Electrical Right and Left Axis Deviation

Article Author:
Anthony Kashou
Article Author:
Hajira Basit
Article Editor:
Lovely Chhabra
5/4/2020 9:06:45 PM
PubMed Link:
Electrical Right and Left Axis Deviation


One of the key steps in interpreting an electrocardiogram (EKG) is determining the electrical axis of the heart. Being able to determine the electrical axis can give insight into underlying disease states and help steer the differential diagnosis towards or away from certain diagnoses. Herein, we will discuss what makes up the electrical axis, ventricular (QRS) axis, axis classifications, various approaches to determining the electrical axis, and causes of axis deviation.[1][2][3]


Electrical Axis

In electrocardiology, a vector represents both the magnitude and direction of the action potential generated by an individual myocyte. The sum of all the individual vectors generated by the depolarization waves makes up the electrical axis. Because each myocyte can produce an action potential, an axis for each wave and interval of the cardiac cycle can be determined. Knowing the axis of each and how they interact can reflect certain pathology.

When the electrical axis is discussed and taught, the ventricular axis is typically used in common clinical practice, although the atrial axis can be quite useful in clinical situations. Since the left ventricle makes up most of the heart muscle under normal circumstances; thus, it generates the most electrical force visible on the EKG. The normal ventricular axis is thus directed downward and slightly towards the left.

The ventricular axis can be determined by looking at the QRS complex, which represents ventricular depolarization. Because the QRS complex is used to determine the ventricular axis, it is also referred to as the QRS axis. The ventricular (QRS) axis signifies the sum of all individual vectors generated by the depolarization waves of ventricular myocytes.[4]

Ventricular (QRS) Axis

The ventricular (QRS) axis is determined indirectly by evaluating the vectors produced under the electrodes. This is done by interpreting the electrical signal (QRS complex) recorded at each electrode as positive, negative, or isoelectric and then considering their relationship with each other.

In general, a positive QRS complex in a lead has a ventricular axis that is approximately in the same direction to that lead. Whereas a negative QRS complex in a lead has a ventricular axis that is approximately in the opposite direction to that lead. If the QRS complex is isoelectric in a lead, then the ventricular axis is perpendicular (90 degrees) to that lead.[5] This is summarized in Figure 1.

Issues of Concern

Electrical Axis Classification

There are five main electrical axis classifications: [6]

  1. normal axis
  2. left axis deviation (LAD)
  3. right axis deviation (RAD)
  4. extreme axis deviation, and 
  5. indeterminate axis 

There is some disagreement on the exact degrees that define each type, but there are some general cutoffs that can be used for the QRS axis.

The QRS axis moves leftward throughout childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. At birth, the normal QRS axis lies between +30 degrees and +190 degrees. Between the ages of 8 to 16 years, the axis moves leftward with normal lying between 0° degrees to +120 degrees. The normal adult QRS axis is between -30 degrees and +90 degrees, which is directed downward and to the left. This adult range is sometimes extended from -30 degrees to +100 degrees.

The following axis classifications described are based on adults. If the QRS axis falls between -30 degrees and -90 degrees, it is considered LAD. In this case, the QRS vector is directed upward and to the left. If the QRS axis falls between +90 degrees and 180 degrees, or beyond +100 degrees if the adult range is used, then RAD is present. The QRS vector would be directed downward and to the right. If the QRS axis happens to fall between -90 degrees and 180 degrees, this would be referred to as extreme axis deviation, whereby the ventricular vector is directed upward and to the right. Lastly, if the QRS complex is isoelectric or equiphasic in all leads with no dominant QRS deflection, it is considered an indeterminate axis. The electrical axis classifications are summarized in Figure 2.

Approach to Determining Axis

There are multiple methods to determine the electrical axis. The following are a few of these simple and adequate approaches to assess the ventricular (QRS) axis. Hence, the focus will be on the QRS complexes in specific leads.

The main QRS complexes to evaluate are those in leads I, II, and aVF. The positive ends of these three leads fall within the normal axis region. The positive ends of leads I, II, and aVF are 0 degrees, +60 degrees, and +90 degrees, respectively. Therefore, if all three of these leads have positive QRS complexes, the axis is normal.

Method 1. One simple way to learn how to determine the electrical axis is to inspect limb leads I and aVF. This is referred to as the quadrant approach or two-lead method. Each of the four quadrants represents 90 degrees and an axis type. In other words, 0 degrees to +90 degrees is a normal axis, +90 degrees to 180 degrees is RAD, 0 degrees to -90 degrees is LAD, and -90 degrees to 180 degrees is an extreme axis. Therefore, if leads I and aVF are both positive, then the axis falls within the normal axis range. If lead I is positive and lead aVF is negative, then there is LAD. If lead I is negative and lead aVF is positive, then there is RAD. And, if both leads I and aVF are negative, then the axis falls within the extreme axis range. This quadrant approach is summarized in Figure 3.

One issue with this method is that it only gives a close approximation to the true axis. In addition, it narrows the normal axis range. This can result in an inaccurate interpretation of the true electrical axis. For instance, if using this approach with a positive lead I and negative lead aVF, the axis would be interpreted as LAD. However, if the true axis were -20 degrees, which lies in the LAD quadrant using this method, it would still be within the normal axis range. Nevertheless, this method is easy to learn and sufficient in most cases.

One way to resolve these issues is by locating the most isoelectric limb lead and knowing that the true axis lies nearly perpendicular to it. Using this can help narrow the axis down to within 10 degrees of the normal axis.

Method 2. A more accurate approach than the simple quadrant approach takes into account leads I and aVF, as well as lead II. This is referred to as the three-lead method. If the net QRS deflection is positive in both leads I and II, the QRS axis is normal. If the net QRS deflection is positive in lead I, but negative lead II, then there is LAD. Notice that in both cases lead aVF was not needed. In other words, if lead I is positive, look next to lead II. Now, if lead I is negative, look next to lead aVF. If lead aVF is positive, then the axis is rightward; however, if lead aVF is also negative, then there is the extreme axis. This approach is summarized in Figure 4 and Table 1.

Method 3. Another simple way to estimate the ventricular (QRS) axis is to locate the most isoelectric limb lead along the frontal plane. The isoelectric (equiphasic) lead represents the lead with a net amplitude of zero and the smallest overall amplitude. The QRS axis is approximately perpendicular (90 degrees) from the positive pole of that lead.

In order to determine which direction to move 90 degrees from that positive pole, look at the net deflection in another lead. For example, if the isoelectric limb lead is lead II, which has a positive end directed at +60 degrees, then the electrical axis is directed approximately 90 degrees from +60 degrees in either direction. Therefore, the axis can lie at around +150° (RAD) or -30 degrees (borderline LAD). If lead I, with a positive pole at 0 degrees, has a net positive QRS deflection, then the axis will be closer to -30 degrees (LAD); and, if lead I has a net negative QRS deflection, then the axis will be closer to +150 degrees (RAD).

Finally, it’s important to note that these three methods determine the electrical axis in the frontal plane. There is also a horizontal plane with a horizontal axis. The axis along this plane can be determined by viewing the heart under the diaphragm. The axis can be considered to have a clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation depending on when the transition from mostly negative QRS complexes to mostly positive QRS complexes occurs along with the precordial leads (V1-V6). Ideally, this would be the isoelectric precordial lead. Normally, this transition occurs between leads V3 and V4. If it occurs earlier, it is considered to a counterclockwise rotation and an early transition. This would indicate that the left ventricular forces are directed more anteriorly. On the other hand, if it occurs later in which there is poor R wave progression, then it is considered a clockwise rotation and a late transition. This would indicate that the left ventricular forces are directed more posteriorly.

Clinical Significance

Causes of LAD include: [7]

  • Normal variation (physiologic, often age-related change)
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy
  • Conduction defects: left bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block
  • Inferior wall myocardial infarction
  • Preexcitation syndromes (e.g., Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome)
  • Ventricular ectopic rhythms (e.g., ventricular tachycardia)
  • Congenital heart disease (e.g., primum atrial septal defect, endocardial cushion defect)
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Emphysema
  • Mechanical shift, such as with expiration or raised diaphragm (e.g., pregnancy, ascites, abdominal tumor, organomegaly)
  • Pacemaker-generated rhythm or paced rhythm

Causes of RAD include:

  • Normal variation (e.g., children, young adults)
  • Limb-lead reversal (left- and right-arm electrodes)
  • Right ventricular overload syndromes (acute or chronic)
  • Right ventricular hypertrophy
  • Conduction defects: left posterior fascicular block, right bundle branch block
  • Lateral wall myocardial infarction
  • Preexcitation syndromes (e.g., Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome)
  • Ventricular ectopic rhythms (e.g., ventricular tachycardia)
  • Congenital heart disease (e.g., secundum atrial septal defect)
  • Dextrocardia
  • Left pneumothorax
  • Mechanical shift, such as with inspiration or emphysema
  • Conditions that cause right ventricular strain (e.g., pulmonary embolism, pulmonary stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, chronic lung disease, and resultant cor pulmonale)

Other Issues

Ventricular (QRS) Axis in Bundle Branch Blocks 

Determining the ventricular (QRS) axis in the setting of a bundle branch block is controversial. With the right bundle branch block (RBBB), RAD or LAD may indicate a bifascicular block. Thus, knowing that the terminal portion of the QRS complex reflects the delay in right ventricular activation with RBBB, one approach to estimating the frontal plane axis is by using the initial 80 to 100 millisecond (ms) of QRS deflection, which primarily reflects left ventricular activation. Similarly, with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and other intraventricular conduction delays, the initial 80-100 ms of the QRS deflection or the entire QRS complex can be used to determine the axis.[8][9][10]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Determining the electrical axis on an electrocardiogram can help narrow the differential diagnosis and lead to an efficient diagnostic approach for the patient. This will help decrease the time needed to arrive at the right diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. An interprofessional team of clinicians, nurses, and technicians trained in the interpretation of an EKG is needed to achieve this goal. An emergency department nurse, trained in potential implications of axis deviation, can help assist the clinicians in providing prompt and prudent diagnostic as well as therapeutic care for the patient. A cardiac specialty-trained nurse can assist the clinicians in monitoring patients with acute cardiac pathology to help treat potential complications. A nurse well versed in the interpretation of an EKG, especially regarding the electrical axis determination and its significance, should communicate this finding with the clinicians. In doing so, a collaborative interprofessional team of healthcare providers can improve patient care and outcomes. [Level 5]

  • Contributed by Anthony H. Kashou, www.theekgguy.com
    (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 5909 Not availableImage 5909 Not available
      Contributed by Anthony H. Kashou, www.theekgguy.com


[1] Storkås HS,Hansen TF,Tahri JB,Lauridsen TK,Olsen FJ,Borgquist R,Vinther M,Lindhardt TB,Bruun NE,Søgaard P,Risum N, Left axis deviation in patients with left bundle branch block is a marker of myocardial disease associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of electrocardiology. 2019 Apr 5;     [PubMed PMID: 31003852]
[2] Lazović B,Svenda MZ,Mazić S,Stajić Z,Delić M, Analysis of electrocardiogram in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Medicinski pregled. 2013 Mar-Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 23653989]
[3] Kronborg MB,Nielsen JC,Mortensen PT, Electrocardiographic patterns and long-term clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2010 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 19915182]
[4] Acunzo RS,Konopka IV,Sanchéz RA,Pizzarelli N,Wells FC,Baranchuk A,Chiale PA, Right bundle branch block and middle septal fiber block with or without left anterior fascicular block manifested as aberrant conduction in apparent healthy individuals: Electro-vectorcardiographic characterization. Journal of electrocardiology. 2013 Mar-Apr     [PubMed PMID: 23498753]
[5] Han Y,Huang L,Li Z,Ma N,Li Q,Li Y,Wu L,Zhang X,Wu X,Che X,Zhang H, Relationship between left ventricular isovolumic relaxation flow patterns and mitral inflow patterns studied by using vector flow mapping. Scientific reports. 2019 Nov 7     [PubMed PMID: 31700142]
[6] Lévy S, Diagnostic approach to cardiac arrhythmias. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 1991     [PubMed PMID: 1723114]
[7] Hara H,Niwano S,Ito H,Karakawa M,Ako J, Evaluation of R-wave offset in the left chest leads for estimating the left ventricular activation delay: An evaluation based on coronary sinus electrograms and the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Journal of electrocardiology. 2016 Mar-Apr     [PubMed PMID: 26763306]
[8] Bertaglia E,Michieletto M,Spedicato L,Pascotto P, Right bundle branch block, intermittent ST segment elevation and inducible ventricular tachycardia in an asymptomatic patient: an unusual presentation of the Brugada syndrome? Giornale italiano di cardiologia. 1998 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 9773315]
[9] Lacombe P,Lévy S,Metge M,Cointe R,Bru P,Gérard R, Electrocardiographic characteristics of the escape rhythm in transient complete atrioventricular block induced by transcatheter electrical ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 1988 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 2451224]
[10] Sohi GS,Flowers NC,Horan LG,Sridharan MR,Johnson JC, Comparison of total body surface map depolarization patterns of left bundle branch block and normal axis with left bundle branch block and left-axis deviation. Circulation. 1983 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 6821910]