Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder with multisystem involvement. It is a subtype of myotonic dystrophy type 1. Features include severe hypotonia and generalized muscle weakness; myotonia is classically absent in infancy. This activity will review clinical features, pathophysiology, and management strategies in CMD. It also highlights the importance of the interprofessional team in achieving the best outcomes in patients suffering from CMD.

Objectives:

  • Describe the incidence of congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD).
  • Summarize the causes of congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD).
  • Outline the clinical features of congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD).
  • Summarize how an interprofessional team is critical for the symptoms management, surveillance, and family support of patients with congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD).

Introduction

Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by trinucleotide repeat expansion of CTG (cytosine-thymine-guanine) in the DMPK (dystrophia myotonica protein kinase) gene on chromosome 19q 13.3. DM is more than just muscular dystrophy as the affected individuals show the involvement of other organ systems such as cataracts, cardiac conduction anomalies, insulin resistance, the congenital form being associated with developmental disabilities, etc.[1] Two major forms are described in the literature.

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), also known as Steinert disease Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), which is a milder version of DM1.

Like any trinucleotide expansion repeat diseases, a larger number of repeats are associated with the severity of the disease.[2][3]

Natural History: The incidence of CMD is 1 in 47619 live births, and the mortality in the neonatal period is up to 40%. Severe CMD demonstrates a unique “biphasic” course; in which neonatal symptoms improve/stabilize in surviving neonates before adult-onset symptoms present in later life.[4]

Etiology

Congenital myotonic dystrophy is caused by the repeat expansion of trinucleotide "CTG" (cytosine-thymine-guanine) in the 3'-untranslated region of the myotonia dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) gene located on chromosome 19q 13.3. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 is caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of the ZNF9 (e zinc finger protein 9) gene. Parallels between these mutations indicate that microsatellite expansions in RNA can be pathogenic and cause the multisystemic features of DM1 and DM2.[5] Variability in the clinical expression of DM1 is thought to be caused by somatic mosaicism due to instability of CTG repeat expansion in the somatic cells during life due to an abnormality in the DNA repair.[6]

The severity of the disease is correlated with allele size (number of repeats) with <30 repeats in an average healthy person to >11,000 repeats in the affected person; however, mild cases were reported with long expansions.[7]

Two important terms are used in the description of autosomal dominant diseases, i.e., penetrance, and anticipation. Penetrance refers to the percentage of the individuals showing signs of the disease, from the mildest to the most severe phenotype. If all individuals who have a disease genotype exhibit the disease phenotype, then the disease is said to be 'fully penetrant' or to have a penetrance of 100%. Anticipation refers to the increased disease severity and decreased age of onset in successive generations.[8][4][9]

In DM1, all clinical phenotypes except premutation exhibit full penetrance and anticipation.[10][11]

Full penetrance alleles of more than 50 are associated with disease manifestations. In CMD, repeats are usually more than 1000, compared to less than 37 in normal individuals, and 38-49 in premutation allele patients (asymptomatic). Offspring of premutation patients can inherit longer repeats, increasing the risk of disease and decreasing the age of onset in the next generations (anticipation). Contrary to the classic (adult), the maternal transmission is up to ~90% of cases, and only 9-12% are paternal. The mechanism is not yet well understood; however, maternal and intrauterine environment are considered contributing factors.[3][12]

Epidemiology

Myotonic dystrophy is the most prevalent adult muscular dystrophy among the people of European ancestry with a minimum prevalence of 11.84/100,000[13][14]

  • The incidence of CMD is 1 in 47619 live births, higher in specific areas (Quebec, Canada) [4]
  • Spain - 0.08 per 10,000 live births [15]
  • Canada - 2.1 in 100,000 (1 in 47,619) live births [16]
  • South Africa - 3 per 100,000 live births [17]
  • Taiwan 0.46/100,000 inhabitants (adult type) [18]
  • In a systemic review, the prevalence of all muscular dystrophies was 19.8 to 25.1 per 100,000 person-years. Myotonic dystrophy (0.5 to 18.1 per100 000), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (1.7 to 4.2), and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (3.2 to 4.6 in 100 000) were the most common types.[19]

Pathophysiology

Mutation in the 3′ untranslated, noncoding region of DMPK gene, located on chromosome 19q13.3, results in the expansion of DNA (CTG) repeats. Transcription of DNA results in a mutant RNA that disrupts the splicing of CUG binding protein (CUG-BP) and Musclebind-like protein (MBNL). This leads to the sequestration of splicing factors forming ribonuclear inclusions. In turn, this disturbs cellular signaling and causes toxic effects on muscle metabolism and RNA processing. This process is known as spliceopathy.

MBNL 1 protein is abundant skeletal muscle, whilst MBNL 2 in brain tissue. These proteins exhibit loss of function, as they are aggregated in the nucleus and unable to be utilized by the cell. Conversely, CUG-BP binds to cardiac troponin and exhibits gain of function via increased activation and phosphorylation. Elevated levels result in cardiac abnormalities, and abnormal insulin receptor function, elucidating the risk of diabetes. It also inhibits myoblast differentiation, resulting in loss of CIC-1 chloride channels through disruption of splicing. Defect in the splicing results in sustained muscle contraction with an inability to relax (myotonia).[4][12][20]

Histopathology

Muscle biopsy is required in certain cases where genetic testing comes out to be inconclusive. Microscopy can show increased internalized nuclei (boxcar appearance), ring fibers, sarcoplasmic masses, and type 1 fiber atrophy with a pyknotic clump and type 2 fiber hypertrophy in DM1 and type 2 fiber atrophy in DM2.[21][22]

Electron Microscopy Appearance: Sarcoplasmic masses composed of disorganized myofibrils, dilated sarcoplasmic reticulum, and free ribosomes.

History and Physical

History

It includes detailed birth history, medical/surgical history, and 3-generation family history.

Clinical features associated with CMD are as follow:[4]

  • Prenatal: polyhydramnios, reduced fetal movements, preterm delivery <36 weeks, small for gestational age.
  • Neonatal: hypotonia, hyporeflexia, muscle weakness (distal > proximal), neck muscle weakness (flexion), myopathic facies (ptosis, facial diplegia, atrophy of temporalis muscles, tent-shaped mouth), contractures, arthrogryposis, scoliosis, talipes equinovarus, visual impairment (cataract, lens opacification), respiratory distress, weak cough, sleep apnea, pulmonary hypoplasia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, raised right hemidiaphragm, pneumothorax, recurrent infections/otitis media, aspiration pneumonia, feeding and sucking difficulties, gastroparesis, GERD, constipation/diarrhea, fecal incontinence, increased sensitivity to anesthesia (due to respiratory muscle compromise and central dysregulation of breathing), cardiac conduction disturbances, valve defects (mitral), and early death.
  • Infancy and childhood, age 1 to 10 years: usually, they are able to walk with improvement in motor function; however, progressive weakness restarts in the 2nd decade. Myotonia (by 10 years of age), intellectual disability (50-60%), autism, ADHD, psychiatric disorders, vision problems (hyperopia, astigmatism, cataract), excessive daytime sleepiness, cardiac and endocrine complications.
  1. Respiratory: respiratory difficulties are found in 50% of neonates and are the main cause of neonatal mortality and used to distinguish between mild and severe CDM.
  2. Musculoskeletal: proximal muscle weakness in DM1 indicates a poor prognosis. The biphasic course in CMD shows improved/stable disease until adolescence/young adult with gradual deterioration. Complications of muscle weakness may include scoliosis and contractures producing foot deformity and toe walking. Bulbar muscle weakness may produce swallowing, speech, and language difficulties.
  3. Cognition: cognitive impairment is one of the most common and challenging manifestations of childhood DM1. CDM patients are most affected, with IQ range 40 to 80, mean 70 (average normal 100). Cognitive impairment correlates with the severity of weakness, size of CTG repeat, and maternal transmission.
  4. Sleep: excessive sleep disorder and sleep apnea may adversely affect learning, memory, high-level cognitive processing, and physical functioning, exacerbating psychomotor and cognitive delays.
  5. Psychosocial: 50% of children have psychiatric diseases (phobia, depression, anxiety), and ADHD. Avoidant personality, apathy, and autistic features may be present.
  6. Cancer: There is an increased risk of cancer in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy, including thyroid, uterine, choroidal melanoma, colon, testicular, prostate, and basal cell cancer.
  7. Others: features of adult “classic” DM are not evident in childhood, including cataracts, significant cardiac disorders, and diabetes mellitus. Lens pathology is evident in 40% and can predict future cataract. Conduction disturbances observed on ECG, or valve abnormalities may be symptomatic. Hypothyroidism, hypogonadism, growth hormone abnormalities, and androgen insensitivity are rare. In contrast, testicular atrophy and infertility are common in CDM males, as are irregular menses in CDM females. 

Physical Exam: vital signs, weight, height, and head circumference measurements are essential. Comprehensive neonatal exam looking for dysmorphic features, contractures, scoliosis, pulmonary and cardiac evaluation for abnormal chest rise, or murmurs. Abdominal exam for organomegaly, back for scoliosis, the musculoskeletal system for contractures, detailed neurological exam assessing mental status, cranial nerves (myopathic facies, ptosis, dysphagia, weak cry/cough/gag, respiratory failure), motor (axial and appendicular hypotonia, frog-like posture, decreased movements), reflexes, Babinski response, sensory, coordination and primitive reflexes. Examine mother (myopathic facies, shake hand as myotonia prevents the prompt release of grip, percussion with a reflex hammer, by tapping thenar, wrist extensor will produce involuntary muscle contraction with a delay in relaxation, called percussion myotonia).[23]

Evaluation

Molecular Genetic Testing (first line): targeted analysis of the DMPK gene appears positive for a heterozygous pathogenic variant in nearly 100% of affected individuals. If the diagnosis is uncertain, the panel can be completed. The multigene panel can include testing for the DMPK CTG repeat expansion and other disorders of interest, depending on the laboratory.

Serum CK: normal to mildly elevated.

Muscle Biopsy (if negative genetic testing): increased internalized nuclei (boxcar appearance), ring fibers, sarcoplasmic masses, and type 1 fiber atrophy with a pyknotic clump.

Electromyography: records myopathic units (distal muscles), fibrillation potentials, and positive sharp waves. Fast runs of single-fiber discharges approaching the pattern of myotonic discharges are seen, without typical waxing and waning electrical myotonia.

Brain MRI: may show ventricular dilatation, cortical atrophy, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, and white matter abnormalities.[2][8][4][12]

Treatment / Management

Severe congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM) will require intensive care mainly for feeding and respiratory support. Gastric/jejunum feeding tube, tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation, and splinting of talipes is occasionally commenced. Genetic counseling and end of life counseling are essential.[8][23][24]

Thereafter, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical for symptom management, surveillance, and family support. The following recommendations are acquired from Consensus-based care recommendations for congenital and childhood-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 published in 2019,[25], and 2- Consensus Statement on Standard of Care for Congenital Muscular Dystrophies, published in 2014.[26]

Neurology: disclosure of diagnosis should address five items: diagnosis, prognosis, recurrence risk, treatment plan, and family/community support. Patients should be followed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in the neuromuscular clinic. Routine surveillance every 3 to 4 months for infants less than 12 months, and 4 to 6 months in toddlers of more than 12 months. Allied health teams include nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, social workers, and genetic counselors. Focusing on the financial burden and psychosocial aspects is vital. Referral to ophthalmology and other services, as discussed below, is recommended.

Respiratory: the primary goal is to monitor respiratory function, decrease secretions, and manage assisted ventilation. There is often an improvement in respiratory strength over time, and consideration for tracheostomy should be careful. Maintenance pulmonary therapy includes cough assist, breathe staking, etc. Pulmonary function testing includes vital capacity (<40% predict nocturnal hypoventilation), spirometry (>20% difference between sitting and supine vital capacity indicates diaphragmatic weakness and is a predictor of nocturnal hypoventilation). Other tests include peak cough flow, polysomnography, and blood gases. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccines are recommended, and palivizumab against RSV for children under two years of age.

Cardiology: arrhythmias, myopathies, and structural cardiac diseases can present with lethargy, dyspnea, pallor, palpitations, and syncope. Twice yearly assessment is required with closer follow-ups in symptomatic patients.

Gastroenterology: serial monitoring of nutrition and growth, feeding, GI motility (GERD, dysmotility, constipation), and oral care is recommended. Feeding tubes with or without Nissen fundoplication, laxatives, antacids, proton pump inhibitors, antiemetics, and probiotics are advisable to consider. 

Malocclusion, teeth crowding, caries, and gingival hyperplasia (prolonged NPO) should prompt an orthodontist evaluation.

Orthopedics and Rehabilitation: conservative or surgical interventions are required to manage joint contractures, scoliosis, foot, and spine deformities. Bracing, serial splinting and assisting devices to include walkers, orthotics, scooters, and wheelchairs, might be required to facilitate standing/walking/sitting. Yearly evaluation is recommended, more frequent in younger children to assess motor development and function. Physical activity is essential as children will experience progressive improvements of proximal muscle strength.

Pain Management: Patients with CMD are prone to developing contractures and can lead to painful spasms and joint pain. Adequate management of pain is important to achieve a good quality of life.[27][28][29]

Surgical Care: pre-anesthesia assessment, prolonged postoperative monitoring, and combined procedures under single sedation are recommended as children at higher risk for complications. Avoidance of specific agents, including inhaled sedation (halothane), IV sedation (thiopentone), muscle relaxants (succinylcholine, vecuronium), neostigmine, and some chemotherapy, is essential. Propofol-induced pain can induce myotonia.[8]

Psychiatry: Patients with CMD with their disability are prone to develop depression and anxiety and must have a psychiatry/psychologist referral as part of multidisciplinary care.[30]

Surveillance:[3]

  • Every six months: dentistry assessment
  • Every year: ECG, 24-hour Holter, pulmonary function test, fasting glucose/HBA1C
  • Every two years: ophthalmologic exam

Differential Diagnosis

Differential diagnoses of congenital myotonic dystrophy include the following:

  • Prader-Willi syndrome
  • Temple syndrome
  • Congenital myopathies (multiminicore, nemaline, and centronuclear) [8]
  • Hereditary inclusion body myopathy
  • Welander distal myopathy
  • Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy types 2B (dysferlinopathy) and 2L

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

Novel Therapies [4][24][31][32]

  • Antisense Oligonucleotides (AONs): work by degrading the CUG expansion, or by binding to CUG expansion to inhibit RNA sequestration and sites for abnormal MBNL binding.
  • Recombinant Adeno-associated viral (rAAV): stimulates overexpression of MBNL1, to prevent sequestration. Inhibition of CUG-BP1 activity via small molecules (pentamidine) or by inhibiting protein kinase C (involved in activating CUG-BP1) can also prevent sequestration.
  • Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas): cleave and degrade CUG mRNA expansion.
  • Others: agents to increase muscle anabolism, such as testosterone, creatine, dehydroepiandrosterone, and recombinant insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), and myostatin inhibitors.

Prognosis

The mortality rate is up to 40% in the neonatal period due to respiratory diseases. The mean life expectancy is 45 years.[3][4]

Complications

Severe CDM will require intensive care mainly for feeding and respiratory support. Gastric/jejunum feeding tube and tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation are occasionally required.[3]

Deterrence and Patient Education

  1. Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD) is a multisystem disease affecting many organs in the body. It is caused by a mutation in the DMPK gene.
  2. Infants appear weak, and sometimes require help with breathing and feeding.
  3. It is usually diagnosed by genetic testing for the targeted gene. 
  4. There is no cure, but multiple teams will follow the patient for symptoms management, surveillance, and family support.
  5. Unfortunately, the mortality rate is up to 40% in the neonatal period secondary to respiratory failure.

Pearls and Other Issues

  1. Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder with multisystem involvement. It is a subtype of myotonic dystrophy type 1. Features include severe hypotonia and generalized muscle weakness; myotonia is classically absent in infancy. 
    • Severe CDM will require intensive care mainly for feeding and respiratory support. Gastric/jejunum feeding tube, and tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation, and splinting of talipes is occasionally commenced.
  2. Mutation in the DMPK gene, located on chromosome 19q13.3, results in the expansion of DNA (CTG) repeats.
  3. Targeted molecular genetic testing of the DMPK gene appears positive for a heterozygous pathogenic variant in nearly 100% of affected individuals.
  4. The multidisciplinary team approach is critical for symptom management, surveillance, and family support.
  5. The mortality rate is up to 40% in the neonatal period due to respiratory diseases. The mean life expectancy is 45 years.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

As discussed previously, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical for symptom management, surveillance, and family support. Consensus-based care recommendations for congenital and childhood-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 published in 2019, and Consensus Statement on Standard of Care for Congenital Muscular Dystrophies, published in 2014 summarized the guidelines recommended inpatient care.[25][26]

Future clinical trials include:

Natural History: Trial Readiness and Endpoint Assessment in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy (TREAT_CDM): children with CDM between ages 0 and 15 will be enrolled, with visits at baseline and one year to evaluate physical and cognitive function and quality of life, to extend understanding of disease progression. 

Treatment: Efficacy and Safety of Tideglusib in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of tideglusib versus placebo in the treatment of children and adolescents 6 to 16 years of age with congenital DM1. The outcome is a change in Clinician-Completed Congenital DM1 Rating Scale (CDM1-RS) after 22 weeks.


Details

Author

Ashish Jain

Updated:

2/2/2023 1:50:06 PM

References


[1]

Thornton CA, Myotonic dystrophy. Neurologic clinics. 2014 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 25037086]


[2]

Hahn C,Salajegheh MK, Myotonic disorders: A review article. Iranian journal of neurology. 2016 Jan 5;     [PubMed PMID: 27141276]


[3]

Turner C,Hilton-Jones D, Myotonic dystrophy: diagnosis, management and new therapies. Current opinion in neurology. 2014 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 25121518]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Ho G,Cardamone M,Farrar M, Congenital and childhood myotonic dystrophy: Current aspects of disease and future directions. World journal of clinical pediatrics. 2015 Nov 8;     [PubMed PMID: 26566479]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Liquori CL,Ricker K,Moseley ML,Jacobsen JF,Kress W,Naylor SL,Day JW,Ranum LP, Myotonic dystrophy type 2 caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2001 Aug 3;     [PubMed PMID: 11486088]


[6]

Pearson CE,Nichol Edamura K,Cleary JD, Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2005 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 16205713]


[7]

Schoser B, Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 1993;     [PubMed PMID: 20301639]


[8]

Bird TD, Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 1993;     [PubMed PMID: 20301344]


[9]

Hamshere MG,Harley H,Harper P,Brook JD,Brookfield JF, Myotonic dystrophy: the correlation of (CTG) repeat length in leucocytes with age at onset is significant only for patients with small expansions. Journal of medical genetics. 1999 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 9950368]


[10]

Yum K,Wang ET,Kalsotra A, Myotonic dystrophy: disease repeat range, penetrance, age of onset, and relationship between repeat size and phenotypes. Current opinion in genetics     [PubMed PMID: 28213156]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Udd B,Krahe R, The myotonic dystrophies: molecular, clinical, and therapeutic challenges. The Lancet. Neurology. 2012 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 22995693]


[12]

Lanni S,Pearson CE, Molecular genetics of congenital myotonic dystrophy. Neurobiology of disease. 2019 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 31326502]


[13]

Husebye SA,Rebne CB,Stokland AE,Sanaker PS,Bindoff LA, A hospital based epidemiological study of genetically determined muscle disease in south western Norway. Neuromuscular disorders : NMD. 2020 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 32146000]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[14]

Pagola-Lorz I,Vicente E,Ibáñez B,Torné L,Elizalde-Beiras I,Garcia-Solaesa V,García F,Delfrade J,Jericó I, Epidemiological study and genetic characterization of inherited muscle diseases in a northern Spanish region. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2019 Dec 2;     [PubMed PMID: 31791368]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[15]

González de Dios J,Martínez Frías ML,Egües Jimeno J,Gairi Tahull JM,Gómez Sabrido F,Morales Fernández MC,Paisán Grisolía L,Pardo Romero M,Medina Rams M, [Epidemiological study of Steinert's congenital myotonic dystrophy: dysmorphological characteristics]. Anales espanoles de pediatria. 1999 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 10690232]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Campbell C,Levin S,Siu VM,Venance S,Jacob P, Congenital myotonic dystrophy: Canadian population-based surveillance study. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 23415617]


[17]

Lotz BP,van der Meyden CH, Myotonic dystrophy. Part I. A genealogical study in the northern Transvaal. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde. 1985 May 17;     [PubMed PMID: 3992413]


[18]

Hsiao KM,Chen SS,Li SY,Chiang SY,Lin HM,Pan H,Huang CC,Kuo HC,Jou SB,Su CC,Ro LS,Liu CS,Lo MC,Chen CM,Lin CC, Epidemiological and genetic studies of myotonic dystrophy type 1 in Taiwan. Neuroepidemiology. 2003 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 12902623]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[19]

Theadom A,Rodrigues M,Roxburgh R,Balalla S,Higgins C,Bhattacharjee R,Jones K,Krishnamurthi R,Feigin V, Prevalence of muscular dystrophies: a systematic literature review. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;     [PubMed PMID: 25532075]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Bissay V,Van Malderen SCH, What the internist should know about hereditary muscle channelopathies. Acta clinica Belgica. 2018 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 29088983]


[21]

Day JW,Ricker K,Jacobsen JF,Rasmussen LJ,Dick KA,Kress W,Schneider C,Koch MC,Beilman GJ,Harrison AR,Dalton JC,Ranum LP, Myotonic dystrophy type 2: molecular, diagnostic and clinical spectrum. Neurology. 2003 Feb 25;     [PubMed PMID: 12601109]


[22]

Lieberman AP,Fischbeck KH, Triplet repeat expansion in neuromuscular disease. Muscle     [PubMed PMID: 10842259]


[23]

Heatwole CR,Statland JM,Logigian EL, The diagnosis and treatment of myotonic disorders. Muscle     [PubMed PMID: 23536309]


[24]

Thornton CA,Wang E,Carrell EM, Myotonic dystrophy: approach to therapy. Current opinion in genetics     [PubMed PMID: 28376341]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[25]

Johnson NE,Aldana EZ,Angeard N,Ashizawa T,Berggren KN,Marini-Bettolo C,Duong T,Ekström AB,Sansone V,Tian C,Hellerstein L,Campbell C, Consensus-based care recommendations for congenital and childhood-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neurology. Clinical practice. 2019 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 31750030]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[26]

Wang CH,Bonnemann CG,Rutkowski A,Sejersen T,Bellini J,Battista V,Florence JM,Schara U,Schuler PM,Wahbi K,Aloysius A,Bash RO,Béroud C,Bertini E,Bushby K,Cohn RD,Connolly AM,Deconinck N,Desguerre I,Eagle M,Estournet-Mathiaud B,Ferreiro A,Fujak A,Goemans N,Iannaccone ST,Jouinot P,Main M,Melacini P,Mueller-Felber W,Muntoni F,Nelson LL,Rahbek J,Quijano-Roy S,Sewry C,Storhaug K,Simonds A,Tseng B,Vajsar J,Vianello A,Zeller R, Consensus statement on standard of care for congenital muscular dystrophies. Journal of child neurology. 2010 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 21078917]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Jain S,Malinowski M,Chopra P,Varshney V,Deer TR, Intrathecal drug delivery for pain management: recent advances and future developments. Expert opinion on drug delivery. 2019 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 31305165]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[28]

Deer TR,Jain S,Hunter C,Chakravarthy K, Neurostimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain. Brain sciences. 2019 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 30682776]


[29]

Deer TR,Grider JS,Lamer TJ,Pope JE,Falowski S,Hunter CW,Provenzano DA,Slavin KV,Russo M,Carayannopoulos A,Shah JM,Harned ME,Hagedorn JM,Bolash RB,Arle JE,Kapural L,Amirdelfan K,Jain S,Liem L,Carlson JD,Malinowski MN,Bendel M,Yang A,Aiyer R,Valimahomed A,Antony A,Craig J,Fishman MA,Al-Kaisy AA,Christelis N,Rosenquist RW,Levy RM,Mekhail N, A Systematic Literature Review of Spine Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2020 Nov 7     [PubMed PMID: 32034422]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

A supportive treatment for equine viral encephalitis., Staley EE,Wiley GL,, Veterinary medicine, small animal clinician : VM, SAC, 1977 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 9728948]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[31]

Bisset DR,Stepniak-Konieczna EA,Zavaljevski M,Wei J,Carter GT,Weiss MD,Chamberlain JR, Therapeutic impact of systemic AAV-mediated RNA interference in a mouse model of myotonic dystrophy. Human molecular genetics. 2015 Sep 1;     [PubMed PMID: 26082468]


[32]

Raaijmakers RHL,Ripken L,Ausems CRM,Wansink DG, CRISPR/Cas Applications in Myotonic Dystrophy: Expanding Opportunities. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Jul 27;     [PubMed PMID: 31357652]