Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation or presence of a thrombus in the deep veins. DVT occurs mostly in the lower extremities and, to a lesser extent, in the upper extremities. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an obstruction of the pulmonary artery or its branches by a thrombus (sometimes due to fat or air). The most likely source of thrombus in pulmonary arteries is an embolization from deep veins in the legs. This activity reviews the causes of DVT and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in the prophylaxis against DVT.

Objectives:

  • Identify the cause of DVT.
  • Develop strategies to increase compliance with the use of DVT prophylaxis.
  • Apply best practices when emergent and ongoing management in prophylaxis is unsuccessful.
  • Coordinate with the interprofessional team to enhance prophylaxis against DVT and improve patient outcomes.

Introduction

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation or presence of a thrombus in the deep veins. DVT occurs mainly in the lower extremities and, to a lesser extent, in the upper extremities. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an obstruction of the pulmonary artery or its branches by a thrombus (sometimes due to fat or air). The most likely source of thrombus in pulmonary arteries is an embolization from deep veins of the legs. This occurs in one-third of patients with DVT. Prevention of DVT thereby decreases the incidence of PE, a serious and life-threatening condition.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes DVT and PE. DVT is a major preventable cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. DVT and PE account for 60,000 to 100,000 deaths annually in the United States.[1]

Normally, a balance of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors in the blood prevents thrombus formation intravascularly. One or more factors of the triad of Virchow can lead to the formation of DVT.

Triad of Virchow

  1. Venous stasis (eg, immobility and congestive heart failure)
  2. Endothelial injury (eg, surgery and trauma)
  3. Hypercoagulability (eg, OCP, cancer, and thrombophilia)[2]

Venous stasis is the most crucial factor, but endothelial injury or hypercoagulability increases the risk of DVT. Hospitalized patients are at risk of venous stasis, and with the presence of other factors, they are at increased risk of DVT compared to patients in the community.

DVT prophylaxis targets either venous stasis (mechanical methods) or hypercoagulability (pharmacological prophylaxis).

Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing DVT (approximately 50%), increasing the risk of PE. PE is one of the most common but preventable causes of death in hospitalized patients.

Only 50% of hospitalized patients receive DVT prophylaxis. Prevention of DVT in hospitalized patients decreases the risk of DVT and PE, decreasing mortality and morbidity.

DVT prophylaxis can be primary or secondary. Primary prophylaxis is preferred, using medications and mechanical methods to prevent DVT. Secondary prophylaxis is a less commonly used method that includes early detection with screening methods and the treatment of subclinical DVT.

Anatomy and Physiology

Deep Veins of the Lower Extremities

  • Common femoral vein
  • Deep femoral vein
  • Superficial femoral vein
  • Popliteal vein
  • Anterior tibial vein
  • Posterior tibial vein
  • Peroneal vein 

Deep Veins of the Upper Extremities

  • Paired radial vein
  • Paired ulnar vein
  • Interosseous vein
  • Brachial vein
  • Axillary vein
  • Subclavian vein

Indications

DVT Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients

Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of VTE when compared to patients in the community. Therefore, DVT prophylaxis should be considered in every hospitalized patient. A full history and physical examination are warranted to assess the risk of VTE and bleeding.

Patients with Increased Thrombosis Risk

  • Elderly (older than 70)[3]
  • Immobile patients
  • History of DVT/PE
  • Critical ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit 
  • Stroke with lower extremity paralysis
  • Advanced congestive heart failure 
  • Active cancer[4]
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Thrombophilia
  • Recent surgery or trauma
  • Obesity[5]
  • Ongoing hormonal therapy

Based on thrombosis risk, patients are classified into low risk, moderate risk, and high risk for VTE. 

  1. Low-risk patients: Young patients with no risk factors for VTE. No need for prophylaxis.
  2. Moderate-risk patients: With at least one risk factor, pharmacological prophylaxis is preferred with or without mechanical prophylaxis.
  3. High-risk patients: With multiple risk factors, pharmacological prophylaxis is preferred with mechanical prophylaxis.

Commonly used pharmacological agents for prophylaxis in hospitalized patients are:

  1.  Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH)
  2.  Unfractionated heparin (UFH)
  3.  Fondaparinux[6]

LMWH is preferred to UFH due to ease of administration (once daily versus 2 to 3 times per day) and decreased incidence of DVT.[7] A number of LMW heparin preparations are available, all of which have almost equal efficacy against VTE. Their dosages are listed in the table below:

LMW Heparin Dose* Administration
Enoxaparin 40 mg SQ, OD
Dalteparin 5000 units SQ, OD
Tinzaparin 4500 units SQ, OD

Table 1. Common dosages for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients[8][9]

* Prophylactic dosages are suggested for medical patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 30 mL/min with no extremes in body weight. Platelet counts should be monitored regularly to detect the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

UFH is used in patients with low GFR. Prophylactic dosage for UFH is usually 5000 units given subcutaneously twice or thrice a day. This may be increased to 5000 to 7500 units 3 times a day in a patient with obesity. UFH is typically less expensive than low-molecular-weight heparin. However, it is also contraindicated in patients with HIT, and platelet counts need to be monitored regularly in all patients receiving low-dose UFH.

Direct oral anticoagulants have been shown to reduce mortality (betrixaban compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin). Betrixaban and rivaroxaban are currently approved for use in hospitalized patients.

Mechanical methods are used in patients with moderate-to-high risk for DVT with an increased risk of bleeding. They include intermittent pneumatic compression, graduated compression stockings, and venous foot pump.

DVT Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Cancer Patients

Patients with active cancer but no additional thrombosis risk factors do not need DVT prophylaxis in outpatient settings. If they have additional risk factors), either LMWH or UFH is used.

  Hospitalized medical patients Surgical patients (postoperative)
Unfractionated heparin
Unfractionated heparin 5000 units once every 8 to 12 hours 5000 units once every 8 to 12 hours starting 6 to 24 hours postoperatively
Low molecular weight (LMW) heparin
Dalteparin 5000 units once daily 5000 units once a day starting 12 to 24 hours postoperatively
Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily 40 mg once a day starting 12 to 24 hours postoperatively
Tinzaparin 3500 anti-Xa units once daily 3500 anti-Xa units once a day starting 12 to 24 hours postoperatively
Fondaparinux
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily

2.5 mg once daily beginning 6 to 8 hours postoperatively or starting the morning after surgery

Table 2. Parenteral venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with cancer[10]

DVT Prophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients

The guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and an international consensus group do not recommend routine VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer, except for those at very high risk of VTE (eg, patients with multiple myeloma receiving lenalidomide or thalidomide plus chemotherapy or dexamethasone). In this case, either a direct factor Xa inhibitor or LMW heparin may be used.

DVT Prophylaxis in Long-Distance Travellers

Long-distance travelers with risk factors for VTE can use properly fitted below-knee graduated compressive devices at 15 to 30 mm Hg of pressure, along with frequent ambulation and calf muscle exercises. Pharmacological prophylaxis is not recommended.

DVT Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgeries

VTE (DVT and PE) risk is high in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries like knee or hip surgeries. In patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, LMWH, apixaban, and rivaroxaban are used. Fondaparinux, UFH, and warfarin are used if the above agents cannot be used or are contraindicated. LMWH, UFH, and fondaparinux are used for DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Duration:

  • At least 10 to 14 days, preferably 35 days from the day of surgery (especially for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty) in the absence of risk factors for bleeding.
  • LMWH typically started 12 hours before and/or 12 hours after surgery. The rest of the medications are typically started 12 hours postoperatively.
  • Aspirin alone is not generally recommended for DVT prophylaxis. Aspirin is efficacious compared to placebo in preventing DVT, but no comparison studies have been done with either UFH or LMWH.[11] Aspirin can be used in hybrid therapy, where other agents are used initially while in the hospital and switched to aspirin at discharge.
  • Patients with a high risk of bleeding are placed on mechanical prophylaxis unless contraindicated.
  • Patients undergoing an arthroscopic procedure without a prior history of DVT/PE rarely need DVT prophylaxis.
  • Patients undergoing isolated lower extremity orthopedic surgery requiring immobilization do not require DVT prophylaxis as long as they can ambulate early and adequately.

DVT Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Non-Orthopedic Surgeries

VTE risk is based on the type of surgery and underlying patient risk factors. Major surgeries are categorized as moderate to high risk for VTE and need DVT prophylaxis. When in doubt about the risk of VTE, a modified Caprini risk assessment score can be used. This tool scores risk factors from 1 to 5. Based on this assessment score, a patient undergoing surgery can be categorized below.

  • Very low-risk patients: No DVT prophylaxis is needed.
  • Low risk: Mechanical methods are preferred.
  • Moderate to high-risk patients: Pharmacological agents are used with or without mechanical methods.

LMWH is preferred, but UFH is used in patients with renal insufficiency. Fondaparinux is used in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Other agents are typically not used for DVT prophylaxis. The duration of DVT prophylaxis is typically for a few days or until patients can ambulate or discharge from the hospital. A prolonged duration of prophylaxis, even after discharge from the hospital, is not typically recommended. In patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer and with a low risk of bleeding, pharmacological prophylaxis is extended to a total of 4 weeks.

Pharmacological Agents

  • Low-molecular-weight heparin: Enoxaparin, 40 mg subcutaneously once daily, or dalteparin, 5000 units subcutaneously once daily
  • Unfractionated heparin: 5000 units subcutaneously every 8 to 12 hours
  • Fondaparinux: 2.5 mg subcutaneously daily
  • Direct oral anticoagulants: betrixaban or rivaroxaban[12][13]
  • Warfarin

Mechanical Agents

  • Intermittent pneumatic compressions (IPC)[14]
  • Graduated compression stockings (GCS)
  • Venous foot pump[15]

DVT Prophylaxis in Pregnancy

The incidence of venous thromboembolism is increased during or trimester of pregnancy and is highest during the postpartum period. Most pregnant patients do not require therapy other than observation. Pharmacological prophylaxis is considered in individual cases, particularly in those with the following risk factors:

  • A prior history of VTE
  • Hospitalization for an acute illness or cesarean delivery
  • The presence of an inherited thrombophilia (eg, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, or antithrombin III, protein C, or protein S deficiencies).

Antepartum pharmacological prophylaxis is continued throughout the pregnancy. The optimal duration of outpatient postpartum prophylaxis is unknown. However, the American College of chest physicians suggests at least 6 weeks postpartum, with a longer duration of up to 3 months for those at greater risk. Inpatient from prophylaxis is continued until the patient is ambulatory, provided there is no need for outpatient prophylaxis.

Contraindications

Contraindications for Pharmacological DVT Prophylaxis

  • Active bleeding or recent bleeding or high risk for bleeding (active PUD)
  • Patients with coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.5)
  • A planned surgical procedure in the next 6 to 12 hours
  • Thrombocytopenia (Less than 50,000, sometimes less than 100,000)
  • Bleeding disorders

 Contraindications for Mechanical Prophylaxis

  • Limb ischemia due to peripheral vascular disease
  • Skin breakdown

Complications

The complications from pharmacological prophylaxis include:

  • Disturbed renal function
  • Bleeding
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Clinical Significance

DVT increases the risk of pulmonary embolism by 50% and also leads to post-thrombotic syndrome. Using DVT prophylaxis in hospitalized patients decreases the risk of DVT anywhere from 10 to 80%. DVT prophylaxis decreases the risk of DVT/PE in both hospitalized medical and surgical patients. However, mortality benefits have been reported in surgical patients but not medical patients.[16]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Interprofessional teamwork is essential in preventing DVT in hospitalized patients. Good interprofessional communication among attending clinicians, surgeons (for surgical patients), nursing staff, and pharmacists is vital in using the appropriate prophylaxis methods. All hospitals should have a formal strategy that increases compliance with DVT prophylaxis.

Nursing is on the "front lines" and is especially important in DVT prophylaxis, as they can spot patients who might be at risk but not receiving prophylaxis and alert the attending clinician. Pharmacists are valuable in consulting regarding appropriate agent selection and dosing based on various factors, including patient parameters and other medications. Open communication among clinicians, nursing, and pharmacy is vital in preventing DVT and successfully managing the condition should prophylaxis fail. The interprofessional approach to care, where all team members are empowered to provide input on the case, is the optimal paradigm in DVT prophylaxis. [Level 5]


Details

Updated:

5/7/2023 6:07:20 PM

References


[1]

Stone J, Hangge P, Albadawi H, Wallace A, Shamoun F, Knuttien MG, Naidu S, Oklu R. Deep vein thrombosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical management. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. 2017 Dec:7(Suppl 3):S276-S284. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.01. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29399531]


[2]

Kushner A, West WP, Khan Suheb MZ, Pillarisetty LS. Virchow Triad. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30969519]


[3]

Spyropoulos AC, McGinn T, Khorana AA. The use of weighted and scored risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2012 Dec:108(6):1072-6. doi: 10.1160/TH12-07-0508. Epub 2012 Nov 8     [PubMed PMID: 23138506]


[4]

Spirk D, Sebastian T, Barco S, Banyai M, Beer JH, Mazzolai L, Baldi T, Aujesky D, Hayoz D, Engelberger RP, Kaeslin T, Korte W, Escher R, Husmann M, Blondon M, Kucher N. Clinical Outcomes of Incidental Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer and Noncancer Patients: The SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER). Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2021 May:121(5):641-649. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1720977. Epub 2020 Nov 17     [PubMed PMID: 33202448]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[5]

Gurunathan U, Barras M, McDougall C, Nandurkar H, Eley V. Obesity and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism after Major Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: A Literature Review. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2022 Dec:122(12):1969-1979. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757200. Epub 2022 Nov 16     [PubMed PMID: 36384225]


[6]

Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS, Lassen MR, Prins MH, Tomkowski W, Turpie AG, Egberts JF, Lensing AW, ARTEMIS Investigators. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2006 Feb 11:332(7537):325-9     [PubMed PMID: 16439370]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Alikhan R, Bedenis R, Cohen AT. Heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients (excluding stroke and myocardial infarction). The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 May 7:2014(5):CD003747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003747.pub4. Epub 2014 May 7     [PubMed PMID: 24804622]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[8]

Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, Cushman M, Dentali F, Akl EA, Cook DJ, Balekian AA, Klein RC, Le H, Schulman S, Murad MH. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb:141(2 Suppl):e195S-e226S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2296. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22315261]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[9]

Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Bohlke K, Lee AYY, Arcelus JI, Wong SL, Balaban EP, Flowers CR, Francis CW, Gates LE, Kakkar AK, Levine MN, Liebman HA, Tempero MA, Lyman GH, Falanga A. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020 Feb 10:38(5):496-520. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01461. Epub 2019 Aug 5     [PubMed PMID: 31381464]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[10]

Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, Samama MM. Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb:141(2 Suppl):e24S-e43S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2291. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22315264]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Karthikeyan G, Eikelboom JW, Turpie AG, Hirsh J. Does acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) have a role in the prevention of venous thromboembolism? British journal of haematology. 2009 Jul:146(2):142-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07734.x. Epub 2009 May 12     [PubMed PMID: 19438502]


[12]

Perrotta C, Chahla J, Badariotti G, Ramos J. Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2022 Aug 22:8(8):CD005259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005259.pub5. Epub 2022 Aug 22     [PubMed PMID: 35993965]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Jiang YY, Chen LJ, Wu XJ, Zhou GQ, Mo DC, Li XL, Liu LY, Li JL, Luo M. Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in a Chinese Population. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2022 Jan-Dec:28():10760296221144038. doi: 10.1177/10760296221144038. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 36503260]


[14]

Duval C, Sirois C, Savoie-White FH, Tardif PA, Bérubé M, Turgeon AF, Cook DJ, Lauzier F, Moore L. Effect of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Addition to Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical care explorations. 2022 Oct:4(10):e0769. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000769. Epub 2022 Oct 3     [PubMed PMID: 36212735]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[15]

Sakai T, Izumi M, Kumagai K, Kidera K, Yamaguchi T, Asahara T, Kozuru H, Jiuchi Y, Mawatari M, Osaki M, Motokawa S, Migita K. Effects of a Foot Pump on the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Given Edoxaban: A Randomized Controlled Study. Medicine. 2016 Jan:95(1):e2247. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002247. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26735531]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Collins R, Scrimgeour A, Yusuf S, Peto R. Reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis by perioperative administration of subcutaneous heparin. Overview of results of randomized trials in general, orthopedic, and urologic surgery. The New England journal of medicine. 1988 May 5:318(18):1162-73     [PubMed PMID: 3283548]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence