Neuroanatomy, Superior and Inferior Olivary Nucleus (Superior and Inferior Olivary Complex)

Article Author:
Manika Paul
Article Editor:
Joe M Das
7/31/2020 3:17:55 PM
PubMed Link:
Neuroanatomy, Superior and Inferior Olivary Nucleus (Superior and Inferior Olivary Complex)


The inferior and superior olives are a collection of brainstem nuclei near the border of the medulla oblongata and the pons.[1] They have highly conserved basic functions throughout mammalian evolution, though their size and shape differ in between species. The inferior olivary (IO) complex, which includes the principal olive (PO) and the medial and dorsal accessory olives (MAO and DAO), functions as a relay station between the spine and cerebellum, integrating motor and sensory information to provide feedback and training to cerebellar neurons.[2] The superior olive (SO), on the other hand, is composed of the lateral and medial superior olives (LSO and MSO) and some peri-olivary cell bodies. It participates in sound localization and analysis, acting as a relay between the cochlear nuclei and the inferior colliculi in the auditory pathway.[3]

Structure and Function

Inferior Olive

The inferior olive nuclei are in the superior medulla, just inferior to the pons. Their composition is the grey matter in the shape of crenated "C," in which the hilum is medially directed. The hilum faces the opposite inferior cerebellar peduncle (ICP), and a large number of fibers travel to and from it.

The inferior olives are much more prominent than the superior olives in humans. The inferior olives are visible upon dissection of the brainstem as two prominent lumps on the ventral surface of the brainstem just lateral to the pyramidal columns.[4] In axial cross-section, the PO, which is the largest nucleus, is evident as a corrugated ring of grey matter extending from the base of the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) to the ICP. The DAO and MAO are much smaller and found medial to the PO, with the DAO dorsal to the MAO.[1]

The inferior olive accepts motor and sensory, particularly proprioceptive, input from several sources, and projects mainly through the ICP to the cerebellar cortex and deep cerebellar nuclei. Inputs include spino-olivary fibers carrying information about the contralateral position and muscle tension; fibers from the motor cortex carrying information about the current motor activity and intention; and smaller inputs from the red nucleus (motor), superior colliculus (eye movement), and other centers.[5] There is also a GABAergic reciprocal connection between the deep cerebellar nuclei and the inferior olive, which appears to regulate the inferior olive further.[6]

After receiving motor and sensory inputs, the axons of inferior olive neurons branch into several climbing and mossy fibers (CF and MF) that ascend through the contralateral ICP to the cerebellar cortex.[2] The inferior olive, its projections, and the cerebellar cortex are all somatotopically organized; for example, the DAO and MAO receive projections from different parts of the spine.[7] In the cerebellar cortex, mossy fibers synapse on granule cells in the deepest, granular layer of the cortex; the granule cells' axons extend throughout the outermost, molecular layer as parallel fibers, forming synapses on large numbers of Purkinje cell dendrites. The thicker climbing fibers synapse directly in the Purkinje cell layer, usually on the Purkinje cell bodies. Thus each mossy fiber has a small effect on a large number of Purkinje cells, while each climbing fiber has a significant impact on a single cell.

The outputs of the inferior olive, the climbing fibers, and mossy fibers, are classically thought to represent an "error signal" and information about the external environment, respectively. The massive dendritic trees of Purkinje cells use this information to calculate movements. Purkinje cell dendrites are very plastic and remodel continuously in response to the relative timing of mossy fiber and climbing fiber signals, contributing to motor learning.[8] Other types of neurons in the cerebellum also cause Purkinje cell adaptation to inputs from different climbing fibers and mossy fibers. In addition to fine-tuning movements, the thinking is also that the same integrative circuits are used in cognitive and emotional processing as well.[2]

Superior Olive

The superior olive is situated caudally near the facial nucleus in the tegmentum of the caudal pons.

The superior olives are much smaller and less apparent than the inferior olives in humans. The superior olives are at the level of the upper borders of the IO, near the MCP, with a lateral, medial, and periolivary part. The LSO and MSO are distinct cylindrical nuclei, medial, dorsal, and slightly superior to the PO; the periolivary cells form an indistinct shell around them in humans, though they form into distinct nuclei in other species.[3][1]

The superior olive acts as an information relay between the cochlear nucleus (CN) and the inferior colliculus (IC). Projections from the CN either go directly to the IC or synapse once in the superior olive before continuing to the IC, and both the IC and the superior olive receive input from bilateral cochlear nuclei (and so bilateral ears).[9] In the superior olive, inputs from both ears are compared to calculate interaural time, phase, frequency, and intensity differences, which then pass to the IC for further processing. The MSO tends to process lower frequencies than the LSO; both components are arranged tonotopically with frequencies arranged along the lengths of the nuclei.[3] They also have a second axis, which represents the magnitude of the interaural distance. For a given frequency, ipsilateral and contralateral axons run in opposite directions stimulating a series of output neurons; the output neurons can only fire when stimulated by both axons near-simultaneously or with the matching phase, depending on the properties of the synapse. This double axis creates a mental map of sounds in space. Since primates have a relatively large head and are thus better able to distinguish lower frequencies, the human MSO is relatively large compared to most mammals.[3]

Like the feedback from the cerebellum to the IO, the superior olive sends feedback to the cochlear nuclei. These olivocochlear projections act on both inner and outer hair cells and appear to reduce auditory stimulation in specific frequency ranges. This feedback helps to regulate attention to competing stimuli, like a private conversation in a crowded room, and may help protect against noise-induced hearing loss.[3][10]

Clinical Significance

Inferior Olive

As a significant source of training inputs for the cerebellum, the inferior olive is essential to the development of fine motor control and coordination. Though it is rare for the inferior olive to be solely affected by a disease process, such a lesion would eventually lead to diffuse cell loss in the cerebellum due to the intense connections between the two parts. The reverse is also true, with cerebellar cell loss eventually leading to atrophy of the inferior olive. Multiple system atrophy, one of the Parkinsonian diseases that also affect the cerebellar system and the autonomic system, is an example of a condition that causes lesions to the inferior olive.[11] The inferior olive also plays a role in the pathogenesis of essential tremor.

Superior Olive

Defects in the synaptic junction in the superior olive may not present with frank hearing difficulties but tend to produce subtler symptoms. An auditory brainstem response (ABR), like that used in routine hearing testing for newborns, can detect superior olive dysfunction by a decreased amplitude of wave V.[3]

The superior olive is crucial in certain auditory processing disorders. A link between autism and a dysmorphic superior olive has been noted in several studies, although the mechanism, if any, by which this causes symptoms, is unclear. However, it is worth noting that autism can present with auditory processing abnormalities, as well as language difficulties, which could plausibly have links to problems in higher-level auditory processing. It is unclear whether there is any non-auditory contribution of the superior olive changes to symptoms, which would imply further roles of the superior olive in cognition.[12]

  • Contributed by Gray's Anatomy Plates
    (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 2231 Not availableImage 2231 Not available
      Contributed by Gray's Anatomy Plates

  • Contributed by Gray's Anatomy Plates
    (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 2238 Not availableImage 2238 Not available
      Contributed by Gray's Anatomy Plates


[1] Ding SL,Royall JJ,Sunkin SM,Ng L,Facer BA,Lesnar P,Guillozet-Bongaarts A,McMurray B,Szafer A,Dolbeare TA,Stevens A,Tirrell L,Benner T,Caldejon S,Dalley RA,Dee N,Lau C,Nyhus J,Reding M,Riley ZL,Sandman D,Shen E,van der Kouwe A,Varjabedian A,Write M,Zollei L,Dang C,Knowles JA,Koch C,Phillips JW,Sestan N,Wohnoutka P,Zielke HR,Hohmann JG,Jones AR,Bernard A,Hawrylycz MJ,Hof PR,Fischl B,LeinReference ES, Comprehensive cellular-resolution atlas of the adult human brain. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2017 Feb 1;     [PubMed PMID: 27917481]
[2] D'Angelo E,Galliano E,De Zeeuw CI, Editorial: The Olivo-Cerebellar System. Frontiers in neural circuits. 2015;     [PubMed PMID: 26793067]
[3] Moore JK, Organization of the human superior olivary complex. Microscopy research and technique. 2000 Nov 15;     [PubMed PMID: 11071722]
[4] Solsberg MD,Fournier D,Potts DG, MR imaging of the excised human brainstem: a correlative neuroanatomic study. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 1990 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 2120974]
[5] Berkley KJ,Worden IG, [Projections to the inferior olive of the cat. I. Comparisons of input from the dorsal column nuclei, the lateral cervical nucleus, the spino-olivary pathways, the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum]. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1978 Jul 15;     [PubMed PMID: 659660]
[6] Dietrichs E,Walberg F, The cerebellar nucleo-olivary and olivocerebellar nuclear projections in the cat as studied with anterograde and retrograde transport in the same animal after implantation of crystalline WGA-HRP. III. The interposed nuclei. Brain research. 1986 May 14;     [PubMed PMID: 3719316]
[7] Ruigrok TJ, Cerebellar nuclei: the olivary connection. Progress in brain research. 1997;     [PubMed PMID: 9193144]
[8] Piochon C,Kruskal P,Maclean J,Hansel C, Non-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity in cerebellar circuits. Frontiers in neural circuits. 2012;     [PubMed PMID: 23335888]
[9] Cant NB,Benson CG, Organization of the inferior colliculus of the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): differences in distribution of projections from the cochlear nuclei and the superior olivary complex. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2006 Apr 10;     [PubMed PMID: 16498677]
[10] Vetter DE, The mammalian olivocochlear system--a legacy of non-cerebellar research in the Mugnaini lab. Cerebellum (London, England). 2015 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 25592068]
[11] Sakurai A,Okamoto K,Yaguchi M,Fujita Y,Mizuno Y,Nakazato Y,Gonatas NK, Pathology of the inferior olivary nucleus in patients with multiple system atrophy. Acta neuropathologica. 2002 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 12012086]
[12] Kulesza RJ Jr,Lukose R,Stevens LV, Malformation of the human superior olive in autistic spectrum disorders. Brain research. 2011 Jan 7;     [PubMed PMID: 20946889]