke-Lowenstein tumour): a case report of conservative surgery. Chirurgia italiana. 2004 Jan-Feb:56(1):157-61     [PubMed PMID: 15038663]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Balik E, Eren T, Bugra D. A surgical approach to anogenital Buschke Loewenstein tumours (giant condyloma acuminata). Acta chirurgica Belgica. 2009 Oct:109(5):612-6     [PubMed PMID: 19994804]


Klaristenfeld D, Israelit S, Beart RW, Ault G, Kaiser AM. Surgical excision of extensive anal condylomata not associated with risk of anal stenosis. International journal of colorectal disease. 2008 Sep:23(9):853-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0494-0. Epub 2008 Jun 12     [PubMed PMID: 18548258]


Perniola G, d'Itri F, Di Donato V, Achilli C, Lo Prete E, Panici PB. Recurrent Buschke-Löwenstein tumor treated using CO(2) laser vaporization. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2010 Sep-Oct:17(5):662-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.05.007. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20728830]


Dinleyici M, Saracoglu N, Eren M, Kiliç Ö, Ciftci E, Dinleyici EC, Sag C, Kara A. Giant Condyloma Acuminate Due to Human Papillomavirus Type 16 in an Infant Successfully Treated with Topical Imiquimod Therapy. Dermatology reports. 2015 Dec 3:7(3):6134. doi: 10.4081/dr.2015.6134. Epub 2015 Dec 3     [PubMed PMID: 26734121]


Ambriz-González G, Escobedo-Zavala LC, Carrillo de la Mora F, Ortiz-Arriaga A, Cordero-Zamora A, Corona-Nakamura A, López Ramírez MK, Velázquez Ramírez GA. Buschke-Löwenstein tumor in childhood: a case report. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2005 Sep:40(9):e25-7     [PubMed PMID: 16150329]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Toro JR, Sanchez S, Turiansky G, Blauvelt A. Topical cidofovir for the treatment of dermatologic conditions: verruca, condyloma, intraepithelial neoplasia, herpes simplex and its potential use in smallpox. Dermatologic clinics. 2003 Apr:21(2):301-9     [PubMed PMID: 12757253]


Ilkay AK, Chodak GW, Vogelzang NJ, Gerber GS. Buschke-Lowenstein tumor: therapeutic options including systemic chemotherapy. Urology. 1993 Nov:42(5):599-602     [PubMed PMID: 8236609]


Butler TW, Gefter J, Kleto D, Shuck EH 3rd, Ruffner BW. Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus in condyloma acuminatum. Successful treatment with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1987 Apr:30(4):293-5     [PubMed PMID: 3829876]


Sobrado CW, Mester M, Nadalin W, Nahas SC, Bocchini SF, Habr-Gama A. Radiation-induced total regression of a highly recurrent giant perianal condyloma: report of case. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2000 Feb:43(2):257-60     [PubMed PMID: 10696901]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Wiltz OH, Torregrosa M, Wiltz O. Autogenous vaccine: the best therapy for perianal condyloma acuminata? Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1995 Aug:38(8):838-41     [PubMed PMID: 7634978]


Long CA, Lewis JM, Orucevic A. Primary rectal adenocarcinoma presenting as a giant perianal mass mimicking giant condyloma of Buschke-Lowenstein. The American surgeon. 2013 Jun:79(6):E228-30     [PubMed PMID: 23711255]


Zhu JW, Lu ZF, Zheng M. Acquired progressive lymphangioma in the inguinal area mimicking giant condyloma acuminatum. Cutis. 2014 Jun:93(6):316-9     [PubMed PMID: 24999645]


Shenoy S, Nittala M, Assaf Y. Anal carcinoma in giant anal condyloma, multidisciplinary approach necessary for optimal outcome: Two case reports and review of literature. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2019 Feb 15:11(2):172-180. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i2.172. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30788043]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Atkinson AL, Pursell N, Sisay A. The giant condyloma (buschke-löwenstein tumor) in the immunocompromised patient. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2014:2014():793534. doi: 10.1155/2014/793534. Epub 2014 Sep 25     [PubMed PMID: 25328732]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Larke NL, Thomas SL, dos Santos Silva I, Weiss HA. Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer causes & control : CCC. 2011 Aug:22(8):1097-110. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9785-9. Epub 2011 Jun 22     [PubMed PMID: 21695385]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Shabbir M, Barod R, Hegarty PK, Minhas S. Primary prevention and vaccination for penile cancer. Therapeutic advances in urology. 2013 Jun:5(3):161-9. doi: 10.1177/1756287212465456. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23730331]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Gholam P, Enk A, Hartschuh W. Successful surgical management of giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor) in the genitoanal region: a case report and evaluation of current therapies. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2009:218(1):56-9. doi: 10.1159/000165359. Epub 2008 Oct 21     [PubMed PMID: 18936533]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence