Gastrocnemius Strain

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

The gastrocnemius muscle consists of two heads. The medial head originates from the posterior medial femoral condyle while the lateral head arises from the posterior lateral femoral condyle. The gastrocnemius muscle is vulnerable to injury because it crosses 3 joints: the knee, the ankle, and the subtalar joint. While Achilles tendon injury is common, injuries over the posterior calf, including the gastrocnemius, soleus, plantaris, and flexor hallucis longus muscles, are far less prevalent. Proper and timely diagnosis is essential to treat patients with posterior calf injuries. Patients generally recover well if they received appropriate diagnosis and treatment. This activity reviews the etiology, presentation, evaluation, and management of gastrocnemius strain and reviews the role of the interprofessional team in the care of patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Describe the common mechanisms of injury that lead to gastrocnemius strains.
  • Review the appropriate history, physical, and evaluation of gastrocnemius strain.
  • Outline the treatment and management options available for gastrocnemius strain.
  • Summarize the importance of communication amongst the interprofessional team to enhance the care of patients with gastrocnemius strain.

Introduction

The gastrocnemius muscle consists of 2 heads. The medial head originates from the posterior medial femoral condyle while the lateral head arises from the posterior lateral femoral condyle. The gastrocnemius muscle is vulnerable to injury because it crosses 3 joints: the knee, the ankle, and the subtalar joint.[1][2] The medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius muscle arise from 2 separate proximal attachments on the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles. Distal to the myotendinous junction, the gastrocnemius muscle becomes a flat aponeurosis and coalesces with the soleus aponeurosis to form the Achilles tendon. While Achilles tendon injury is common, injuries over the posterior calf, including the gastrocnemius, soleus, plantaris, and flexor hallucis longus muscles, are far less prevalent.[3][4] Proper and timely diagnosis is essential to treat patients with posterior calf injuries. Patients generally recover well if they receive appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Etiology

Gastrocnemius strain usually develops at the posture of the knee. This is during maximal extension of the knee with the ankle in full dorsiflexion, which maximally stretches the gastrocnemius muscle. The posture increases the tension of the elastic elements of the muscle to let them approach the threshold of muscle tear, especially during eccentric contraction of the muscle.

Epidemiology

Gastrocnemius strain occurs most commonly in middle-aged or older patients. Gastrocnemius strain may also occur in younger athletes and has been termed "tennis leg."[5] The term is derived from the posture to serve tennis, which involves maximal knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion. The medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle is injured more commonly than the lateral head as some studies have shown the muscular activity to be more active at the medial head than the lateral head.[6]

Gastrocnemius injury is common in young athletes practicing exercises such as racquet sports, running, basketball, football, and skiing. One report described that this injury happened following praying namaz.[3] The activity mentioned above requires the participant to kneel with the head touching the ground. The calf muscle is eccentrically stretched when the participant attempts to stand up.

Pathophysiology

Muscle fatigue and impaired coordination are common factors contributing to gastrocnemius muscle strain. Some research has revealed that impaired vascular supply to the gastrocnemius muscle might result in weakness of the musculotendinous unit. Failure of muscle relaxation also plays a role in causing muscle strain. Due to the inability to fully relax, muscle fibers are more vulnerable to stretching injury.[5] The associated symptoms include muscle stiffness, indicating a decline of muscular elasticity. A common prodrome before the injury event comprises of a dull muscle ache.[5]

History and Physical

Often, patients will complain of feeling like something struck them on their calf. Accompanying this feeling is an audible snap or pop, sounding like breaking a twig. At the moment of injury, there may be no pain. After the patient takes a few steps, the pain develops on the posteromedial part of the calf. Intense pain may limit their ability to ambulate.[5] Prodromal symptoms play an interesting role in gastrocnemius muscle injury. Patients may recall similar prodromic discomfort. There might be dull pain first noted on the affected calf. One report states that 20% of patients experience prodromic symptoms.[7]

The physical examination will frequently demonstrate edema, ecchymosis, and tenderness over the muscle tear site and possibly extending to the knee and ankle. Practitioners should palpate the calf along the full length of the muscles. Gastrocnemius strains usually present with pain on palpation of the medial belly or the musculotendinous junction. In soleus strains, the tenderness is frequently more lateral.[1] A subcutaneous gap may be palpated if there is a frank retraction across the injury site. The Achilles tendon should be palpated to determine if it is intact. If the clinician is unable to ascertain this from palpation, the Thompson test can be done.[1] The peripheral pulses should be assessed as well. Provocative muscle testing should be done. The patient may have severe pain during passive ankle dorsiflexion or resistive plantar flexion and this can be indicative of a more severe injury.[3] A neurological examination should include both motor and sensory testing. Some patients with a complete tear may develop a large hematoma. The hematoma may compress the sural nerve and cause loss of sensation in the lateral calf and ankle.

Evaluation

Although the diagnosis of a gastrocnemius strain is mainly clinical, imaging studies can assist in differentiating partial and complete ruptures. The utility of plain films and computed tomography scans in soft tissue injury is limited. Ultrasound offers the advantage of nonionizing radiation and is relatively inexpensive. The examiner should be aware of sonographic findings such as the disruption of the normal fiber arrangement at the myotendinous junction, hematoma, and fluid collection between the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Ultrasonography can also differentiate partial from complete tears of the muscle, and determine the size of the hematoma. A bigger hematoma usually indicates a complete gastrocnemius muscle tear rather than a partial tear. Ultrasound can also determine the size of a complete rupture and is helpful in guiding the percutaneous aspiration of the hematoma. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can also be scrutinized by using ultrasound, which is sometimes concomitant with gastrocnemius strain.[3][8]

One study of 141 patients with clinically diagnosed tennis leg showed that 67% had a partial tear of medial gastrocnemius, 1.4% had associated plantaris tendon rupture, and 21% had intermuscular fluid collection without medial gastrocnemius muscle tear. Ten percent had deep vein thrombosis without visible gastrocnemius pathology.[9]

Sonography is useful to follow up the healing course. Signs of recovery on sonography include a progressive decrease in the hematoma size, reparative tissue signified by a peripheral hypoechoic area that extends toward the center, and rearrangement of muscle fibers.[10]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indispensable in certain conditions as it offers outstanding soft tissue imaging. Findings include rupture or discontinuity of muscle fibers and retraction of the torn muscle fibers. MRI also allows differentiation between gastrocnemius and Achilles tendon injury, which can help to improve direct treatment. MRI can also provide an assessment of surrounding connective tissues in some muscle injury cases. Three MRI studies reported that connective tissue injury plays an important role to evaluate the return to sports after muscle injury.[11][12][13]

Treatment / Management

Early and accurate diagnosis and treatment can have a major impact on patient outcomes. Early treatment emphasizes symptomatic relief. Limiting further bleeding, decreasing pain, and preventing joint contracture are the main goals of early management of the gastrocnemius strain. Rest, ice packing, compressive wrapping, and elevation are common measures to minimize swelling and pain of injured muscle. The application of moist heat and massage are considered contraindicated early in treatment as they are thought to increase the risk of further hemorrhage.[1] 

Medications may be necessary to reduce pain and muscle spasms. Early mobilization is also paramount for preventing contracture. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not recommended within the first 24 to 72 hours of injury due to an increased risk of bleeding from their antiplatelet effects. Celecoxib and possibly other COX-inhibitors are possible options during this period due to their weaker antiplatelet effect. Acetaminophen or narcotic pain medication can also be used.[1] If a patient is not improving despite these measures, reexamination and imaging studies should be considered to look for complications or possible surgical indications.[1]

Once the acute phase of treatment has been successful, that patient should be started on the rehabilitative phase of treatment. It is important to prescribe physical therapy to promote functional recovery. Initially, gentle stretching can help lengthen the intramuscular scar of the injured muscle. Later, strengthening, heel raising, and proprioceptive exercise should be added as well as core muscle strengthening and general reconditioning. The patient is allowed to ambulate as tolerated and to increase the activity level gradually after the pain subsides. In patients suffering from severe injury, weight-bearing of the affected lower extremity should be limited, and a cast or orthosis may be needed for ambulation. Weight-bearing exercise or dorsiflexion stretching should be delayed until the pain subsides. 

Most patients recover well under non-operative treatment. Surgical repairing of the muscle tear may be needed in certain cases. However, the procedure is technically challenging due to the difficulty of performing a suture through muscle tissue. Fibrosis and contracture at the incision site appear to be another concern. The absolute surgical indication is still unclear.[1][14]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis includes:

  • Achilles tendon pathology
  • Soleus muscle injury
  • Plantaris muscle injury
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Compartment syndrome 

Among calf muscle injuries, injury of the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle remains the most frequent. Plantaris strain is relatively rare. Soleus muscle has a lower risk of injury in contrast to the gastrocnemius muscle. The soleus muscle mainly consists of type 1 slow-twitch muscle fibers and crosses only the ankle joint. Soleus strain tends to be less severe than gastrocnemius strain.[1]

Staging

Grade 1 Injury (Mild)

The patients may feel a sharp pain at the time of injury or pain with activity. They are usually able to continue the activity. There may be no or minimal loss of strength and range of motion. One MRI study exposes bright signals on fluid-sensitive sequences with less than 5% feathery appearance of muscle fiber involved. Pathologically, grade 1 injury indicates less than 10% of muscle fibers disrupted.

Grade 2 Injury (Moderate)

The patient cannot walk at the moment of injury. The patient may complain of weakness during ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. One MRI study concedes the change in myotendinous junction as edema or hemorrhage. Grade 2 injury implies 10% to 50% disruption of muscle fibers. 

Grade 3 Injury (Severe)

There may be a palpable defect on the affected calf. The MRI findings include complete disruption of the continuity of muscle, wavy tendon morphology and retraction, and extensive hemorrhage or edema. Dixon et al. suggested that grade 3 injury indicates 50% to 100% disruption of muscle fibers.[1][10]

Prognosis

The majority of studies indicate that gastrocnemius strains mostly have a good prognosis. Most patients can have a marked decrease in pain and return to exercise after adequate management.

Complications

  • Scar tissue formation
  • Chronic pain/dysfunction
  • Reinjury
  • DVT formation
  • Compartment syndrome

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients should be educated about the importance of maintaining their flexibility in the gastrocnemius muscle. Regular gentle stretching activities for the lower extremities may help lower the risk of gastrocnemius strains and reinjury. Patients should also be encouraged to follow up with their physical therapist as recommended and continue with their prescribed home exercise program during their rehabilitation. Athletes should be educated that return to play should not occur before they are pain-free and have recovered their full range of motion.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Gastrocnemius strain remains a common injury among young athletes and middle to older ages and is best managed with an interprofessional team approach. Many of these patients often first present to the emergency department or the primary care provider. Hence, these professionals need to know about the diagnosis and management of the disorder. Physical therapists will be vital to helping the patient progress through their rehabilitation program. With severe injuries, orthopedic surgeons, sports medicine clinicians, and physiatrists may be required. The key to preventing these injuries is patient education about the importance of warmup and stretching before the formal exercise. For most patients, the prognosis is good. Non-operative treatment often provides optimal symptoms relief and functional recovery. The indication for surgical intervention remains uncertain. [Level 5][15]


Details

Author

David Hsu

Editor:

Ke-Vin Chang

Updated:

8/14/2023 9:36:59 PM

References


[1]

Bryan Dixon J. Gastrocnemius vs. soleus strain: how to differentiate and deal with calf muscle injuries. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2009 Jun:2(2):74-7. doi: 10.1007/s12178-009-9045-8. Epub 2009 May 23     [PubMed PMID: 19468870]


[2]

Anouchi YS, Parker RD, Seitz WH Jr. Posterior compartment syndrome of the calf resulting from misdiagnosis of a rupture of the medial head of the gastrocnemius. The Journal of trauma. 1987 Jun:27(6):678-80     [PubMed PMID: 3599116]


[3]

Campbell JT. Posterior calf injury. Foot and ankle clinics. 2009 Dec:14(4):761-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2009.07.005. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19857847]


[4]

Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasonography Imaging for the Diagnosis and Guided Injection of Plantaris Tendon Strain in a Patient With Tennis Leg. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2018 Jun:97(6):e60-e61. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000855. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29087967]


[5]

Froimson AI. Tennis leg. JAMA. 1969 Jul 21:209(3):415-6     [PubMed PMID: 5819446]


[6]

Cibulka M, Wenthe A, Boyle Z, Callier D, Schwerdt A, Jarman D, Strube MJ. VARIATION IN MEDIAL AND LATERAL GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ACTIVITY WITH FOOT POSITION. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2017 Apr:12(2):233-241     [PubMed PMID: 28515978]


[7]

Shields CL Jr, Redix L, Brewster CE. Acute tears of the medial head of the gastrocnemius. Foot & ankle. 1985 Jan-Feb:5(4):186-90     [PubMed PMID: 3830847]


[8]

Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasound Imaging for Posterior Knee Pain: Tibial Nerve Schwannoma Not Popliteus Muscle Strain. Medical ultrasonography. 2017 Apr 22:19(2):237-238. doi: 10.11152/mu-1024. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28440363]


[9]

Delgado GJ, Chung CB, Lektrakul N, Azocar P, Botte MJ, Coria D, Bosch E, Resnick D. Tennis leg: clinical US study of 141 patients and anatomic investigation of four cadavers with MR imaging and US. Radiology. 2002 Jul:224(1):112-9     [PubMed PMID: 12091669]


[10]

Lee JC, Mitchell AW, Healy JC. Imaging of muscle injury in the elite athlete. The British journal of radiology. 2012 Aug:85(1016):1173-85. doi: 10.1259/bjr/84622172. Epub 2012 Apr 11     [PubMed PMID: 22496067]


[11]

Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Malara F, Buchbinder R, Koulouris G, Burke F, Bass C. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2004 Oct:183(4):975-84     [PubMed PMID: 15385289]


[12]

Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT. Diagnostic and prognostic value of clinical findings in 83 athletes with posterior thigh injury: comparison of clinical findings with magnetic resonance imaging documentation of hamstring muscle strain. The American journal of sports medicine. 2003 Nov-Dec:31(6):969-73     [PubMed PMID: 14623665]


[13]

Prakash A, Entwisle T, Schneider M, Brukner P, Connell D. Connective tissue injury in calf muscle tears and return to play: MRI correlation. British journal of sports medicine. 2018 Jul:52(14):929-933. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098362. Epub 2017 Oct 26     [PubMed PMID: 29074478]


[14]

Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, Kalimo H, Järvinen M. Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. The American journal of sports medicine. 2005 May:33(5):745-64     [PubMed PMID: 15851777]


[15]

Bourne MN, Timmins RG, Opar DA, Pizzari T, Ruddy JD, Sims C, Williams MD, Shield AJ. An Evidence-Based Framework for Strengthening Exercises to Prevent Hamstring Injury. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2018 Feb:48(2):251-267. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0796-x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29116573]