Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Tumors in the spine comprise about 15 percent of all central nervous system tumors. They usually are benign and cause symptoms primarily via compression of the spinal cord and nerves. Spinal tumors can be classified into three groups, based on their locations: extradural, intradural-extramedullary, and intramedullary. Extradural tumors are most common, are commonly metastatic, and occupy the vertebrae body or structures outside the dura. Intradural extramedullary tumors are the second most common and come from the leptomeninges or nerve roots. These tumors are located inside the dura but external to the spinal cord, as exemplified by meningiomas or neurofibromas. The least common are intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT), which represent 2 to 5 percent of spinal tumors and arise from the spinal cord itself, leading to invasion and destruction of the gray and white matter. Ependymomas and astrocytomas are the most commonly encountered intramedullary spinal cord tumors, followed by hemangioblastomas. Other entities include lipomas, germ cell tumors, gangliogliomas, germinomas, lymphomas, and metastases. This activity reviews the causes and presentation of spinal cord tumors and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in their management.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of intramedullary spinal cord tumors.
  • Describe the presentation of a patient with an intramedullary spinal cord tumor.
  • Outline the treatment and management options available for intramedullary spinal cord tumors.
  • Explain the importance of improving care coordination amongst interprofessional team members to improve outcomes for patients affected by intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Introduction

Tumors in the spine comprise about 15% of all tumors in the central nervous system. They usually are benign and cause symptoms primarily through compression of the spinal cord and nerves. Spinal tumors can be classified into three groups, based on their locations: extradural, intradural-extramedullary, and intramedullary. Extradural tumors are most common, as they occupy the vertebrae body or structures outside the dura. They are most commonly metastatic. Intradural extramedullary tumors are the second most common and come from the leptomeninges or nerve roots. These tumors are located inside the dura but external from the spinal cord, exemplified by meningiomas or neurofibromas. The least common (2 to 5%) are intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT); these arise from the spinal cord proper, leading to invasion and destruction of the gray and white matter. Ependymomas and astrocytomas are the most commonly encountered intramedullary spinal cord tumors, followed by hemangioblastomas. Other entities include lipomas, germ cell tumors, gangliogliomas, germinomas, lymphomas, and metastases.[1][2][3]

Etiology

Although IMSCT is mostly sporadic, some are associated with clinical syndromes such as neurofibromatosis 1, 2 (NF-1, NF-2), and Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). NF-1 is due to a mutation on chromosome 17, which encodes a tumor suppressor gene. About 19% of patients with NF-1 develop IMSCT. NF-1 is largely associated with neurofibromas (intradural extramedullary), but in relation to IMSCTs, astrocytomas are most frequently encountered. NF-2 is due to a mutation on chromosome 22 and can be seen in about 2% of patients with IMSCTs. They commonly are associated with ependymomas and occasionally meningiomas (extramedullary). In VHL, hemangioblastomas are the most commonly found IMSCT.[4][5][6]

Epidemiology

About 80% of intramedullary tumors are gliomas, which can be subdivided into astrocytomas and ependymomas. Astrocytomas are more common in children with IMSCTs, while ependymomas are more often found in adults with IMSCT. Astrocytomas peak in the third to fifth decades, often low-grade, and are found most commonly at the thoracic level. Ependymomas are more commonly found in the lower cord, conus, and filum, with a slight male predominance and peak in the third to sixth decades. Hemangioblastomas are the third most common IMSCT, making up about 2 to 15%. Metastatic intramedullary tumors are rare and most frequently develop from lung and breast tumors.

Pathophysiology

Astrocytomas are glossy, infiltrative tumors with a poorly defined surgical resection plane. They can form a cavity in the spinal cord, known as a syrinx, and can degenerate into a malignant subtype. Ependymomas arise from ependymal cells, are soft and encapsulated, grow slowly, and are more centrally located, appearing as a focal enlargement within the spinal cord. A common histologic subtype is a WHO grade II cellular variant with perivascular pseudorosettes. In the filum terminale, micropapillary ependymoma, a WHO grade I tumor, is most commonly found. Ependymomas can span in length across 3 to 4 vertebral bodies, whereas astrocytomas can span 5 to 6 segments on average. Hemangioblastomas are small tumors that are highly vascularized but rarely extend beyond one or two vertebral bodies. Cyst formation is common, and the tumor is more often found in men.[7][8]

History and Physical

The most common presenting symptom in patients with IMSCT is pain, which classically worsens at night when the patient is recumbent and can be diffuse or radicular in nature. If the dermatomal distribution is unusual for a disk herniation, IMSCT should be suspected. The pain also can be local, causing stiff neck or back, and can be described as burning and bilateral. As IMSCT can impinge on the motor or sensory nerves, sensory changes such as paresthesia can be seen, followed by motor disturbances as the second or third most common complaint. In children, gait disturbance frequently is seen. In addition to motor weakness, patients also can have clumsiness and ataxia, atrophy, muscle twitches, fasciculations, and decreased deep tendon reflexes. Loss of bowel and bladder function can occur at a later stage and can lead to retention, incontinence, or impotence. In children, diagnosis is especially difficult, where IMSCT can remain asymptomatic for a long time. Children can have nonspecific complaints, and their symptoms can be misperceived as clumsiness, although scoliosis can be seen in 30% of patients.

Evaluation

Following the identification of symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred modality to characterize IMSCT for further treatment planning. MRI can show the size, location, length, extent of surrounding edema, the presence of the cord-tumor interface, and associated cysts or syringomyelia. Although each of the three common types of IMSCT has a particular T1-, T2-, and contrast-enhanced T1 weighted imaging pattern, differentiation between them based on imaging alone remains difficult. Both ependymomas and astrocytomas span multiple vertebral segments, enhance with contrast, are hypo- or isointense on T1-weighted, and are hyperintense on T2 weighted images. Ependymomas often are located centrally within the spinal cord leading to symmetric expansion, occupy the whole width of the cord, and enhance diffusely with a well-defined border. Astrocytomas tend to be positioned more eccentrically, can be non-enhancing or have an enhancing nodule or large satellite cysts, and usually do not have a well-defined border. Intratumoral hemorrhage can be seen in both types but are more common in ependymomas. Hemangioblastomas have homogeneous contrast enhancement compared to the more heterogeneous pattern found in astrocytomas or ependymomas. They also have mural nodules, are associated with syringomyelia, and can have significant surrounding edema. As they are highly vascularized tumors, spinal angiography is helpful to characterize feeding vessels and associated dilated pial veins from vascular shunting and can help in the consideration for pre-operative embolization.[9][5]

Treatment / Management

Surgical resection should be performed as soon as possible following a diagnosis of IMSCT, as outcomes correlate with the preoperative neurologic conditions, and observation can lead to further neurologic deficits, some of which are irreversible. The goals of surgical resection are to obtain tissue diagnosis, maximize tumor resection, and improve neurologic functions. Intraoperative somatosensory and motor evoked potentials are used to monitor for changes in neurologic function and help guide resection. The extent of total resection is greatly dependent on the presence of a clear plane between tumor and normal spinal cord tissue. Astrocytomas are infiltrative nonencapsulated tumors that are challenging to resect. For low-grade astrocytoma, if a plane can be developed between the tumor and spinal cord, gross total resection is an option; however, for high-grade astrocytoma or low-grade astrocytoma with no definable plane of resection, biopsy plus limited resection is recommended, as aggressive resection can lead to significant neurologic deficits. Postoperative radiotherapy can be used for high-grade astrocytomas. Ependymomas are benign with a distinct tumor and normal spinal cord interface, making gross total resection an option for cure. The rate of recurrence is dependent on the extent of tumor resection, and with the presence of a discrete surgical plane, gross total resection is reported in more than 90% of cases of ependymomas. Similarly, hemangioblastomas also can be resected circumferentially, and preoperative embolization can attenuate their rich vascular supply. Complete excision is possible in 83% to 92% of patients with clinical improvements noted following resection. Generally, for IMSCT, better long-term outcomes are seen in patients with less preoperative deficits, and recurrence depends on the extent of resection and tumor histology. Adjuvant therapies, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are often reserved for tumor recurrence, high-grade lesions, or when there are contraindications to resection. Further research into novel treatment strategies is needed to improve outcomes, especially for astrocytomas with no clear surgical resection planes.[10][11][12]

Differential Diagnosis

  • Benign lesions - Epidermoid cyst, lipoma
  • Glial tumors - Ependymoma, astrocytoma, ganglioglioma
  • Non-glial tumors - Hemangioblastoma, metastasis, lymphoma

Prognosis

The outcomes for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors are guarded. Those with neurological deficits are presentation have the worst outcomes. Patients with metastatic disease rarely live beyond 12 months.[13] [Level 5]

Complications

  • Paralysis
  • Complications related to bed-ridden state - deep vein thrombosis, bedsore, atelectasis
  • Local spread of the lesion
  • Death

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients should be adequately counseled regarding the prognosis of the disease and expected neurological and functional outcomes.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Intramedullary spinal cord tumors are best managed by an interprofessional team that includes and neurosurgeon and neuro-critical care nurses experienced in monitoring these patients. Surgical resection should be performed as soon as possible following a diagnosis of IMSCT, as outcomes correlate with the preoperative neurologic conditions, and observation can lead to further neurologic deficits, some of which are irreversible. The goals of surgical resection are to obtain tissue diagnosis, maximize tumor resection, and improve neurologic functions. When surgeons cannot completely excise the lesion, adjuvant therapy may be tried.[14] The neuro-critical care nurse should monitor the patient's physical exam, focusing on any signs of progression of tumor involvement compressing the spinal cord. If new deficits develop, they should contact the surgeon in managing the case immediately. Pain control balanced again blunting the physical exam is also a challenge. A critical care specialist pharmacist should assist the clinician in evaluating pain medication choices and dosing as well as monitoring the patient for appropriate pain relief. an interprofessional approach will provide the best outcomes. [Level 5]


Details

Author

Joe M. Das

Author

Stanley Hoang

Updated:

4/24/2023 12:41:43 PM

References


[1]

Khalid S, Kelly R, Carlton A, Wu R, Peta A, Melville P, Maasarani S, Meyer H, Adogwa O. Adult intradural intramedullary astrocytomas: a multicenter analysis. Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong). 2019 Mar:5(1):19-30. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.12.06. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31032435]


[2]

Chen X, Zhang G. Multiple Spinal Intramedullary Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors Mimicking Acute Myelitis. World neurosurgery. 2019 Jun:126():72-75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.108. Epub 2019 Mar 2     [PubMed PMID: 30831283]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Benjamin CG, Frempong-Boadu A, Hoch M, Bruno M, Shepherd T, Pacione D. Combined Use of Diffusion Tractography and Advanced Intraoperative Imaging for Resection of Cervical Intramedullary Spinal Cord Neoplasms: A Case Series and Technical Note. Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.). 2019 Nov 1:17(5):525-530. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz039. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30892657]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[4]

Goyal A, Yolcu Y, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Krauss WE, Bydon M. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases: an institutional review of survival and outcomes. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2019 Apr:142(2):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03105-2. Epub 2019 Jan 17     [PubMed PMID: 30656530]


[5]

Weng Y, Zhan R, Shen J, Pan J, Jiang H, Huang K, Xu K, Huang H. Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature. BioMed research international. 2018:2018():7485020. doi: 10.1155/2018/7485020. Epub 2018 Dec 16     [PubMed PMID: 30643818]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Kofod DH, Wegge C, Buhl-Jensen G. [Intramedullary spinal cord tumour as differential diagnosis to bilateral muscle weakness]. Ugeskrift for laeger. 2018 Dec 10:180(50):. pii: V04180294. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30547876]


[7]

Chanchotisatien A, Xiong J, Yu J, Chu S. Exophytic Primary Intramedullary Spinal Cord Glioblastoma: Case Report and Critical Review of Literature. World neurosurgery. 2019 Feb:122():573-576. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.113. Epub 2018 Nov 23     [PubMed PMID: 30476666]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Eroglu U, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I, Ozgural O, Shah KJ, Zaimoglu M, Al-Beyati ESM, Ugur HC, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgical Management of Spinal Arachnoid Cysts in Adults. World neurosurgery. 2019 Feb:122():e1146-e1152. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 14     [PubMed PMID: 30447456]


[9]

Rijs K, Klimek M, Scheltens-de Boer M, Biesheuvel K, Harhangi BS. Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Case Series. World neurosurgery. 2019 May:125():498-510.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 17     [PubMed PMID: 30659972]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[10]

Wu J, Ranjan S. Neoplastic Myelopathies. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). 2018 Apr:24(2, Spinal Cord Disorders):474-496. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000585. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29613896]


[11]

Navarro Fernández JO, Monroy Sosa A, Cacho Díaz B, Arrieta VA, Ortíz Leyva RU, Cano Valdez AM, Reyes Soto G. Cervical Intramedullary Schwannoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case reports in neurology. 2018 Jan-Apr:10(1):18-24. doi: 10.1159/000467389. Epub 2018 Feb 14     [PubMed PMID: 29606952]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

O'Neill AH, Phung TB, Lai LT. Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis from thyroid carcinoma: Case report and a systematic pooled analysis of the literature. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2018 Mar:49():7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 29248379]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[13]

Bhimani AD, Rosinski CL, Denyer S, Hobbs JG, Patel S, Shah K, Mudreac A, Diamond R, Behbahani M, Mehta AI. Acute Surgical Risk Profile of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection in Pediatric Patients: A Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. World neurosurgery. 2019 Jan:121():e389-e397. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.113. Epub 2018 Sep 26     [PubMed PMID: 30266692]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[14]

Morikawa A, de Stanchina E, Pentsova E, Kemeny MM, Li BT, Tang K, Patil S, Fleisher M, Van Poznak C, Norton L, Seidman AD. Phase I Study of Intermittent High-Dose Lapatinib Alternating with Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2019 Jul 1:25(13):3784-3792. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3502. Epub 2019 Apr 15     [PubMed PMID: 30988080]