Back To Search Results

Medicare and Medicaid Accreditation and Deemed Status

Editor: Julie Bohlen Updated: 9/4/2023 2:30:52 PM

Definition/Introduction

Medicare and Medicaid are federal health insurance programs that provide coverage to millions of Americans annually.[1] Accreditation plays a vital role in the healthcare industry by ensuring that healthcare providers uphold specific quality and safety standards.[2] Accreditation and deemed status are crucial components of Medicare and Medicaid programs, facilitating healthcare providers in receiving reimbursement from the government for the services they offer to program beneficiaries.[3] Accreditation entails a comprehensive evaluation of a provider's policies, procedures, and clinical practices to confirm their alignment with the guidelines set forth by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).[4] Conversely, deemed status permits healthcare providers to skip the conventional accreditation process and gain automatic approval from CMS by meeting specific criteria. Grasping the fundamental concepts of Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status is essential for healthcare providers aiming to participate in these federal programs.

Definitions

Medicare and Medicaid accreditation refers to the process of evaluation and recognition of healthcare providers, such as hospitals and clinics, by the CMS to ensure that they meet specific standards of care. Accreditation is voluntary, but it is required for facilities that wish to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.[5]

Deemed status is a designation granted to healthcare facilities accredited by an approved accrediting organization, such as The Joint Commission, that CMS has recognized as meeting the requirements for participation in Medicare and Medicaid. This means that the healthcare facilities with deemed status do not need to undergo a separate survey by CMS to become eligible for participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs, as the accrediting organization has already assessed the facility for adherence to CMS standards.[6]

For facilities lacking accreditation or deemed status from CMS, a separate survey by CMS is mandatory to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. This survey assesses the facility's adherence to CMS criteria, including patient care, safety, physical environment, administration, and more.[7]

Significance

Accreditation and deemed status contribute to the assurance of high-quality care and adherence to industry standards within healthcare facilities.[8] Patients gain access to care in accredited facilities or those with deemed status, assuring that these facilities meet CMS requirements. Moreover, accreditation and deemed status can offer healthcare facilities a competitive edge by showcasing their dedication to quality care and safety, which both patients and insurers appreciate.

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

Maintaining Deemed Status: Requirements and Challenges

Given the difficulty of obtaining and retaining accreditation, sustaining deemed status is a demanding endeavor. A significant challenge lies in keeping up with the continuous updates and alterations to CMS accreditation standards, necessitating healthcare facilities to promptly adapt and stay abreast of these changes. Furthermore, accrediting organizations may institute their own standards, adding to the complexity of maintaining deemed status and making the process even more challenging for healthcare facilities. Moreover, retaining deemed status demands substantial investments in staff, equipment, and technology, posing a challenge for smaller or resource-constrained healthcare organizations. Despite these obstacles, healthcare organizations must adhere to the requirements to maintain deemed status and guarantee access to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements.

Major Issues in Accreditation

Inconsistencies. A significant challenge within Medicare and Medicaid accreditation lies in the potential for inconsistencies in the process. Different accrediting organizations may employ varying standards, and the application of these standards may differ, potentially resulting in disparities in the level of care offered by accredited facilities.[9]

Cost. The cost of accreditation is a valid concern, as the process can be both time-consuming and expensive for healthcare facilities. These expenses can ultimately translate into higher healthcare costs for patients. Furthermore, smaller healthcare facilities may face difficulties meeting accreditation requirements, potentially restricting access to care in certain regions.[10]

Effectiveness. The effectiveness of accreditation in enhancing patient outcomes is a topic of debate. While studies have linked accreditation with improved quality of care, other research indicates that accreditation may not always result in better patient outcomes. This complexity underscores the ongoing discussions surrounding the impact of accreditation on healthcare quality.[11]

Evidence. The concerns surrounding accreditation vary in the level of supporting evidence. Some studies suggest a positive association between accreditation, improved quality of care, and outcomes, while others fail to find a significant correlation. Furthermore, research into the cost-effectiveness of accreditation remains limited. Overall, there is a clear need for more extensive research to better understand the precise impact of accreditation on healthcare quality and patient outcomes.[9]

Conflicts. Another issue is the potential for conflicts of interest in the accreditation process. Accrediting organizations may have financial ties to the healthcare facilities they accredit, which raises questions regarding the impartiality of the process.

Marketing. Indeed, there is a valid concern that accreditation might be employed primarily as a marketing tool, potentially overshadowing its role as a genuine indicator of quality care. Some healthcare facilities may prioritize accreditation as a marketing strategy rather than focusing on substantial improvements in their care processes, raising questions about the true motivations behind seeking accreditation.[9]

Validity. The level of evidence for validity concerns varies. Certain studies indicate potential conflicts of interest within the accreditation process, while others have uncovered limited evidence of bias. While some research suggests that accreditation may serve as a marketing tool, other studies have demonstrated a correlation between accreditation and tangible improvements in the quality of care.[9]

The Future of Medicare and Medicaid Accreditation

A significant challenge confronting the Medicare and Medicaid programs in the future is the necessity to maintain high care standards among healthcare providers while managing costs. This requires ongoing monitoring and strict enforcement of accreditation standards. Moreover, it necessitates the innovation and adoption of new strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services, ensuring sustainable and accessible care for beneficiaries.

To address these challenges, exploring potential approaches becomes essential. This may involve leveraging technology to enhance coordination and communication among healthcare providers, adopting value-based payment models that incentivize high-quality, cost-effective care, and employing data analytics and other tools to pinpoint improvement areas. The success of these endeavors hinges on the collaboration of policymakers, regulators, and stakeholders. Their collective efforts are vital to ensure that Medicare and Medicaid continue offering access to high-quality, affordable healthcare for millions of Americans.[10]

Importance

Accreditation and deemed status hold significance in maintaining quality care for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Nevertheless, legitimate concerns persist regarding the accreditation process's consistency, cost, and effectiveness. Continual research and evaluation of the accreditation process are essential in addressing these concerns and guaranteeing that patients consistently receive the highest quality of care.[10]

Clinical Significance

Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status have significant clinical relevance as they help to ensure that healthcare facilities provide high-quality patient care. Accreditation and deemed status are crucial indicators of quality care, aiding patients and their families in making informed decisions about where to seek healthcare services. These designations offer valuable guidance when selecting healthcare providers and facilities.

Additionally, accreditation and deemed status incentivize healthcare facilities to implement best practices and enhance their care processes. This commitment to quality improvement can ultimately result in improved patient health outcomes. By establishing and enforcing care quality standards in healthcare facilities, accreditation and deemed status are pivotal in promoting patient safety and mitigating the risk of medical errors. Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status are indispensable elements of the healthcare system, essential for guaranteeing high-quality patient care and fostering an ongoing culture of improvement in care quality.

Accreditation

The importance of accreditation in health care. Accreditation in healthcare is paramount to ensuring safe, effective, and high-quality patient care. Accreditation entails a comprehensive assessment of healthcare facilities, including a review of their policies, procedures, and overall performance, to verify their alignment with nationally recognized standards. Accreditation provides healthcare facilities with a roadmap to identify and correct areas for improvement. Moreover, accrediting agencies offer training and guidance to facilities, helping them remain current and aware of evolving care standards. Medicare and Medicaid accreditation ensures these programs provide the best care for their beneficiaries. Deemed status, which allows for automatic accreditation for Medicare- and Medicaid-approved facilities, saves time and resources for the facilities while ensuring compliance with all the relevant standards. Therefore, without accreditation, healthcare facilities may not build trust with their patients or demonstrate their commitment to delivering quality care.[12]

Understanding the Medicare accreditation process. The Medicare Accreditation Process is essential for healthcare providers to maintain high standards of quality and safety in the care they provide to Medicare beneficiaries. Accreditation ensures that healthcare facilities meet specific requirements and standards set forth by the CMS. The CMS requires an approved accrediting organization to accredit all healthcare providers seeking reimbursement for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. The accreditation process includes an initial survey of the facility, ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the facility's compliance with standards, and periodic surveys to ensure continued compliance. The Medicare accreditation process aims to create a more standardized and efficient healthcare system, allowing patients to access high-quality care that meets their needs. Additionally, it assures Medicare beneficiaries that their care is of the highest quality and is consistent with industry standards.[13]

The Medicaid accreditation process for providers. To become accredited, providers must undergo a rigorous evaluation process by one of several national accrediting organizations. This evaluation ensures that providers meet the highest quality and safety standards in their care delivery. Providers who receive accreditation have a higher level of credibility and are more likely to be approved for Medicaid reimbursement. In addition, accreditation can help providers identify areas where they need to improve and implement changes to enhance the quality of care they provide. Overall, the Medicaid accreditation process is essential for healthcare providers who wish to participate in the Medicaid program and provide quality patient care.[14]

The role of accrediting organizations in Medicare and Medicaid. Accrediting organizations play a critical role in the Medicare and Medicaid system. They are charged with reviewing the quality of care healthcare facilities provide and ensuring they meet specific standards. By accrediting healthcare facilities, the federal government can ensure that patients receive high-quality care and that taxpayer dollars are being spent appropriately. However, accrediting organizations are not without their critics. Some argue that the system is too lenient and that accredited facilities may still provide sub-par care. Others point to the high cost of accreditation, which can burden small, rural facilities. Despite these criticisms, accreditation remains a vital component of the Medicare and Medicaid system, helping to ensure that patients receive quality care and that the government's investment in healthcare is protected.[15]

Accreditation Standards

Home health agencies. Accreditation standards for home health agencies play a crucial role in ensuring high-quality healthcare services to patients. These standards dictate the minimum requirements that home health agencies must meet regarding their services, staffing, safety, and overall management. Some critical areas of focus within accreditation standards for home health agencies include patient rights and responsibilities, clinical services, personnel qualifications, and safety practices. Compliance with these standards is typically a prerequisite for Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status. Home health agencies seeking to participate in these federal programs must demonstrate their commitment to delivering safe, effective, patient-centered care by meeting or exceeding these standards. Ultimately, adherence to accreditation standards helps to maintain a high level of consistency and transparency across the home health industry and promotes positive patient outcomes.[16]

Hospices. Accreditation standards for hospices are crucial in ensuring that patients receive quality end-of-life care. The CMS sets standards for hospices to meet specific requirements to receive accreditation. Hospices must comply with 15 standards, such as patient care, quality assurance, and CMS regulation compliance. These standards ensure that hospices provide comprehensive, coordinated, and effective care to patients and families. In addition to meeting the CMS standards, hospices undergo periodic evaluations and surveys to maintain their accreditation status. Accreditation is essential for hospices to receive funding from Medicare and Medicaid, which enables them to provide affordable care to patients who may not otherwise be able to afford it.[17][18][19]

Ambulatory surgery centers. Ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) annually provide outpatient surgical services to millions of Americans. Consequently, adherence to strict accreditation standards for these centers by Medicare and Medicaid is essential to ensuring patient safety and quality care. Apart from the ability to provide evidence of compliance with federal and state regulations, accreditation standards for ASCs cover areas such as building and fire safety, emergency preparedness, infection prevention and control, performance improvement, patient rights, and medical staff qualifications for those wishing to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs must obtain and maintain accreditation from an accepted organization, like the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) or the Joint Commission Ambulatory Care Accreditation Program. The accreditation process is rigorous and conducted through onsite surveys that assess these centers' quality and safety protocols. Adherence to these accreditation standards is crucial in establishing and maintaining a robust healthcare system that provides safe, affordable, and quality patient care.[20][3]

Hospitals. Hospital accreditation standards are crucial to ensuring that healthcare facilities maintain high care and patient safety standards. Many accrediting organizations have developed comprehensive standards that hospitals must meet to obtain and maintain accreditation, including requirements for infection control, staff training and qualifications, emergency preparedness, and patient rights and privacy. These standards are updated regularly to keep pace with changes in the healthcare industry and to reflect new research and best practices in patient care. Hospitals that fail to meet accreditation standards may face sanctions, fines, or loss of accreditation, which can seriously affect their ability to provide care and receive reimbursement from third-party payers like Medicare and Medicaid. As a result, hospitals must remain vigilant in meeting and exceeding accreditation standards to ensure the highest possible quality of patient care.[21]

Medicare Advantage Plans. The CMS sets the accreditation standards for Medicare Advantage plans to ensure that health plans meet specific requirements to operate as a Medicare Advantage plan. These standards include quality improvement, customer service, network adequacy, and financial stability. For instance, plans must have a process for continuous quality improvement that includes using data to identify and address improvement areas. They must also have a sufficient network of providers to ensure that beneficiaries have access to the care they need, and they must demonstrate financial stability to ensure that they can fulfill their contractual obligations to Medicare. By setting and enforcing these standards, CMS helps to ensure that beneficiaries have access to high-quality Medicare Advantage plans and that these plans are held accountable for their performance.[22]

Medicaid Managed Care Plans. The CMS has established accreditation standards for Medicaid Managed Care plans to ensure they meet the high-quality standards required to provide healthcare services to beneficiaries. The standards include network adequacy, quality management, member rights and responsibilities, grievances and appeals, and financial stability. Plans that meet these standards can enroll beneficiaries and receive payment from Medicaid. The CMS periodically reviews and updates these standards to ensure they continue meeting the needs of beneficiaries and the healthcare industry. These accreditation standards are crucial in improving the quality of care provided to Medicaid beneficiaries and promoting accountability among managed care plans.[23][24]

CMS Deemed Status

CMS deemed status overview. Deemed status is a recognition assigned by the CMS to certain accrediting organizations. When an organization achieves deemed status, it has met the established Medicare and Medicaid compliance requirements. Therefore, a deemed healthcare facility or organization can participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs without undergoing further surveys or accreditation reviews by CMS. Deemed status is a vital component of the accreditation process, as organizations must maintain their eligibility status to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Achieving and maintaining deemed status requires continuous compliance with CMS requirements, including timely reporting and performance improvement initiatives. Deemed status has been implemented to enhance patient care quality.[25][26][27][28]

Benefits of deemed status for healthcare providers. Obtaining deemed status for healthcare providers can provide numerous benefits, such as streamlined administrative processes and reduced paperwork and administrative burdens. This can lead to cost savings passed on to patients through reduced healthcare costs. Additionally, deemed status can enhance the reputation of healthcare providers, as it signifies that they meet the high standards set forth by Medicare and Medicaid. This can attract more patients to these providers and can help to improve the quality of care delivered. Lastly, obtaining deemed status can mitigate legal and financial risks associated with noncompliance, resulting in costly penalties and legal fees. In summary, deemed status can help healthcare providers improve efficiency, reputation, and compliance, ultimately leading to better patient care.[29]

Deemed status impact on patient care and outcomes. The impact of deemed status on patient care and outcomes is significant. Through the deemed accreditation process, healthcare facilities are held to the same standards as those accredited through traditional methods, ensuring that quality patient care is provided. This leads to improved patient outcomes and experiences receiving care from facilities that have met rigorous quality and safety standards. Additionally, deemed status encourages healthcare providers to continuously assess and improve their practices to maintain accreditation, benefiting patient care. Notably, deemed status alone does not guarantee quality care, as continued monitoring and evaluation of healthcare facilities are necessary to ensure they deliver the best possible patient care.

Levels of Evidence

Care quality. Accreditation and deemed status have been linked to improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital mortality rates [Level 1 evidence]. Additionally, accreditation is associated with improved clinical quality in nursing homes [Level 2 evidence].[30]

Patient safety. Accreditation and deemed status require healthcare organizations to implement patient safety initiatives, such as reduced hospital-acquired infections and medication errors. Studies show that these initiatives improve patient safety and reduce healthcare costs [Level 1 evidence].[21][30]

Reimbursement. Medicare and Medicaid are major payers in the healthcare industry, and accreditation and deemed status are necessary for healthcare organizations to receive reimbursement for patient services [Level 3 evidence].[3][31]

Competitive advantage. Accreditation and deemed status can provide a competitive advantage for healthcare organizations by improving their reputation and attracting patients and healthcare professionals. Studies show accreditation is associated with higher patient satisfaction and improved hospital market share [Level 2 evidence].[32][33][34]

Regulatory compliance. Accreditation and deemed status require healthcare organizations to comply with regulatory requirements to protect patient safety and improve care quality. Compliance with these requirements can improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs [Level 1 evidence].[35]

Continuous improvement. Accreditation and deemed status require healthcare organizations to monitor and improve their processes and outcomes continuously. This can lead to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs over time. Studies show participation in quality improvement initiatives is associated with improved patient outcomes [Level 1 evidence].[21][35]

Navigating the Complexities of Accreditation and Deemed Status in Healthcare

In summary, navigating the intricacies of accreditation and deemed healthcare status can be challenging. Given the multitude of healthcare providers seeking to meet these standards and gain deemed status, it is imperative to grasp these designations' rigorous requirements and criteria. This understanding is essential for both healthcare providers and patients seeking high-quality care. Maintaining accreditation and deemed status is far more than just an administrative obligation; it is a fundamental component of delivering quality healthcare. Healthcare providers must remain vigilant about regulatory changes, adhere to national standards, and continuously assess their practices to ensure ongoing compliance. Patients reap the benefits of accredited and deemed status facilities, as these designations instill trust in the safety and high quality of care they receive. In an evolving healthcare landscape, a steadfast dedication to accreditation and deemed status will remain pivotal in ensuring that patients consistently receive the best possible care, aligning with healthcare quality and safety standards.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Collaboration of Healthcare Professionals in Medicare and Medicaid Accreditation. The accreditation and deemed status process for Medicare and Medicaid programs require the cooperation of various healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other allied health professionals. The interprofessional team should work together to ensure compliance with the CMS standards and regulations.[36]

Critical Role of Nurses in the Accreditation and Deemed Status Process. Nurses play a crucial role in the accreditation and deemed status process, as they are often responsible for implementing and maintaining the policies and procedures necessary for compliance. They can contribute to developing and revising policies and procedures to ensure that they are in accordance with CMS standards. Nurses can also facilitate communication between the healthcare team and patients to meet the patient's needs and concerns.[37]

Contributions of Pharmacists in Medicare and Medicaid Accreditation. Pharmacists can assist in the accreditation and deemed status process by reviewing medication-related policies and procedures, ensuring that they meet CMS standards, and monitoring the use of medications to promote patient safety. They can also educate other healthcare professionals on the proper use of medications and identify potential drug interactions or adverse effects.[38][39]

Physician's Role in Ensuring Compliance With CMS Standards. Physicians play a critical role in the accreditation and deemed status process by ensuring patient care is delivered according to CMS standards. They can contribute to developing clinical policies and procedures and monitor patient outcomes to ensure effective care.[40]

Effective Communication and Coordination in the Accreditation and Deemed Status Process. Effective communication and coordination among healthcare professionals are crucial to ensure the accreditation and deemed status process is successful. Clear lines of communication and clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each team member need to be established. Healthcare professionals should work together to identify and address any ethical concerns during the process.[41] 

Evidence for Interprofessional Team Interventions in Medicare and Medicaid Accreditation. Limited literature addresses the interprofessional team interventions for Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status. Most evidence available comes from case studies and expert opinions, categorizing them as level 5 evidence. However, the importance of interprofessional collaboration and communication has been widely recognized and supported by level 2 and 3 evidence.[8]

MEDICARE AND MEDICAID ACCREDITATION AND DEEMED STATUS CHECKLIST

This checklist can help organizations navigate the Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status process and ensure ongoing compliance.

  1. Determine the type of accreditation needed. There are different types of accreditation, such as hospital, home health agency, or hospice accreditation. Determine the type of accreditation required based on the services provided.
  2. Research accrediting organizations. Research accrediting organizations approved by the CMS, such as The Joint Commission, the AAAHC, or the Community Health Accreditation Partner (CHAP). Consider the organization's reputation, cost, and accreditation requirements.
  3. Meet the accreditation requirements. Review the accreditation requirements and ensure that the organization meets them. This may involve policy and procedure development, staff training, and quality improvement initiatives.
  4. Apply. Submit the accreditation application, the required documentation, and fees to the accrediting organization.
  5. Prepare for the survey. Prepare for the survey by reviewing the organization's policies and procedures, conducting mock surveys, and addressing any identified deficiencies.
  6. Complete the survey. The accrediting organization will conduct a survey to evaluate compliance with accreditation standards. Be prepared to provide documentation and answer questions during the survey.
  7. Address any deficiencies. If deficiencies are identified during the survey, develop and implement a plan of correction to address them.
  8. Receive accreditation. If the organization meets all accreditation requirements, it will receive accreditation.
  9. Maintain accreditation. Maintain accreditation by complying with ongoing requirements, such as submitting annual reports and participating in continuous quality improvement initiatives.
  10. Maintain deemed status. Once accredited, ensure ongoing compliance with CMS regulations to maintain deemed status. This involves ongoing monitoring, reporting, and compliance with CMS requirements.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring

Importance of Accreditation and Deemed Status for Medicare and Medicaid Programs. Research has shown that effective nursing and interprofessional team monitoring can improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. For example, a systematic literature review found that interprofessional team-based care can improve patient satisfaction, reduce hospital readmission, and decrease healthcare costs [Level 1 evidence].[21]

Role of Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Teams in Maintaining Accreditation and Deemed Status. Studies have found that effective nursing monitoring can improve patient safety and quality of care. For example, a study of nursing monitoring in a long-term care facility found that increased monitoring led to decreased falls and medication errors [Level 2 evidence].[42]

Benefits of Effective Nursing and Interprofessional Team Monitoring in Improving Patient Outcomes. Similarly, effective allied health monitoring can improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. A study of allied health monitoring in a hospital setting found that increased monitoring led to decreased patient length of stay and readmission [Level 2 evidence].[42]

Importance of Allied Health Monitoring in Maintaining Accreditation and Deemed Status. It is essential to understand the specific regulatory requirements to support further the importance of nursing, allied health, and interprofessional team monitoring in maintaining Medicare and Medicaid accreditation and deemed status. For example, the CMS requires nursing homes to have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, and a licensed nurse 24 hours a day. Additionally, nursing homes must conduct periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity and develop a plan of care that includes measurable objectives and timetables [Level 3 evidence][43]

Regulatory Requirements for Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring in Medicare and Medicaid Programs. Similarly, CMS requires hospitals to have an effective quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program that includes monitoring and tracking adverse events, patient outcomes, and compliance with regulatory requirements. This program should involve interprofessional teams, including nursing and allied health professionals, and should include a process for analyzing data and implementing improvement initiatives [Level of Evidence].[44][45][21] 

Discussion

Medicare and Medicaid are 2 government-sponsored healthcare programs that provide coverage for certain groups of individuals. Accreditation and deemed status are essential for healthcare organizations that participate in these programs, as they indicate that the organization meets specific standards of care. Nursing, allied health, and interprofessional team monitoring ensure that healthcare organizations maintain accreditation and deemed status. These teams work together to provide comprehensive and effective patient care while meeting regulatory requirements. Research has shown that effective monitoring can improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Regulatory requirements further emphasize the importance of these teams in providing high-quality care and meeting regulatory standards.

References


[1]

Boufford JI. Crisis, leadership, consensus: the past and future federal role in health. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1999 Jun:76(2):192-206     [PubMed PMID: 10924029]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[2]

Zinn J, Getzen T. Developing key laboratory performance indicators: a feasibility study. Potential roles for CLMA. Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association. 1995 May-Jun:9(3):178-98     [PubMed PMID: 10143165]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[3]

Joint Commission. Accepted: changes to requirements for deemed status ambulatory surgical centers. Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2009 Apr:29(4):12-3, 15     [PubMed PMID: 19492511]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Murphy M, Duff J, Whitney J, Canales B, Markham MJ, Close J. Implementation of a mock root cause analysis to provide simulated patient safety training. BMJ open quality. 2017:6(2):e000096. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000096. Epub 2017 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 29450282]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[5]

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare and Medicaid programs: revisions to deeming authority survey, certification, and enforcement procedures. Final rule. Federal register. 2015 May 22:80(99):29795-840     [PubMed PMID: 26003965]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Kim J, Choi EY, Lee W, Oh HM, Pyo J, Ock M, Kim SY, Lee SI. Feasibility of Capturing Adverse Events From Insurance Claims Data Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Codes Coupled to Present on Admission Indicators. Journal of patient safety. 2022 Aug 1:18(5):404-409. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000932. Epub 2021 Dec 17     [PubMed PMID: 35948289]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[7]

Humphreys H, Vos M, Presterl E, Hell M. Greater attention to flexible hospital designs and ventilated clinical facilities are a pre-requisite for coping with the next airborne pandemic. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2023 May 12:():. pii: S1198-743X(23)00238-0. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 12     [PubMed PMID: 37182640]


[8]

Balio CP, Yeager VA, Beitsch LM. Perceptions of Public Health 3.0: Concordance Between Public Health Agency Leaders and Employees. Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. 2019 Mar/Apr:25 Suppl 2, Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey 2017(2 Suppl):S103-S112. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000903. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30720623]


[9]

Alam L, Alam M, Malik AM, Faraid V. Is Telemedicine our cup of tea? A nationwide cross-sectional survey regarding doctors' experience and perceptions. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2021 Sep-Oct:37(5):1319-1325. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.3970. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34475905]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[10]

Kehl KL, Liao KP, Krause TM, Giordano SH. Access to Accredited Cancer Hospitals Within Federal Exchange Plans Under the Affordable Care Act. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2017 Feb 20:35(6):645-651. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9835. Epub 2017 Jan 9     [PubMed PMID: 28068172]


[11]

Johanson JF. Continuous quality improvement in the ambulatory endoscopy center. Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America. 2002 Apr:12(2):351-65     [PubMed PMID: 12180166]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[12]

Greene ME, Goldman RE, Hutter MM. Selection of patient-reported outcomes measures for implementation in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2023 Aug:19(8):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.01.031. Epub 2023 Feb 9     [PubMed PMID: 37037688]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Haurani MJ, Kiser D, Vaccaro PS, Satiani B. Addition of Efficiency Measures to Current Accuracy Measures in the Vascular Laboratory Can Be Used for Future Accreditation and Payment Models. Annals of vascular surgery. 2020 May:65():145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.028. Epub 2020 Jan 3     [PubMed PMID: 31904519]


[14]

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2019 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update and CY 2020 Case-Mix Adjustment Methodology Refinements; Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model; Home Health Quality Reporting Requirements; Home Infusion Therapy Requirements; and Training Requirements for Surveyors of National Accrediting Organizations. Final rule with comment period. Federal register. 2018 Nov 13:83(219):56406-638     [PubMed PMID: 30457255]


[15]

Mahlmeister L. Crosswalk: the joint commission and centers for medicare and medicaid services pathway to patient safety and quality. The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing. 2015 Apr-Jun:29(2):107-15; quiz E1. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000093. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25919601]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Ma C, Dutton HJ, Wu B. Quality of care in home health agencies with and without accreditation: a cohort study. Home health care services quarterly. 2023 Jan-Mar:42(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2022.2123756. Epub 2022 Sep 18     [PubMed PMID: 36117455]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[17]

Periyakoil VS, von Gunten CF, Bowman B, Emanuel E, Smith TJ. Incentives for Palliative Care. Journal of palliative medicine. 2022 Jul:25(7):1024-1030. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0280. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35775898]


[18]

Lippe MP, Davis A. Development of a Primary Palliative Nursing Care Competence Model and Assessment Tool: A Mixed-Methods Study. Nursing education perspectives. 2023 Mar-Apr 01:44(2):76-81. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001056. Epub 2022 Sep 30     [PubMed PMID: 36240024]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[19]

Stevenson D, Sinclair N, Krone E, Bramson J. Trends in Hospice Quality Oversight and Key Challenges to Making it More Effective, 2006-2015. Journal of palliative medicine. 2019 Jun:22(6):670-676. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0445. Epub 2019 Jan 9     [PubMed PMID: 30625006]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[20]

. Medicare program; recognition of the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. for ambulatory surgical centers program-HCFA. Final notice. Federal register. 1998 Dec 2:63(231):66554-6     [PubMed PMID: 10338879]


[21]

Battard Menendez J. The impetus for legislation revoking the Joint Commission's deemed status as a Medicare accrediting agency. JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation. 2010 Jul-Sep:12(3):69-76; quiz 77-8. doi: 10.1097/NHL.0b013e3181ee276f. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20733410]


[22]

. CMS gives National Committee on quality assurance authority to accredit Medicare+Choice organizations. Health care law monthly. 2002 Feb:():8     [PubMed PMID: 12436735]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[23]

Kim JG, Rodriguez HP, Shortell SM, Fuller B, Holmboe ES, Rittenhouse DR. Factors Associated With Family Medicine and Internal Medicine First-Year Residents' Ambulatory Care Training Time. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2021 Mar 1:96(3):433-440. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003522. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32496285]


[24]

Wadhera RK, Vaduganathan M, Jiang GY, Song Y, Xu J, Shen C, Bhatt DL, Yeh RW, Fonarow GC. Performance in Federal Value-Based Programs of Hospitals Recognized by the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology for High-Quality Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction Care. JAMA cardiology. 2020 May 1:5(5):515-521. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32074242]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[25]

Rosenkrantz AB, Hawkins CM, Ryu RK, Duszak R Jr. Clinical Practice Characteristics of Radiologists Based on American Board of Radiology Interventional Radiology Certification Status. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2020 Jan:214(1):149-155. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21878. Epub 2019 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 31670588]


[26]

Dick AW, Bell JM, Stone ND, Chastain AM, Sorbero M, Stone PW. Nursing home adoption of the National Healthcare Safety Network Long-term Care Facility Component. American journal of infection control. 2019 Jan:47(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 30227943]


[27]

Rudolph NV, Montgomery MA. Low-income Medicare beneficiaries and their experiences with the part D prescription drug benefit. Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. 2010 Summer:47(2):162-72     [PubMed PMID: 20812464]


[28]

Morse BC, Boland BN, Blackhurst DW, Roettger RH. Analysis of Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services 'Never Events' in Elderly Patients Undergoing Bowel Operations, USA. The American surgeon. 2010 Aug 1:76(8):841-845     [PubMed PMID: 28958240]


[29]

MacDowell M, Glasser M, Fitts M, Nielsen K, Hunsaker M. A national view of rural health workforce issues in the USA. Rural and remote health. 2010 Jul-Sep:10(3):1531     [PubMed PMID: 20658893]


[30]

Payton J. Assuring the Quality of Care: Understanding Common Deficiencies in Outpatient Dialysis Facilities. Nephrology nursing journal : journal of the American Nephrology Nurses' Association. 2022 Mar-Apr:49(2):153-156     [PubMed PMID: 35503691]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

. HCFA extends survey cycle for home health agencies with deemed status. Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 1997 May-Jun:17(3):1, 4     [PubMed PMID: 10175835]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[32]

Lansdale AJ, Kaplan RM. Explanations for variations in hospital expenditures among four large California counties. BMC health services research. 2023 Apr 22:23(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09390-y. Epub 2023 Apr 22     [PubMed PMID: 37087458]


[33]

Newhouse JP. Commentary on: The effects of coding intensity in Medicare advantage on plan benefits and finances. Health services research. 2021 Apr:56(2):175-177. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13639. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33730765]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[34]

Jacobs PD, Kronick R. The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances. Health services research. 2021 Apr:56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9     [PubMed PMID: 33165932]


[35]

Kim DU. The quest for quality blood banking program in the new millennium the American way. International journal of hematology. 2002 Aug:76 Suppl 2():258-62     [PubMed PMID: 12430934]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[36]

Damewood RB, Blair PG, Park YS, Lupi LK, Newman RW, Sachdeva AK. "Taking Training to the Next Level": The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey. Journal of surgical education. 2017 Nov-Dec:74(6):e95-e105. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 7     [PubMed PMID: 28781132]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[37]

Treiger TM. Long-Term Services and Supports: A Primer for Case Managers: Part 2. Professional case management. 2019 May/Jun:24(3):114-129. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000335. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30946248]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[38]

Trofe-Clark J, Kaiser T, Pilch N, Taber D. Value of solid organ transplant-trained pharmacists in transplant infectious diseases. Current infectious disease reports. 2015 Apr:17(4):475. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0475-8. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25870143]


[39]

Olmastroni E, Galimberti F, Tragni E, Catapano AL, Casula M. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Chronic Therapies: A Systematic Review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023 Feb 21:20(5):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053825. Epub 2023 Feb 21     [PubMed PMID: 36900831]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[40]

Emberger J, Tassone D, Stevens MP, Markley JD. The Current State of Antimicrobial Stewardship: Challenges, Successes, and Future Directions. Current infectious disease reports. 2018 Jun 29:20(9):31. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0637-6. Epub 2018 Jun 29     [PubMed PMID: 29959545]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[41]

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Standards changes for ambulatory surgical centers that use deemed status. Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2012 Feb:32(2):3     [PubMed PMID: 22439373]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[42]

Sidiropoulos N, Daley SK, Briggs M, Fernandes H, Lockwood CM, Mahmoud AZ, Merker JD, Vasalos P, Wielgos LM, Moncur JT, Farkas DH. Most Frequently Cited Accreditation Inspection Deficiencies for Clinical Molecular Oncology Testing Laboratories and Opportunities for Improvement. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2022 Dec 1:146(12):1441-1449. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0448-CP. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35438717]


[43]

Stull GA. Accreditation in the allied health professions. Journal of allied health. 1989 Fall:18(5):425-35     [PubMed PMID: 2584131]


[44]

Skydel JJ, Egilman AC, Wallach JD, Ramachandran R, Gupta R, Ross JS. Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017. JAMA health forum. 2022 May:3(5):e221158. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1158. Epub 2022 May 27     [PubMed PMID: 35977252]


[45]

. "One-hour rule" effective for hospitals seeking deemed status. Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2000 Sep-Oct:20(5):15, 19     [PubMed PMID: 11147542]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence