Aortic Valve Endocarditis Surgical Treatment

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Infective endocarditis is an infectious disease involving the endocardial surface of the heart and can include the valves and/or the mural endocardium. Infective endocarditis is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential. This activity reviews the evaluation, treatment, and complications of infective endocarditis and underscores the importance of an interprofessional team approach to its management.

Objectives:

  • Describe the epidemiological trends for infective endocarditis.
  • Review the most commons symptoms associated with infective endocarditis.
  • Summarize the treatment options for infective endocarditis.
  • Outline how infective endocarditis requires an interprofessional team approach involving medical specialties such as cardiology, infectious disease, radiology, and cardiothoracic surgery to enhance care coordination for patients with infectious endocarditis, determine which patients are surgical candidates, and optimize clinical outcomes.

Introduction

Infective endocarditis is an infectious disease of the endocardial surface of the heart, and it classifies as acute, subacute, or chronic depending upon the symptom’s onset and duration. The most common target is the valves, and rarely it can involve the mural endocardium.[1][2] The incidence of IE has risen over the past few decades in the United States and across the Globe. The epidemiological trends have changed with Staphylococcus aureus being the predominant causative organism in the developed world. Despite optimal medical management, mortality remains unacceptably high. Patients not responsive to medical therapy or with certain complications may require surgical intervention and recognition of those factors is critical.

Etiology

For native valve, infective endocarditis, the most common microorganisms are  S. viridans and S. aureus.[1] For prosthetic valve endocarditis in the early phase (less than 2 months), typical agents include coagulase-negative staphylococci (S. epidermidis - 30 to 35%), S. aureus (20 to 24%) and in the late phase (more than 12 months) typical etiology is S. viridans and S. aureus.[1] For acute bacterial endocarditis, the most common agent is S. aureus, whereas, for subacute bacterial endocarditis, the most common agent is S. mutans. Candidal infectious endocarditis usually presents in prosthetic valves, intravenous drug abusers, and immunocompromised individuals.[1] Gastrointestinal or genitourinary manipulation is a risk factor for S. bovis or enterococcal IE. Poor dental hygiene is a risk for Streptococci and the HACEK group agents (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter (previously Actinobacillus), Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella) whereas nosocomial agents include Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative agents and candida. 

Epidemiology

Epidemiological studies demonstrate that the epidemiological profile of infectious endocarditis worldwide has changed and now Staphylococcus aureus the most common causative organism in the developed world. Furthermore, characteristics of patients have also changed, which include increased mean age of patients, increased number of prosthetic valve IE, and an increased number of surgeries performed for IE.[3] There has been an increased incidence of IE after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery or percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve replacement.[4][5]

History and Physical

The most common symptoms include fever, anorexia, weight loss, malaise, and night sweats.[1] The most common physical examination findings include the presence of a murmur, petechiae on the skin, oral mucosa or conjunctivae, and splenomegaly.[1] Peripheral findings of IE include splinter hemorrhages, normally seen under the fingernails or toenails, Osler nodes, and Janeway lesions.[1]

Evaluation

Infective endocarditis classification is by The Modified Duke Criteria, which is useful in the evaluation of patients suspected of IE. Three categories include definite IE, possible IE, or rejected IE.[6] Definite IE subclassify into:

a) Definite IE by pathological criteria: whereby there is evidence of microorganisms on excised vegetation or an abscess specimen or vegetation or abscess demonstrate active endocarditis and

b) Definite IE by clinical criteria: defined by presence of two major criteria, one major criterion plus three minor criteria, or five minor criteria in The Modified Duke Criteria.[6][7][8]

Major clinical criteria are defined as follows: multiple positive blood cultures, single positive culture for Coxiella burnetti, endocardial involvement (presence of new valvular regurgitation, or presence of vegetation, abscess or dehiscence).[8] Minor clinical criteria include:

a) Predisposing heart condition or use of intravenous drug use

b) Fever with body temperature greater than 38 degrees C (100.4 degrees F)

c) Vascular phenomena, arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhages, and Janeway lesions

d) Immunologic phenomena: Osler nodes, Roth spots, and rheumatoid factor

e) Positive blood culture that does not meet the major criteria.[8]

Possible IE is when there are one major criterion and one minor criterion or three minor criteria present.[6] Rejected IE is defined when there is likely an alternative diagnosis, or there is no pathological evidence of IE with less than 4 days of antibiotic therapy, or there is a resolution of clinical symptoms with less than 4 days of antibiotic therapy.[6] Echocardiographically vegetation is an oscillating intracardiac mass on valve or supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets. Presence of abscess or partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve also satisfies echocardiographic criteria of IE.[6]

A transthoracic echocardiogram should be corroborated by transesophageal echocardiogram in the evaluation for patients with suspected IE. Sometimes no definitive diagnosis is established until the patient has an operation upon at that time tissue specimens should be obtained for histological analysis. 

Treatment / Management

Infective endocarditis management is with prolonged duration of bactericidal antibiotics. The choice of antibiotic regimen (whether single or combination therapy) and the treatment duration are selected according to the pathogen’s susceptibility and resistance patterns, whether it’s a native or prosthetic valve endocarditis. Accordingly, the duration can vary from two weeks to as long as six weeks. Treatment is usually started in the hospital and completed as an outpatient once the fever subsides and the blood cultures are negative. But in some instances, antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient, and patients require surgery. Class I indications for surgery in patients with infective endocarditis include valvular dysfunction with symptoms of congestive heart failure, left-sided IE caused by S. aureus, fungal, or other highly resistant microorganisms, IE with conduction defects or heart block, annular or aortic abscess, persistent infection 5 to 7 days after initiation of antibiotic therapy.[2]

The basic principles of infective endocarditis management are aggressive debridement with removal of all infected and necrotic tissue followed by reconstructive surgery. Intraoperative Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended as a Class I recommendation by the American Society of Echocardiography.[2] With some exceptions, median sternotomy is the recommendation (Class I).[2] The aortic valve is accessed via a low transverse or oblique aortotomy. For patients with native valve endocarditis, eradication of the infected valvular tissue with subsequent valve repair or replacement is the primary therapy. For native valve IE limited to the leaflets/cusps, repair should be performed whenever feasible (Class I).[2] When simple valve replacement is needed, the basis for the decision regarding valve choice (mechanical or bioprosthetic) is on the usual criteria (Class I).[2] However, the use of a mechanical valve should be obviated among patients with intracranial hemorrhage and in patients developing a major stroke (Class IIa).[2]

For native valve IE involving the aortic annulus, radical resection of all infected areas is necessary, leaving behind a rim of healthy tissue. Subsequent reconstructive surgery to correct the defects is necessary before prosthetic valve implantation. Type of reconstruction varies according to the size of the defect. For small to moderate-sized defects, autologous or bovine pericardial patches are sufficient, whereas larger defects require a Dacron patch.[9] If greater than 50% of the annulus has been destroyed, an aortic homograft becomes the preferred therapeutic modality.[10] Aortic root abscess is a challenging condition because of the extent of damage it can cause to the adjacent neighborhood such as fibrous trigones, interventricular septum, both atria, and the pulmonary artery.[9] These patients often require replacement of the entire aortic root with reimplantation of the coronary arteries. An aortic homograft becomes the preferred choice when there is involvement of intervalvular fibrosa.[11]

For prosthetic aortic valve IE that spares the aortic root and annulus after radical resection, implantation of a new prosthetic valve (tissue or mechanical) is reasonable (Class IIa).[2] However, with the destruction of the annulus or if the infection has spread beyond the aortic root, then reconstruction and the use of an allograft or a biologic tissue root is preferable to a prosthetic valved conduit (Class IIa).[2]

Differential Diagnosis

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis was formerly known as marantic endocarditis, in which there are small sterile vegetations on the valve leaflets, and predisposing conditions for this include certain malignancies and hypercoagulable states. Libman–Sacks endocarditis is seen in association with systemic lupus erythematosus and causes verrucous vegetations.

Prognosis

The in-hospital mortality for infectious endocarditis is around 20%, whereas the 6-month mortality is about 30% confirming that IE is a fatal disease.[12] Mortality is related to underlying factors such as causative organisms (with higher mortality noted in IE caused by S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae, or fungi), presence of comorbid conditions or complications such as advanced age, hemodialysis, prosthetic valve endocarditis, severe heart failure, stroke, abscess, severe immunosuppression due to HIV infection, and development of perivalvular extension or a myocardial abscess.[1][12][1] The mortality rate for right-sided IE in intravenous drug users is usually lower, approximately 10 percent.[13] Despite technological advances in medical care, the mortality rate for IE has not decreased due to several factors in the host and the pathogen including increased longevity of patients with multiple comorbidities, changing epidemiological trends in developed countries with a surge in nosocomial infections and a greater degree of antibiotic resistance in pathogens.[1][12]

Complications

Cardiac complications include congestive heart failure caused by valvular damage from the infection, annular abscess, the extension of infection into the conduction system leading to atrioventricular blocks, mycotic aneurysms of the sinus of Valsalva which can result in pericarditis, hemopericardium, and cardiac tamponade, or fistulas to the cardiac chambers including the right or left ventricle.[1] Neurologic complications include thromboembolic events, mycotic aneurysms from septic embolization of vegetations; these aneurysms can rupture and cause intracranial hemorrhage and sudden death.[1] Other complications include systemic embolism to the end organs, including the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, and the spleen.[1] 

Deterrence and Patient Education

Early recognition and diagnosis of infective endocarditis are imperative to ensure timely management optimal clinical outcomes. Identifying patients who are surgical candidates is essential as early surgical intervention is associated with lower mortality.[14]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Infective endocarditis is a serious condition with a grave prognosis. Despite technological advances over the past few decades, which have helped improve the diagnosis and management of IE its mortality remains high. Treatment of IE requires an interprofessional approach involving nurses, pharmacists, and physicians, all communicating across interprofessional lines to drive patient outcomes. [Level V] Early recognition of surgical candidacy is critical.


Details

Editor:

Nauman Khalid

Updated:

8/8/2023 12:04:54 AM

References


[1]

Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB. Infective endocarditis in adults. The New England journal of medicine. 2001 Nov 1:345(18):1318-30     [PubMed PMID: 11794152]


[2]

AATS Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee Chairs, Pettersson GB, Coselli JS, Writing Committee, Pettersson GB, Coselli JS, Hussain ST, Griffin B, Blackstone EH, Gordon SM, LeMaire SA, Woc-Colburn LE. 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Executive summary. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2017 Jun:153(6):1241-1258.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.093. Epub 2017 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 28365016]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG Jr, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, Barsic B, Lockhart PB, Gewitz MH, Levison ME, Bolger AF, Steckelberg JM, Baltimore RS, Fink AM, O'Gara P, Taubert KA, American Heart Association Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Stroke Council. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Oct 13:132(15):1435-86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. Epub 2015 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 26373316]


[4]

Goyal A, Chhabra L, Parekh A, Bhyan P, Khalid N. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29261951]


[5]

Regueiro A, Linke A, Latib A, Ihlemann N, Urena M, Walther T, Husser O, Herrmann HC, Nombela-Franco L, Cheema AN, Le Breton H, Stortecky S, Kapadia S, Bartorelli AL, Sinning JM, Amat-Santos I, Munoz-Garcia A, Lerakis S, Gutiérrez-Ibanes E, Abdel-Wahab M, Tchetche D, Testa L, Eltchaninoff H, Livi U, Castillo JC, Jilaihawi H, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Kodali S, de Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro HB, Miceli A, Fiorina C, Dato GM, Rosato F, Serra V, Masson JB, Wijeysundera HC, Mangione JA, Ferreira MC, Lima VC, Carvalho LA, Abizaid A, Marino MA, Esteves V, Andrea JC, Giannini F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Himbert D, Kim WK, Pellegrini C, Auffret V, Nietlispach F, Pilgrim T, Durand E, Lisko J, Makkar RR, Lemos PA, Leon MB, Puri R, San Roman A, Vahanian A, Søndergaard L, Mangner N, Rodés-Cabau J. Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Infective Endocarditis and In-Hospital Death. JAMA. 2016 Sep 13:316(10):1083-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12347. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27623462]


[6]

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Creager MA, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Guyton RA, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Stevenson WG, Yancy CW, American College of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, American Heart Association. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Jul:148(1):e1-e132. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 9     [PubMed PMID: 24939033]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. The American journal of medicine. 1994 Mar:96(3):200-9     [PubMed PMID: 8154507]


[8]

Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG Jr, Ryan T, Bashore T, Corey GR. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2000 Apr:30(4):633-8     [PubMed PMID: 10770721]


[9]

d'Udekem Y, David TE, Feindel CM, Armstrong S, Sun Z. Long-term results of operation for paravalvular abscess. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1996 Jul:62(1):48-53     [PubMed PMID: 8678685]


[10]

Yankah AC, Pasic M, Klose H, Siniawski H, Weng Y, Hetzer R. Homograft reconstruction of the aortic root for endocarditis with periannular abscess: a 17-year study. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2005 Jul:28(1):69-75     [PubMed PMID: 15982588]


[11]

Knosalla C, Weng Y, Yankah AC, Siniawski H, Hofmeister J, Hammerschmidt R, Loebe M, Hetzer R. Surgical treatment of active infective aortic valve endocarditis with associated periannular abscess--11 year results. European heart journal. 2000 Mar:21(6):490-7     [PubMed PMID: 10681490]


[12]

Wang A, Gaca JG, Chu VH. Management Considerations in Infective Endocarditis: A Review. JAMA. 2018 Jul 3:320(1):72-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7596. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29971402]


[13]

Hecht SR, Berger M. Right-sided endocarditis in intravenous drug users. Prognostic features in 102 episodes. Annals of internal medicine. 1992 Oct 1:117(7):560-6     [PubMed PMID: 1524330]


[14]

Park LP, Chu VH, Peterson G, Skoutelis A, Lejko-Zupa T, Bouza E, Tattevin P, Habib G, Tan R, Gonzalez J, Altclas J, Edathodu J, Fortes CQ, Siciliano RF, Pachirat O, Kanj S, Wang A, International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE) Investigators. Validated Risk Score for Predicting 6-Month Mortality in Infective Endocarditis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016 Apr 18:5(4):e003016. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003016. Epub 2016 Apr 18     [PubMed PMID: 27091179]