Opioid receptor antagonists block one or more of the opioid receptors in the central or peripheral nervous system. Opioid receptors are specific transmembrane neurotransmitter receptors that couple G-proteins, which upon stimulation by endogenous or exogenous opioids, lead to the intracellular process of signal transduction.
The most recent classification scheme identifies three major classes of opioid receptors, with several minor classes. The three most clinically relevant opioid receptors are the mu, kappa and delta receptors. Stimulation of central mu receptors causes respiratory depression, analgesia (supraspinal and peripheral), and euphoria. Peripheral mu receptors are tissue-specific with higher concentrations in bronchial smooth muscle and the digestive tract. This is the reason for opioids suppressing the cough reflex and causing constipation. Kappa and delta-opioid receptors also have potent analgesic effects; kappa receptors are known to cause disassociation, hallucinations, and dysphoria and delta receptors also modulate mu receptors.
The two most commonly used centrally acting opioid receptor antagonists are naloxone and naltrexone. Naloxone comes in intravenous, intramuscular and intranasal formulations, and is FDA-approved for the use in an opioid overdose, and the reversal of respiratory depression associated with opioid use. Naltrexone is available in both oral and long-acting injectable formulations and is FDA-approved for the treatment of opioid and alcohol use disorders as a maintenance treatment. The most commonly used peripheral opioid receptor antagonist is methylnaltrexone, which is a potent competitive antagonist acting at the digestive tract and is also FDA-approved for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Methylnaltrexone comes in oral tablets and as a subcutaneous injection. Nalmefene is another opioid antagonist. Its affinity for mu and kappa receptors is similar to naltrexone through its affinity for delta receptor is greater than of naltrexone. In the United States, it is approved for the reversal of Mu receptor agonist effects by parenteral routes. Nalmefene has a more extended duration of action than naloxone and has increased bioavailability. Nalmefene has approval in some European countries as an oral formulation for the maintenance treatment of alcohol use disorder.
Opioid antagonists such as naloxone have come into the public spotlight with the emergence of the opioid epidemic and the need for readily accessible reversal agents in the setting of an acute opioid overdose. Various communities have experimented with naloxone dispensaries or over-the-counter availability at pharmacies without the need for a prescription. These communities have shown promising results in lives saved. There is also a national movement to arm law enforcement officers, first responders, and schoolteachers with specific training in being able to recognize an opioid overdose, and the knowledge and confidence to correctly administer a reversal agent such as naloxone.
Centrally acting opioid receptor antagonists are potent competitive inhibitors, with the highest affinity for the mu receptor. Naloxone is the most common choice in opioid overdose emergencies, and naltrexone is utilized primarily in opioid and alcohol use disorders to help maintain abstinence primarily by decreasing cravings. The competitive antagonism of the central mu receptors stimulates the respiratory drive, increases alertness, terminates analgesia and euphoria, and causes mydriasis.
Peripherally acting opioid receptor antagonists, do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, but are potent competitive inhibitors at the mu receptor, which are found in high concentration at peripheral nerve terminals in bronchial smooth muscle and the digestive tract. Antagonism of these peripheral mu receptors can lead to intestinal hypermotility. Some studies suggest that up to 60% of opioid analgesia originates from the peripheral opioid receptors and that antagonizing through pharmacologic means may lead to an acute pain crisis.
A precipitated withdrawal from opiates, whether caused by naloxone in the pre-hospital or emergency department setting, or by naloxone or naltrexone during a medically supervised withdrawal treatment can lead to hospital admission or even require intensive care. There are rare, isolated reports of stress-induced cardiomyopathy and organic delusional disorder. More commonly, the implementation of intravenous hydration and electrolyte replacement is in order due to significant nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
During a medically supervised withdrawal, often great care is taken in increasing the naltrexone dose gradually over a period of 3-7 days resulting in opiate “washout.” This naltrexone-accelerated withdrawal has high complication rates and almost certainly requires the addition of an alpha-2 agonist (like clonidine and lofexidine which requires less concern for hypotensive effects.), and comfort medications such as benzodiazepines, antiemetics, and muscle relaxers.
Accelerated protocols for medically supervised management of withdrawal aim to reduce the transition time to naltrexone treatment, thereby reducing patient inconvenience, lengths of inpatient or residential stay, and treatment costs. This method has not found widespread use. During a supervised naltrexone-accelerated withdrawal, a “naloxone challenge” can be performed to ensure a complete system depletion of exogenous opioids prior to full-dose oral naltrexone, or extended-release intramuscular naltrexone (Vivitrol). A low naloxone starting dose of just 0.1 mg intravenous is given, and the patient monitored for up to 30 minutes for signs of withdrawal. Typically, symptoms present within 1-5 minutes. A doubled dose of 0.2 mg follows, and the patient undergoes observation. Thirty minutes following, a final dose of 0.4 mg is given, and if the patient is asymptomatic, the assumption is that the patient can safely receive naltrexone without fear of withdrawal symptoms. The extended-release injectable version of naltrexone has found increased favor among practitioners for the treatment of opiate maintenance treatment as it only needs dosing every four weeks.
Buprenorphine, a partial mu agonist and kappa antagonist, can be combined with naloxone for effective therapy in a medically supervised opioid withdrawal. Naloxone, when combined with buprenorphine, has poor oral availability, but when crushed and intravenously injected, can precipitate opioid withdrawal symptoms. This can act as a deterrent in opioid users who are physiologically dependent. To begin buprenorphine-naloxone therapy during induction, the patient must have a mild-to-moderate withdrawal (Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale [COWS] of greater than 10 or 12) to receive a net benefit for the opioid agonist-component and relief from withdrawal symptoms. The time it takes to be in a mild-to-moderate withdrawal (COWS > 10 or 12) is dependent on the half-life of the opioid used by the patient. Methadone, for example, has a half-life greater than 24 hours. Buprenorphine can be started for maintenance therapy if the patient has not used opiates for a while but still has a craving (after completing rehab or releasing from prison). On the whole, starting buprenorphine should only take place when there are no signs of opioid intoxication or sedation or some observable signs of opioid withdrawal.
Opioid receptor antagonists block one or more of the opioid receptors in the central or peripheral nervous system. Stimulation of central mu receptors causes respiratory depression, analgesia, and euphoria.
The 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain specifically recommend incorporating strategies to mitigate risk, such as prescribing naloxone in patients with a history of substance use disorder, high risk and/or history of overdose, higher opioid dose (>50 morphine milligram equivalent daily dosing),patients at risk of returning to a high dose to which they are no longer tolerant (eg, patients recently released from prison), or concurrent benzodiazepine use . Some studies have shown a dose-dependent relative risk reduction on the amount of naloxone distributed in the community, whether by prescription or community dispensaries, versus opioid-related overdose mortality . There has also been various legislation passed providing legal protection to laypersons attending to a suspected opioid overdose, and/or initiating early activation of the emergency response system. All healthcare workers including nurse practitioners who prescribe opioids should be familiar with current guidelines for pain management; failure to do so may result in patient harm and loss of prescribing privileges for certain controlled substances.
|||Waldhoer M,Bartlett SE,Whistler JL, Opioid receptors. Annual review of biochemistry. 2004 [PubMed PMID: 15189164]|
|||Sridharan K,Sivaramakrishnan G, Drugs for Treating Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Mixed Treatment Comparison Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2018 Feb [PubMed PMID: 28919541]|
|||Karkhanis A,Holleran KM,Jones SR, Dynorphin/Kappa Opioid Receptor Signaling in Preclinical Models of Alcohol, Drug, and Food Addiction. International review of neurobiology. 2017 [PubMed PMID: 29056156]|
|||Varga EV,Navratilova E,Stropova D,Jambrosic J,Roeske WR,Yamamura HI, Agonist-specific regulation of the delta-opioid receptor. Life sciences. 2004 Dec 24 [PubMed PMID: 15567186]|
|||Thomas J,Karver S,Cooney GA,Chamberlain BH,Watt CK,Slatkin NE,Stambler N,Kremer AB,Israel RJ, Methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in advanced illness. The New England journal of medicine. 2008 May 29 [PubMed PMID: 18509120]|
|||Walley AY,Xuan Z,Hackman HH,Quinn E,Doe-Simkins M,Sorensen-Alawad A,Ruiz S,Ozonoff A, Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2013 Jan 30 [PubMed PMID: 23372174]|
|||Stein C,Lang LJ, Peripheral mechanisms of opioid analgesia. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2009 Feb [PubMed PMID: 19157985]|
|||Hassanian-Moghaddam H,Afzali S,Pooya A, Withdrawal syndrome caused by naltrexone in opioid abusers. Human [PubMed PMID: 23690227]|
|||Fishbain DA,Goldberg M,Rosomoff RS,Rosomoff H, Atypical withdrawal syndrome (organic delusional syndrome) secondary to oxycodone detoxification. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 1988 Dec [PubMed PMID: 3235702]|
|||Bisaga A,Mannelli P,Sullivan MA,Vosburg SK,Compton P,Woody GE,Kosten TR, Antagonists in the medical management of opioid use disorders: Historical and existing treatment strategies. The American journal on addictions. 2018 Apr [PubMed PMID: 29596725]|
|||Johnson BA, Naltrexone long-acting formulation in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2007 Oct [PubMed PMID: 18472999]|
|||Comer SD,Sullivan MA,Vosburg SK,Manubay J,Amass L,Cooper ZD,Saccone P,Kleber HD, Abuse liability of intravenous buprenorphine/naloxone and buprenorphine alone in buprenorphine-maintained intravenous heroin abusers. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2010 Apr [PubMed PMID: 20403021]|
|||Wolff K,Rostami-Hodjegan A,Shires S,Hay AW,Feely M,Calvert R,Raistrick D,Tucker GT, The pharmacokinetics of methadone in healthy subjects and opiate users. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 1997 Oct [PubMed PMID: 9354306]|
|||Dowell D,Haegerich TM,Chou R, CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016 Apr 19 [PubMed PMID: 26977696]|