Glomus Jugulare

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Glomus jugulare is a slow-growing paraganglioma of the head and neck that arises within the jugular foramen and localized to the jugular fossa. Paragangliomas are benign and are originated from neural crest derivatives, known as the paraganglia. This activity reviews the evaluation, treatment, and management of glomus jugulare, and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in managing patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of glomus jugulare.
  • Review the appropriate evaluation of glomus jugulare patients.
  • Outline the management options available for patients with glomus jugulare.
  • Discuss interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to improve the care of patients with glomus jugulare and improve outcomes.

Introduction

Glomus jugulare is a rare, slow-growing neuroendocrine paraganglioma of the head and neck that arises within the jugular foramen and is localized to the jugular fossa in the temporal bone of the skull base.[1][2] Paragangliomas are benign and originate from neural crest derivatives, known as the paraganglia. Paragangliomas are also known as chemodectomas, and their estimated incidence has been reported up to 1 to 3 per 100,000 people.[1][3] There are two types of paragangliomas: sympathetic and parasympathetic, and most head and neck paragangliomas, including glomus jugulare tumors, are derived from the latter type.[4]

Throughout the head and neck, paragangliomas can have a wide range of locations including the carotid bifurcation (carotid body tumor), at the superior vagal ganglion (glomus jugulare tumor), at the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (glomus tympanicum tumor), and at the inferior vagal ganglion (glomus vagale tumor). Although their natural history is usually slow-growing, glomus tumors can cause significant complications due to the associated mass effect and compression, and even erosion of local structures.[1] Management of glomus jugulare can present a challenge due to their hypervascularity, difficult anatomic location, and advanced stage at diagnosis.[4]

Etiology

Glomus jugulare tumors arise from the paraganglia cells located in the adventitia wall of the jugular bulb, within the jugular foramen. They have slow growth and are usually benign. However, due to their location, they can cause a mass effect with invasion and erosion of the temporal bone as they increase in size. Only 1% to 5% are malignant.[2] Eighty percent of paragangliomas are sporadic, with the rest exhibiting a hereditary component.[4] Inherited forms will present with an earlier onset of symptoms and can be bilateral; however, familial forms have a decreased pattern of malignancy when compared to sporadic counterparts.[4]

Epidemiology

The estimated annual incidence of glomus jugulare tumors has been reported to be about 0.07 per 100,000 per year or 1 case per 1.3 million people.[2] The median age at diagnosis is 56 years (44 to 69 years).[5] Female presentation is 3 to 6 times more common than men.[6]

Among head and neck paragangliomas, 44% to 48% are carotid body tumors, 16% to 24% are glomus jugulare, 20% are glomus tympanicum, and 8% are glomus vagale.[7][8]

Pathophysiology

Early-stage paragangliomas present with signs and symptoms related to their location. Specifically, most of these will be related to the involvement of the middle-ear cleft. These neoplasms tend to spread through the hypotympanic air cell tract, around the jugular bulb, inferior petrosal sinus and carotid artery into the jugular foramen and posterior fossa.[4] They can also erode the floor of the hypotympanum, and can, therefore, present as a middle ear mass. If an erosion of the tympanic membrane has occurred, they can also present as an aural polyp or with otorrhagia. Further extension of the tumor through the facial recess, can result in facial nerve encasement and paralysis.[4]

Up to 1 to 3% of glomus tumor cases have secretion of catecholamines.[1] With high enough levels, pheochromocytoma-like symptoms may develop, resulting in systemic effects. Signs and symptoms of a hormonally active tumor include labile hypertension, increased heart rate, headache, excessive sweating, tremors, as well as facial flushing; these mandate a comprehensive evaluation.[4] A 24-hour urinary collection for catecholamines and metanephrines needs to be ordered in these cases. Plasma metanephrine testing can also be requested.

History and Physical

Patients present most commonly with hearing loss, pulsatile tinnitus, and lower cranial nerve neuropathy.[2][4][6] These symptoms can occur in up to 75% of the patients. Lower cranial nerve deficits are encountered in up to 10% of cases and can present with neurological deficits, resulting in facial palsy, dysphagia, hoarseness, shoulder weakness, and tongue deviation.[2][6][9] Other signs and symptoms include earache, ear discharge, and ear bleeding.

Evaluation

Otoscopic Examination

The most common finding on physical examination is a pulsatile red middle ear mass behind an intact tympanic membrane.[6] The tympanic membrane can show increased vascularity associated with an inferiorly based red ear mass, giving the characteristic rising sun appearance. Sometimes, the tympanic portion of the tumor may erode into the ear canal, resulting in otorrhagia.[6]

Audiologic Testing

Pure tone and speech audiometry should be performed.

Head computed tomographic scan with fine-cuts at the temporal bone demonstrate bone destruction. Bone erosion is sometimes called a moth-eaten appearance.[4]

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI with intravenous contrast-enhancement shows an enhancing lesion usually extending from the jugular bulb to the middle ear. Posterior fossa and cervical extension are common in untreated tumors. Vascular flow voids are described with the characteristic “salt-and-pepper” appearance on T1 and T2 weighted images. The MRI depicts the tumor vascularity, extension along neural foramina and multicentricity, and should be the first imaging study when evaluating a patient with a suspected glomus jugulare. On T1 weighted images without intravenous contrast, paragangliomas can appear hypointense with a speckled appearance; however, on intravenous gadolinium-enhanced contrast sequences, pronounced enhancement is seen secondary to the hypervascular nature of the glomus jugulare.[4]

Angiography

Angiography helps differentiate paragangliomas from other pathologies but also can help to demonstrate the tumor blush and the feeding vessels, which can then be embolized. The principal feeding artery is the ascending pharyngeal artery, although the occipital artery can also contribute; both branches of the external carotid artery.[4] Branches of the internal carotid artery and the vertebrobasilar system have also been reported, including the caroticotympanic artery and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery.[4] Balloon test occlusion studies can be performed to help decide whether occlusion of the petrous internal carotid artery would be tolerated.[10]

Tumor Classifications

Those described by Fisch and by Glasscock-Jackson are the most commonly used, which are based on the location and extension of the tumor.[11][12][13][12]

Treatment / Management

Observation provides an excellent treatment alternative, as 65% of the tumors remained stable and sometimes regressed in size.[14] Approximately 40% of the tumors demonstrated growth at an average of 0.9 mm per year.[15] If a patient is diagnosed with a glomus jugulare and a decision for observation is made, close follow up is necessary with serial brain MRI with and without intravenous contrast to assess the nature and behavior of the disease.

There are different therapeutic options aimed at improving local control and minimizing associated treatment morbidity; however, the management of glomus tumors continues to be a challenge.[4] There are still many controversies regarding optimal treatment. Historically, the treatment of this tumor involved surgical resection, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or a combination of both.[1] However, these treatment options carry a significant risk of morbidity, and as a result, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an increasingly popular treatment.[1] A systematic review of the literature shows that EBRT and SRS are comparable to surgical intervention in patients with jugular paragangliomas.[16] The treatment decision should be individualized in each patient.

For young, healthy patients with functional cranial nerve deficits, the mainstay treatment of choice is surgical removal. Preoperative embolization is generally performed 24 to 72 hours before surgery.[10] In about 80% of patients, complete resection may be accomplished, but it may result in debilitating cranial neuropathy. New postoperative cranial nerve injuries occur in 60% of patients, involving IX X, XI, and XII. Subtotal resection has been used more frequently to minimize morbidity and improve symptoms associated with the disease.[15]

Sub-total resection followed by radiosurgery for the residual tumor yields a better outcome with lower morbidity and mortality.[17] As an adjunct for surgical intervention, endoscopy has been used and is associated with smaller incisions and tailored trajectories, however, this is mostly reserved for posterior fossa extensions. Advances in technology have provided nerve monitoring techniques that are used during evaluation and to prevent lower cranial nerve damage during surgery.

Radiation can be utilized in the setting of bilateral glomus jugulare tumors and can represent an adjunct to limited surgical approaches with associated subtotal resection.[4] Modalities include standard fractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Standard fractionated radiotherapy requires multiple sessions while radiosurgery can be given in a single session providing focused radiation and, at the same time, sparring the vulnerable structures inside the tympanic bone.[4] It can be offered as an adjunctive to limited surgery or as the primary treatment modality in poor surgical candidates or patients with bilateral disease providing up to 90% control rate.[4][18] Radiosurgery alone (systematic review and meta-analysis) provides tumor control in 92% of the patients, symptom control in 93%, with 8% of complications.[19][20] For local control, ≥ 90%, a recommended median marginal dose of 15 Gy (range, 12-30 Gy) should be given.[5]

Complete obliteration of glomus jugulare tumors with the use of embolization is very difficult and is prone to revascularization and is not beneficial in terms of alleviating clinical symptoms.[21] Endovascular embolization, as a single modality of treatment, is considered palliative.[4] Onyx embolization can be used for palliative management of otorrhagia in patients with unresectable tumors.[22] Preoperative embolization of the tumor can lead to a decrease in the duration of surgery, as well as a reduction of operative estimated blood loss.[4]

Differential Diagnosis

  • Schwannoma of lower cranial nerves
  • Neuroma of lower cranial nerves
  • Glomus tympanicum
  • Neck and head metastasis
  • Bone metastasis
  • Lymph node metastasis
  • Meningioma
  • Cholesteatoma
  • Endolymphatic sac tumors
  • Chordoma
  • Chondrosarcoma
  • Epidermoid
  • Chronic mastoiditis
  • Hemangiopericytoma
  • Plasmacytoma
  • Dural arteriovenous fistula
  • Arteriovenous malformations
  • High riding jugular bulb
  • Asymmetry of jugular foramen size
  • Tortuous internal carotid artery
  • Idiopathic intracranial hypertension[23]

Prognosis

Recent series show a stroke rate of 0% to 3.5%, a cranial nerve injury rate of 5%-39%, and overall mortality of 0%-2.7%, with 15% of the patients unable to return to their preoperative daily activities.[24]

With stereotactic radiosurgery treatment, 60% of the patients showed improvement of previous neurological deficits. Tumor control is obtained in 91% of the patients.[25] The Kaplan-Meier tumor control rate is 92.2% at five years and 86.3% at ten years.[26] Hearing tends to worsen post radiosurgery; however, balance, dizziness, and tinnitus usually improve post radiosurgery.[27]

Complications

  • Sigmoid sinus thrombosis
  • Cranial neuropathies
  • Pulsatile tinnitus
  • Deterioration of hearing
  • Vocal cord paralysis
  • Aspiration
  • Facial paralysis
  • Conductive hearing loss
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leak
  • Lower cranial neuropathy
  • Temporal bone osteoradionecrosis
  • Brain radionecrosis

Deterrence and Patient Education

Glomus jugulare are slow-growing tumors; therefore, long-term follow-up is necessary. Follow-up is given by an interprofessional team, which should include primary care physicians, neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, and neuroradiologists. Other healthcare providers dealing with rehabilitation and complications, will also be part of the team, such as physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians and physical therapists. Patients should be well educated in terms of the disease, particularly those with a family history because genetic screening of high-risk individuals in affected families allows early detection and management of multifocal disease.[4] Early management of the condition leads to a lower associated morbidity.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Glomus jugulare patients may exhibit non-specific signs and symptoms such as tinnitus and decreased hearing. At first, diagnosis may be challenging to recognize. While the otolaryngologist is almost always involved in the care of patients with glomus jugulare tumors, it is essential to consult with an interprofessional team of specialists that include a neurosurgeon, neuro otologist, and neurologist. Interventional neuroradiologists are necessary to make proper diagnostic evaluations and sometimes contribute to the management of these lesions, including interval assessment and follow-up. Nurses will monitor the patient's vital signs and assist with the education of the patient and family.

The pharmacist will ensure that the patient is on the right analgesics, antiemetics, and appropriate antibiotics during the postoperative period. The neuroradiologist also plays a vital role in determining the cause. If the patient undergoes preoperative embolization, endovascular specialists such as endovascular neurosurgeons, interventional neurologists, or interventional neuroradiologists will also play a vital role in the care and treatment of the patient. For radiation treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists are also involved in the decision-making process.

The outcomes of glomus jugulare tumors depend on their extension and involved structures. However, to improve outcomes, prompt consultation with an interprofessional group of specialists is recommended. An interprofessional team that provides a holistic and integrated approach to postoperative care can help achieve the best possible outcomes. Collaboration, shared decision making, and communication are crucial elements for a good result.


Details

Updated:

8/23/2023 12:39:10 PM

References


[1]

Fussey JM, Kemeny AA, Sankar S, Rejali D. Successful management of a catecholamine-secreting glomus jugulare tumor with radiosurgery alone. Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base. 2013 Dec:74(6):399-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1347375. Epub 2013 May 22     [PubMed PMID: 24436943]


[2]

Ramina R, Maniglia JJ, Fernandes YB, Paschoal JR, Pfeilsticker LN, Neto MC, Borges G. Jugular foramen tumors: diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurgical focus. 2004 Aug 15:17(2):E5     [PubMed PMID: 15329020]


[3]

Petropoulos AE, Luetje CM, Camarata PJ, Whittaker CK, Lee G, Baysal BE. Genetic analysis in the diagnosis of familial paragangliomas. The Laryngoscope. 2000 Jul:110(7):1225-9     [PubMed PMID: 10892701]


[4]

Semaan MT, Megerian CA. Current assessment and management of glomus tumors. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2008 Oct:16(5):420-6. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32830c4595. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18797283]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Fatima N, Pollom E, Soltys S, Chang SD, Meola A. Stereotactic radiosurgery for head and neck paragangliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical review. 2021 Apr:44(2):741-752. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01292-5. Epub 2020 Apr 21     [PubMed PMID: 32318920]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Wanna GB, Sweeney AD, Haynes DS, Carlson ML. Contemporary management of jugular paragangliomas. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 2015 Apr:48(2):331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2014.12.007. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25769354]


[7]

Tokgöz SA, Saylam G, Bayır Ö, Keseroğlu K, Toptaş G, Çadallı Tatar E, Akın İ, Korkmaz MH. Glomus tumors of the head and neck: thirteen years' institutional experience and management. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2019 Oct:139(10):930-933. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1655588. Epub 2019 Aug 27     [PubMed PMID: 31452413]


[8]

Singh S, Madan R, Singh MK, Thakar A, Sharma SC. Head-and-neck paragangliomas: An overview of 54 cases operated at a tertiary care center. South Asian journal of cancer. 2019 Oct-Dec:8(4):237-240. doi: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_339_18. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31807486]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Jackson CG, Harris PF, Glasscock ME 3rd, Fritsch M, Dimitrov E, Johnson GD, Poe DS. Diagnosis and management of paragangliomas of the skull base. American journal of surgery. 1990 Apr:159(4):389-93     [PubMed PMID: 2156465]


[10]

Tomasello F, Conti A. Judicious management of jugular foramen tumors. World neurosurgery. 2015 May:83(5):756-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 16     [PubMed PMID: 25225132]


[11]

Fisch U. Infratemporal fossa approach for glomus tumors of the temporal bone. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1982 Sep-Oct:91(5 Pt 1):474-9     [PubMed PMID: 6291440]


[12]

Oldring D, Fisch U. Glomus tumors of the temporal region: surgical therapy. The American journal of otology. 1979 Jul:1(1):7-18     [PubMed PMID: 233408]


[13]

Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Harris PF. Glomus Tumors. Diagnosis, classification, and management of large lesions. Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1982 Jul:108(7):401-10     [PubMed PMID: 6284098]


[14]

Prasad SC, Mimoune HA, D'Orazio F, Medina M, Bacciu A, Mariani-Costantini R, Piazza P, Sanna M. The role of wait-and-scan and the efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of temporal bone paragangliomas. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014 Jun:35(5):922-31. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000386. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24751735]


[15]

Carlson ML, Sweeney AD, Wanna GB, Netterville JL, Haynes DS. Natural history of glomus jugulare: a review of 16 tumors managed with primary observation. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2015 Jan:152(1):98-105. doi: 10.1177/0194599814555839. Epub 2014 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 25361637]


[16]

Suárez C, Rodrigo JP, Bödeker CC, Llorente JL, Silver CE, Jansen JC, Takes RP, Strojan P, Pellitteri PK, Rinaldo A, Mendenhall WM, Ferlito A. Jugular and vagal paragangliomas: Systematic study of management with surgery and radiotherapy. Head & neck. 2013 Aug:35(8):1195-204. doi: 10.1002/hed.22976. Epub 2012 Mar 16     [PubMed PMID: 22422597]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[17]

Pai BS, Bysani PR, Nagaraj NM. A Middle Path in the Surgical Management of Glomus Jugulare: Lessons Learnt from a Short Series. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2019 Jan-Mar:14(1):96-101. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_232_17. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30937017]


[18]

Sallabanda K, Barrientos H, Isernia Romero DA, Vargas C, Gutierrez Diaz JA, Peraza C, Rivin Del Campo E, Praena-Fernandez JM, López-Guerra JL. Long-term outcomes after radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors. Tumori. 2018 Aug:104(4):300-306. doi: 10.1177/0300891618765576. Epub 2018 Apr 16     [PubMed PMID: 29714667]


[19]

Shapiro S, Kellermeyer B, Ramadan J, Jones G, Wiseman B, Cassis A. Outcomes of Primary Radiosurgery Treatment of Glomus Jugulare Tumors: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2018 Oct:39(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001957. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30124618]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Hafez RFA, Morgan MS, Fahmy OM, Hassan HT. Long-term effectiveness and safety of stereotactic gamma knife surgery as a primary sole treatment in the management of glomus jagulare tumor. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2018 May:168():34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 29514114]


[21]

Kocur D, Ślusarczyk W, Przybyłko N, Hofman M, Jamróz T, Suszyński K, Baron J, Kwiek S. Endovascular Approach to Glomus Jugulare Tumors. Polish journal of radiology. 2017:82():322-326. doi: 10.12659/PJR.901141. Epub 2017 Jun 19     [PubMed PMID: 28685005]


[22]

Dalfino JC, Drazin D, Nair A, Gifford E, Boulos AS. Successful Onyx embolization of a giant glomus jugulare: case report and review of nonsurgical treatment options. World neurosurgery. 2014 May-Jun:81(5-6):842.e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9     [PubMed PMID: 23313234]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[23]

Sismanis A. Pulsatile tinnitus: contemporary assessment and management. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2011 Oct:19(5):348-57. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283493fd8. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22552697]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[24]

Lim M, Gibbs IC, Adler JR Jr, Chang SD. Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors. Neurosurgical focus. 2004 Aug 15:17(2):E11     [PubMed PMID: 15329026]


[25]

Lior U, Rotem H, Uzi N, Roberto S. LINAC radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors: retrospective - cohort study of 23 patients. Acta neurochirurgica. 2020 Apr:162(4):839-844. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04251-7. Epub 2020 Feb 11     [PubMed PMID: 32048040]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[26]

Ibrahim R, Ammori MB, Yianni J, Grainger A, Rowe J, Radatz M. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors: a single-center series of 75 cases. Journal of neurosurgery. 2017 May:126(5):1488-1497. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152667. Epub 2016 Jul 8     [PubMed PMID: 27392265]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Hebb ALO, Erjavec N, Morris DP, Shoman NM, Mulroy L, Walling SA. Treatment of patients with glomus jugulare tumours (GJT) and its subjective effect on quality of life (QoL) measures. American journal of otolaryngology. 2020 Nov-Dec:41(6):102559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102559. Epub 2020 May 27     [PubMed PMID: 32527669]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence