Genetics, Transposons


Introduction

In the 1950s, Barbara McClintock published groundbreaking research on maize with broken chromosomes and characteristic DNA elements.[1] These DNA elements could switch positions, turn on and off, and reverse mutations between generations of the Zea Mays plant. The article, “Induction of Instability at Selected Loci in Maize,” won her the Nobel prize in 1983.[2] Ninety percent of maize DNA is transposable elements.[3] Transposons, transposable elements, or jumping genes, are DNA sequences that can change their position in the genome. Genomes are the comprehensive set of genes in an organism. Transposons get their name from their mode of movement, called transposition. Transposition is often simplified to a “cut-and-paste” mechanism of movement through the genome. A transposon could, for example, be cut from its position on chromosome 9 and pasted into a new position on chromosome 11. Because of the nature of transposition, the process leads to mutation and changes in the amount of DNA in a cell. They are responsible for a large number of mutations and genetic polymorphisms, a significant contribution to genetic diversity.[1]

Development

There are transposons in a wide variety of organisms, from bacteria and yeasts to humans. Transposition can take place from one site to another of the same chromosome, or from one chromosome to another (in eukaryotic organisms whose genome is organized into several chromosomes), or even from a chromosome site to a plasmid site (in organisms containing plasmids, genetic elements independent of the chromosome and capable of autonomous replication), or finally from the chromosome of one cell to that of another.

As widely documented, transposons can influence the output of the host genome; this mechanism allows the development of totipotency, a key stage of development. Some structures prove to be important for the epigenetic action of transposons, such as the presence of human leucine tRNA primer (HERVL), endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1s); these are important elements for the movement and action of transposons.

During embryological development, we find different transposons depending on the stage of development (without forgetting the retrotransposons).

Cellular

Researchers have found transposons in the genomes of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Genomes of eukaryotes contain multitudes of repetitive DNA sequences. Transposons make up much of this repetitive DNA. 45% of the human genome is transposable elements.[4] Because so much of the genome is transposable, the theory is that they are participants in speciation and evolution, although the triggers are not understood.[5] Transposons have a similar structure to non-transposable DNA and contain the same nucleic acids and nucleotides (cytosine, adenine, guanine, and thymine).

Molecular Level

Bacterial transposons belong to two classes: compound transposons (class I) and complex transposons (class II). A class I transposon contains a copy of an insertion sequence (IS) at each end. At its ends, a class II transposon has two equal sequences of 30/40 pairs of nucleotides each, arranged in the opposite orientation.

The transposition can be replicative or non-replicative. In non-replicative transposition, there is a cut of the double helix to the original site before the transposon moves. In other cases, the transfer takes place without cutting the double helix to the site of origin (conservative transposition). In the replicative transposition, as a consequence of the replication, there will be a copy of the transposon at the insertion site and another at the origin site, without any cut of the double helix. This process will lead to the formation of an intermediate called co-integrated.

Function

Transposons are a mechanism to increase genomic diversity. Transposons can inactivate or alter gene expression by inserting themselves within introns, exons, and other regions. They can move non-transposon DNA. They can remove genes by internal deletions.[6] There are many mechanisms of transposition that minimize the deletions to promote the survival of the host.[6]

Mechanism

Transposons can be divided based on the mechanism of transposition and integration. Class I elements, retrotransposons, use an RNA intermediate that is reverse-transcribed into a cDNA copy that reintegrates into a new genomic home.  Class II elements are DNA transposons mobilized by a DNA intermediate or by replication involving a circular DNA intermediate. Each of these classes can further sub-categorize based on common genetic or monophyletic origins.

Class I elements are also called retrotransposons. They begin as DNA and become transcribed into RNA via the normal mechanism. Then reverse transcriptase and an endonuclease, which are generally coded for within their transposable element, are used to reverse transcribe the RNA back into DNA. This DNA is then inserted back into the chromosome at its new location. Their life cycle and structure are very similar to retroviruses.[7]

Class II elements, called DNA transposons, are the classic “cut-and-paste” transposons whose mechanism begins which excision from the genome. They are not replicated like Class I elements but often include a transposase gene. Transposase is an enzyme that facilitates transposon movement. TIRs (terminal inverted repeats) flank transposase, which transposase uses to excise the transposon. When the transposon is inserted into a new location, the DNA at the target site duplicates producing TSDs, or target site duplications. TIRs and TSDs are unique to transposons and are used to classify transposons into different families.[6]

Testing

Currently, tests can be used to detect pathogenic mutations from transposons, such as large deletions or large insertions/duplications.

Pathophysiology

Transposon insertions can be pathogenic, being able to alter gene expression; transposon inserts represent about 5% of the molecular pathology. Among the alterations in the function of the transposons, we find the: Kindler syndrome (in the FERMT1 gene or fermitin family member 1); hemophilia A (in the factor VIII gene or anti-hemophiliac factor or AHF).

Transposon inserts may play a role in determining susceptibility to multifactorial diseases such as tumors. Transposons, and real disease mutations, seem to be able to create hypomorphic alleles: they are not actual pathogenic alleles but alleles with reduced functionality that can worsen the phenotype when they are in association with a mutation- real disease. These hypomorphic alleles may have some weight in generating traits of susceptibility to multifactorial diseases.

Clinical Significance

Transposons can serve as genetic tools to introduce foreign DNA into the genome of another organism.  For example, the insertion of mouse DNA into zebrafish.[8] Since transposons are useable for insertional mutagenesis, they are important for better understanding genomes. Transgenics allows for a fast in vivo analysis of the genome and proteome. Transposons also play roles in the pathogenesis of some identified conditions, such as hemophilia A.

Transgenics has helped to identify genes related to diseases and pathologies. For example, transposons have been a tool to study novel culprits of cell transformation in cancer pathogenesis. Before insertional mutagenesis, studying genes involved in cancer pathogenesis was difficult.[9] Insertional mutagenesis has also helped to determine the pathogenesis of pathogens like Cryptococcus neoformans. It is an infectious fungus that is being analyzed through insertional mutagenesis to determine what genes were involved in fungal virulence.[10]

Worldwide mortality rates are increasing due to bacterial infectious disease, and bacterial transposons have implications in the development of bacterial antibiotic resistance.[11] All bacteria are capable of adapting to the evolutionary stressor of antibiotic usage. Resistance determinants that already exist in bacterial DNA become mobilized by transposition. Through this process, horizontal genetic exchange is possible and allows bacteria to attain resistance.[12]

Some diseases may have arisen from transposition within the human genome. Studies have found that some epithelial tumors arise from spontaneous retrotransposon integration. The research of these retrotransposons may be highly impactful in understanding tumorigenesis.[13] Hemophilia A, an X-linked recessive disorder that results in low amounts of clotting factor VIII, results in bleeding episodes. A study has demonstrated that insertional mutagenesis of a repetitive sequence, some L1 sequences, can be spread through transposition and cause disease.[14]

Gene therapy, using genetic tools to edit the human genome, has a high potential for benefitting patients with genetic pathology, but it is also high risk. The administration of retroviruses in gene therapy trials has correlated with adverse outcomes. In the treatment of 9 patients with SCID, 4 developed acute leukemia within ten years of being treated with gene therapy. One of the four who developed leukemia died. However, the eight remaining had sustained reversal of the immunodeficiency.[15] The Sleeping beauty (SB) transposon is the most researched transposon used in non-viral insertional mutagenesis gene therapy. Using transposons instead of viral vectors has two advantages in gene therapy: easier manufacturing and transposons like SB have less preference for integration sites.[16] The use of gene therapy to remove a deleterious mutation has successfully treated a mouse model of hemophilia. They were able to restore hemostasis in the mice treated.[17] Duchenne muscular dystrophy, another X-linked recessive disorder, results in a mutation in the dystrophin gene, which leads to muscle fiber degeneration, weakness, and death. A study utilizing the PiggyBac transposon demonstrated that muscles treated with an autologous cell-based therapy had become more resistant to fatigue.[18]


Details

Author

Megan Ladd

Editor:

Bruno Bordoni

Updated:

4/10/2023 3:14:35 PM

References


[1]

Kawakami K, Largaespada DA, Ivics Z. Transposons As Tools for Functional Genomics in Vertebrate Models. Trends in genetics : TIG. 2017 Nov:33(11):784-801. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Sep 6     [PubMed PMID: 28888423]


[2]

McClintock B. Induction of Instability at Selected Loci in Maize. Genetics. 1953 Nov:38(6):579-99     [PubMed PMID: 17247459]


[3]

SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin YK, Motchoulskaia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Avramova Z, Bennetzen JL. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1996 Nov 1:274(5288):765-8     [PubMed PMID: 8864112]


[4]

Baltimore D. Our genome unveiled. Nature. 2001 Feb 15:409(6822):814-6     [PubMed PMID: 11236992]


[5]

Sheen FM, Levis RW. Transposition of the LINE-like retrotransposon TART to Drosophila chromosome termini. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994 Dec 20:91(26):12510-4     [PubMed PMID: 7809068]


[6]

Muñoz-López M, García-Pérez JL. DNA transposons: nature and applications in genomics. Current genomics. 2010 Apr:11(2):115-28. doi: 10.2174/138920210790886871. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20885819]


[7]

Beauregard A, Curcio MJ, Belfort M. The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts. Annual review of genetics. 2008:42():587-617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091549. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18680436]


[8]

Sivasubbu S, Balciunas D, Amsterdam A, Ekker SC. Insertional mutagenesis strategies in zebrafish. Genome biology. 2007:8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9     [PubMed PMID: 18047701]


[9]

Ranzani M, Annunziato S, Adams DJ, Montini E. Cancer gene discovery: exploiting insertional mutagenesis. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2013 Oct:11(10):1141-58. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0244. Epub 2013 Aug 8     [PubMed PMID: 23928056]


[10]

Idnurm A, Reedy JL, Nussbaum JC, Heitman J. Cryptococcus neoformans virulence gene discovery through insertional mutagenesis. Eukaryotic cell. 2004 Apr:3(2):420-9     [PubMed PMID: 15075272]


[11]

Babakhani S, Oloomi M. Transposons: the agents of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Journal of basic microbiology. 2018 Nov:58(11):905-917. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800204. Epub 2018 Aug 16     [PubMed PMID: 30113080]


[12]

Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2018 Oct:31(4):. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00088-17. Epub 2018 Aug 1     [PubMed PMID: 30068738]


[13]

Lee E, Iskow R, Yang L, Gokcumen O, Haseley P, Luquette LJ 3rd, Lohr JG, Harris CC, Ding L, Wilson RK, Wheeler DA, Gibbs RA, Kucherlapati R, Lee C, Kharchenko PV, Park PJ, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2012 Aug 24:337(6097):967-71. doi: 10.1126/science.1222077. Epub 2012 Jun 28     [PubMed PMID: 22745252]


[14]

Kazazian HH Jr, Wong C, Youssoufian H, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE. Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L1 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature. 1988 Mar 10:332(6160):164-6     [PubMed PMID: 2831458]


[15]

Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Hauer J, Lim A, Picard C, Wang GP, Berry CC, Martinache C, Rieux-Laucat F, Latour S, Belohradsky BH, Leiva L, Sorensen R, Debré M, Casanova JL, Blanche S, Durandy A, Bushman FD, Fischer A, Cavazzana-Calvo M. Efficacy of gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. The New England journal of medicine. 2010 Jul 22:363(4):355-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000164. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20660403]


[16]

Hackett PB, Largaespada DA, Switzer KC, Cooper LJ. Evaluating risks of insertional mutagenesis by DNA transposons in gene therapy. Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2013 Apr:161(4):265-83. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 10     [PubMed PMID: 23313630]


[17]

Li H, Haurigot V, Doyon Y, Li T, Wong SY, Bhagwat AS, Malani N, Anguela XM, Sharma R, Ivanciu L, Murphy SL, Finn JD, Khazi FR, Zhou S, Paschon DE, Rebar EJ, Bushman FD, Gregory PD, Holmes MC, High KA. In vivo genome editing restores haemostasis in a mouse model of haemophilia. Nature. 2011 Jun 26:475(7355):217-21. doi: 10.1038/nature10177. Epub 2011 Jun 26     [PubMed PMID: 21706032]


[18]

Iyer PS, Mavoungou LO, Ronzoni F, Zemla J, Schmid-Siegert E, Antonini S, Neff LA, Dorchies OM, Jaconi M, Lekka M, Messina G, Mermod N. Autologous Cell Therapy Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy using PiggyBac Transposons and Mesoangioblasts. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2018 Apr 4:26(4):1093-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 2     [PubMed PMID: 29503200]