Although physicians commonly utilize screening instruments to identify cognitive problems and psychological issues in patients with various neurological etiologies, frequently situations arise when referral to a neuropsychologist is needed for more comprehensive assessment. Screening instruments, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination, are sensitive to moderate to severe cognitive impairment but relatively insensitive to milder forms of impairment; they are also susceptible to lower educational levels. Health care professionals administering and interpreting screening measures of cognitive functioning should understand and employ the standardized administration procedures of the test, have knowledge of the development of the test, and use appropriate norms and procedures to interpret test scores. The reader should be aware that certain patient variables such as culture, language, and level of education may render certain tests inappropriate for some patients.
Clinical neuropsychologists are doctoral level health care providers, who have specialized training in brain-behavior relationships and perform comprehensive evaluations in addition to providing certain forms of treatment. Cognitive screening tests, therefore, can be useful to indicate the need for a consult with a neuropsychologist for further, more formal and comprehensive examinations.
Neuropsychological evaluations requires the use of standardized instruments to assess cognitive functions, behavior, social-emotional functioning (i.e., mood, personality), and in certain cases adaptive funcitoning and academic-achievement. More specifically, cognitive functions can be organized into specific major domains such as intelligence, attention/concentration, learning and memory, language, visuospatial and perceptual functions, executive functions, psychomotor speed, and sensory-motor functions. Given the complex nature of cognition, most standard test instruments measure more than one functional domain, though neuropsychologist have methods of differentiating strengths and weaknesses. Many neurologic and psycahitric disorders have been empirically shown to have specific patterns of dysfunction. Though more common with pediatric evauation, adult evaluations may also require assessment of academic-achievement skills in addition to cognitive and social-emotional funciotning. The neuropsychological battery is typically chosen based on the referral question(s) and the suspected condition or conditions that need to be ruled out. An important part of neuropsychological evaluations are the use of Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) and Symptom Validity Tests (SVTs), in order to measure for the deliterious effects of suboptimal effort, feignining, and malingering, all of which can impact the outcome of exam results and interpretation. PVTs and SVTs are used in both pediatric and adult evaluations, even when there is no initial suspicion of possible exaggeration or concern for fabrication of cognitive dysfunction.
Comprehensive assessment typically begins with a detailed medical record review, including medical and psychiatric history, medications, laboratory results, and neuroimaging reports, and in-depth clinical interview. The clinical interview includes behavioral observations and may last one to two hours. A wide variety of neuropsychological test instruments (primarily paper-pencil tests) are then administered; most are done sitting at a table in an outpatient clinic or private office or bedside in a hospital. Evaluations can vary from less than one hour to 6 to 8+ hours of direct face-to-face examination, depending on the information sought and the patient’s stamina and motivation. In general, pediatric and more comprehensive adult evaluations are longer and are usually performed on an outpatient basis.
The neuropsychological evaluation is tailored to the needs of the individual patient. The neuropsychologist selects, administers, and interprets the particular battery of tests that will yield the most comprehensive understanding of an individual's strengths and weaknesses and help to answer the referral question(s). Following explination of the primary problem areas and diagnosis, the neuropsychologist then provides tailored recommendations for the patient. Test batteries can be either "flexible" or "fixed." Flexible test batteries are more common and may revolve around a core set of tests with additional tests employed, as needed, to address specific issues. A flexible battery approach permits test selection on a case-by-case basis. Some clinical neuropsychologists, however, utilize a fixed battery approach such as the Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB) or the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB), although this is less common.
Tests are administered in a standardized manner (meaning each test is administered according to the methods outlined in the respective test manuals for every patient), and scores are interpreted by comparing the patient’s scores to an appropriate normative group. Depending on the test, norms should be selected to match the patients gender, age, education, and ethnicity. The reader should note that neuropsychological evaluations are thorough examinations with multiple components and involve much more than administration of a few tests. A neuropsychological evaluation is not limited to testing but also involves, as mentioned above, a clinical interview, review of medical records, testing current cognitive and academic abilities, tests of social-emotional functioning and personality, adaptive functioning, estimates of premorbid functioning, behaivoral observations, and integration of all these components. In addition, the clinician may also need to obtain educational andemployment records, and conduct collateral interviews with family members .
Neuropsychological assessment is performed for several reasons. The following are a few of the goals and benefits:
Patients with brain injury can benefit from neuropsychological assessment as part of an interprofessional team approach to care. As mentioned above, cognitive assessment can help dictate a treatment plan, monitor recovery, and help determine when a person is ready to return to work, driving, or sports.
Another clinical population for which assessment is valuable is older patients with long-standing memory concerns along with other cognitive deficits with or without corresponding brain atrophy. These cases may require an assessment to help determine a differential diagnosis as well as aid in decision-making. Other groups with reported memory and other cognitive problems also may require dementia assessment and consideration of psychological factors contributing to a patient’s symptoms (e.g., dementia versus depression).
Psychological factors can be overlooked in neurological patients. These may include mood changes such as depression or anxiety including post-traumatic stress disorder, or behavioral dysfunction such as agitation, poor initiation, or wandering. Emotional and behavioral sequelae can be the direct result of underlying neurological impairment. For example, patients with left frontal strokes or those localized to subcortical areas of the brain can experience an “organic depression.” Alternatively, damage to frontal areas also may result in behavioral disturbances such as disinhibition, impulsivity, abulia, and emotional lability. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, in this case, would also assess for neuropsychiatric sequelae.
Forensic issues, such as that of capacity (competency, in legal terms), also can arise in medical settings. Decision-making capacity, whether for a medical procedure, designation of a health care agent, or disposition, is a clinical finding regarding a patient’s decisional abilities. Although people are presumed to have capacity, cognitive impairment and/or psychiatric disturbances can impair one’s capacity to make decisions. Neuropsychologists often are called in to help assess capacity; this always involves an interview with the patient and any collaterals, as well as an assessment of functional abilities. A full neuropsychological assessment is not always required, although some evaluation of cognition usually is performed.
Many other patients with neurological and/or psychiatric etiologies can benefit from neuropsychological assessment. In children, neuropsychologists often work with the school system to provide accommodations for deficits.
Sensory deficits such as poor visual acuity or visual field cut, or hearing impairment and motor deficits (e.g., ataxia) need to be taken into consideration when assessing any of the above populations, as tests require visual and verbal input and sometimes writing or manual manipulation of stimuli.
Another issue is that of cross-cultural competence. Although beyond the scope of this article, neuropsychologists must ensure that patients have fluency with the language in which they are being tested. For exmaple, if the langauge of test adminsitration is English, and the patient's native language is Chinese Mandarin, a high level of English fluency is required by the patient in order to consider completing the evaluation in English. Even so, fluency in the language of testing does not necessairly eliminate the need for the patient to receive a bilingual evaluation in both their native and second langauges. In cases where the patient is not fluent in the target language, it is highly advisable to refer the patient to a bilingual neuropsychologists, who speaks both langauges fluently and has experience working with bilingual individuals. Use of interpreters and/or technicians who are bilingual may also be necesary in order to obtain valid test results and appropriately communicate with the patient during the duration of the evaluation and when providing feedback of results .
Health professionals may not always be aware when a referral to a neuropsychologist is needed. Neuropsychologists have specialized training in brain-behavior relationships and perform comprehensive cognitive evaluations in addition to providing treatment. Cognitive screening can be useful to indicate the need for a consult for further, more formal testing. The healthcare team should be aware of this option to provide the best outcomes for patients.
|||Rosenbloom M,Borson S,Barclay T,Hanson LR,Werner A,Stuck L,McCarten J, Routine cognitive screening in a neurology practice: Effect on physician behavior. Neurology. Clinical practice. 2016 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 26918200]|
|||Goudsmit M,van Campen J,Schilt T,Hinnen C,Franzen S,Schmand B, One Size Does Not Fit All: Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and the Mini Mental State Examination in a Memory Clinic Population with Very Low Education. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra. 2018 May-Aug; [PubMed PMID: 30323830]|
|||Block CK,Johnson-Greene D,Pliskin N,Boake C, Discriminating cognitive screening and cognitive testing from neuropsychological assessment: implications for professional practice. The Clinical neuropsychologist. 2017 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 27937143]|
|||Williams JM, The malingering factor. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2011 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 21345930]|
|||Casaletto KB,Heaton RK, Neuropsychological Assessment: Past and Future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS. 2017 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 29198281]|
|||Schretlen DJ,Buffington AL,Meyer SM,Pearlson GD, The use of word-reading to estimate [PubMed PMID: 16248914]|
|||Sawamura D,Ikoma K,Ogawa K,Sakai S, Clinical utility of neuropsychological tests for employment outcomes in persons with cognitive impairment after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Brain injury. 2018 Oct 23; [PubMed PMID: 30351982]|
|||Mayo CD,Scarapicchia V,Robinson LK,Gawryluk JR, Neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury: Current ethical challenges and recommendations for future practice. Applied neuropsychology. Adult. 2018 Jan 9; [PubMed PMID: 29313718]|
|||Allan CL,Behrman S,Ebmeier KP,Valkanova V, Diagnosing early cognitive decline-When, how and for whom? Maturitas. 2017 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 28041588]|
|||Zgaljardic DJ,Seale GS,Schaefer LA,Temple RO,Foreman J,Elliott TR, Psychiatric Disease and Post-Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 1; [PubMed PMID: 25629222]|
|||Palmer BW,Harmell AL, Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2016 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 27551024]|
|||Davis GA,Anderson V,Babl FE,Gioia GA,Giza CC,Meehan W,Moser RS,Purcell L,Schatz P,Schneider KJ,Takagi M,Yeates KO,Zemek R, What is the difference in concussion management in children as compared with adults? A systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2017 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 28455361]|
|||Brickman AM,Cabo R,Manly JJ, Ethical issues in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Applied neuropsychology. 2006; [PubMed PMID: 17009882]|