Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Article Author:
Stephanie Carr
Article Editor:
Anup Kasi
Updated:
6/22/2019 12:43:51 PM
PubMed Link:
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Introduction

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or familial polyposis coli (FPC) is an autosomal dominant polyposis syndrome with varying degrees of penetrance. If untreated, patients will develop hundreds to thousands of polyps throughout the colon and rectum. Polyps often develop in the early teens and result in a nearly 100% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer by age forty if untreated. Colectomy is necessary for substantial reduction in the risk of developing colorectal cancer. FAP also correlates with other malignancies including gastric, duodenal, hepatoblastoma and desmoid tumors.[1]

Etiology

FAP results from a mutation at the APC gene on chromosome 6. The APC gene is a tumor suppressor gene. Most mutations are non-sense mutations, but the genotype and phenotypes vary significantly as the APC gene is large.  The location of gene mutation contributes to the phenotypic variations including the development of extracolonic manifestations of the disease.[2]

If more than ten adenomatous polyps present on a single colonoscopy, genetic testing is necessary. Ten to thirty percent of patients with a presentation of FAP will not have a detectable APC gene mutation.[1] Family members of patients without an identified mutation should still undergo the same surveillance as those with a detectable mutation.

Epidemiology

FAP occurs in 1 in 10000 individuals and is the second most common inherited colorectal cancer syndrome.[1]  Overall, the syndrome is rare and contributes to only 1% of diagnosed colorectal cancer. About 30% of individuals with FAP have no known family history and represent de novo APC mutations.[3]

A milder form of the disease, attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) also contributes to colorectal cancer. These patients present at a later age with a lower polyp burden.  Patients with AFAP have a 70% risk of developing CRC.[4] The treatment of FAP and AFAP requires surgical resection for a dramatic reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer.[1]

History and Physical

The clinical presentation of familial adenomatous polyposis will vary based on family history. Patients with a known family history of FAP should begin screening at a young age with annual endoscopy evaluation. Individuals with no family history often present with colorectal cancer at a young age or during screening colonoscopy.

The diagnosis is the result of the visualization of more than 100 polyps on colonoscopy. FAP has a 100% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer if left untreated. There is also an increased risk of extra-colonic cancers.

Extracolonic Manifestations

Desmoid

Desmoid tumors are solid connective tissue tumors. The tumors are often benign but can grow very large and are locally invasive. They are very rare in the general population but occur in up to 10 to 15% of FAP patients with an increased incidence within the abdominal cavity. Individuals with a family history of desmoid tumors (DT) have a 25% risk of developing DTs. Females are twice as likely to develop DTs compared to males. Interestingly, surgical trauma is also related to an increased incidence of DTs. Therefore colectomy in FAP patients is deferred as long as possible in young patients.[5]

Desmoid tumors often present as a large, firm, painless mass. National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend annual abdominal palpation with consideration of imaging in those with a significant family history of FAP and desmoid tumors. MRI imaging is most useful to determine the relationship to surrounding structures and evidence of local invasion. Most masses are ovoid or round in shape with irregular margins. Similar to treatment of adenomas, sulindac and Celebrex have demonstrated stabilization or regression of DTs in nearly 30% of cases. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) also demonstrate a positive effect against desmoid tumors.[5]

Gastric/Duodenal

Gastric polyps are present in approximately 90% of patients with FAP. Unlike colonic polyps, these polyps are unlikely to progress to adenocarcinoma. Only 1% of these patients will develop gastric cancer.[1] Upper endoscopy should begin at 20 to 25 years of age according to NCCN guidelines. These polyps should be treated endoscopically if possible, but polyps with high grade-dysplasia or malignant degeneration require surgical resection.

Hepatoblastoma

The increased incidence of hepatoblastoma in FAP patients is very low. It occurs most commonly in male children under the age of five. No universal screening recommendations exist. In children at high risk, screening would include liver ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein levels every 3 to 6 months.[1]

Thyroid

Thyroid cancer occurs in approximately 2% of FAP patients with papillary carcinoma being the most common. There is thought to be an increased incidence in the Hispanic population. There is a proven increased incidence in women as nearly 90% of thyroid cancers diagnosed in FAP patients are women.[1] Annual thyroid exam should begin in the teenage years with consideration for annual ultrasound screening.

Evaluation

Patients with known FAP or a strong family history FAP should undergo annual endoscopy evaluation with flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy starting at 10 to 12 years of age.[6] Surveillance should continue until the polyp load is unable to be controlled with endoscopic removal. Genetic testing is not recommended at an early age due to the psychologic burden associated with positive results. Once a diagnosis of FAP is confirmed clinically genetic testing should occur.

Treatment / Management

Definitive surgical management involves colectomy with or without proctectomy. Surgical options include subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, subtotal colectomy with ileostomy or total proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch. 

Subtotal colectomy is a technically less challenging surgical technique but requires continued surveillance of the rectum. The rectal mucosa is still at high risk of developing adenocarcinoma. If the rectum is left intact, endoscopic surveillance must be performed every six months as the risk of developing rectal cancer is as high as 29% at 50 years of age.[2] Candidates for rectal sparing include those with a low polyp burden within the rectum, lack of advanced rectal neoplasia and no evidence of CRC at the time of resection. In appropriately selected patients, the conversion to total proctocolectomy is near zero but increases to 35% in poorly surveillance candidates.

Total proctocolectomy (TPC) involves removal of the colon and rectum with the creation of either an ileostomy or ileoanal pouch. Although no surveillance is required, there are disadvantages to this approach. TPC with ileoanal pouch can result in increased rates of infertility in men and women as well as urinary dysfunction. Although there is no difference in incontinence, there is an increase in stool urgency with an ileoanal pouch.[7]

Exploration of non-surgical treatment modalities in hopes of delaying surgical resection have had limited results. Sulindac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory that has been shown in small studies to reduce the number of adenomas by nearly 50% and the size of adenomas by 65%. There was a recurrence of the adenomas with discontinuation of sulindac.[1] For patients with a retained rectum, sulindac is used to reduce the polyp burden within the rectum. The selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, has also been studied and at high doses, has demonstrated a 30% reduction in adenoma burden.[2] Annual surveillance remains essential in patients with a retained rectum.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Multi-specialty management of familial adenomatous polyposis patients is essential to ensure appropriate screening and management of these complex patients. Team members should include a primary care provider, gastroenterologist, surgeon, otolaryngologist, and geneticist. Early endoscopic surveillance is essential to determine the appropriate timing of surgical resection. Although medical treatments can aid in stabilization of the disease, the mainstay of FAP treatment is a colectomy with or without proctectomy. Extra-colonic manifestations also require intensive screening recommendations with close clinical follow-up of FAP patients. With surveillance and surgical resection, patients with FAP can substantially reduce their risk of colorectal cancer and other associated malignancies. 


References

[1] Kanth P,Grimmett J,Champine M,Burt R,Samadder NJ, Hereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Cancer Syndromes: A Primer on Diagnosis and Management. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 28786406]
[2] Chintalacheruvu LM,Shaw T,Buddam A,Diab O,Kassim T,Mukherjee S,Lynch HT, Major hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes: a narrative review. Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD. 2017 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 28617886]
[3] Sammour T,Hayes IP,Hill AG,Macrae FA,Winter DC, Familial colorectal cancer syndromes: an overview of clinical management. Expert review of gastroenterology     [PubMed PMID: 25779305]
[4] Thorson AG,Faria J, Familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, and familial risk: what are the implications for the surgeon? Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2000 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 11008233]
[5] DE Marchis ML,Tonelli F,Quaresmini D,Lovero D,Della-Morte D,Silvestris F,Guadagni F,Palmirotta R, Desmoid Tumors in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Anticancer research. 2017 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 28668823]
[6] Syngal S,Brand RE,Church JM,Giardiello FM,Hampel HL,Burt RW, ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2015 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 25645574]
[7] Chittleborough TJ,Warrier SK,Heriot AG,Kalady M,Church J, Dispelling misconceptions in the management of familial adenomatous polyposis. ANZ journal of surgery. 2017 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 28266097]