Tricuspid Stenosis

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is a relatively rare valvular heart disease, accounting for less than 1% of cases. It is the narrowing of the tricuspid valve due to any etiology. The clinical sequel of The cause of tricuspid stenosis can be broadly classified into three categories: acquired, congenital, and iatrogenic. is predominantly systemic congestion. It most often co-exists with mitral valve pathology, especially in patients with rheumatic heart disease. There are various causes of the disease, including systemic illnesses and drugs; the cause of tricuspid stenosis can be broadly classified into three categories: acquired, congenital, and iatrogenic. This activity describes the evaluation and management of tricuspid stenosis and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in evaluating and treating patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Describe various etiologies of tricuspid stenosis.
  • Review the hemodynamic consequences of tricuspid stenosis.
  • Outline diagnostic evaluation of tricuspid stenosis.
  • Describe the stages of tricuspid stenosis and the relevant management strategy.

Introduction

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is a very rare valvular abnormality occurring due to the narrowing of the tricuspid valve. It results in an elevated gradient between the right atrium and right ventricle, systemic congestion, and failure to augment right ventricle output. The isolated occurrence is rare, and tricuspid stenosis usually accompanies other valvular abnormalities. It most often co-exists with mitral valve pathology, especially in patients with rheumatic heart disease.[1]

Etiology

The cause of tricuspid stenosis can be broadly classified into three categories: acquired, congenital, and iatrogenic.[2]

Acquired: Rheumatic heart disease is one of the most common causes of acquired tricuspid stenosis and almost always occurs in conjunction with mitral stenosis.[1] In a series of 173 patients with rheumatic heart disease, 15 patients had tricuspid stenosis.[3] Other causes include large vegetation causing relative stenosis.[4] Carcinoid syndrome can result in isolated tricuspid stenosis or, more commonly, mixed regurgitant and stenosed lesions.[5] Systemic diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome have been known to cause non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis leading to TS. Benign tumors like atrial myxomas can cause functional TS.[6] Renal and ovarian tumors can metastasize and grow into the tricuspid orifice, causing stenosis.[7] Hyper-eosinophilic syndrome and endomyocardial fibrosis have also been linked with TS.[8]

Acquired causes also include valvopathy associated with drugs like fenfluramine, phentermine, and methysergide, characterized by thickened fibrotic and hypo-mobile tricuspid leaflets with various degrees of valve stenosis and regurgitation.[9] 

Congenital: Other less common causes of tricuspid stenosis include congenital abnormalities such as Ebstein’s anomaly and metabolic or enzymatic abnormalities such as Fabry and Whipple disease.[10][4] 

Iatrogenic: The presence of permanent pacing and fusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads with sub-valvular structures can cause tricuspid stenosis.[11][12] Tricuspid stenosis can also occur after tricuspid valve repair for tricuspid regurgitation. Bioprosthetic tricuspid valve stenosis is a serious and late complication of tricuspid valve replacement.[13] 

Epidemiology

Tricuspid stenosis accounts for about 2.4% of all cases of organic tricuspid valve disease and is mostly seen in young women.[14][15] Overall, tricuspid stenosis accounts for less than 1% of valvular heart diseases. In a study of 13,289 patients with primary valvular disease, TS was found in 0.3%, followed only by pulmonary stenosis (0.04%). At least 90% of these patients had rheumatic heart disease.[16]

Pathophysiology

The primary result of tricuspid stenosis is right atrial pressure elevation and right-sided congestion. Tricuspid stenosis results in elevated gradients between the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV) during diastole. This is exaggerated during inspiration and exercise and reduced with expiration. With the increasing severity of TS, there is a failure to augment cardiac output with exercise. Clinically, TS results in signs and symptoms of systemic congestion.

The valves consist of an outer layer of valve endothelial cells (VECs) surrounding three layers of the extracellular matrix, each with a specialized function and interspersed with interstitial valve cells (VICs).[14] Genetic or acquired/environmental causes that disrupt the normal organization and composition of the extracellular matrix and communication between VECs and VICs alter valve mechanics and interfere with the valve leaflet function, culminating in valve damage.[17]

The rheumatic TS is characterized by diffuse fibrous thickening of the leaflets and fusion of 2 or 3 commissures. Leaflet thickening usually occurs in the absence of calcific deposits, and the anteroseptal commissure is most involved.

Tricuspid stenosis in carcinoid syndrome is caused by the deposition of fibrous plaques through vasoactive substance-mediated reactions, mainly serotonin. The deposition of endocardial plaques results in plaque distortion, which can lead to both TS and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Methysergide and serotonin share common chemical properties. Methysergide, which is a synthetic ergot alkaloid, causes fibrotic thickening and structural deterioration of the tricuspid valve.[18] 

Incompletely developed leaflets, shortened or malformed chordae, a small annulus, or an abnormal number or size of papillary muscles may also result in tricuspid stenosis.[19]

History and Physical

Patients with tricuspid stenosis can present with features of systemic congestion, exertional syncope due to reduced cardiac output, or symptoms of accompanying valvular heart disease, such as mitral stenosis (MS). Symptoms of reduced cardiac output include exertional dyspnea, fatigue, or exertional syncope.[20][21]

Signs of systemic congestion include leg edema, ascites, anasarca, and congestive hepatopathy. The jugular venous pressure is elevated with prominent or giant 'a' wave classically greater in height than usually perceived. A "slow y descent" due to delayed emptying of the right atrium into the right ventricle can also be seen.[22] Kussmaul's sign (failure of JVP to descend with inspiration) can also be seen. 

The lungs are clear in patients with isolated tricuspid stenosis. On precordial examination, there is a mid-diastolic rumble at the left fourth intercostal space, preceded by an opening snap. It is shorter in duration and softer in intensity than the murmur of mitral stenosis. The intensity of the murmur and opening snap increase with maneuvers that increase blood flow across the tricuspid valve, especially with inspiration, leg raise, inhalation of amyl nitrate, squatting, or exercise.

Evaluation

A comprehensive assessment of tricuspid stenosis includes all the following:

Biochemistry: may reveal mildly elevated unconjugated bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, or aminotransferases. 

Chest radiograph: In isolated tricuspid stenosis, there is right atrial enlargement and clear lung fields. When accompanying MS, interstitial edema or straightening of the left heart border can be seen. 

ECG: may show right atrial enlargement, which is known as 'P-pulmonale.' The tall and peaked T waves are particularly observed in leads II, III, and aVF. At least 50% of patients can have atrial fibrillation. 

Transthoracic echocardiogram: is performed to assess the valve area and gradients across the valve. It helps to determine the severity of tricuspid stenosis and guides management strategy. Following echocardiographic parameters help establish the severity of the disease.[23]

  1. Thickening and distortion of the tricuspid valve, with or without calcification.
  2. Commissural fusion, with doming of the valve.
  3. Valve area < 1 cm-sq signifies severe TS. This is calculated by dividing 190 with pressure half-time. The normal area of the tricuspid valve is 4.0 cm-sq. 
  4. A transvalvular gradient across the tricuspid valve of more than 5-10 mmHg at a heart rate of 70 beats per minute suggests severe stenosis. Gradients are affected by the patient's current hemodynamic status. 
  5. The presence of significant tricuspid regurgitation can potentially alter the management strategy. Surgical correction may be needed instead of percutaneous intervention.
  6. Pressure half-time of more than 190 msec suggests severe TS. 
  7. Inflow-time velocity integral of more than 60 cm suggests severe stenosis.
  8. Right atrial enlargement.
  9. Plethoric inferior vena cava.

Cardiac Catheterization: In tricuspid stenosis, there is a large right atrial "a" wave of 12 to 20 mm Hg and a mean diastolic gradient of 4 to 8 mm Hg across the tricuspid valve. The mean gradient across the tricuspid valve is more significant in TS because an end-diastolic gradient may be absent with significant obstruction. This is because of the lower filling pressures on the right side of the heart.[24] Elevated RA pressure with a slow fall in early diastole and a diastolic pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve is characteristic of tricuspid stenosis.

Treatment / Management

There is a lack of large evidence on the management and outcomes of tricuspid stenosis. Treatment is centered on treating underlying mechanical obstruction. Medical therapy has a limited role. 

Medical

Loop diuretics may be useful to relieve systemic and hepatic congestion in patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid stenosis.[25] Caution is advised since diuretics may excessively decrease the preload in patients with a low output state.

Not every tricuspid stenosis case requires invasive intervention. Treatment of SLE and APLA syndrome may reduce the “coating” over the valves and chordae and reduce stenosis and regurgitation.[26] Cessation of fenfluramine or Methysergide has been associated with valve normalization.[27] However, in advanced cases, surgical therapy may be needed in addition to medical management.

Intervention

For patients with unacceptable surgical risk and absence of tumor, thrombus, vegetation, and insignificant or mild tricuspid regurgitation, percutaneous valvotomy can be performed.[25] Surgical correction (either repair or replacement) is suggested for patients with low-moderate surgical risk or significant regurgitation. Surgical correction is recommended for patients with other valvular heart diseases, such as mitral stenosis.[28]

Valvotomy: Valvotomy is performed using 1, 2, or 3 balloons. While some stenosis may persist, the change in valve area causes a significant reduction in the transvalvular pressure gradient and a decrease in right atrial pressure.[29] Valve area generally increases by 1 to 2 cm^2.[30] Bioprosthetic valve stenosis can be treated with balloon valvotomy or valve-in-valve replacement.

Valve surgery: Tricuspid valve surgery includes repair or replacement. Repair should be attempted when reasonable. When repair is not an option, valve replacement can be done by open surgery. No differences in outcomes have been established between bioprosthetic vs. mechanical valves.[31] However, in carcinoid syndrome, a mechanical valve is preferred over a bioprosthetic to avoid degeneration. Tricuspid valve surgery is indicated for treating symptomatic severe tricuspid stenosis accompanied by tricuspid regurgitation (rheumatic, carcinoid), as percutaneous balloon tricuspid commissurotomy may worsen regurgitation.[25]

The operative mortality for isolated tricuspid stenosis is significant and increases if performed with other valvular surgery (10% and 16%, respectively).[32]

Differential Diagnosis

Differential diagnosis includes any disease that causes systemic congestion, such as tricuspid regurgitation secondary to any etiology, constrictive pericarditis, and right ventricular dysfunction due to any cause.[6][33]

Staging

The stage of the disease is determined by clinical symptoms, hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessment, and valve anatomy. 

The categories include A, B, C, and D, where A stands for 'at risk' for the disease, B stands for progressive disease (mild-moderate, asymptomatic), C implies severe but asymptomatic disease, and category D signifies severe and symptomatic disease.[25]

Prognosis

The underlying cause and the degree of ventricular dysfunction determine the prognosis. The prognosis is generally good for patients with isolated tricuspid stenosis undergoing intervention.[15] Given the rarity of the disease, there is a lack of large evidence on the outcomes of the disease. 

Complications

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Heart failure
  • Liver failure
  • Infective endocarditis

Deterrence and Patient Education

TS should be suspected in patients presenting with signs and symptoms of systemic congestion such as leg swelling, abdominal swelling, shortness of breath, or unexplained blackout and dizziness. Although rare in isolation, the disease frequently accompanies other valvular heart diseases, such as rheumatic mitral stenosis. Left untreated, it can lead to complications such as heart failure, lethal rhythm disturbances, consequent stroke, and irreversible heart dysfunction, necessitating advanced therapies. Early detection is the key to successful treatment and outcomes.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Tricuspid valve stenosis is a rare disorder and is best managed by an interprofessional team. In most cases, mild cases of tricuspid stenosis are well tolerated and can be managed medically. Severe cases may require surgery. While percutaneous dilatation of the leaflets can be undertaken, recurrence is common. Choosing between percutaneous or open surgical treatment depends on the patient’s frailty, comorbid conditions, valve morphology, and regional expertise. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary team that includes a cardiac surgeon, interventional cardiologist, and cardiovascular imaging specialist. 

The interprofessional team in tricuspid stenosis cases includes the cardiologist, family clinician, and nursing staff. Clinicians will coordinate their activities, and nurses are often invaluable in ensuring that communication between specialties and the patient is accomplished efficiently. Nurses also help monitor patients, offer patient counsel about their condition, and can enlist the pharmacist for medication reconciliation if the condition requires medical care. All care team members must maintain accurate and updated records, so everyone on the case has the most recent data. Every team member can also make valuable contributions and should be treated as a respected interprofessional team member. This coordinated approach to care will yield optimal patient outcomes. [Level 5]


Details

Author

Pirbhat Shams

Updated:

7/5/2023 11:18:45 AM

References


[1]

Roberts WC, Ko JM. Some observations on mitral and aortic valve disease. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). 2008 Jul:21(3):282-99     [PubMed PMID: 18628928]


[2]

Asmarats L, Taramasso M, Rodés-Cabau J. Tricuspid valve disease: diagnosis, prognosis and management of a rapidly evolving field. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2019 Sep:16(9):538-554. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0186-1. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30988448]


[3]

Rashid MB, Parvin T, Ahmed CM, Islam MJ, Monwar MM, Karmoker KK, Parveen R, Shakil SS, Hasan MN. Pattern and Extent of Tricuspid Valve Involvement in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease. Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ. 2018 Jan:27(1):120-125     [PubMed PMID: 29459602]


[4]

Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation--Part I., Waller BF,Howard J,Fess S,, Clinical cardiology, 1995 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 7720297]


[5]

Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ, Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Callahan JA, Pitot HC, Kvols LK. Carcinoid heart disease. Clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients. Circulation. 1993 Apr:87(4):1188-96     [PubMed PMID: 7681733]


[6]

Şaşkın H, Düzyol Ç, Özcan KS, Aksoy R. Right atrial myxoma mimicking tricuspid stenosis. BMJ case reports. 2015 Aug 13:2015():. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210818. Epub 2015 Aug 13     [PubMed PMID: 26272962]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[7]

Seibert KA, Rettenmier CW, Waller BF, Battle WE, Levine AS, Roberts WC. Osteogenic sarcoma metastatic to the heart. The American journal of medicine. 1982 Jul:73(1):136-41     [PubMed PMID: 6953763]


[8]

Mocumbi AO, Right ventricular endomyocardial fibrosis (2013 Grover Conference series). Pulmonary circulation. 2014 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 25621149]


[9]

Muraru D, Badano LP, Sarais C, Soldà E, Iliceto S. Evaluation of tricuspid valve morphology and function by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. Current cardiology reports. 2011 Jun:13(3):242-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0176-3. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21365261]


[10]

Khatib N, Blumenfeld Z, Bronshtein M. Early prenatal diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012 Nov:207(5):e6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.030. Epub 2012 Aug 21     [PubMed PMID: 22964066]


[11]

Gur AK, Odabasi D, Kunt AG, Kunt AS. Isolated tricuspid valve repair for Libman-Sacks endocarditis. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.). 2014 Jul:31(6):E166-8. doi: 10.1111/echo.12558. Epub 2014 Mar 25     [PubMed PMID: 24661289]


[12]

The Forgotten Valve: Isolated Severe Tricuspid Valve Stenosis., Al-Hijji M,Yoon Park J,El Sabbagh A,Amin M,Maleszewski JJ,Borgeson DD,, Circulation, 2015 Aug 18     [PubMed PMID: 26283605]


[13]

Hirata K, Tengan T, Wake M, Takahashi T, Ishimine T, Yasumoto H, Nakasu A, Mototake H. Bioprosthetic tricuspid valve stenosis: a case series. European heart journal. Case reports. 2019 Sep 1:3(3):. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz110. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31367735]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[14]

Tao G, Kotick JD, Lincoln J. Heart valve development, maintenance, and disease: the role of endothelial cells. Current topics in developmental biology. 2012:100():203-32. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387786-4.00006-3. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22449845]


[15]

Roguin A, Rinkevich D, Milo S, Markiewicz W, Reisner SA. Long-term follow-up of patients with severe rheumatic tricuspid stenosis. American heart journal. 1998 Jul:136(1):103-8     [PubMed PMID: 9665226]


[16]

Manjunath CN,Srinivas P,Ravindranath KS,Dhanalakshmi C, Incidence and patterns of valvular heart disease in a tertiary care high-volume cardiac center: a single center experience. Indian heart journal. 2014 May-Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 24973838]


[17]

Hinton RB Jr, Lincoln J, Deutsch GH, Osinska H, Manning PB, Benson DW, Yutzey KE. Extracellular matrix remodeling and organization in developing and diseased aortic valves. Circulation research. 2006 Jun 9:98(11):1431-8     [PubMed PMID: 16645142]


[18]

Smith SA, Waggoner AD, de las Fuentes L, Davila-Roman VG. Role of serotoninergic pathways in drug-induced valvular heart disease and diagnostic features by echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2009 Aug:22(8):883-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jun 23     [PubMed PMID: 19553085]


[19]

Shah PM, Raney AA. Tricuspid valve disease. Current problems in cardiology. 2008 Feb:33(2):47-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2007.10.004. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18222317]


[20]

Coffey S, Rayner J, Newton J, Prendergast BD. Right-sided valve disease. International journal of clinical practice. 2014 Oct:68(10):1221-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12485. Epub 2014 Sep 2     [PubMed PMID: 25269950]


[21]

Stapleton JF. Natural history of chronic valvular disease. Cardiovascular clinics. 1986:16(2):105-47     [PubMed PMID: 3742519]


[22]

Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, Applefeld MM. The Jugular Venous Pressure and Pulse Contour. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 1990:():     [PubMed PMID: 21250143]


[23]

Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quiñones M, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2009 Jan:22(1):1-23; quiz 101-2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19130998]


[24]

Morgan JR, Forker AD, Coates JR, Myers WS. Isolated tricuspid stenosis. Circulation. 1971 Oct:44(4):729-32     [PubMed PMID: 5094152]


[25]

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014 Jun 10:63(22):e57-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. Epub 2014 Mar 3     [PubMed PMID: 24603191]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[26]

Adler DS. Non-functional tricuspid valve disease. Annals of cardiothoracic surgery. 2017 May:6(3):204-213. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.04.04. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28706863]


[27]

Seghatol FF, Rigolin VH. Appetite suppressants and valvular heart disease. Current opinion in cardiology. 2002 Sep:17(5):486-92     [PubMed PMID: 12357124]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[28]

Cevasco M, Shekar PS. Surgical management of tricuspid stenosis. Annals of cardiothoracic surgery. 2017 May:6(3):275-282. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.05.14. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28706872]


[29]

Orbe LC, Sobrino N, Arcas R, Peinado R, Frutos A, Blazquez JR, Maté I, Sobrino JA. Initial outcome of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis. The American journal of cardiology. 1993 Feb 1:71(4):353-4     [PubMed PMID: 8427185]


[30]

Ribeiro PA, Al Zaibag M, Al Kasab S, Idris M, Halim M, Abdullah M, Shahed M. Percutaneous double balloon valvotomy for rheumatic tricuspid stenosis. The American journal of cardiology. 1988 Mar 1:61(8):660-2     [PubMed PMID: 3344697]


[31]

Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Balasubramanian S, Dunning J. Should the tricuspid valve be replaced with a mechanical or biological valve? Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2007 Aug:6(4):551-7     [PubMed PMID: 17669933]


[32]

Lee R, Li S, Rankin JS, O'Brien SM, Gammie JS, Peterson ED, McCarthy PM, Edwards FH, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgical Database. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011 Mar:91(3):677-84; discussion p 684. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.009. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21352979]


[33]

McGinn JS, Zipes DP. Constrictive pericarditis causing tricuspid stenosis. Archives of internal medicine. 1972 Mar:129(3):487-90     [PubMed PMID: 4259627]