Allergic and Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis

Nancy Finnigan; Preeti Rout; Stephen Leslie; Khalid Bashir

Allergic and Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Free Review Questions

Continuing Education Activity

Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (DI-AIN), also called allergic acute interstitial nephritis, is the most common cause of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) in developed countries. DI-AIN is associated with a sharp decline in renal function, often requiring dialysis, and has the potential for permanent renal insufficiency, especially if left untreated. Differentiating from other causes of acute kidney injury and discontinuing the causative medication is key to early reversibility. Renal biopsy is the definitive diagnostic test for AIN, and barring chronic changes seen on biopsy or contraindications, steroid therapy is the preferred treatment. This activity discusses the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical symptomatology, and treatment while emphasizing the interprofessional team's role in managing allergic interstitial nephritis.

Objectives:

Identify potential allergic and drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis cases by recognizing varied presentations and conducting a thorough medication history review.
Differentiate allergic and drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis from other causes of acute kidney injury through clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, and renal biopsy if indicated.
Apply evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of allergic and drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis, including the judicious use of corticosteroids when indicated, weighing the potential benefits against risks.
Coordinate care and follow-up for patients with allergic and drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis to monitor renal function, medication adjustments, and potential long-term consequences, aiming for optimal outcomes.

Introduction

Interstitial nephritis was first described in 1898 by William Thomas Councilman, chief pathologist at Brigham Hospital, who noted nonsuppurative interstitial lesions on autopsies of patients with streptococcal infections, and this term is used to describe various immune-mediated kidney disorders that cause significant inflammatory cell infiltration of the renal interstitium and tubules while sparing the glomeruli.[1][2][3]

The most common form of AIN in developed countries is caused by drug exposure, estimated at 70% to 75% of cases. DI-AIN is a frequent causative agent of acute kidney injury (AKI), responsible for about 20% of renal biopsies performed for unexplained AKI.[1] AIN is associated with an acute decline in renal function and may progress to permanent renal insufficiency or even end-stage renal disease (ESRD).[3] AIN has been defined as an increase of 0.5 mg/dL or 50% in serum creatinine over a 24- to 72-hour period starting 24 to 48 hours after exposure to a potential triggering medication.[4][5]

The classic clinical presentation of AIN characterized by fever, rash, and eosinophilia was prominently associated with methicillin use, which occurred in about 17% of cases. However, this specific presentation is less common with other medications known to cause AIN.[6] Identification and discontinuation of the offending medication are the mainstays of treatment, with conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of steroid treatment.[7][8][9][10] With early recognition and proper treatment, AIN and its associated renal failure are generally reversible.[7]

For information on other causes of interstitial nephritis (genetic, idiopathic, infectious, immune-mediated, and associated with various systemic inflammatory disorders), as well as anti-tubular basement membrane disease and tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome (TINU), see our companion StatPearls reference article on Tubulointerstitial Nephritis. Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease is also described elsewhere.[11][12]

Etiology

NSAIDs are the most common class of drugs causing DI-AIN, responsible for 44% of cases.[7][10][13][14][15] Antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, rifampin, sulfonamides, and ciprofloxacin account for about 33% of DI-AIN.[13]

Different medication classes causing DI-AIN have distinct presentations and are associated with specific patient demographics.

NSAIDs are very commonly used both as a prescription and over-the-counter. Patients with NSAID-induced AIN tend to be older than 50 years and are frequently chronic users with significant comorbidities or some degree of preexisting renal dysfunction.[15] Associated characteristics of Allergic Interstitial Nephritis (AIN) include significant proteinuria, which may even reach nephrotic range levels (3 grams or more of urinary protein per day), longer latency periods, less complete renal recovery, and minimal change disease. Clinical presentation is less likely to show eosinophilia, eosinophiluria, rashes, fevers, hematuria, or arthralgias than patients with AIN from other triggering drugs.[15][16][17] All NSAIDs can produce AIN, but nonselective agents, such as aspirin, ibuprofen, and sulindac, tend to produce less DI-AIN.[18][19]

Proton pump inhibitors are an increasing cause of AIN, with an estimated 12/100,000 population incidence.[20] In some studies, they are the second most common underlying trigger for DI-AIN.[21][22] The severity of AIN from proton pump inhibitors is somewhat less than from other medications, such as antibiotics, but the likelihood of recovery is also reduced.[23][24]

Beta-lactams are the class of drugs most likely to demonstrate the classic triad of symptoms (fever, rash, and arthralgias), produce eosinophilia, and develop a pure form of allergic/hypersensitivity reaction histologically. Patients with a prior penicillin or cephalosporin reaction are more likely to develop this.[25]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies used for cancer therapy and are an increasingly significant cause of AIN.[26] Clinical and histological presentations are similar to other cases of AIN, but patients tend to have a longer latency period, reduced level of AKI, and a slower recovery of renal function.[15][27] There also appears to be an association with the simultaneous use of proton pump inhibitors.[28][29][30][31] AIN from immune checkpoint inhibitors poses a significant therapeutic dilemma since there are no reasonable alternative medications for many cancer patients, making it difficult or impossible to discontinue the offending drug safely.[15][32][15]

Other drug classes that have demonstrated a tendency to produce AIN include sulfa drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antiepileptics (phenytoin), antivirals, and histamine-2 antagonists.[4]

Numerous case reports in the literature regarding other medication culprits demonstrate the need for ongoing consideration of DI-AIN as a potential cause of worsening renal function after initiation of drug therapy. More than 250 drugs have been described as triggering agents for DI-AIN.[33] Polypharmacy, particularly in the older population, can make identification of the causative agent challenging in many cases.[34][35][36][37]

Epidemiology

The frequency of AIN and DI-AIN is likely underestimated, as the diagnosis can only be definitively confirmed with the histological evaluation from a renal biopsy.[15] In practice, renal biopsies are often deferred as clinical suspicion often guides therapy, especially if the patient's symptoms and renal function improve within 7 days of drug discontinuation.[15] Given the lack of solid evidence to pursue immunosuppressant therapy, a biopsy often does not change the treatment plan beyond discontinuing the likely offending agent.

The increased use of NSAIDs, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors in most countries globally has contributed to a worldwide increase in DI-AIN diagnosis, even though it represents less than fifteen percent of all reported adverse drug reactions.[15][33] Older patients are particularly susceptible to AIN due to chronic use of triggering medications, preexisting renal disorders, and polypharmacy.[15][38] The most common triggers are NSAIDs, proton pump inhibitors, and penicillins, while systemic causes are less likely in older AIN patients.[23][38]

Older patients with AIN are more likely to have preexisting chronic kidney disease, higher baseline creatinine levels, increased levels of proteinuria, and a greater need for dialysis than younger patients.[23][39] Although more likely to develop AIN, older patients may not be considered good candidates for a renal biopsy for various reasons, which may cause the overall prevalence to be further underestimated in this population group.

Pathophysiology

Renal parenchyma is prone to cellular damage for many reasons, including high metabolic activity with a relatively limited blood supply, greater exposure to higher concentrations of drugs than other organs, active tubule transport systems further increasing drug exposure, and a high osmotic environment.[7][40] Several mechanisms of inflammatory pathway activation appear to be involved, including hapten-mediated immune activation, direct drug stimulation of T-cells, medication-induced renal tubular cell damage, tubular crystallization of medications, and antibody-mediated cellular injury.[15]

The underlying pathophysiology of DI-AIN is thought to be a type IV idiosyncratic T-cell–mediated delayed hypersensitivity reaction.[15][41] It is primarily a cell-mediated immunological process, as evidenced by high numbers of activated T-cells in renal biopsies of DI-AIN patients.[42] Drug-specific T-cells have also been identified in the renal interstitium of biopsy-proven DI-AIN patients in research settings.[43][44]

Haptens are small molecules that become immunogenic only when attached to a larger molecule, most often a protein. Drugs causing AIN are endocytosed by interstitial or tubular cells, becoming haptens.[15][33][42][43][45] As the tubular epithelial cells process the drug haptens, adjacent renal interstitial dendritic cells near the basolateral basement membrane are mobilized and migrate to the regional lymph nodes to activate T-cells further.[15][46] These activated T-cells eventually reach the damaged renal tubular cells and produce cytokines and proinflammatory chemokines.[15][47] The initiation of the inflammatory process results in fibroblast proliferation, macrophage migration, and localized edema, producing AIN's characteristic inflammatory interstitial infiltrate.[15][47]

Several drugs can also directly cause local and regional T-cell stimulation and activation.[15][45][48] Others may cause kidney tubular damage directly or indirectly via cross-reactivity between some medications, the renal tubular basement membrane (TBM), and interstitial antigens.[15][49][50][51]

Some medications or their metabolites are relatively insoluble in the urine, resulting in drug crystal precipitation in the distal tubular lumens. This causes renal tubular obstruction and injury, as well as localized inflammation resulting in AKI and AIN.[52] Examples of drugs with poor urinary solubility include antibiotics (ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides), antivirals (acyclovir, indinavir), methotrexate, and triamterene.[4]

Although the predominant pathophysiology of AIN is related to cytotoxic T-cell activity, antibody-mediated cellular injury is sometimes involved.[15] Methicillin, for example, is associated with granular immune complex deposition on the tubular basement membrane and a TBM-specific hapten.[15][53] Similarly, AIN from rifampin demonstrates anti-rifampin antibodies.[15]

There also appears to be an association between some human leukocyte antigen (HLA) histocompatibility genotypes and AIN.[54] Specifically, individuals with greater HLA-DR and HLA-DQ expression showed a positive correlation with the risk of AIN, DI-AIN severity, and increased interstitial T-lymphocyte infiltration.[54][55]

In severe, chronic cases, extensive fibroblastic infiltration is associated with increased extracellular matrix production, which promotes further renal tubular cellular damage, ultimately leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and chronic kidney disease.[15][43]

Histopathology

DI-AIN can be definitively diagnosed only by renal biopsy, characterized by an inflammatory infiltrate in the renal interstitium and tubules that typically does not involve the glomeruli.[7][15][41] Light microscopy shows interstitial inflammation with a predominance of T-lymphocytes, both CD4+ and CD8+, along with eosinophils, whose presence near the tubular basement membrane is diagnostic of AIN. Neutrophils and plasma cells may also be present. The inflammatory infiltrate is typically associated with interstitial edema and tubulitis. An altered brush border, prominent nucleoli, cytoplasmic vacuolization, tubular dilation, and disruption of the tubular basement membrane characterize Tubulitis. Immunofluorescence will usually not show a specific immunoglobulin or complement pattern, and electron microscopy is useful in diagnosing NSAID-induced AIN, causing a minimal change in disease.[43][56]

The glomeruli and renal vasculature are usually not involved, and fibrosis is minimal unless exposure has been ongoing and chronic interstitial nephritis has developed. Older AIN patients tend to have more tubular atrophy, fibrosis, and sclerotic glomeruli.[23] The presence of fibrosis or tubular atrophy indicates that steroids may not be helpful, as the acute inflammatory phase (which steroids suppress) has been completed.[57] [58]

Granulomatous interstitial nephritis is a less common presentation of DI-AIN. It is associated with NSAIDs and antimicrobials like vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. Granulomas are formed by macrophages and multinucleated giant cells, often due to the inability to eradicate the offending antigen.[15]

History and Physical

The initial workup should include a thorough history and physical examination with particular attention to over-the-counter medications such as NSAIDs, proton pump inhibitors, and any recently introduced drugs. Symptoms may appear within a few days or be delayed weeks or months after exposure to the triggering medication.[15] Earlier presentation is typically associated with prior exposure to the offending drugs.[59][60][61]

Patients with DI-AIN may present with the classic triad of rash, fever, and eosinophilia (in 10% of cases) but more often present with nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, malaise, and nausea.[7][41][62] When present, rashes or skin eruptions are highly suggestive of DI-AIN. Skin manifestations are variable but most often described as a maculopapular or morbilliform rash, although diffuse erythroderma or even toxic epidermal necrolysis may be present.[15][38] Many patients will demonstrate hypertension due to increased angiotensin II activity from interstitial inflammation, causing arterial vasoconstriction and increased water and sodium retention.[63][64][65][66][67] Patients are not usually oliguric until advanced AKI develops and may even be polyuric due to impaired tubular concentrating ability.[2]

Evaluation

AIN and DI-AIN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any patient with worsening renal function, especially if they have recently been exposed to new medications. Worsening renal function, eosinophilia, increased levels of serum IgE, eosinophiluria, sterile pyuria, proteinuria, WBC casts in the urine, and microscopic hematuria are common laboratory findings.[7][2] While traditionally considered diagnostic of DI-AIN, eosinophiluria can no longer be considered a reliable test due to a sensitivity of 40% with a positive predictive value of just 38%.[15][25]

Proteinuria is frequently found in DI-AIN (40% of cases) due to the release of a cytokine-like permeability-enhancing factor from interstitial inflammatory cells, preexisting underlying glomerular disease, or new glomerular injury from AIN-related cytokines.[2][68] Nephrotic-range proteinuria (3 grams or more per day) is often encountered in NSAID-induced AIN.[16]

One study found that glucosuria in patients without diabetes highly suggests tubular injury related to AIN and is often associated with low serum phosphorus, uric acid, and bicarbonate levels from impaired tubular reabsorption.[2]

There is no available imaging test that will reliably diagnose patients for AIN. Ultrasound or CT scans are frequently used to identify and exclude hydronephrosis or obstructive uropathy in cases of newly discovered azotemia but may show nonspecific kidney enlargement or enhanced echogenicity of the renal cortex in AIN.[3][25][42]

Investigational Tests

A higher ratio of urinary proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory macrophages has been suggested to help distinguish AIN from other renal disorders.[69] The lymphocyte transformation test measures the degree of lymphocytic proliferation in the presence of a specific medication. This can help identify the critical triggering drug in challenging situations such as cancer treatment, where discontinuing a critical chemotherapy agent can have serious consequences.[15][70]

Several urinary biomarkers are being investigated for possible use in diagnosing and monitoring AIN. These include monocyte chemotactic peptide-1, alpha1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin, KIM-1, sC5b-9, TNF-α, IL-9, and CXCL9.[7][57][71][72][73][74][75] Of these, the most clinically promising appears to be the following:

TNF-α and IL-9 are consistently elevated in patients with interstitial nephritis compared to other forms of kidney disease and normal controls.[75][58]

CXCL9, an interstitial nephritis-promoting chemokine associated with lymphocytic chemotaxis, also appears quite promising as a biomarker for AIN, with urinary levels more than 7-fold higher in patients with the disorder than controls.[7][73][76]

Treatment / Management

In patients with suspected or confirmed AIN or drug-induced interstitial nephritis, the mainstay of treatment is the withdrawal and discontinuation of the offending agent.[15][77][15]

If the withdrawal of the likely offending drug does not result in a substantial improvement in renal function after 5 to 7 days, the consensus recommendation is to start the patient on corticosteroids.[7][15][41][57] It is thought that AIN patients with high urinary biomarkers like IL-9, greater levels of interstitial inflammation, and lower degrees of chronic changes, such as fibrosis and tubular atrophy, on renal biopsy are likely to show the best response.[57][58]

Short-term dialysis is often needed in 30% to 69% of patients with DI-AIN, regardless of initial treatment.[15] Treatment should also be directed at concurrent potentially nephrotoxic factors such as anemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension to preserve renal function optimally.[5]

Small case series have evaluated mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, infliximab, azathioprine, and cyclosporine as therapeutic options in glucocorticoid-dependent and steroid-resistant AIN patients.[78][79][80][81][82][83][84] Mycophenolate has been the most studied, but further investigations are needed before this alternative approach can be generally recommended.[78][85]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of DI-AIN includes acute tubular necrosis; autoimmune-induced AIN; tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome (TINU); underlying systemic diseases, eg, sarcoidosis, SLE, Sjogren; lead or toxic metal exposure; glomerulonephritis, vasculitis; and pyelonephritis.

Urine sediment, urine chemistries, and serum markers can be useful in distinguishing the above etiologies; however, the definitive diagnosis is a renal biopsy, which should be performed unless contraindicated in all patients without imminent renal recovery after medication discontinuation.

Prognosis

The prognosis of AIN is favorable in cases where a diagnosis has been made promptly, and exposure to the offending medication is minimized. AIN with renal failure for greater than 3 weeks portends a worse prognosis, likely due to the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular damage. NSAID-related AIN is also associated with a somewhat worse outcome. AIN due to proton pump inhibitors has been linked to lower severity of acute kidney injury but with a reduced likelihood of recovery at 6 months. This has been attributed to the possibility of prolonged drug exposure.

One series revealed that 26% of patients with AIN ultimately returned to their baseline renal function, while 4% required long-term renal replacement therapy. It is estimated that 40% to 60% of patients with biopsy-proven AIN will not fully recover their baseline renal function when assessed six months after biopsy.[58] Lack of recovery is associated with lower GFR and albuminuria before DI-AIN, longer exposure to the attributable drug, and greater fibrosis, granulomas, or tubular atrophy on biopsy.[24][57][58][86]

Complications

In most instances, suspected DI-AIN resolves, as treating the underlying issue resolves the problem. Renal failure may persist for weeks or months, but recovery usually occurs within the first 3 months. AIN can progress into chronic kidney damage or even end-stage renal failure. This complication is more likely in older patients and those with preexisting kidney disorders. Hypertension may develop from increased angiotensin II production. [67] Anemia can be caused by decreased erythropoietin production, end-organ unresponsiveness, or hemolytic processes and should be monitored.[62]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients need to understand the underlying cause of their condition and strictly comply with all directions towards ameliorating the condition, usually by removing the offending agent. If started on steroids, they need to be aware of the need to taper the dosage over time and not stop the medication before the prescribed course duration. Patients should also be informed of the nature of their new "allergy" and that future lifetime avoidance of the triggering medication is necessary.

Pearls and Other Issues

A BUN/creatinine ratio of 12 or less is a good, quick, easy test that suggests interstitial nephritis but not necessarily which type. An elevated IgE and a low BUN/creatinine ratio would strongly suggest AIN. Eosinophilia and eosinophiluria suggest AIN and DI-AIN, except in NSAID-induced disease, in which proteinuria is the predominant lab abnormality.

Early steroid use appears to be beneficial.[15][87][88][89] If the differential diagnoses contain only disorders for which steroids would be therapeutic, there may be little reason to wait for the usual 5 to 7 days after medication withdrawal before starting therapy in the more severe cases.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

AIN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any patient with worsening renal function or newly discovered azotemia. A careful, focused, and comprehensive medication history, including OTC drugs, should be obtained, and a thorough physical examination should look for unexplained or new arthralgias, flank pain, fever, and rashes.

Close cooperation and communication among the interprofessional healthcare team will help optimize patient outcomes. Clinicians who prescribe medications should be aware of those with a high potential for causing AIN and which patients might be at higher risk, such as older individuals. A careful and thorough medication history should be obtained and verified by all members of the clinical healthcare team, including nurses and pharmacists. Adverse reactions, including those associated with AIN, should be identified and reported. Patients should be aware of the importance of reporting possible adverse reactions so their healthcare team can take appropriate action.

Nephrologists should be involved in any patient with newly discovered azotemia to advise on drug management, therapeutic steroid use, differential diagnoses for AKI, and the need and timing for a kidney biopsy. Interventional radiology or nephrology may need to be involved to perform the actual biopsy, while pathology will evaluate the specimen histologically to confirm the presence of AIN.

Close coordination, communication, and cooperation within the interprofessional healthcare team (primary care physicians, nephrologists, pharmacists, dermatologists, histopathologists, nurses, and other professionals) will help improve patient care, preserve renal function, avoid end-stage renal disease, and optimize outcomes.

Details

References

[1]

Moledina DG, Perazella MA. Drug-Induced Acute Interstitial Nephritis. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2017 Dec 7:12(12):2046-2049. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07630717. Epub 2017 Sep 11 [PubMed PMID: 28893923]

[2]

Lee T, Yang WS. Non-diabetic glycosuria as a diagnostic clue for acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in patients with azotemia. Renal failure. 2020 Nov:42(1):1015-1021. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1824923. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32985319]

[3]

Perazella MA, Markowitz GS. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Nature reviews. Nephrology. 2010 Aug:6(8):461-70. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.71. Epub 2010 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 20517290]

[4]

Dobrek L. A Synopsis of Current Theories on Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2023 Jan 24:13(2):. doi: 10.3390/life13020325. Epub 2023 Jan 24 [PubMed PMID: 36836682]

[5]

Awdishu L, Mehta RL. The 6R's of drug induced nephrotoxicity. BMC nephrology. 2017 Apr 3:18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0536-3. Epub 2017 Apr 3 [PubMed PMID: 28372552]

[6]

Nolan CM, Abernathy RS. Nephropathy associated with methicillin therapy. Prevalence and determinants in patients with staphylococcal bacteremia. Archives of internal medicine. 1977 Aug:137(8):997-1000 [PubMed PMID: 879956]

[7]

Bhandari J, Thada PK, Arif H. Tubulointerstitial Nephritis. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 32491469]

[8]

Gaudreault-Tremblay MM, Litalien C, Patey N, Merouani A. Severe Acute Kidney Injury and Multiple Organ Failure in a 17-Day-Old Newborn: When Pathology Makes the Difference. Canadian journal of kidney health and disease. 2018:5():2054358118804834. doi: 10.1177/2054358118804834. Epub 2018 Oct 6 [PubMed PMID: 30305914]

[9]

Finnigan NA, Rout P, Leslie SW, Bashir K. Allergic and Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 29493948]

[10]

Moledina DG, Perazella MA. PPIs and kidney disease: from AIN to CKD. Journal of nephrology. 2016 Oct:29(5):611-6. doi: 10.1007/s40620-016-0309-2. Epub 2016 Apr 12 [PubMed PMID: 27072818]

[11]

Živná M, Kidd KO, Barešová V, Hůlková H, Kmoch S, Bleyer AJ Sr. Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease: A review. American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics. 2022 Sep:190(3):309-324. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32008. Epub 2022 Oct 17 [PubMed PMID: 36250282]

[12]

Shamam YM, Hashmi MF. Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 33760469]

[13]

Clarkson MR, Giblin L, O'Connell FP, O'Kelly P, Walshe JJ, Conlon P, O'Meara Y, Dormon A, Campbell E, Donohoe J. Acute interstitial nephritis: clinical features and response to corticosteroid therapy. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2004 Nov:19(11):2778-83 [PubMed PMID: 15340098]

[14]

De Vriese AS, Robbrecht DL, Vanholder RC, Vogelaers DP, Lameire NH. Rifampicin-associated acute renal failure: pathophysiologic, immunologic, and clinical features. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 1998 Jan:31(1):108-15 [PubMed PMID: 9428460]

[15]

Sanchez-Alamo B, Cases-Corona C, Fernandez-Juarez G. Facing the Challenge of Drug-Induced Acute Interstitial Nephritis. Nephron. 2023:147(2):78-90. doi: 10.1159/000525561. Epub 2022 Jul 13 [PubMed PMID: 35830831]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Mérida E, Praga M. NSAIDs and Nephrotic Syndrome. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2019 Sep 6:14(9):1280-1282. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08090719. Epub 2019 Aug 15 [PubMed PMID: 31416889]

[17]

Praga M, González E. Acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney international. 2010 Jun:77(11):956-61. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.89. Epub 2010 Mar 24 [PubMed PMID: 20336051]

[18]

Mann JF, Goerig M, Brune K, Luft FC. Ibuprofen as an over-the-counter drug: is there a risk for renal injury? Clinical nephrology. 1993 Jan:39(1):1-6 [PubMed PMID: 8428401]

[19]

Pamuk ON, Cakir N. The renal effects of the addition of low-dose aspirin to COX-2 selective and nonselective antiinflammatory drugs. Clinical rheumatology. 2006 Feb:25(1):123-5 [PubMed PMID: 16175430]

[20]

Blank ML, Parkin L, Paul C, Herbison P. A nationwide nested case-control study indicates an increased risk of acute interstitial nephritis with proton pump inhibitor use. Kidney international. 2014 Oct:86(4):837-44. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.74. Epub 2014 Mar 19 [PubMed PMID: 24646856]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[21]

Nast CC. Medication-Induced Interstitial Nephritis in the 21st Century. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2017 Mar:24(2):72-79. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.016. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28284382]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[22]

Sierra F, Suarez M, Rey M, Vela MF. Systematic review: Proton pump inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2007 Aug 15:26(4):545-53 [PubMed PMID: 17661758]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[23]

Muriithi AK, Leung N, Valeri AM, Cornell LD, Sethi S, Fidler ME, Nasr SH. Clinical characteristics, causes and outcomes of acute interstitial nephritis in the elderly. Kidney international. 2015 Feb:87(2):458-64. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.294. Epub 2014 Sep 3 [PubMed PMID: 25185078]

[24]

Muriithi AK, Leung N, Valeri AM, Cornell LD, Sethi S, Fidler ME, Nasr SH. Biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis, 1993-2011: a case series. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2014 Oct:64(4):558-66. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.027. Epub 2014 Jun 11 [PubMed PMID: 24927897]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[25]

Kodner CM, Kudrimoti A. Diagnosis and management of acute interstitial nephritis. American family physician. 2003 Jun 15:67(12):2527-34 [PubMed PMID: 12825841]

[26]

Barreto EF, Rule AD. Management of Drug-Associated Acute Interstitial Nephritis. Kidney360. 2020 Jan 30:1(1):62-64. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000042019. Epub 2020 Jan 7 [PubMed PMID: 35372864]

[27]

Draibe JB, García-Carro C, Martinez-Valenzuela L, Agraz I, Fulladosa X, Bolufer M, Tango A, Torras J, Soler MJ. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors versus classical acute tubulointerstitial nephritis: are they the same disease? Clinical kidney journal. 2021 Mar:14(3):884-890. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa027. Epub 2020 May 4 [PubMed PMID: 33777371]

[28]

Cortazar FB, Marrone KA, Troxell ML, Ralto KM, Hoenig MP, Brahmer JR, Le DT, Lipson EJ, Glezerman IG, Wolchok J, Cornell LD, Feldman P, Stokes MB, Zapata SA, Hodi FS, Ott PA, Yamashita M, Leaf DE. Clinicopathological features of acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Kidney international. 2016 Sep:90(3):638-47. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Jun 7 [PubMed PMID: 27282937]

[29]

Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, Chau I, Ernstoff MS, Gardner JM, Ginex P, Hallmeyer S, Holter Chakrabarty J, Leighl NB, Mammen JS, McDermott DF, Naing A, Nastoupil LJ, Phillips T, Porter LD, Puzanov I, Reichner CA, Santomasso BD, Seigel C, Spira A, Suarez-Almazor ME, Wang Y, Weber JS, Wolchok JD, Thompson JA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2018 Jun 10:36(17):1714-1768. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385. Epub 2018 Feb 14 [PubMed PMID: 29442540]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

Cortazar FB, Kibbelaar ZA, Glezerman IG, Abudayyeh A, Mamlouk O, Motwani SS, Murakami N, Herrmann SM, Manohar S, Shirali AC, Kitchlu A, Shirazian S, Assal A, Vijayan A, Renaghan AD, Ortiz-Melo DI, Rangarajan S, Malik AB, Hogan JJ, Dinh AR, Shin DS, Marrone KA, Mithani Z, Johnson DB, Hosseini A, Uprety D, Sharma S, Gupta S, Reynolds KL, Sise ME, Leaf DE. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI: A Multicenter Study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2020 Feb:31(2):435-446. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019070676. Epub 2020 Jan 2 [PubMed PMID: 31896554]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

Moledina DG, Perazella MA. Proton Pump Inhibitors and CKD. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2016 Oct:27(10):2926-2928 [PubMed PMID: 27080978]

[32]

Seethapathy H, Zhao S, Chute DF, Zubiri L, Oppong Y, Strohbehn I, Cortazar FB, Leaf DE, Mooradian MJ, Villani AC, Sullivan RJ, Reynolds K, Sise ME. The Incidence, Causes, and Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2019 Dec 6:14(12):1692-1700. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00990119. Epub 2019 Oct 31 [PubMed PMID: 31672794]

[33]

Raghavan R, Shawar S. Mechanisms of Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2017 Mar:24(2):64-71. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.004. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28284381]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[34]

Lomboy JR, Jose F. Allergic Interstitial Nephritis Masquerading as Pyelonephritis in a Pediatric Patient With Crohn Disease. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2017 Jul:65(1):e18-e20. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000811. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28644363]

[35]

Park SH, Lee YJ, Sabri SS, Cathro HP. Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate-Induced Acute Allergic Interstitial Nephritis. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2017 Jul:40(7):1125-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1620-6. Epub 2017 Mar 29 [PubMed PMID: 28357570]

[36]

Alsaad AA, Dhannoon SM, Pantin SA, Porter IE. Rare allergic reaction of the kidney: sitagliptin-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. BMJ case reports. 2016 Jul 19:2016():. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216297. Epub 2016 Jul 19 [PubMed PMID: 27436034]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[37]

Davison AM, Jones CH. Acute interstitial nephritis in the elderly: a report from the UK MRC Glomerulonephritis Register and a review of the literature. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 1998:13 Suppl 7():12-6 [PubMed PMID: 9870431]

[38]

Praga M, Sevillano A, Auñón P, González E. Changes in the aetiology, clinical presentation and management of acute interstitial nephritis, an increasingly common cause of acute kidney injury. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2015 Sep:30(9):1472-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu326. Epub 2014 Oct 16 [PubMed PMID: 25324356]

[39]

Haas M, Spargo BH, Wit EJ, Meehan SM. Etiologies and outcome of acute renal insufficiency in older adults: a renal biopsy study of 259 cases. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2000 Mar:35(3):433-47 [PubMed PMID: 10692269]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[40]

Hosohata K. Role of Oxidative Stress in Drug-Induced Kidney Injury. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016 Nov 1:17(11): [PubMed PMID: 27809280]

[41]

Naik RH, Annamaraju P. Interstitial Nephritis. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 33232019]

[42]

Krishnan N, Perazella MA. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis: pathology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Iranian journal of kidney diseases. 2015 Jan:9(1):3-13 [PubMed PMID: 25599729]

[43]

Spanou Z, Keller M, Britschgi M, Yawalkar N, Fehr T, Neuweiler J, Gugger M, Mohaupt M, Pichler WJ. Involvement of drug-specific T cells in acute drug-induced interstitial nephritis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2006 Oct:17(10):2919-27 [PubMed PMID: 16943303]

[44]

Kelly CJ, Neilson EG. Contrasuppression in autoimmunity. Abnormal contrasuppression facilitates expression of nephritogenic effector T cells and interstitial nephritis in kdkd mice. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1987 Jan 1:165(1):107-23 [PubMed PMID: 2947967]

[45]

Pichler WJ. Pharmacological interaction of drugs with antigen-specific immune receptors: the p-i concept. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2002 Aug:2(4):301-5 [PubMed PMID: 12130944]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[46]

Kitching AR, Hutton HL. The Players: Cells Involved in Glomerular Disease. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2016 Sep 7:11(9):1664-1674. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13791215. Epub 2016 Apr 12 [PubMed PMID: 27073196]

[47]

Buysen JG, Houthoff HJ, Krediet RT, Arisz L. Acute interstitial nephritis: a clinical and morphological study in 27 patients. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 1990:5(2):94-9 [PubMed PMID: 2113219]

[48]

Gerber BO, Pichler WJ. Cellular mechanisms of T cell mediated drug hypersensitivity. Current opinion in immunology. 2004 Dec:16(6):732-7 [PubMed PMID: 15511665]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[49]

Rossert J. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney international. 2001 Aug:60(2):804-17 [PubMed PMID: 11473672]

[50]

Rastegar A, Kashgarian M. Long-term analgesic use and renal disease. Kidney international. 1999 Feb:55(2):743 [PubMed PMID: 9987102]

[51]

Rojas M, Restrepo-Jiménez P, Monsalve DM, Pacheco Y, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Ramírez-Santana C, Leung PSC, Ansari AA, Gershwin ME, Anaya JM. Molecular mimicry and autoimmunity. Journal of autoimmunity. 2018 Dec:95():100-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 26 [PubMed PMID: 30509385]

[52]

Perazella MA, Rosner MH. Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2022 Aug:17(8):1220-1233. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11290821. Epub 2022 Mar 10 [PubMed PMID: 35273009]

[53]

Border WA, Lehman DH, Egan JD, Sass HJ, Glode JE, Wilson CB. Antitubular basement-membrane antibodies in methicillin-associated interstitial nephritis. The New England journal of medicine. 1974 Aug 22:291(8):381-4 [PubMed PMID: 4211170]

[54]

Cheng HF, Nolasco F, Cameron JS, Hildreth G, Neild GH, Hartley B. HLA-DR display by renal tubular epithelium and phenotype of infiltrate in interstitial nephritis. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 1989:4(3):205-15 [PubMed PMID: 2498779]

[55]

Jia Y, Su T, Gu Y, Li C, Zhou X, Su J, Sun P, Tang J, Yang L, Liu G, Yang L. HLA-DQA1, -DQB1, and -DRB1 Alleles Associated with Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis in a Chinese Population: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2018 Jul 15:201(2):423-431. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800237. Epub 2018 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 29858267]

[56]

Marco T, Anna P, Annalisa T, Francesco M, Stefania SL, Stella D, Michele R, Marco T, Loreto G, Franco S. The mechanisms of acute interstitial nephritis in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. 2019:11():1758835919875549. doi: 10.1177/1758835919875549. Epub 2019 Sep 24 [PubMed PMID: 31579108]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[57]

Moledina DG, Perazella MA. The Challenges of Acute Interstitial Nephritis: Time to Standardize. Kidney360. 2021 Jun 24:2(6):1051-1055. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001742021. Epub 2021 Apr 1 [PubMed PMID: 35373086]

[58]

Moledina DG, Wilson FP, Kukova L, Obeid W, Luciano R, Kuperman M, Moeckel GW, Kashgarian M, Perazella MA, Cantley LG, Parikh CR. Urine interleukin-9 and tumor necrosis factor-α for prognosis of human acute interstitial nephritis. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2021 Sep 27:36(10):1851-1858. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa169. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33125471]

[59]

Moinuddin I, Bracamonte E, Thajudeen B, Sussman A, Madhrira M, Costello J. Allergic Interstitial Nephritis Manifesting as a Striated Nephrogram. Case reports in medicine. 2015:2015():250530. doi: 10.1155/2015/250530. Epub 2015 Nov 18 [PubMed PMID: 26664405]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[60]

Humayun Y, Sanchez P, Norris LT, Monga D, Lewin J, Fülöp T. Kidney biopsy for renal tubular acidosis: when tissue diagnosis makes a difference. Clinical nephrology. Case studies. 2015:3():1-4. doi: 10.5414/CNCS108412. Epub 2015 May 22 [PubMed PMID: 29043125]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[61]

Sulaiman K, Locati J, Sidhu I, Sangha B. Allergic interstitial nephritis due to ceftaroline. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2014 Oct:348(4):354-5. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000323. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25192358]

[62]

Perazella MA. Clinical Approach to Diagnosing Acute and Chronic Tubulointerstitial Disease. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2017 Mar:24(2):57-63. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.08.003. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28284380]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[63]

De Broe ME, Elseviers MM. Over-the-counter analgesic use. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2009 Oct:20(10):2098-103. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008101097. Epub 2009 May 7 [PubMed PMID: 19423685]

[64]

Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ. Role of inflammatory cells in the kidney in the induction and maintenance of hypertension. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2006 Feb:21(2):260-3 [PubMed PMID: 16326746]

[65]

Vaziri ND. Roles of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2004 Jan:13(1):93-9 [PubMed PMID: 15090865]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[66]

Rodríguez-Iturbe B, Quiroz Y, Ferrebuz A, Parra G, Vaziri ND. Evolution of renal interstitial inflammation and NF-kappaB activation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. American journal of nephrology. 2004 Nov-Dec:24(6):587-94 [PubMed PMID: 15564764]

[67]

Franco M, Martínez F, Rodríguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ, Santamaría J, Montoya A, Nepomuceno T, Bautista R, Tapia E, Herrera-Acosta J. Angiotensin II, interstitial inflammation, and the pathogenesis of salt-sensitive hypertension. American journal of physiology. Renal physiology. 2006 Dec:291(6):F1281-7 [PubMed PMID: 16868307]

[68]

Ghosh B, Singh RG, Usha, Behura SK, Soni A, Sharatchandra LK, Singh S. Interstitial nephritis with moderate-to-heavy proteinuria: an unusual combination. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia. 2012 Mar:23(2):397-402 [PubMed PMID: 22382248]

[69]

Sun PP, Zhou XJ, Su JQ, Wang C, Yu XJ, Su T, Liu G, Wang SX, Nie J, Yang L. Urine macrophages reflect kidney macrophage content during acute tubular interstitial and glomerular injury. Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.). 2019 Aug:205():65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 15 [PubMed PMID: 31212026]

[70]

Yang HH, Chang CW, Chen TD. Nivolumab-induced acute tubular injury: A case report. Clinical case reports. 2023 Mar:11(3):e6991. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6991. Epub 2023 Mar 7 [PubMed PMID: 36911644]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[71]

Joyce E, Glasner P, Ranganathan S, Swiatecka-Urban A. Tubulointerstitial nephritis: diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2017 Apr:32(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3394-5. Epub 2016 May 7 [PubMed PMID: 27155873]

[72]

Hettinga YM, Scheerlinck LM, Lilien MR, Rothova A, de Boer JH. The value of measuring urinary β2-microglobulin and serum creatinine for detecting tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome in young patients with uveitis. JAMA ophthalmology. 2015 Feb:133(2):140-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4301. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25356569]

[73]

Canney M, Clark EG, Hiremath S. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury: On the cusp of a new era? The Journal of clinical investigation. 2023 Jul 3:133(13):. doi: 10.1172/JCI171431. Epub 2023 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 37395275]

[74]

Martinez Valenzuela L, Draibe J, Bestard O, Fulladosa X, Gómez-Preciado F, Antón P, Nadal E, Jové M, Cruzado JM, Torras J. Urinary Cytokines Reflect Renal Inflammation in Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis: A Multiplex Bead-Based Assay Assessment. Journal of clinical medicine. 2021 Jul 4:10(13):. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132986. Epub 2021 Jul 4 [PubMed PMID: 34279469]

[75]

Moledina DG, Wilson FP, Pober JS, Perazella MA, Singh N, Luciano RL, Obeid W, Lin H, Kuperman M, Moeckel GW, Kashgarian M, Cantley LG, Parikh CR. Urine TNF-α and IL-9 for clinical diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. JCI insight. 2019 May 16:4(10):. pii: 127456. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.127456. Epub 2019 May 16 [PubMed PMID: 31092735]

[76]

Moledina DG, Obeid W, Smith RN, Rosales I, Sise ME, Moeckel G, Kashgarian M, Kuperman M, Campbell KN, Lefferts S, Meliambro K, Bitzer M, Perazella MA, Luciano RL, Pober JS, Cantley LG, Colvin RB, Wilson FP, Parikh CR. Identification and validation of urinary CXCL9 as a biomarker for diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2023 Jul 3:133(13):. doi: 10.1172/JCI168950. Epub 2023 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 37395276]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[77]

Caravaca-Fontán F, Fernández-Juárez G, Praga M. Acute kidney injury in interstitial nephritis. Current opinion in critical care. 2019 Dec:25(6):558-564. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000654. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31503026]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[78]

Galesić K, Prkacin I, Tisljar M, Horvatić I, Ljubanović DG. [Drug induced allergic interstitial nephritis]. Lijecnicki vjesnik. 2011 Jul-Aug:133(7-8):276-83 [PubMed PMID: 22165196]

[79]

Preddie DC, Markowitz GS, Radhakrishnan J, Nickolas TL, D'Agati VD, Schwimmer JA, Gardenswartz M, Rosen R, Appel GB. Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of interstitial nephritis. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2006 Jul:1(4):718-22 [PubMed PMID: 17699278]

[80]

Rodríguez-Iturbe B. Is mycophenolate mofetil a new treatment option in acute interstitial nephritis? Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2006 Jul:1(4):609-10 [PubMed PMID: 17699264]

[81]

Zhang YQ, Chen Y, Ding YM, Yu TH. Protective effect of cyclosporine on inflammatory injury of renal tubular epithelial cells. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2018 Oct:22(19):6551-6559. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201810_16071. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30338826]

[82]

Shen Y, Xie J, Lin L, Li X, Shen P, Pan X, Ren H, Chen N. Combination Cyclophosphamide/Glucocorticoids Provide Better Tolerability and Outcomes versus Glucocorticoids Alone in Patients with Sjogren's Associated Chronic Interstitial Nephritis. American journal of nephrology. 2017:46(6):473-480. doi: 10.1159/000484903. Epub 2017 Dec 14 [PubMed PMID: 29241210]

[83]

Tanabe K, Matsuoka-Uchiyama N, Mifune T, Kawakita C, Sugiyama H, Wada J. Management of corticosteroid-dependent eosinophilic interstitial nephritis: A case report. Medicine. 2021 Dec 17:100(50):e28252. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028252. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34918693]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[84]

Lin JS, Mamlouk O, Selamet U, Tchakarov A, Glass WF, Sheth RA, Layman RM, Dadu R, Abdelwahab N, Abdelrahim M, Diab A, Yee C, Abudayyeh A. Infliximab for the treatment of patients with checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute tubular interstitial nephritis. Oncoimmunology. 2021 Feb 2:10(1):1877415. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1877415. Epub 2021 Feb 2 [PubMed PMID: 33643693]

[85]

Bhat R, Tonutti A, Timilsina S, Selmi C, Gershwin ME. Perspectives on Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Management of Autoimmunity. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2023 Aug:65(1):86-100. doi: 10.1007/s12016-023-08963-3. Epub 2023 Jun 20 [PubMed PMID: 37338709]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[86]

Simpson IJ, Marshall MR, Pilmore H, Manley P, Williams L, Thein H, Voss D. Proton pump inhibitors and acute interstitial nephritis: report and analysis of 15 cases. Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2006 Oct:11(5):381-5 [PubMed PMID: 17014549]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[87]

Surendra M, Raju S, Chandragiri S, Uppin MS, Raju N. Steroid therapy in drug induced acute interstitial nephritis- Retrospective analysis of 83 cases. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia. 2019 Jan-Feb:30(1):157-165 [PubMed PMID: 30804277]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[88]

González E, Gutiérrez E, Galeano C, Chevia C, de Sequera P, Bernis C, Parra EG, Delgado R, Sanz M, Ortiz M, Goicoechea M, Quereda C, Olea T, Bouarich H, Hernández Y, Segovia B, Praga M, Grupo Madrileño De Nefritis Intersticiales. Early steroid treatment improves the recovery of renal function in patients with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney international. 2008 Apr:73(8):940-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002776. Epub 2008 Jan 9 [PubMed PMID: 18185501]

[89]

Ramachandran R, Kumar K, Nada R, Jha V, Gupta KL, Kohli HS. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis: A clinicopathological study and comparative trial of steroid regimens. Indian journal of nephrology. 2015 Sep-Oct:25(5):281-6. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.147766. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26628793]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence