Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with an estimated 134,490 new cases in 2016 and 49,190 deaths. Most colorectal cancers occur sporadically; however, inherited cancer syndromes or inherited mutations cause approximately 5% to 10% of cases. The most common hereditary form of hereditary colorectal cancer is Lynch syndrome, also known as Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome (HNPCC). Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome is clinically important because the marked increase lifetime risk of colorectal cancer ranges up to 80% and lifetime risk of endometrial cancer ranges up to 60%. Furthermore, there is an increased risk for other primary cancers including gastric, ovarian, small bowel, urothelial (ureter, renal pelvis), biliary tract, pancreatic, brain cancers (glioblastoma), sebaceous gland adenomas, and keratoacanthomas.
Lynch syndrome results from a germline mutation in one of four mismatch repair (MMR) genes called MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Large deletions in a non-mismatch repair gene, called epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EPCAM) which silences MSH2 expression, have also been found to cause Lynch syndrome. Mismatch repair genes are necessary for repairing incorrect pairing of nucleotide bases during DNA replication. If these “mismatches” are not corrected, then the resulting copy may not function properly leading to an increased risk for cancer. Individuals with Lynch syndrome are born with one functional allele (copy) of a specific gene and one non-functional allele of a specific gene due to an inherited mutation. The risk for cancer occurs when a mutation is acquired in the functional allele. Of note, on the rare occasion, an individual is not born with Lynch syndrome but develops a tumor with loss of both alleles leading somatic loss of the MMR proteins. Screening for Lynch syndrome can be performed on colorectal and endometrial tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for the four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) and/or microsatellite instability testing (MSI).
Lynch syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Thus first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, children) have a 50% chance to be affected with Lynch syndrome.
Lynch syndrome accounts for 2% to 4% of all colorectal cancer cases and approximately 2.5% of endometrial cancer cases. In fact, one out of 35 colorectal cancers and one out of 50 endometrial cancers is attributable to Lynch syndrome. The mean age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in affected patients is 44 to 61 years, while for endometrial cancer mean age at diagnosis is 48 to 62 years.
Individuals with Lynch syndrome tend to have fewer than ten adenomatous polyps cumulatively in their life. Adenomas are commonly seen in patients younger than the age of 40 and frequently have a villous growth pattern with moderate to high-grade dysplasia. Adenomas in individuals with Lynch syndrome tend to transform to cancers more rapidly than in individuals in the general population with adenomas. Both adenomas and colon tumors associated with Lynch syndrome occur most frequently on the right side of the colon. Tumors are also noted to have a characteristic phenotype, including poor differentiated medullary-type carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cells, and a Crohn-like reaction with infiltrating lymphocytes.
Screening and subsequent germline mutation testing typically identify patients with Lynch syndrome. Those at risk for Lynch syndrome may be identified if they have a personal or family history of malignancy and meet clinical criteria, for example, the Amsterdam II or Revised Bethesda guidelines (Table 1), for screening. Further, patients with colorectal cancer who are found to have microsatellite instability in a tumor sample can be diagnosed with Lynch syndrome if they have a germline mutation in a mismatch repair gene. An individual with Lynch syndrome is at increased risk of colonic and extracolonic tumors, including endometrial, ovarian, upper gastrointestinal tract, urothelial, pancreatic, and brain cancers.
Current approaches to screening guidelines for Lynch syndrome are published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends immunohistochemical staining of the mismatch repair proteins in all colorectal cancer tumors in all patients with colorectal cancer younger than age 70 and those older than age 70 meeting Bethesda criteria and endometrial tumors diagnosed in patients younger than the age of 50.
The two methods used to screen for Lynch syndrome are immunohistochemical staining and/or microsatellite instability testing. Concordance is high between these tests, and both have been found to be highly sensitive and specific; both have a false negative rate of about 5% to 10%.
Immunohistochemical staining is performed on a tumor sample to look for expression of proteins encoded by mismatch repair genes. If staining for expression of all mismatch repair proteins is present, a mismatch repair gene mutation is unlikely to be present. This is a normal result and referred to as mismatch repair-proficient. If staining is negative for expression of at least one mismatch repair protein, this is referred to as mismatch repair-deficient, and germline genetic testing should be offered. Of note, if immunohistochemical staining for MLH1 (either alone or with PMS2) is abnormal (not expressed) in colorectal tumor tissue, this should be followed by testing for BRAF V600E mutation or hypomethylation of the MLH1 promoter (in blood or normal tissue). If this testing is positive, it suggests a sporadic colorectal cancer rather than Lynch syndrome, and if negative germline mutation testing for Lynch syndrome should follow. For more information, please refer to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Screening Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer.
Microsatellite instability is another screening test for Lynch syndrome and is characterized by variations in length of repetitive DNA sequences known as microsatellites in the human genome which occur as a result of the loss of mismatch repair activity. Identification of microsatellite instability technique involves testing for nucleotide markers. If a tumor is found to have a certain proportion of abnormal microsatellite repeat markers, it is considered to be microsatellite instability-high. mismatch repair-proficient is generally equivalent to microsatellite instability-low. The great majority of Lynch syndrome tumors are microsatellite instability-high; however, this pattern can be observed sporadic colorectal cancers thus germline testing is recommended for microsatellite instability-high tumors.
Among sporadic colorectal cancers, 10% to 15% exhibit deficiency of at least one mismatch repair protein and/or are microsatellite instability-high most often as a result of abnormal methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter and not due to Lynch syndrome. Therefore, screening with microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemical staining alone is not adequate to diagnosed Lynch syndrome and must be followed by germline mutation testing. This is accomplished by DNA sequencing and large rearrangement analysis. Genetic testing should be preceded by genetic counseling due to the complexities of test selection.
Patients identified to have abnormal immunohistochemical staining and/or abnormal microsatellite instability testing, but in whom germline testing does not reveal a mutation may be a result of a double somatic mismatch repair gene mutations in the tumor DNA or may still have undetected Lynch syndrome and management should be based on the personal/family history.
Clinical Testing Criteria (based on personal and family history)
Assessment for Lynch syndrome begins with taking a thorough family cancer history, which includes both maternal and paternal relatives and at least three generations made up of first, second, and third-degree relatives. All cancers should be noted, including the age of diagnosis, if available. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome should be considered for patients who meet:
Table 1. Amsterdam II Criteria and Revised Bethesda Guidelines
A. Amsterdam II Criteria
B. Revised Bethesda Guidelines
* Lynch syndrome-related cancers include colorectal, endometrial, gastric, ovarian, pancreas, ureter and renal pelvis, biliary tract, brain (usually glioblastoma as seen in Turcot syndrome), and small intestinal cancers, as well as sebaceous gland adenomas and keratoacanthoma (as seen in Muir-Torre syndrome).
Use of Amsterdan and Bethesda criteria to identify patients with Lynch syndrome misses approximately 50%, whereas about 50% of patients meeting criteria do not have Lynch syndrome.
Individuals identified by tumor testing with immunohistochemical staining and/or microsatellite instability or meeting testing criteria are recommended to consider Lynch syndrome-specific gene testing or multi-gene testing of affected family members is encouraged; however, when no affected member is available, testing of unaffected individuals should be considered.
Lynch Syndrome Management
Individuals found to have a deleterious Lynch syndrome mutation are at increased cancer risk with the greatest risk of colorectal and endometrial cancers, followed by gastric and ovarian cancers. Fortunately, there are risk management guidelines for carriers of Lynch syndrome which are associated with a decrease in cancer-related deaths. Recommended surveillance for Lynch syndrome carriers is outlined as follows:
Screening/Risk Reduction Guidelines for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM mutation carriers
Endometrium (Uterus) and Ovaries in females
Hysterectomy with Salpingo-Oophorectomy (Females)
Other Extracolonic Cancers (**MLH1, MSH2 and EPCAM mutation carriers only)
** The risk for other Lynch syndrome-related malignancies is reported to be low in MSH6 and PMS2 carriers; due to limited data, the NCCN does not make recommendations for management for these other MSH6- and PMS2-related malignancies at this time. Recommendations can be made by treating physician(s).
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
A diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in a patient can also be of significance for at-risk family members. Patients should be advised to discuss with family members regarding possible cancer risk and their opportunity for testing, screening, and surveillance. At-risk family members should be offered genetic counseling, and testing if desired.
Lynch syndrome is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. The mechanism underlying this disease involves inherited mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, leading to inadequate expression and function of their proteins. Mutations in mismatch repair genes have been discovered and implicated in this disease, and clinical features have been identified and tailored to identify at-risk patients. As Lynch syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, screening and identifying patients with Lynch syndrome and Lynch syndrome-associated cancers is imperative to decrease mortality and morbidity associated with this disease.
Lynch syndrome is best managed by an interprofessional team including oncology nurses. Besides the patient, it is important to monitor the carrier of the genes. Lynch syndrome carriers are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancers and extracolonic cancers including endometrial, gastric, ovarian, pancreas, ureter and renal pelvis, biliary tract, brain (usually glioblastoma as seen in Turcot syndrome), small intestinal cancers, and sebaceous gland adenomas, and keratoacanthoma (as seen in Muir-Torre syndrome). Screening for colorectal cancers has shown proven beneficial in detecting colorectal cancers and reducing mortality, while the value of screening for extracolonic cancers remains unclear. Ongoing research may better delineate risk and guidelines for screening, surveillance, and treatment of Lynch syndrome carriers.
|||Lim A,Rao P,Matin SF, Lynch syndrome and urologic malignancies: a contemporary review. Current opinion in urology. 2019 Apr 30; [PubMed PMID: 31045926]|
|||Shih AR,Kradin RL, Malignant mesothelioma in Lynch syndrome: A report of two cases and a review of the literature. American journal of industrial medicine. 2019 May; [PubMed PMID: 31033031]|
|||Kaur RJ,Pichurin PN,Hines JM,Singh RJ,Grebe SK,Bancos I, Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma Associated With Lynch Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2019 Apr 1; [PubMed PMID: 30963136]|
|||Gupta D,Heinen CD, The mismatch repair-dependent DNA damage response: Mechanisms and implications. DNA repair. 2019 Apr 1; [PubMed PMID: 30959407]|
|||Clark SK, Management of genetically determined colorectal cancer. The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. 2019 Mar 29; [PubMed PMID: 30935877]|
|||Duraturo F,Liccardo R,De Rosa M,Izzo P, Genetics, diagnosis and treatment of Lynch syndrome: Old lessons and current challenges. Oncology letters. 2019 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 30867733]|
|||Fadare O,Parkash V, Pathology of Endometrioid and Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary. Surgical pathology clinics. 2019 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 31097114]|
|||Ryan NAJ,Glaire MA,Blake D,Cabrera-Dandy M,Evans DG,Crosbie EJ, The proportion of endometrial cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2019 May 14; [PubMed PMID: 31086306]|
|||Vleugels JLA,van Neerven SM,van Leerdam ME,Wanders LK,de Wit M,Carvalho B,Delis-van Diemen PM,Kallenberg FGJ,Vermeulen L,Beliën JA,East JE,Meijer GA,Dekker E, CD31-positive microvessel density within adenomas of Lynch Syndrome patients is similar compared to adenomas of non-Lynch patients. Endoscopy international open. 2019 May; [PubMed PMID: 31073537]|
|||Foretová L, Hereditary cancer syndromes, their testing and prevention. Casopis lekaru ceskych. 2019 Spring; [PubMed PMID: 31046387]|