Psittacosis Pneumonia

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Psittacosis is a systemic disease that can cause an atypical pneumonia when it infects the lungs. Psittacosis is also known as avian chlamydiosis, ornithosis, and parrot fever. This disease is caused by the zoonotic bacterium Chlamydia psittaci, which is transmitted to humans primarily from birds. This activity reviews the pathophysiology and presentation of psittacosis pneumonia and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in its management.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of psittacosis pneumonia.
  • Review the presentation of psittacosis pneumonia.
  • Outline the treatment and management options available for psittacosis pneumonia.
  • Summarize interprofessional team strategies for improving care and outcomes in patients with psittacosis pneumonia.

Introduction

Psittacosis is a systemic disease that can cause an atypical pneumonia when it infects the lungs.  Psittacosis is also known as avian chlamydiosis, ornithosis, and parrot fever. This disease is caused by the zoonotic bacterium Chlamydia psittaci, which is transmitted to humans primarily from birds. Although all birds are susceptible, pet birds and poultry are most frequently involved in transmission to humans. C. psittaci can be transmitted to humans by direct contact with the animals, avian nasal discharges, infectious avian fecal material, or even inhalation of feather dust. Person-to-person transmission has not been demonstrated.[1]

Historically, C. psittaci was used in the 1960s and 1970s as the model organism that laid the foundation for modern chlamydia research. Multiple severe outbreaks have been documented as early as 1879, including an outbreak in the United States that helped lead to the creation of the National Institute of Health (NIH) in 1930.[2] Today, psittacosis is well known for its economic impact on the poultry industry.

Etiology

Chlamydia psittaci is an obligate intracellular bacterium. Besides poultry (turkeys and ducks), pet birds including parrots, cockatiels, macaws, and parakeets are the main culprits. C. psittaci can also be found in non-avian domestic animals, such as cattle, sheep, swine, horses, goats, cats, and wildlife, but cases of clinical disease and transmission to humans have not been proven.

Epidemiology

Chlamydia psittaci is an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is thought to comprise approximately 1% of all CAP cases. Fewer than 50 cases per year of psittacosis are reported in the United States.[3] Given that birds are the primary reservoir, exposure is greatest in owners of pet birds and workers in poultry-processing centers, pet-shops, aviaries, and veterinary facilities. Due to lack of routine testing, incidence and prevalence are hard to establish. As mentioned above, the organism is transmitted by air droplets from feces, urine, respiratory secretions, and feather dust. Dried organisms remain viable for months. Psittacosis is statistically more common in young to middle-aged males, although this may be related to higher exposure potential.[1]

Pathophysiology

Infection of C. psittaci begins with inhalation of aerosolized bacteria when exposed to secretions from infected birds. The infection begins in the upper respiratory tract and may persist as a prolonged asymptomatic condition of the mucosal surfaces. Infection of the mucosal membrane causes these cells to expose outer membrane proteins, which may promote a host immune response, leading to an autoimmune reaction and manifesting as atypical pneumonia.[4]

Histopathology

Elementary bodies (EB) of C. psittaci infect the lung by direct interaction with the surface microvilli. EBs are subsequently engulfed by endocytosis, hence creating inclusions called reticulate bodies (RB) that avoid lysosomal fusion. These bodies then transform back into EB and are released during cell lysis, restarting the cycle. The pathogen can also cause systemic symptoms due to hematogenous spread, perhaps within macrophages. Persistence of infection has been observed when pathogens remain viable but non-cultivable, and the host immune system is unable to eliminate them. Hence, alveolar-lining cells with intracytoplasmic inclusions are pathognomonic.[2]

History and Physical

Exposure to birds or occupational exposure is the most important clue in the patient's history. C. psittaci commonly presents in young to middle-aged males who complain of fever (most common symptom), chills, headache, myalgia, and dry cough. Symptoms vary from mild to severe systemic disease. In systemic involvement, the patient may present with hepatosplenomegaly and gastrointestinal symptoms. Endocarditis and myocarditis have also been described, and a minimal percentage of patients present with altered mental status. The incubation period is usually 5 to 19 days but can be as long as 28 days. In the pre-antibiotic era, fatal cases were common. Today, imported bird quarantine, treatment, and improved hygiene measures have rendered psittacosis cases rare.[1]

Pulmonary symptoms include a dry cough, and lung auscultation during physical exam may reveal rales or rhonchi. Uncommonly, a pleural rub may be appreciated. A pulse-temperature dissociation (fever and relative bradycardia) has been described for psittacosis pneumonia. Patients may also show signs of photophobia, epistaxis, tinnitus, deafness, gastrointestinal symptoms, and arthralgia if systemically compromised.

Evaluation

The best method for confirming C. psittacosis infection is with serologic testing, namely micro-immunofluorescent antibody test (MIF). Cultures are highly discouraged due to being difficult, infectious to lab personnel, and only performed in specialized labs. MIF testing uses chlamydia-specific surface antigen. A test result with antibodies above 1:16 is considered evidence for exposure, while a 4-fold titer rise with clinical correlation is considered diagnostic. Complement fixation (CF) was the previously diagnostic test of choice, but it cannot differentiate between chlamydial species.[3]

If obtained, laboratory testing may evidence a normal white blood cell count with a "left shift." Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) may be elevated. If a systemic illness is present, the patient may evidence abnormal liver enzymes, hyponatremia, and elevated BUN/creatinine.[5]

Chest radiographs most often show single lower lobar changes. Computed tomography has higher sensitivity and may reveal nodular pulmonary infiltrates with surrounding ground-glass opacities.

Treatment / Management

The primary treatment for C. psittaci consists of tetracyclines. Tetracycline 500 mg by mouth (PO) 4 times per day or doxycycline 100 mg PO or intravenously (IV) 2 times per day are described as a treatment of choice for 7 to 10 days. Minocycline 100 mg PO or IV 2 times per day may also be effective. Macrolides are second-line agents. Azithromycin 250 to 500 mg PO once daily is favored over erythromycin. Macrolides are the treatment of choice for children.[1]

Differential Diagnosis

The initial signs and symptoms of C. psittaci, including fever, headache, and dry cough, can lead to a very broad differential diagnosis. Other culprits of atypical pneumonia, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, mycoplasma infections, Legionnaires' disease, Q fever, and Tularemia, may be considered when presenting with C. psittacosis. Patients presenting only with fever have a broader differential that includes influenza, septicemia, endocarditis, other causes of pneumonia (bacterial and fungal), and other sources of infection. History of exposure to birds or bird droppings, as might be found under bridges, should raise psittacosis on the differential diagnosis.

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

Recent studies have shown that C. psittaci copes better than other chlamydial strains with the host's pro-inflammatory effectors during early immune response.[6] In a recent case study,[7] a nested PCR of a nasopharyngeal swab of a patient and feces of his pet parakeet confirmed C. psittaci infection when serology was negative, pointing to a possible need for broader implementation of PCR for early diagnosis. C. psittaci has also been found in non-avian hosts, although its clinical importance to humans has not been proven.[6]

Prognosis

Prognosis for C. psittacosis depends largely on the patient's baseline health status, the severity of disease, and early diagnosis and treatment. Full recovery may take from 6 to 8 weeks, including residual changes on chest films. Per the CDC, the current mortality rate in the United States is less than 1% with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.[3]

Complications

Apart from pneumonia and its pulmonary complications, systemic infection with C. psittaci can lead to endocarditis, hepatitis, and encephalitis.[1]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Psittacosis pneumonia, better known as parrot fever or ornithosis, is an infection caused by birds. Infection usually presents with sudden fever, headache, body aches, and a dry cough. People at increased risk are pet bird owners, pet shop workers, veterinarians, and poultry processing plant workers. In severe cases, C. psittaci can infect other organs including the kidneys, liver, and central nervous system. Given the potentially fatal nature of this disease, antibiotics should be started as soon as possible and continued for 7 to 10 days. Per the CDC, only buy pet birds from a well-known pet store. If you own pet birds or poultry, follow good hygiene precautions when handling and cleaning birds and cages.[1]

Pearls and Other Issues

  • Psittacosis pneumonia is a zoonotic infection caused by contact with birds infected by C. psittaci.
  • Infection is caused by inhalation (including transient) of aerosolized particles from dried feces, respiratory secretions, bird bites, and feather dust.
  • C. psittaci usually presents in young to middle-aged adults as a sudden fever with pulse-temperature dissociation, headache, myalgia, and dry cough. The physical exam may be remarkable for rales and rarely a pleural rub. Chest radiography may show single lobe changes, although multi-lobar changes are also possible. 
  • Infection may manifest with systemic involvement such as respiratory failure, endocarditis, myocarditis, encephalopathy, and/or hepatitis.
  • Diagnosis is usually established clinically with the presence of fever, headache, dry cough, lobar changes on chest radiography, and recent exposure to birds- treatment should be initiated when suspected.
  • Serologic testing is the gold standard for diagnosis. Cultures are highly discouraged and are only performed in specialized labs.
  • Tetracyclines are first-line therapy. Tetracycline (500 mg PO 4 times per day) or doxycycline (100 mg PO or IV 2 times per day) for 7 to 10 days are recommended. Macrolides are second-line therapy, especially for children and pregnant women.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Pneumonia due to infection with C. psittaci is a very rare disease worldwide (less than 1% of all CAP cases) that can present with common symptoms.[3] (Level I) Adequate history taking and physical exam must be performed at all levels of care to achieve early diagnosis and treatment. Given the zoonotic nature of this disease and the potential for an outbreak, it is important to coordinate with the appropriate public health and veterinary officials for adequate quarantine of infected birds and avoid the spread of disease.[8] (Level I) Physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists must work together to provide appropriate patient education and coordinate care for the best outcome.


Details

Author

Pranav Modi

Editor:

Mark F. Brady

Updated:

7/4/2023 12:17:15 AM

References


[1]

Balsamo G, Maxted AM, Midla JW, Murphy JM, Wohrle R, Edling TM, Fish PH, Flammer K, Hyde D, Kutty PK, Kobayashi M, Helm B, Oiulfstad B, Ritchie BW, Stobierski MG, Ehnert K, Tully TN Jr. Compendium of Measures to Control Chlamydia psittaci Infection Among Humans (Psittacosis) and Pet Birds (Avian Chlamydiosis), 2017. Journal of avian medicine and surgery. 2017 Sep:31(3):262-282. doi: 10.1647/217-265. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28891690]


[2]

Knittler MR, Sachse K. Chlamydia psittaci: update on an underestimated zoonotic agent. Pathogens and disease. 2015 Feb:73(1):1-15. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftu007. Epub 2014 Dec 4     [PubMed PMID: 25853998]


[3]

Hogerwerf L, DE Gier B, Baan B, VAN DER Hoek W. Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and infection. 2017 Nov:145(15):3096-3105. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817002060. Epub 2017 Sep 26     [PubMed PMID: 28946931]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Rane V,Khailin K,Williams J,Francis M,Kotsanas D,Korman TM,Graham M, Underdiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia psittaci revealed by introduction of respiratory multiplex PCR assay with Chlamydiaceae family primers. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2018 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 29258707]


[5]

Beeckman DS, Vanrompay DC. Zoonotic Chlamydophila psittaci infections from a clinical perspective. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2009 Jan:15(1):11-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02669.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19220335]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Radomski N, Einenkel R, Müller A, Knittler MR. Chlamydia-host cell interaction not only from a bird's eye view: some lessons from Chlamydia psittaci. FEBS letters. 2016 Nov:590(21):3920-3940. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12295. Epub 2016 Jul 26     [PubMed PMID: 27397851]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[7]

Vande Weygaerde Y, Versteele C, Thijs E, De Spiegeleer A, Boelens J, Vanrompay D, Van Braeckel E, Vermaelen K. An unusual presentation of a case of human psittacosis. Respiratory medicine case reports. 2018:23():138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 2     [PubMed PMID: 29719801]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Halsby KD, Walsh AL, Campbell C, Hewitt K, Morgan D. Healthy animals, healthy people: zoonosis risk from animal contact in pet shops, a systematic review of the literature. PloS one. 2014:9(2):e89309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089309. Epub 2014 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 24586679]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence