Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Article Author:
Dipesh Ludhwani
Article Editor:
Jerald Wieters
Updated:
6/30/2019 8:04:51 PM
PubMed Link:
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

A normal heartbeat consists of a sequential contraction of atria followed by ventricles in a series of events called the cardiac cycle. The succession of 3 such regular heartbeats displaying identical waveform leads to a steady rhythm. The stimulus for each heartbeat commonly originates from sinus node in right atria, hence the name sinus rhythm. Abnormal heart rate or rhythm which is not physiologically justified is known as arrhythmia. Arrhythmias are almost always pathological except sinus arrhythmia, which is physiological. As the name suggests sinus arrhythmia originates from the sinus node, but the regularity between each heartbeat varies with inspiration and expiration. All pathological arrhythmia can be further classified based on heart rate into tachyarrhythmia (fast), bradyarrhythmia (slow) or tachy-brady (fast-slow) arrhythmia.

All tachyarrhythmia originating above the ventricles including atria and atrioventricular node (AV node) are grouped under supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).[1] Examples of SVT include atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation (AF), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) also known as paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a subtype of SVT that causes an irregularly irregular heart rhythm. AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia characterized by disorganized, rapid, and irregular atrial activation leading to irregular ventricular response. As a result of the above effects, atrial contractility is lost causing inability to completely empty blood from atrial appendage leading to the risk of clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic events. Ventricular response to atrial activation depends on conduction properties of the AV node. Typically the heart rate varies from 120 to 160 beats per minute however heart rate as fast as 200 beats per minutes can be seen.

The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology further classified AF as follows:[2]

  1. Paroxysmal AF: intermittent in nature, terminating spontaneously or within 7 days of treatment
  2. Persistent AF: Failure to terminate in 7 days
  3. Long lasting AF: AF lasting for more than 12 months
  4. Permanent AF: Persistent AF where rhythm strategy is no longer pursued

Other Types of AF

  1. Lone AF: Lone AF is used to describe patients younger than 60 years with no other concomitant heart disease and structurally normal heart on an echocardiogram.
  2. Non-Valvular AF: Defines whether AF is related to valvular disease, replacement or repair. It is much more difficult to convert valvular AF into sinus rhythm.

Etiology

Atrial fibrillation is commonly associated with conditions that alter the structure of the heart. Important causes and risk factors for AF are as follows

Cardiac Causes

  • Hypertensive heart disease 
  • Coronary artery disease 
  • Valvular heart disease 
  • Heart failure 
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Infiltrative cardiac disease 
  • Sick sinus syndrome
  • Pre-excitation syndrome

Non-Cardiac Causes

  • Chronic lung disease 
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Electrolyte abnormalities
  • Acute infections 
  • Thyroid disorders
  • Pheochromocytoma
  • Hypothermia
  • Post-surgical (seen in 35% to 50% of patients post coronary artery bypass graft)[3] 

Risk Factors

  • Age-related fibrosis
  • Diabetes 
  • Obesity 
  • Metabolic syndrome 
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • High-intensity exercise
  • Genetic factors

Epidemiology

Researchers of a 2010 study systematically reviewed 184 population-based studies for AF and estimated that approximately 33.5 million individuals in the world have AF.[4] AF prevalence has gradually increased over the last few decades[5] and based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate in 2017, 2.6 to 6.1 million people in the United States have AF. Further, prevalence increases with age and approximately 9% of all adults aged greater than 80 have AF.[6] Europe has a higher prevalence of AF compared to the United States. Similar to the prevalence the incidence of AF increases with age. In all age groups, males are more commonly affected than females. Despite a high prevalence of risk factors African Americans tend to have lower AF incidence compared to Caucasians.[6]

Pathophysiology

The underlying mechanism for AF is related to a complex interaction between triggers and substrate. Triggers are responsible for initiating the event (arrhythmia), and substrate will maintain that arrhythmia. Triggers arise when the action potential induce after-depolarization that is strong enough to overcome recovering repolarization.[7] This after-depolarization can cause extra systole but cannot maintain persistent arrhythmia. Impulses from such extrasystoles, however, are discharged at high frequency. When these impulses encounter myocardium with variable excitability or refractoriness, it gives rise to functional electrical blocks. Re-entry circuits arise which in turn gives rise to new impulse waves generating additional re-entry circuits that help maintain persistent arrhythmia yo overcome such blocks.[8]

The most common site for ectopic foci and trigger origin is left atrial muscular sleeve extending into the pulmonary vein. Myocardial cells in this region display shorter refractory period compared to surrounding myocardium and patients without AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed during catheter ablation for AF aims to isolate this region from surrounding myocardium dissipating further development of AF. Occasionally, AF can be triggered by other arrhythmias such as AVRT/ Atrial flutter and even premature atrial contractions (PACs). Atrial remodeling arising from electrical, structural and autonomic changes of the myocardium promotes both trigger and substrate. These changes lead to altered sympathovagal activity, shorter refractory period and increased atrial inducibility propagating AF.[9][10] Inflammatory and oxidative changes are also noted at the molecular level which can be correlated with high C-reactive protein (CRP) level. AF can cause hemodynamic and electrophysiological changes causing increased susceptibility to new episodes of AF.[11]

History and Physical

Clinical presentation for AF can range from asymptomatic incidental findings on electrocardiogram (ECG) to a catastrophic stroke with an undiagnosed underlying irregular rhythm. More commonly symptoms are similar to other arrhythmias like palpitations, dyspnea at rest or exertion, angina-like symptoms, fatigue or decreased exercise tolerance, lightheadedness, diaphoresis, dizziness, pre-syncope, and syncope. AF can also masquerade as symptoms of heart failure exacerbation like weight gain, pedal edema, and pulmonary congestion.

All patients presenting with the above symptoms should have a detailed history including past medical/cardiac history. On physical examination, patients should be examined for an irregularly irregular pulse, signs of heart failure like jugular vein distension (JVD), pedal edema and lung crackles. In valvular AF, mitral stenosis/regurgitation murmur can be heard. A history of prior investigation of underlying causes, anticoagulation choices, and previously-attempted methods for rate/rhythm control is important.

Evaluation

As mentioned above all patients being evaluated for AF should have a detailed history and physical exam. Diagnosis of AF is based on characteristic ECG findings. ECG findings as seen in patients with AF:

  • The absence of distinct “P” waves
  • Irregularly irregular R-R interval.
  • Narrow QRS complex tachycardia, typically with the heart rate between 110 and 160; QRS duration fewer than 0.12 seconds unless accompanied by pre-existing bundle block, aberrant conduction, or accessory pathway
  • Fibrillatory waves may be present which can mimic “P” waves.

Ashman phenomenon: QRS morphology is usually unaffected in AF, however in cases with aberrant ventricular conduction bundle branch block can occur as a result of an abrupt change in length of the cardiac cycle. These aberrantly conducted beats are usually of right bundle branch block morphology.[12]

Further evaluation should include workup to identify the cause of AF. Patients should be tested for electrolyte abnormalities, endocrine disorders (specifically hyperthyroid) drug-induced causes, infections, drug or chemical withdrawal, and echocardiography to check for structural heart disease. In patients presenting with ischemic stroke and with no prior history of AF, 72-hour Holter monitoring improves the detection rate of silent paroxysmal AF.[13]

Treatment / Management

Treatment strategy involves antithrombotic therapy and selection between rate or rhythm control. Previous randomized studies such as Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) and Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) have shown no superiority with one compared to other.[14][15][16]

Antithrombotic Therapy

AF is associated with 5-fold, increased risk of stroke. Whether all patients with AF need anticoagulation regardless of risk factor status is debatable. The embolic risk in patients with AF is estimated using the CHA2DS2-VASc risk model (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, vascular disease, sex).[17] A higher CHA2DS2-VASc score correlates with higher risk of ischemic stroke per year. The risk of AF related ischemic strokes increases from 1.3% to 2.2% as the CHA2DS2-VASc score increases from 1 to 2. Benefits with antithrombotic therapy are well documented in moderate to high-risk AF patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score equal to 2),[18] however its use in low-risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score less than 2) is often controversial as benefits are not well-defined.[19]

Benefits of anticoagulation should be balanced against the risk of bleeding. HAS-BLED scoring system (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol) is widely used to estimate the risk of bleeding from anticoagulation. The HAS-BLED score equal to 3 is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Once the patient’s individualized stroke risk is determined, the selection of antithrombotic therapy varies from one patient to another. Compared to warfarin-aspirin monotherapy is not recommended for primary stroke prevention in patients with AF.[20] Warfarin therapy needs constant monitoring with International Normalized Ratio (INR) to maintain the therapeutic range between 2.0 to 3.0 which usually requires bridging with heparin while initiating therapy. Several newer non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have a shorter duration of action, not requiring heparin bridging. Trials such as RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE have shown similar effectiveness and decreased intra-cranial bleeding risk with NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) when compared head-to-head with warfarin.[21][22][23] NOACs, do not require routine INR testing but they have challenges with access to rapid reversal agents. This is an area of rapid development. In patients with prosthetic heart valves and valvular AF, warfarin remains the preferred drug of choice. Selection of antithrombotic agent should be based on account of risk factors, cost tolerability, patient preference, and potential drug interaction.

Rate Control

Rate control is the preferred strategy for all asymptomatic AF patients. Guidelines on target heart rate in patients selected for rate control are lacking. Previously conducted randomized trial (RACE II) to assess heart rate goal in patients with AF showed no outcome difference between lenient and strict heart rate control however sufficient evidence to assess the impact on all-cause mortality was lacking. Physicians usually attempt to control heart rate control with agents such as beta-blockers (metoprolol, esmolol, propranolol), nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem), or digoxin. All 3 classes of drugs are given intravenously (IV) for acute rate control and can be switched to oral therapy for chronic management. In patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, carvedilol therapy has shown significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction. Due to negative inotropic properties of calcium channel blockers, physicians do not use thesei not preferred in such patients. Digoxin is usually reserved for patients who do not achieve rate control with beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers alone. Amiodarone can be used as second-line therapy when treatment with other agents has failed.[23] In patients refractory to medical therapy AV node ablation with a permanent pacemaker placement can effectively control and regularize ventricular heart rate. Low doses of magnesium have shown synergistic effects on rate control.[24]

Rhythm Control

The decision to achieve rhythm control either with pharmacological or non-pharmacological (electric) methods is based on the presence or absence of symptoms, age, and other comorbidities. Rhythm control with pharmacological therapy alone is associated with increased side effects and lower success rate.[25] Risk and side effects of specific antiarrhythmic should be considered before drug selection. Class I sodium channel blocking agents (flecainide, propafenone, disopyramide) have negative, inotropic action, and healthcare professionals should avoid these agents in patients with a history of coronary artery disease or heart failure. Class III agents (sotalol, dofetilide) have a 3% risk of causing QT prolongation and should be initiated while in hospital. Other class III antiarrhythmic like amiodarone has greater long-term efficacy however over 20% of patients develop toxicities during long-term therapy. Drug therapy is most commonly used in adjunction to direct current cardioversion (DCCV). DCCV is associated with high immediate success rate.[26] It is commonly performed in patients with hemodynamic compromise and patients with new-onset AF (fewer than 48 hours) who are candidates for rhythm control. Patients undergoing DCCV should have preexisting atrial thrombus ruled out with either transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. Anticoagulation with warfarin 3 weeks prior and 4 weeks after DCCV is recommended for patients when the duration of AF is greater than 48 hours. Risk of AF recurrence post-DCCV is high and can be reduced with the use of antiarrhythmic medications. In patients with contraindication to antiarrhythmic therapy catheter or surgical ablation can be attempted. Ablation is performed with the aim to electrically isolate pulmonary vein (trigger foci) from rest of atrial myocardium. Catheter ablation is associated with high success rates (70%). No significant difference in AF burden was noted between catheter ablation and oral antiarrhythmic therapy; however, overall symptoms and quality of life were significantly better in patients receiving ablation.[27] Surgical ablation is a reasonable option for AF patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications. The decision to perform catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic medications used to maintain sinus rhythm is guided by patient symptoms and risk/benefits of each therapy.

Differential Diagnosis

  1. Sinus tachycardia
  2. Atrial flutter
  3. Atrial flutter with variable block
  4. Atrial tachycardia (AT)
  5. Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT)
  6. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW)
  7. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT)
  8. Atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT)
  9. Junctional ectopic tachycardia

Prognosis

AF is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality.[14] Anticoagulation in all patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score equal to 2 has shown improved prognosis. Patients not on anticoagulation are at high risk for thromboembolic events. Fifty-five percent of AF patients are not on antithrombotic therapy, and this accounts for over 50,000 strokes annually.[28] Prognosis for AF related stroke is worse compared to non-AF related cerebrovascular events. Patients with heart failure are at increased risk to develop AF related complication. Elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and troponins have been implicated with adverse outcomes in AF patients.[29]

Complications

Complications associated with AF include [30]

  1. Thromboembolism including stroke
  2. New-onset heart failure or worsening of existing heart failure
  3. Acute myocardial infarction
  4. Hemodynamic instability leading to cardiogenic shock
  5. Sudden death from Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
  6. Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy

Deterrence and Patient Education

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Practitioners should educate all patients about the risk and benefits of anticoagulation. It is important to explain to patients that the risk of stroke increases each year exponentially without anticoagulation. Clinicians should offer the patient choices among various anticoagulation options and treatment strategies to improve adherence and decrease side effect profile. Stress should be laid on regular INR testing to maintain a therapeutic range while taking warfarin. Furthermore, physicians should counsel the patient about red-flag signs such as shortness of breath, palpitations, fatigue, and weight gain. Patients should learn to reduce AF recurrence non-pharmacologically, by cutting down on caffeine intake, avoiding alcohol, and exercising regularly.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

AF is a huge financial burden on health care. Managing AF requires an interprofessional approach with close involvement of various health care professionals such as primary care physicians, cardiologists, electrophysiologists, neurologists, surgeons, pharmacists, and nursing staff.

Ensuring guideline-directed treatment of AF is pivotal in improving over-all outcomes and reducing health care cost. Nurse-led, guideline-based clinics supported by appropriate software and cardiologist have shown superior results in terms of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations.[31] (Level I). Outpatient specialty AF clinics have shown better outcomes in AF-related hospitalizations and quality of life compared to usual care clinic.[32] (Level IV). Similar results have been seen with pharmacist-managed anticoagulation compared to telephone/usual care clinic. AF management guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology has stressed the importance of integrated management in coordinating care and improving outcomes.


References

[1] Patti L,Gossman WG, Rhythm, Tachycardia, Supraventricular (SVT) null. 2018 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 28723001]
[2] January CT,Wann LS,Alpert JS,Calkins H,Cigarroa JE,Cleveland JC Jr,Conti JB,Ellinor PT,Ezekowitz MD,Field ME,Murray KT,Sacco RL,Stevenson WG,Tchou PJ,Tracy CM,Yancy CW, 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014 Dec 2     [PubMed PMID: 24682348]
[3] Maisel WH,Rawn JD,Stevenson WG, Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Annals of internal medicine. 2001 Dec 18     [PubMed PMID: 11747385]
[4] Chugh SS,Havmoeller R,Narayanan K,Singh D,Rienstra M,Benjamin EJ,Gillum RF,Kim YH,McAnulty JH Jr,Zheng ZJ,Forouzanfar MH,Naghavi M,Mensah GA,Ezzati M,Murray CJ, Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 24345399]
[5] Ball J,Carrington MJ,McMurray JJ,Stewart S, Atrial fibrillation: profile and burden of an evolving epidemic in the 21st century. International journal of cardiology. 2013 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 23380698]
[6] Go AS,Hylek EM,Phillips KA,Chang Y,Henault LE,Selby JV,Singer DE, Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9     [PubMed PMID: 11343485]
[7] Nattel S,Dobrev D, The multidimensional role of calcium in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. European heart journal. 2012 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 22507975]
[8] Wakili R,Voigt N,Kääb S,Dobrev D,Nattel S, Recent advances in the molecular pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 21804195]
[9] Wijffels MC,Kirchhof CJ,Dorland R,Allessie MA, Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995 Oct 1     [PubMed PMID: 7671380]
[10] Li D,Fareh S,Leung TK,Nattel S, Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999 Jul 6     [PubMed PMID: 10393686]
[11] Nattel S, Atrial electrophysiological remodeling caused by rapid atrial activation: underlying mechanisms and clinical relevance to atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular research. 1999 May     [PubMed PMID: 10533568]
[12] Longo D,Baranchuk A, Ashman phenomenon dynamicity during atrial fibrillation: the critical role of the long cycles. Journal of atrial fibrillation. 2017 Oct-Nov     [PubMed PMID: 29250245]
[13] Grond M,Jauss M,Hamann G,Stark E,Veltkamp R,Nabavi D,Horn M,Weimar C,Köhrmann M,Wachter R,Rosin L,Kirchhof P, Improved detection of silent atrial fibrillation using 72-hour Holter ECG in patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Stroke. 2013 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 24130137]
[14] Wyse DG,Waldo AL,DiMarco JP,Domanski MJ,Rosenberg Y,Schron EB,Kellen JC,Greene HL,Mickel MC,Dalquist JE,Corley SD, A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2002 Dec 5     [PubMed PMID: 12466506]
[15] Saksena S,Slee A,Waldo AL,Freemantle N,Reynolds M,Rosenberg Y,Rathod S,Grant S,Thomas E,Wyse DG, Cardiovascular outcomes in the AFFIRM Trial (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management). An assessment of individual antiarrhythmic drug therapies compared with rate control with propensity score-matched analyses. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011 Nov 1     [PubMed PMID: 22032709]
[16] Hagens VE,Van Gelder IC,Crijns HJ, The RACE study in perspective of randomized studies on management of persistent atrial fibrillation. Cardiac electrophysiology review. 2003 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 14618033]
[17] Friberg L,Rosenqvist M,Lip GY, Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study. European heart journal. 2012 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 22246443]
[18] Ezekowitz MD,Bridgers SL,James KE,Carliner NH,Colling CL,Gornick CC,Krause-Steinrauf H,Kurtzke JF,Nazarian SM,Radford MJ, Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The New England journal of medicine. 1992 Nov 12     [PubMed PMID: 1406859]
[19] Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Archives of internal medicine. 1994 Jul 11     [PubMed PMID: 8018000]
[20] Hart RG,Pearce LA,Aguilar MI, Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Annals of internal medicine. 2007 Jun 19     [PubMed PMID: 17577005]
[21] Connolly SJ,Ezekowitz MD,Yusuf S,Eikelboom J,Oldgren J,Parekh A,Pogue J,Reilly PA,Themeles E,Varrone J,Wang S,Alings M,Xavier D,Zhu J,Diaz R,Lewis BS,Darius H,Diener HC,Joyner CD,Wallentin L, Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2009 Sep 17     [PubMed PMID: 19717844]
[22] Patel MR,Mahaffey KW,Garg J,Pan G,Singer DE,Hacke W,Breithardt G,Halperin JL,Hankey GJ,Piccini JP,Becker RC,Nessel CC,Paolini JF,Berkowitz SD,Fox KA,Califf RM, Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2011 Sep 8     [PubMed PMID: 21830957]
[23] Granger CB,Alexander JH,McMurray JJ,Lopes RD,Hylek EM,Hanna M,Al-Khalidi HR,Ansell J,Atar D,Avezum A,Bahit MC,Diaz R,Easton JD,Ezekowitz JA,Flaker G,Garcia D,Geraldes M,Gersh BJ,Golitsyn S,Goto S,Hermosillo AG,Hohnloser SH,Horowitz J,Mohan P,Jansky P,Lewis BS,Lopez-Sendon JL,Pais P,Parkhomenko A,Verheugt FW,Zhu J,Wallentin L, Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2011 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 21870978]
[24] Bouida W,Beltaief K,Msolli MA,Azaiez N,Ben Soltane H,Sekma A,Trabelsi I,Boubaker H,Grissa MH,Methemem M,Boukef R,Dridi Z,Belguith A,Nouira S, Low-dose Magnesium Sulfate Versus High Dose in the Early Management of Rapid Atrial Fibrillation: Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study (LOMAGHI Study). Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2018 Jul 19     [PubMed PMID: 30025177]
[25] Naccarelli GV,Dell'Orfano JT,Wolbrette DL,Patel HM,Luck JC, Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy. The American journal of cardiology. 2000 May 25     [PubMed PMID: 10822039]
[26] Elhendy A,Gentile F,Khandheria BK,Hammill SC,Gersh BJ,Bailey KR,Montgomery S,Burger K,Seward JB, Predictors of unsuccessful electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. The American journal of cardiology. 2002 Jan 1     [PubMed PMID: 11779532]
[27] Cosedis Nielsen J,Johannessen A,Raatikainen P,Hindricks G,Walfridsson H,Kongstad O,Pehrson S,Englund A,Hartikainen J,Mortensen LS,Hansen PS, Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2012 Oct 25     [PubMed PMID: 23094720]
[28] Caro JJ, An economic model of stroke in atrial fibrillation: the cost of suboptimal oral anticoagulation. The American journal of managed care. 2004 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 15696909]
[29] McManus DD,Rienstra M,Benjamin EJ, An update on the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012 Sep 4     [PubMed PMID: 22949543]
[30] Capucci A,Villani GQ,Aschieri D, Risk of complications of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 1997 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 9358515]
[31] Hendriks JM,de Wit R,Crijns HJ,Vrijhoef HJ,Prins MH,Pisters R,Pison LA,Blaauw Y,Tieleman RG, Nurse-led care vs. usual care for patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized trial of integrated chronic care vs. routine clinical care in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation. European heart journal. 2012 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 22453654]
[32] Frydensberg VS,Brandes A, Does an interdisciplinary outpatient atrial fibrillation (AF) clinic affect the number of acute AF admissions? A retrospective cohort study. Journal of clinical nursing. 2018 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 29603828]