Dermatofibroma is a commonly occurring cutaneous entity usually centered within the skin's dermis. Dermatofibromas are referred to as benign fibrous histiocytomas of the skin, or superficial/cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytomas, or common fibrous histiocytoma. These mesenchymal cell lesions of the dermis clinically are firm sub-cutaneous nodules which occur on the extremities in the vast majority of cases, and which may or may not be associated with overlying skin changes. They are most commonly asymptomatic and usually relatively small, less than or equal to 1 centimeter in diameter. The term "fibrous histiocytoma" refers more to the morphologic appearance of the cell populations that comprise these lesions rather than strictly describing the cellular lineage.
There are two theories of the genesis of dermatofibromas: (1) reactive process vs. a clonal, and (2) neoplastic proliferation. Evidence exists for both of these theories. Often, patients who present with a dermatofibroma relate a history of possibly inciting local trauma at the site, such as from an insect bite or superficial puncture wound from thorns or wood splinters. Dermatofibromas occur in people of all ages, although more commonly during the ages of the 20s to 40s, and develop more frequently in females than males, with as high as a 2:1 female to male predominance according to some reports. They are a benign tumor, although there have been cases of local recurrence, and even more rarely, distant metastases have been reported. When considering the differential diagnosis of these lesions, it is vitally important to distinguish dermatofibromas from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, a similar appearing but more aggressive cutaneous neoplasm.    
The development of dermatofibromas remains a controversial topic. Patients who are diagnosed with dermatofibroma often endorse a history of local trauma. This history argues for a reactive process. However, this history of local trauma is not reliably reported, and only found in about a fifth of cases. More often, there is no inciting event or trauma, and the dermatofibroma develops spontaneously. Interestingly, although they will develop spontaneously, spontaneous regression is not commonly observed, which may support an argument against a primarily reactive process in favor of a clonal or neoplastic model.
Some studies have identified clonal markers in the cells of dermatofibromas by analyzing X-chromosome inactivation, which argues for a monoclonal pattern, and possibly favor a neoplastic process as the origin of development for dermatofibromas. There are others who propose that dermatofibromas are heterogeneously derived in that they represent both a reactive and neoplastic process within the same lesion; wherein the histiocytoid component may be neoplastic, and the fibrous portion may result from reactive fibroblastic proliferation.
The majority of dermatofibromas occur as solitary lesions, only clinically presenting as multiple simultaneous lesions in 10% of cases. Interestingly, although there are multiple histologic benign variants of dermatofibromas, in patients with two or more simultaneously occurring dermatofibromas, the lesions tend to appear histopathologically similar.   
Dermatofibromas are a common skin lesion in almost all populations, with one study reporting that they account for 3% of all dermatopathology laboratory specimens. The overall worldwide incidence is difficult to determine, as the vast majority of patients are asymptomatic and therefore many patients may never seek care for these lesions. These lesions are most common in patients in their 20s to their 40s. Most studies indicate a female predominance, with an incidence ranging from equivocal to only slightly higher in females too as high as twice as frequent in females as compared to males.   
Dermatofibromas have many histologic variants including cellular, epithelioid, lipidized, aneurysmal, monster cell, and atypical (to name only a few); but the most frequently diagnosed is the common fibrous histiocytoma or common dermatofibroma.
The common dermatofibroma is characterized histopathologically by a localized proliferation of spindle-shaped fibrous cells admixed with histiocytoid cells within the dermis. This proliferation is usually nodular in appearance, with spiculated, but moderately defined, borders that may have a pushing appearance in regards to the surrounding tissue. The spindle cells will form focally what is referred to as a “storiform” pattern, which describes a multi-centric whorling appearance of the elongated nuclei. There may be intermixed capillaries and lymphocytes or multinucleated giant cells. These proliferations are usually contained within the dermis, but it is not uncommon to observe a small portion of the lesion dipping down into the subcutaneous tissue along septal lines. A helpful and distinguishing characteristic is the presence of trapped collagen bundles or “collagen balls” within and between the fascicles of spindled fibrous cells. These entrapped collagen collections are more commonly found forming at the periphery of the lesion.
The overlying epidermis is usually separated by a clearly delineated and unaffected zone of separation, the "Grenz zone." Typical reactive epidermis changes include hyperkeratosis and acanthosis. The epidermis also will often exhibit elongated rete ridges diving into the dermis with hyperpigmented basal keratinocytes, which is referred to as the “dirty feet” sign.
Arguably the most important entity to distinguish dermatofibromas from is the similar appearing, but much more worrisome, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). These lesions are more typically much more cellular, have a more marked development of the storiform pattern, and will invade and involve the subcutis much more deeply, often entrapping fat as it dives and proliferates along the subcutaneous septae.   
Dermatofibromas are slow growing lesions which can affect any part of the body but have a predilection for the extremities. Clinically these lesions are a firm, non-tender cutaneous nodule, with or without overlying skin changes (such as tan-pink to reddish-brown discoloration, depending on the age of the lesion) with a smooth surface. Dermoscopic evaluation of these lesions will most commonly exhibit a central white patch with a peripheral pigmented network. Dermatofibromas are usually less than or equal to one centimeter in diameter. Patients are usually asymptomatic but will relate a history of local trauma at the site of the lesion such as vaccination or an insect bite in approximately one out of five cases. A thorough full body skin exam is important as these lesions may be subtle and are multiple in 10% of cases. The “dimple sign” is a characteristic finding where in lateral inward digital pressure of the skin produces a central dimpling over the lesion.  
The most important evaluation is biopsy with histopathologic examination. These lesions can be reliably diagnosed through this method along with the correlated clinical exam. If these lesions are evaluated prior to biopsy by sonography, they should appear as an avascular lesion within the dermis which will often have superficial subcutis involvement and spiculated margins that are not well defined. The size and margins of these lesions correlate well on the histopathologic exam with sonographic findings. 
Dermatofibromas are benign lesions with an excellent prognosis that are usually cured through surgical excision. In excisional biopsies with cellular or atypical variants, re-excision may be recommended to ensure clear margins because of the documented, albeit low, the rate of local recurrence. Metastases are extremely rare but have been observed. No histopathologic appearance has been reliably indicated in which lesions will tend to recur or metastasize. 
There are many benign variants of dermatofibroma which are not discussed here. It is more important to differentiate benign dermatofibromas from more advanced and aggressive neoplasms that may appear similar to dermatofibromas in some cases.
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a low to intermediate grade, locally aggressive neoplasm that can be mistaken for a benign dermatofibroma. Thankfully, there are several distinguishing features. DFSP is characteristically more cellular and will involve more of the subcutis, displaying “honeycomb” entrapment of subcutaneous fat. In difficult cases, immunohistochemical staining can be very helpful, as DFSP characteristically stains positive for CD-34, and will be factor XIIIa negative. Benign dermatofibromas will stain strongly positive for factor XIIIa but negative for the marker CD-34. Dermatofibromas may also show higher positive staining for D2-40. Ki-67 staining should indicate a much higher proliferation index in DFSP’s, and the mitotic rate should also be much higher in DFSP than in dermatofibromas. DFSPs are also often much larger lesions, with average diameters of 5 centimeters according to one study.
Kaposi Sarcoma, also composed of a spindled cell proliferation within the dermis, may be mistaken for the aneurysmal variant of dermatofibroma as Kaposi Sarcoma characteristically displays red blood cells between spindled cellular areas and vascularity. However, Kaposi Sarcoma should display HHV-8 positivity and may also stain positive for CD31, CD34, and D2-40.
Basal cell carcinomas (BCC) can mimic a dermatofibroma with overlying follicular induction, which refers to epidermal hyperplasia such as basaloid proliferation. This differentiation is usually most difficult in superficial biopsies, which do not catch the underlying dermatofibroma. There may even be peripheral palisading in these lesions, a characteristic finding usually of BCCs. Important differentiating factors include the presence of CK20 positive Merkel cells in follicular induction. Other signs arguing for dermatofibroma may include clear cell hyperplasia, the absence of nuclear atypia, and crowding. 
Complications of dermatofibroma are primarily related to surgical removal, including bleeding, infection, scar/disfigurement, and need for further procedures.
Patients should be educated that dermatofibromas are benign entities and do not necessarily require excision. However, although the clinical history and exam and imaging studies may favor a dermatofibroma, definitive diagnosis can only be made on pathologic examination. Patient request or desire may also influence the decision to excise vs choosing surveillance.
Patients should be educated that dermatofibromas are benign entities and do not necessarily require excision. However, although the clinical history and exam and imaging studies may favor a dermatofibroma, definitive diagnosis can only be made on pathologic examination. Patient request or desire may also influence the decision to excise versus choosing surveillance. Of course, if surveillance is opted for, any abrupt or unusual change in the behavior of any skin lesion should necessitate a referral to a competent dermatologist for evaluation. (IV)
|||Dermatofibroma is a clonal proliferative disease., Chen TC,Kuo T,Chan HL,, Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2000 Jan [PubMed PMID: 10660130]|
|||Massoumi R,Podda M,Fässler R,Paus R, Cylindroma as tumor of hair follicle origin. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2006 May; [PubMed PMID: 16484982]|
|||Cutaneous fibrohistiocytic tumours - an update., Luzar B,Calonje E,, Histopathology, 2010 Jan [PubMed PMID: 20055912]|
|||Soft Tissue Tumors of Uncertain Histogenesis: A Review for Dermatopathologists., Buehler D,Weisman P,, Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2017 Sep [PubMed PMID: 28802505]|
|||Clonal analysis of cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma (dermatofibroma)., Hui P,Glusac EJ,Sinard JH,Perkins AS,, Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2002 Aug [PubMed PMID: 12139632]|
|||Dermatofibroma: Atypical Presentations., Bandyopadhyay MR,Besra M,Dutta S,Sarkar S,, Indian journal of dermatology, 2016 Jan-Feb [PubMed PMID: 26955137]|
|||Phosphohistone-H3 and Ki67: Useful Markers in Differentiating Dermatofibroma From Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans and Atypical Fibrohistiocytic Lesions., Agarwal A,Gopinath A,Tetzlaff MT,Prieto VG,, The American Journal of dermatopathology, 2017 Jul [PubMed PMID: 28609344]|
|||Clinical and histological patterns of dermatofibroma without gross skin surface change: A comparative study with conventional dermatofibroma., Lee WJ,Jung JM,Won CH,Chang SE,Choi JH,Moon KC,Lee MW,, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology, 2015 May-Jun [PubMed PMID: 25851763]|
|||Malignant dermatofibroma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of seven cases., Mentzel T,Wiesner T,Cerroni L,Hantschke M,Kutzner H,Rütten A,Häberle M,Bisceglia M,Chibon F,Coindre JM,, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2013 Feb [PubMed PMID: 22996372]|
|||Beyond classic dermoscopic patterns of dermatofibromas: a prospective research study., Kelati A,Aqil N,Baybay H,Gallouj S,Mernissi FZ,, Journal of medical case reports, 2017 Sep 20 [PubMed PMID: 28927449]|
|||Aneurysmal dermatofibroma mimicking both clinical and dermoscopic malignant melanoma and Kaposi's sarcoma., Morariu SH,Suciu M,Vartolomei MD,Badea MA,Cotoi OS,, Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie, 2014 [PubMed PMID: 25607410]|
|||Dermatofibroma: sonographic findings and pathologic correlation., Won KY,Park SY,Jin W,Lew BL,, Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 2017 Jan 1 [PubMed PMID: 28791883]|
|||Romano RC,Fritchie KJ, Fibrohistiocytic Tumors. Clinics in laboratory medicine. 2017 Sep [PubMed PMID: 28802503]|
|||The Role of CD34 and D2-40 in the Differentiation of Dermatofibroma and Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans., Sadullahoğlu C,Dere Y,Atasever TR,Öztop MT,Karaaslan Ö,, Turk patoloji dergisi, 2017 [PubMed PMID: 28832078]|
|||Histologic Mimics of Basal Cell Carcinoma., Stanoszek LM,Wang GY,Harms PW,, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2017 Nov [PubMed PMID: 29072946]|