Injuries to the penis from zipper entrapment are actually the most common cause of penile trauma in adults, with roughly 2,000 reported cases yearly. When they occur, the individual often presents to the emergency department with the prepuce caught in the zipper after having unsuccessfully tried home management. It will often present with swelling, pain, bruising, and edema related to the injury. Adult patients are often extremely reluctant to come to the hospital for this type of problem, due to extreme embarrassment, which can cause delays in presentation and treatment. The majority of affected patients are children. The condition of the penile skin or foreskin becoming caught in a zipper is technically described as a "zipper related penile injury" (ZIRPI) and was first reported in JAMA in 1936.
Zippers were first patented about 100 years ago by Gideon Sundback, a Swedish - Ameican engineer, as an improved clasp locker. At the time of its development, Sundback reportedly had some reservations about "possible genital mishaps". In 1923, B. F. Goodrich was the first company to use the new fastener commercially on their rubber galoshes. It was originally called a "separable fastener" but was soon given the catchy name of "zipper".
Penile rings are intended to improve and maintain erections and are typically used for erotic or auto-erotic purposes. Various types of constricting bands and the injuries they can produce have been reported, but the first case of penile strangulation from such a ring was described by Gauthier in 1755. When a ring becomes trapped either at the base of the penis or behind the penoscrotal junction, it can become quite serious. Such events, called penile ring entrapments, are quite rare. When distal venous engorgement and edema prevents their removal, the penis can progressively become quite swollen, ischemic, and painful. If left untreated, this can progress to ischemia, infarction, necrosis, and even gangrene. For these reasons, penile ring entrapments are considered urological emergencies and need to be dealt with promptly.
Typically, zipper injuries occur in young children who are dressing and zipping while paying attention to something else. It is certainly not unusual for young children to be easily distracted. Zipper injuries also happen in adults but less often. In adults, the condition typically occurs when the zipper is being closed by a relative or caretaker, as in patients with dementia, or individuals with other neurocognitive disabilities who are unable to fully dress themselves. In children, only toilet seat injuries are more common causes of penile trauma than zippers. It is unclear if "going commando" (not using underwear) is a contributing factor. Known risk factors for penile zipper injuries include younger age (less than 18 years), not being circumcised, and requiring assistance for dressing.
Penile ring entrapments occur when a ring placed around the penis, usually intended for erotic purposes, and cannot be removed by the patient. This causes increasing venous stasis leading to worsening edema, reduced lymphatic and arterial flow, bruising, cyanosis, ischemia, necrosis, and eventual gangrene. Patients are typically adults who often delay coming to the Emergency Department due to embarrassment. This often results in a more severe level of injury when they finally appear for medical assistance.
The majority of zipper injury cases are in children and younger teenagers. The overall incidence is quite low as it comprises less than 0.5% of all emergency room pediatric visits. The most common cause is having the foreskin becomes caught between the two sides of the zipper during closure, due to distraction or inattention. This also occurs in adults who are unable to dress themselves due to dementia, birth defects, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsey, spinal cord injuries, and similar conditions. In these patients, others are needed to close the zipper when dressing. Since the overall incidence of zipper related penile injuries in adults is so low, the risk is often not recognized by the caregivers. In patients who have no sensation in the genital area or are unable to communicate, this can become a potentially serious injury due to delayed recognition.
The exact incidence of penile ring entrapments is unknown but it is considered quite rare with less than 100 cases reported in the medical literature. When it occurs, it is almost always in adults. Reported ages are 15 to 56 years of age with a duration ranging from 3 hours to 1 month! In young children, a hair can accidentally cause a similar tourniquet effect, called penile hair strangulation, that can mimic paraphimosis in appearance. The most commonly reported age is 3 years but it has been reported in young boys from neonates to 5 years.
Typically, the pathophysiology for both conditions is similar to direct tissue damage to the foreskin or penile skin from compression and entrapment. The injury may demonstrate bleeding, swelling, pain, contusions, bruising and other signs of tissue damage. In general, the longer the tissue is trapped, the greater the degree of tissue damage, edema, bruising, scarring and trauma. Therefore, the conditions should be relieved as quickly as reasonably possible.
Of the two problems, penile entrapment is potentially more dangerous as it can quickly progress to more serious and permanent injury to the penis. Zipper injuries are more likely to show tissue damage to the entrapped skin while penile ring entrapment will tend to progress from venous stasis to distal edema with a lymphatic and arterial blockage, followed by increasing ischemia. This ischemia can progress to infarction, necrosis, urethral fistulas and either self-amputation or gangrene in a matter of hours. It can even result in death. Ring compression may be sufficient to interfere with voiding and cause urinary retention requiring suprapubic tube placement. Ring entrapments longer than 72 hours are likely to be the most serious. Non-metallic rings tend to cause more serious injuries as their limited degree of elasticity results in greater compression.
Rings of various materials have been reported including, but not limited to, metal rings, wedding rings, iron sleeves, nuts, washers, plastic bottles, bull rings, hammer-heads, and rubber bands. Almost any material that be manufactured into a ring can potentially be used. This complicates removal as ultimately this will depend on the nature of the ring material and the equipment available.
Penile hair strangulation typically occurs in young male children, less than 5 years of age. It is often from long maternal hair which accidentally becomes wrapped around the penis and then shortens as it dries out causing penile strangulation. It typically occurs in circumcised children and the most common site of hair entrapment is at the coronal sulcus. If the problem is not diagnosed early and the constricting hair tourniquet removed, it can damage the dorsal neurovascular bundle with loss of sensation to the glans penis as well as develop urethrocutaneous fistulas, damage the corpora, transect the glans, create a urethral stricture, and even cause partial or total penile auto-amputation distal to the constriction. In chronic cases, the hair can become embedded in the penile tissue and may not even be visible. Fortunately, these cases are quite rare but should be considered in any young child with distal penile edema; especially if circumcised.
The patient will often present with significant pain. In adults, there will also be a considerable embarrassment in even discussing the problem. Examiners should be aware of this and deal with the issue professionally. Most zipper cases will typically only involve partial involvement of the prepuce. However, in some cases, there may be a full-thickness involvement of the foreskin with considerable tissue damage.
Penile ring entrapment injuries are also fairly obvious on physical examination although there may be so much tissue edema that the ring may not be immediately visible. It is also possible that the ring is not just around the penis but the is also around the base of the scrotum which makes removal more complicated.
In most cases, patients and caregivers will already have attempted manual extraction. Such attempts usually cause additional tissue damage. They also delay the patient's presentation to the Emergency Department. This typically results in additional pain, swelling, bruising, and tissue damage.
A grading system for penile ring entrapment injuries has been proposed by Dawood et al. Grade 1 includes cases of distal edema with only superficial penile tissue damage. Grade 2 encompasses deep tissue damage involving the urethra and/or corpora. Finally, Grade 3 involves fistula formation, significant tissue loss, necrosis or gangrene.
The diagnosis is usually made quite easily based on a simple history and physical examination. No special laboratories or imaging is required.
It is preferable if the zipper can be removed or dismantled without formal surgical intervention. When attempting manual extraction or removal, extreme care should be used to minimize any further tissue damage.
The following are the initial steps that can be taken to remove the zipper in the Emergency Department. Usually, little or no sedation or anesthesia is necessary but should be used as necessary.
1) Edema around the site of the injury can be reduced by the use of continuous compression from a narrow elastic wrap. This will gently but continuously compress the injured area and slowly reduce the edema, allowing for easier manipulation and removal of the zipper. Roughly twenty minutes is usually enough to reduce the penile edema sufficiently to allow for further treatment.
2) The initial attempt at release should generally start by applying mineral oil to help soften the entrapped tissue. Five to ten minutes is usually enough to help facilitate the gentle removal of the skin from the zipper with simple manipulation by hand or with a cotton swab but this can be extended to 30 minutes if necessary. The disadvantage of this technique is that, if unsuccessful, it leaves the entrapped skin and zipper slippery with the lubricant so it should be skipped if a more mechanical solution will obviously be necessary.
3) The next step is to mechanically remove, destroy, or otherwise separate the zipper to free up the prepuce or other entrapped penile tissue. First, cut the cloth portion of the zipper with scissors or wire cutters as close as possible to the zipper teeth on either side. This will usually allow the individual teeth of the zipper to fall out and release the entrapped skin. This can easily be done without sedation or local anesthesia. Bleeding can suddenly arise once the skin is released, due to a previously unsuspected injury to the underlying tissue which was hidden by tissue compression from the entrapment.
4) Various hand tools can be used to cut the central portion of the zipper. Cutting will destroy part of the zipper mechanism and should help separate the two interlocking strips. This may require the use of significant hand tools such as a hacksaw, scissors, bone cutter, or wire cutters.
5) Another approach is to make a transverse incision in the material on the lateral margin of the zipper where it pinches the foreskin.
6) Alternatively, the flat end of a screwdriver can be used to pry the zipper open. This is done by forcibly separating the zipper's interlocking teeth. The flat end of the screwdriver is placed parallel to the zipper in an area that is open but close to the entrapment area. When the screwdriver is rotated 90 degrees, it will very forcibly pry the two ends of the zipper apart. This method can exert substantial force and may cause pain. The released tissue may start bleeding or demonstrate other signs of injury such as abrasions, contusions, or lacerations. It should now be possible to identify any potential injury to the underlying penile tissue, corpora, or urethra. Urology should be involved in any of these areas are injured beyond that of the prepuce.
7) If entrapped skin removal by mechanical destruction of the zipper and gentle manipulative techniques as noted above are unsuccessful, further treatment usually requires the application of a topical local anesthetic. This is especially useful in the pediatric population. Adults and older children may require a formal penile block.
A formal penile block can be performed to provide immediate pain relief and allow for additional manipulation. A penile block is performed similarly to a digital or finger block. A circumferential, superficial injection is made with a local anesthetic (without epinephrine) starting at the base of the penis and continuing completely around the penile base. Alternately, an injection can be given more deeply on either side of the neurovascular bundle, under Buck's fascia. A penile block may also be performed using ultrasound guidance.
8) Treatment now progresses to a more surgical intervention approach. Incision and/or removal of part, or even all, of the prepuce in the Emergency Department may be required. A urology consultation is generally recommended in these cases due to potential significant injury to the penis or urethral tissue.
9) A circumcision can be done as a last resort. This is usually reserved for those cases when a simple local excision or dorsal slit is not feasible. If circumcision is recommended, it may need to be postponed to allow for the resolution of the initial traumatic edema. Further, there may be cultural or religious objections to circumcision from the family.
One thing that should not be done is to attempt painful manipulation in the Emergency Department without adequate anesthesia/analgesia. This is counterproductive and uncomfortable for the patient. Anesthesia is usually required to remove the prepuce skin from the zipper in children and young teenagers when simple manipulative techniques fail. Procedural sedation will typically be adequate due to the short duration of the procedure. Once sedated, the use of surgical instruments, such as a bone cutter, may be safely used to remove the zipper.
The prognosis is excellent for most children. Skin injuries to the prepuce should generally be closed primarily using absorbable sutures. If the skin cannot be extracted from the zipper, an excision of the affected area can be done. This then undergoes primary repair or can be left open. In such a case, the skin edges should be oversewn, again with absorbable sutures.
Penile Ring Entrapment
There are two basic ways of getting entrapped penile rings off of the penis: finding a way to eventually slide the ring off (sliding technique) or cutting the ring off. There is no single consensus approach to treatment as the degree of injury and type of ring materials are so variable. However, a stepwise approach, from simple to more advanced, is recommended.
The sliding technique is recommended as the initial approach as it is the easiest and fastest way to remove the constricting ring. Local or regional anesthesia is usually recommended. Lubrication in the form of mineral oil, machine oil, and even olive oil have all been used successfully. This is usually complemented by distal penile compression, usually via a continuous elastic wrap. The use of a lubricant allows for easier passage of the ring, but it also makes it more difficult to grasp and hold the constricting band well enough to attempt extraction. In these cases, vascular tape can be passed behind the ring using forceps or a hemostat. Four, six or eight tapes are spread out around the ring and grasped with Kelly clamps. These can then be used to provide considerable traction even to well lubricated and slippery rings.
Aspiration of the edema fluid by needle skin punctures has been done with some success. Superficial, longitudinal skin incisions along the lateral penile shaft together with an elastic compression wrap allows more of the edematous fluid to escape. A Winter's shunt (corpora cavernosa to corpora spongiosa), the same shunt used in cases of priapism, has also been used to help with distal corporal fluid decompression further facilitating ring removal. Direct corporal aspiration has also been used with limited success.
The modified Coban/string technique has been used successfully to remove penile rings and should be attempted prior to surgery, when possible. In this technique, a narrow, one-inch thin elastic wrap such a Coban (3M Corp.), is used for both distal penile compression and ring extraction.
This is very similar to the "string" technique frequently used to extract rings from fingers. One of the differences is the greater degree of edema that can occur with the penis compared to the finger. The technique works well if the distal penile edema is not too severe after elastic compression. Coban is somewhat sticky so it is not as likely to migrate during extraction as some other elastic wraps might. It is thin but also very strong and therefore is not likely to tear even when pulled quite hard. The tight, interlocking layers are designed to avoid any bumps, bulges or restrictions to ring extraction.
In some cases, an edematous ring of tissue may develop just proximal to the glans. If it appears that this circular edematous tissue is preventing ring extraction, it can be surgically incised or even excised, leaving sufficient skin for reapproximation after ring removal.
All of these techniques have been helpful in some cases; they are all intended to help deal with the sometimes extreme penile edema that is preventing ring removal.
Ring cutting will be necessary if the above sliding methods are not successful. Much will depend on the nature of the ring material. Non-metallic rings are more easily surgically cut than metallic bands. Cutting is best done in the operating room with the patient under general anesthesia to guarantee that there is no movement while using potentially dangerous cutting tools near the genitalia. The obvious tools to use first include scissors and a ring cutter as these are readily available in most Emergency Departments. The skin directly under the ring should be protected, which can be done with a tongue depressor or a scalpel handle. Orthopedic pin cutters and a Gigli saw can then be safely used to cut the ring. A handheld rotating electric saw and industrial bolt cutters are additional tools that can be used when other methods fail. Such tools are available from hospital maintenance as they are not typically found in most operating rooms. Constant irrigation with cold water is needed to minimize the heat these saws generate which can result in tissue burns. If all the above fail, higher strength electrical saws are available from most Fire Departments. Usually, two separate cuts are needed 180 degrees apart to allow the ring to easily separate. Again, great care needs to be taken to avoid direct injury to the underlying tissue and from the heat generated by the powerful saws.
There is usually no doubt about the diagnosis which is fairly obvious on direct examination. Some of the lesions that could conceivably cause some confusion would include:
Prognosis is generally good, even with extensive soft tissue injury. Patients with urethral injuries may develop strictures. More severe injuries may require grafting and other repair techniques.
Potential complications include stricture formation, penile partial or complete self amputation, fistula formation, necrosis, gangrene and death.
Routine wound care is generally sufficient for adequate healing. Use of topical or oral antibiotics is rarely necessary but might be advised in selected, more severely injured patients.
Urology should be consulted for severe cases. Plastic surgery might need to be involved in cases of severe skin loss to the penile shaft.
The patient should be advised to utilize undergarments to prevent further episodes of zipper injuries. In penile ring entrapment cases, patients are advised to use alternate means of satisfaction.
An interprofessional care team of nurses, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners, and physicians is crucial given the nature of the injury. All healthcare professionals should cooperate to provide a non-judgemental, professional atmosphere. It is helpful to utilize staff that is experienced in calming or papoosing of pediatric patients.
The manual release of the entrapped skin is far easier when the patient is more relaxed. The nurse should help the physician in restraining the patient during the procedure, if necessary. Nursese can also help in educating the family and patient regarding the nature of the injury and the mechanisms of treatment being utilized. One of the simplist ways of dealing with an entrapped penis zipper injury is to apply mineral oil for at least 5 to 10 minutes and possibly up to 30 minutes. In many cases, the zipper will gradually slide off with gentle manipulation either manually or utilizing a cotton tipped swab. This is one approach that all physicians, nurses, and other healthcare providers should know as this is something that patients can do at home.
For more difficult cases, a general anesthetic in the operating room may be necessary.
All healthcare workers who work in an Emergency Department should be aware of the initially recommended techniques for both zipper injuries and penile ring entrapments. Common to both is the use of mineral oil, minimizing unnecessary manipulation and compression of the edematous area. The use of the Coban/string technique to remove penile rings should also be familiar as it is generally the least painful and works most of the time. If sedation or anesthesia needs to be used, physicians and nurses should work together to assure the patient is in minimal pain. A coordinated approach from healthcare professionals will ultimately provide the best patient outcome. (Level V)
|||Mankowitz SL, Laceration Management. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2017 Sep [PubMed PMID: 28847677]|
|||Krishnan A,McCormick B,Swana H,Rich M, Acute Foreskin Strangulation Injury due to Bathing Suit Mesh Entrapment. Urology case reports. 2017 Jul [PubMed PMID: 28462164]|
|||Dawood O,Tabibi S,Fiuk J,Patel N,El-Zawahry A, Penile ring entrapment - A true urologic emergency: Grading, approach, and management. Urology annals. 2020 Jan-Mar [PubMed PMID: 32015611]|
|||Oquist M,Buck L,Michel K,Ouellette L,Emery M,Bush C, Comparative analysis of five methods of emergency zipper release by experienced versus novice clinicians. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2017 May [PubMed PMID: 27836312]|
|||Puvvada S,Kasaraneni P,Gowda RD,Mylarappa P,T M,Dokania K,Kulkarni A,Jayakumar V, Stepwise approach in the management of penile strangulation and penile preservation: 15-year experience in a tertiary care hospital. Arab journal of urology. 2019 [PubMed PMID: 31723448]|
|||Detweiler MB, Penile incarceration with metal objects--a review of procedure choice based on penile trauma grade. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 2001 Jun [PubMed PMID: 11487074]|
|||Degheili JA,El-Asmar JM,Aoun B, Penile hair strangulation: A prodigious cause of pediatric agitation. Clinical case reports. 2019 Jul [PubMed PMID: 31360511]|
|||Agu TC,Obiechina N, Post coital penile ring entrapment: A report of a non-surgical extrication method. International journal of surgery case reports. 2016 [PubMed PMID: 26670412]|
|||Morentin B,Biritxinaga B,Crespo L, Penile strangulation: report of a fatal case. The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology. 2011 Dec [PubMed PMID: 22101437]|
|||Buckner BJ,Parousis V,Tarry W,Zaslau S, Strangulation injuries of the glans penis: a case series. The West Virginia medical journal. 2004 Sep-Oct [PubMed PMID: 15617464]|
|||Jezior JR,Brady JD,Schlossberg SM, Management of penile amputation injuries. World journal of surgery. 2001 Dec [PubMed PMID: 11775199]|
|||Badawy H,Soliman A,Ouf A,Hammad A,Orabi S,Hanno A, Progressive hair coil penile tourniquet syndrome: multicenter experience with 25 cases. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2010 Jul [PubMed PMID: 20638535]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 12859932]|
|||Djordjevic ML,Bumbasirevic MZ,Krstic Z,Bizic MR,Stojanovic BZ,Miocinovic R,Santucci RA, Severe penile injuries in children and adolescents: reconstruction modalities and outcomes. Urology. 2014 Feb [PubMed PMID: 24275276]|
|||Mellick LB, Wire cutters and penis skin entrapped by zipper sliders. Pediatric emergency care. 2011 May [PubMed PMID: 21546816]|
|||Sallami S,Zribi S,Abou El Makarim S,Touinsi H, Penile foreskin trapped in a zipper: what to do? La Tunisie medicale. 2017 Novembre [PubMed PMID: 29877561]|
|||Raveenthiran V, Releasing of zipper-entrapped foreskin: a novel nonsurgical technique. Pediatric emergency care. 2007 Jul [PubMed PMID: 17666927]|
|||Rose G,Costa V,Drake A,Siadecki SD,Saul T, Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block performed in a case of zipper entrapment injury. Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU. 2017 Nov 12 [PubMed PMID: 28186626]|
|||Liu GM,Sun G,Ma HS, Extrication of penile entrapment in a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle: a technique of suture traction and Dundee and literature review. International urology and nephrology. 2012 Oct [PubMed PMID: 22710972]|
|||Wu X,Batra R,Al-Akraa M,Seneviratne LN, Penoscrotal entrapment: a safe, innovative technique for removing metal constricting devices. BMJ case reports. 2012 Sep 25 [PubMed PMID: 23010460]|
|||[PubMed PMID: 19672365]|
|||Tan V, Coban Method for Removing a Constricting Ring. Hand (New York, N.Y.). 2019 Jan [PubMed PMID: 30188186]|
|||Noh J,Kang TW,Heo T,Kwon DD,Park K,Ryu SB, Penile strangulation treated with the modified string method. Urology. 2004 Sep [PubMed PMID: 15351614]|
|||Patel NH,Schulman A,Bloom J,Uppaluri N,Iorga M,Parikh S,Phillips J,Choudhury M, Penile and Scrotal Strangulation due to Metal Rings: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature. Case reports in surgery. 2018 [PubMed PMID: 29780654]|
|||Nason GJ,Abdelsadek AH,Foran AT,O'Malley KJ, Multidisciplinary emergent removal of a metal penoscrotal constriction device. Irish medical journal. 2017 Mar 10 [PubMed PMID: 28657249]|
|||Dell'Atti L, Penile strangulation: an unusual sexual practice that often presents an urological emergency. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica. 2014 Mar 28 [PubMed PMID: 24704937]|
|||Lukacs S,Tschobotko B,Mazaris E, A new nonsurgical technique for managing zipper injuries. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2014 Aug [PubMed PMID: 23995667]|