Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common presenting causes of sepsis in hospitals, and urinary tract infections have a wide variety of presentations. Some are simple UTIs that can be managed with outpatient antibiotics and lead to almost universally good outcomes. On the other end of the spectrum, florid urosepsis in a patient with comorbidities can be fatal. There are several risk factors that can complicate urinary tract infections and lead to treatment failure, repeat infections, or significant morbidity and mortality. It is vitally important to determine if the patient's infection may have resulted from one of these risk factors and whether the episode is likely to resolve with first-line antibiotics. Complicated urinary tract infections are those that carry a higher risk of treatment failure, and typically require longer antibiotic courses and often additional workup. Complicated urinary tract infections include those that occur: in males, in pregnant females (including asymptomatic bacteriuria), as a result of obstruction, hydronephrosis, renal tract calculi, or colovesical fistula, in immunocompromised patients or the elderly, due to atypical organisms, after instrumentation or in conjunction with medical equipment such as urinary catheters, in renal transplant patients, in patients with impaired renal function, or after prostatectomies or radiotherapy. Additionally, urinary tract infections that recur despite adequate treatment are complicated. This activity reviews the evaluation and management of complicated urinary tract infections and highlights the role of interprofessional team members in collaborating to provide well-coordinated care and enhance outcomes for affected patients.


  • Describe the criteria of a complicated urinary tract infections.
  • Outline populations in whom all urinary tract infections are complicated.
  • Summarize management considerations for patients for patients with complicated urinary tract infections.
  • Explain the importance of improving coordination amongst the interprofessional team to enhance care for patients affected by complicated urinary tract infections.


Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common causes of sepsis presenting to hospitals. UTIs have a wide variety of presentations. Some are simple UTIs that can be managed with outpatient antibiotics and carry a reassuring clinical course with almost universal good progress, and on the other end of the spectrum, florid urosepsis in a comorbid patient can be fatal. UTIs can also be complicated by several risk factors that can lead to treatment failure, repeat infections, or significant morbidity and mortality with a poor outcome. It is vitally important to determine if the presenting episode is the result of these risk factors and whether the episode is likely to resolve with first-line antibiotics.[1][2][3][4]

It is important to properly define a complicated UTI as infections which carry a higher risl of treatment failure as these typically require longer antibiotic courses and sometimes additional workup.

In a clinical context that is not associated with treatment failure or poor outcomes, a simple UTI, or simple cystitis, is an infection of the urinary tract that occurs due to appropriate susceptible bacteria. Typically this is an infection in a nonpregnant immune competent female patient.  Pyuria and/or bacteriuria without any symptoms is not a UTI and may not require treatment. An example would be a patient with a Foley catheter or an incidental positive urine culture in an asymptomatic non pregnant immune competent female.

The normal female urinary tract has a comparatively short urethra, and therefore, carries an inherent predisposition to proximal seeding of bacteria. This anatomy increases the frequency of infections. Simple cystitis, a one-off episode of ascending pyelonephritis, and occasionally even recurrent cystitis in the right context can be considered as simple UTI, provided there is a prompt response to first-line antibiotics without any long-term sequela.

Any urinary tract infection that does not conform to the above description or clinical trajectory is considered a complicated UTI. In these scenarios, one can always find protective factors that failed to prevent infection or risk factors that lead to poor resolution of sepsis, higher morbidity, treatment failures, and reinfection.[5][6][7]

Examples of a complicated UTI include:

  • Infections occurring despite the presence of anatomical protective measures (UTI in males are by definition considered complicated UTI)
  • Infections occurring due to anatomical abnormalities, for example, an obstruction, hydronephrosis, renal tract calculi, or colovesical fistula
  • Infections occurring due to an immune compromised state, for example, steroid use, post chemotherapy, diabetes, elderly population, HIV)
  • Atypical organisms causing UTI
  • Recurrent infections despite adequate treatment (multi-drug resistant organisms)
  • Infections are occurring in pregnancy (including asymptomatic bacteriuria)
  • Infections are occurring after instrumentation, nephrostomy tubes, ureteric stents, suprapubic tubes or Foley catheters
  • Infections in renal transplant patients
  • Infections are occurring in patients with impaired renal function
  • Infections following prostatectomies or radiotherapy


Most cases of urinary tract infections are due to the colonization of the urogenital tract with rectal and perineal flora. The most common organisms include Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and other Enterococcus or Staphylococcus species. Of these, Escherichia coli is the most common followed by Klebsiella. Residential care patients, diabetics, and those with indwelling catheters or any form of immunocompromise can also colonize with Candida.


Cohorts with more risk factors show an increased incidence of urinary tract infections. Risk factors include female anatomy, increasing age, diabetes, obesity, and frequent intercourse (although UTI is not defined as a sexually transmitted infection).

Simple UTIs in nonpregnant immune-competent females have been estimated to occur with as high a frequency as 0.7 infections per person per year. Fifty percent of females will have at least one UTI at some stage in life.

Complicated UTI incidence is associated with specific risk factors. For example, there is a 10% daily risk of developing bacteriuria with indwelling bladder catheters, and up to a 25% risk that bacteriuria will progress to a UTI.

Bacteriuria occurs in up to 14% of diabetic females but does not tend to occur with a higher frequency in diabetic males.

The incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant females is similar to that in nonpregnant females (2% to 7%) but tends to progress to symptomatic UTIs in as many as 40% of pregnant women. 

Asymptomatic bacteriuria also tends to increase with age in females and is present in up to 80% of the elderly female population. It is rare among younger healthy males but can be present in up to 15% of older males.

UTIs are the most common infections in renal transplant patients. Up to 25% of these patients will develop a UTI within the first year after a transplant.

Increased incidence of UTI has been described in patients using Dapagliflozin (SGLT2i).[8]

History and Physical

Despite the frequency of which urinary tract infections present in hospitals, UTIs (especially complicated UTIs) remain a clinical entity causing considerable confusion, diagnostic uncertainty, and a source of significant inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions.

Symptoms (increased urinary frequency, urgency, hematuria, dysuria, suprapubic or flank pain) are the most important clinical criteria for initially diagnosing a UTI. There must also be an appropriate clinical scenario in which infection of the urogenital tract is the most likely explanation for these symptoms. In this situation, it is appropriate to start empiric treatment with first-line antibiotics. A urine sample should also be sent for microscopy and culture before starting treatment, although that is not always possible. The urine sample would almost always show an abnormal red cell or white cell count and bacteria.

Severe complicated urinary tract infections can present as severe undifferentiated sepsis or even septic shock.

Furthermore, urinary tract infections may present with nonspecific grumbling symptoms, atypical presenting features (delirium in the elderly), signs mimicking an acute abdomen, be a trigger for precipitating diabetic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and even present without any symptoms (asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy).


A good quality urine specimen is vital in making the diagnosis. However, treatment must not be delayed if the clinical scenario is strongly suggestive of a urinary tract infection.[9][10][11]

Most patients can provide a high-quality midstream urine sample with appropriate instructions. If that is not possible, a catheterized urine sample (indwelling catheter or a straight in-out catheter) may be used. Catheter insertion is not without some risk, and this must be weighed against the diagnostic advantage of having a urine specimen for analysis and culture.  In general, obtaining a urine specimen for culture is recommended whenever possible and feasible.

Different normal white cell ranges depend on the urine sample, and the results should be interpreted accordingly.

Often, urine samples in prostatitis may not be diagnostic, especially if the patients have already been partially treated. A pre-prostate and post-prostate massage urine sample (also known as the four-glass test or even the shortened 2-glass test) can improve the diagnostic yield.

Blood cultures are also useful in more severe septic presentations. A positive blood culture can sometimes also help corroborate a urine sample result and reduce the suspicion of contamination.

Other microbiology and culture specimens can be directed if there is multifocal sepsis.

Radiological investigations are not helpful in the initial diagnosis of most infections limited to the genitourinary tract, as there should be sufficient clues from the history, physical examination, and laboratory results. Ultrasound and CT scans may sometimes be useful or even critical for diagnosing a perinephric abscess, urinary retention, hydronephrosis, and obstructive pyelonephritis from stones in septic patients. All patients who fail to respond to appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics should undergo imaging to exclude complications such as abscesses, urinary retention, calculi, gas, obstructive uropathy, and hydronephrosis. 

All patients who present with a complicated UTI, even the first presentation of ascending pyelonephritis in nonpregnant immune-competent females, should undergo a renal tract ultrasound at a minimum to evaluate for anatomical abnormalities, hydronephrosis or lesions. Since there is no reliable clinical method to rule out urinary obstructions in complicated UTIs (such as a stone), it is the responsibility of the treating physician to do so with ultrasound or CT.

Older patients, especially those with dementia, are at increased risk for complicated UTIs. Dementia can cause a decline in personal hygiene and increase various voiding issues. There is also an increased risk for urinary catheterization. Diagnosis can be more difficult as patients with dementia may present with altered mental status, increased confusion, or agitation instead of the usual lower urinary tract symptoms.[12]

Treatment / Management

As UTI can present with severe, life-threatening sepsis and multiorgan involvement. Resuscitation often precedes definitive treatment. The severely septic patient might need aggressive fluid resuscitation as well as broad-spectrum antibiotics administered in the emergency department. Antibiotic choices should always be made according to local guidelines.[13][14][15][16]

Patients presenting with septic shock may not respond to fluid resuscitation alone, and there should be a low threshold to consider vasopressor support in light of a poor initial response to fluids.

On the other hand, nonseptic stable patients may be treated as outpatients.

Broad-spectrum, empiric antibiotics should always be switched to a targeted narrow-spectrum antibiotic, if possible, once culture results are available. Initial broad-spectrum choices tend to be penicillins or beta-lactams, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems (especially if dealing with an extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) organism). The specific choice will depend on the individual hospital's microbiological spectrum and antibiogram.

Patients who present with repeat infections may also be initially treated as per their previous urine culture results until new cultures are available. Imaging to look for a source of infection such as an abscess or stone should be done with relapsing infections that involve the same organisms.

In most cases, treatment response should be evident in 24 to 48 hours. A poor response may indicate an inappropriate antibiotic selection, polymicrobial infections, atypical infections, hydronephrosis, obstructing stone causing pyonephrosis, complications such as a perinephric abscess or emphysematous UTI, fluid collections such as urinary retention or anatomical lesions leading to poor response (nephrocalcinosis acting like an infective nidus, obstructive urinary tract lesions, or fistulas). A Foley catheter, to guarantee good bladder drainage, is often recommended for these patients if they are septic and particularly if they have increased post-void residual volumes.

The duration of antibiotic therapy in complicated UTIs is typically 10 to 14 days. Men presenting with recurrent UTIs or bacterial prostatitis may require four to six weeks or longer to completely eradicate their infecting bacteria.

Failure to respond to appropriate antibiotics should suggest a possible obstructive component such as obstructive pyelonephritis. In such cases, a renal ultrasound or non-contrast CT scan should be done for diagnosis and immediate surgical drainage performed if an obstructed, infected kidney is found (either double J stenting or a percutaneous nephrostomy).

Prophylactic antibiotics are seldom recommended due to rapid bacterial resistance patterns developing. When the clinical situation requires prophylaxis, nitrofurantoin is usually the preferred agent.

Patients with permanent Foley catheters or suprapubic tubes should avoid prophylactic antibiotics and should only be treated when symptomatic. More frequent changes of urinary catheters are recommended in chronically catheterized patients with recurrent infections. Patients with long-term Foley catheters will tend to have fewer infections if converted to a suprapubic tube. 

Mandelamine is a twice-daily medication that, in acid urine, is converted to formaldehyde which is a potent urinary antiseptic. This can be useful in patients with persistently elevated post-void residuals instead of prophylactic antibiotics.

Patients with frequent UTI recurrences, especially if already performing intermittent self-catheterization, can be managed with daily bladder instillations of gentamicin solution. The recommended dosage is to instill 30-60 cc's of a solution of 480 mg of gentamicin in 1 Liter of Normal Saline after initially draining the bladder.[17]  Gentamicin has no significant systemic absorption when used in this fashion so it can be used regardless of renal function. If gentamicin is not available, tobramycin or neosporin can be used as alternatives. Neosporin can also be used as a short-term (10-day) continuous bladder irrigation with a three-way Foley catheter. Interestingly, heparin bladder instillations have also shown some activity in reducing recurrent UTIs.[18]

Cefiderocol is a new, unique, FDA-approved cephalosporin that can be used for complicated UTIs involving highly resistant organisms. It is intended only for limited use as a last-resort option for multiple drug-resistant infections. It is active against all carbapenemases and is well tolerated in all age groups.[19]

Differential Diagnosis

  • Acute pyelonephritis
  • Bladder cancer
  • Chlamydial genitourinary infections
  • Cystitis
  • Herpes simplex
  • Interstitial cystitis
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Prostatitis
  • Urethritis
  • Vaginitis

Pearls and Other Issues

Diagnostic Pitfalls

Urinary tract infections are primarily a clinical diagnosis, and expert opinion should be sought before initiating treatment of an isolated positive result in an otherwise asymptomatic patient, the only exception being asymptomatic bacteria.

Quite often, clinicians end up treating the positive culture report rather than a genuine urinary tract infection.  Most often, positive culture in an asymptomatic patient can be traced to a poor sampling technique.

Another confusing scenario is that of a septic, delirious, elderly patient who is unable to provide a history or demonstrate adequate examination signs to help localize a septic source. Quite frequently, these patients are treated as having a presumed UTI in the absence of a clear alternative septic source.

UTI-associated radiological changes can sometimes take several months to resolve and must be interpreted with care in cases of recurrent or persistent infections.

UTI must be considered as a differential diagnosis when evaluating a patient with a pelvic inflammatory disease or an acute abdomen.

Male patients with a urinary tract infection must also be screened for sexually transmitted infections.

Interstitial cystitis is frequently misdiagnosed and treated as a UTI, and must be considered as an alternative diagnosis in patients who keep presenting with cystitis symptoms without positive cultures.

"Sterile pyuria," with persistent urinary WBCs but negative standard urine cultures, could indicate tuberculosis which requires special cultures. 

Bacterial infections only tend to account for 80% of all urinary tract infections, and antibiotics may sometimes prove ineffective.

Management Pitfalls

Multidrug-resistant infections are becoming a major source of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Suppressive antibiotic regimens are sometimes used in poorly responding or resistant cases. These presentations should always be guided by a dedicated infectious disease team, as long-term suppressive antibiotics come with a unique set of complications.

Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis must also be used with caution, as it would increase the risk of resistance and change the susceptibilities of colonized organisms. On occasion, residual urinary symptoms may take several months to resolve or might never resolve (especially in patients with indwelling catheters, post-prostatectomy cases, post bladder surgery, or radiotherapy), and do not always indicate a genuine urinary tract infection.

Long-term prophylaxis with nitrofurantoin is associated with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Patients should be counseled accordingly.

It helps to identify predisposing factors for the infection and correct them if possible. For example, the diabetic patient would benefit from improving glycemic control. Renal tract anatomic abnormalities may be assessed by urology to see if an intervention is appropriate (renal calculi, BPH, ureteric strictures). Immunocompromising factors may be addressed if possible (steroids, HIV). Finally, nephrotoxic medications may be rationalized in patients with suboptimal renal functions.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The management of complex UTIs is best performed by an interprofessional team that includes a urologist, nephrologist, infectious disease expert, internist, pharmacist, and primary care provider.Complicated UTIs need to be treated more carefully to serve patients with these infections and to avoid overuse and misuse of antibiotics that will ultimately result in more resistant infections in the future. Using the right antibiotic for the right duration is key. Practitioners should not hesitate to take advantage of infectious disease specialty services in these situations to help optimize antibiotic use. 

Failure of a standard UTI or pyelonephritis to respond to initial treatment should suggest some other medical problem such as diabetes, sepsis, an abscess, urinary retention, or an obstructing stone with a possible pyonephrosis. Bladder drainage with a Foley and appropriate imaging tests can identify these problems.

These patients need close monitoring because of potential complications. The outlook for patients with severe UTIs is guarded and even those who do recover tend to have a prolonged recovery period.[20][21][22] (Level V)

Article Details

Article Author

Ayan Sabih

Article Editor:

Stephen Leslie


4/29/2022 1:24:52 PM



Girgenti V,Pelizzo G,Amoroso S,Rosone G,Di Mitri M,Milazzo M,Giordano S,Genuardi R,Calcaterra V, Emphysematous Pyelonephritis Following Ureterovesical Reimplantation for Congenital Obstructive Megaureter. Pediatric Case Report and Review of the Literature. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2019     [PubMed PMID: 30733936]


Habak PJ,Griggs, Jr RP, Urinary Tract Infection In Pregnancy StatPearls. 2021 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 30725732]


Shortridge D,Duncan LR,Pfaller MA,Flamm RK, Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators when tested against Gram-negative isolates collected from paediatric patients in the USA and Europe between 2012 and 2016 as part of a global surveillance programme. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2019 May     [PubMed PMID: 30716448]


Shi H,Kang CI,Cho SY,Huh K,Chung DR,Peck KR, Follow-up blood cultures add little value in the management of bacteremic urinary tract infections. European journal of clinical microbiology     [PubMed PMID: 30689071]


Gomila A,Carratalà J,Eliakim-Raz N,Shaw E,Wiegand I,Vallejo-Torres L,Gorostiza A,Vigo JM,Morris S,Stoddart M,Grier S,Vank C,Cuperus N,Van den Heuvel L,Vuong C,MacGowan A,Leibovici L,Addy I,Pujol M, Risk factors and prognosis of complicated urinary tract infections caused by {i}Pseudomonas aeruginosa{/i} in hospitalized patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Infection and drug resistance. 2018;     [PubMed PMID: 30588040]


Esposito S,Rinaldi VE,Argentiero A,Farinelli E,Cofini M,D'Alonzo R,Mencacci A,Principi N, Approach to Neonates and Young Infants with Fever without a Source Who Are at Risk for Severe Bacterial Infection. Mediators of inflammation. 2018;     [PubMed PMID: 30581369]


Cruz J,Figueiredo F,Matos AP,Duarte S,Guerra A,Ramalho M, Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases of the Urinary Tract: Role of MR Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2019 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 30466913]


Donnan JR,Grandy CA,Chibrikov E,Marra CA,Aubrey-Bassler K,Johnston K,Swab M,Hache J,Curnew D,Nguyen H,Gamble JM, Comparative safety of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2019 Feb 1     [PubMed PMID: 30813108]


Al Midani A,Elands S,Collier S,Harber M,Shendi AM, Impact of Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 4-Year Single-Center Experience. Transplantation proceedings. 2018 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 30577206]


Belyayeva M,Jeong JM, Pyelonephritis, Acute 2018 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 30137822]


Bono MJ,Reygaert WC, Urinary Tract Infection 2018 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 29261874]


MacRae V,Holland S,MacLeod R, Diagnosing, managing and preventing urinary tract infections in older people with dementia in hospital. Nursing older people. 2022 Apr 20     [PubMed PMID: 35441502]


NICE Guidance - Complicated urinary tract infections: ceftolozane/tazobactam: © NICE (2016) Complicated urinary tract infections: ceftolozane/tazobactam. BJU international. 2018 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 29878700]


Lemoine L,Dupont C,Capron A,Cerf E,Yilmaz M,Verloop D,Blanckaert K,Senneville E,Alfandari S, Prospective evaluation of the management of urinary tract infections in 134 French nursing homes. Medecine et maladies infectieuses. 2018 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 29747905]


Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:.,Karmazyn BK,Alazraki AL,Anupindi SA,Dempsey ME,Dillman JR,Dorfman SR,Garber MD,Moore SG,Peters CA,Rice HE,Rigsby CK,Safdar NM,Simoneaux SF,Trout AT,Westra SJ,Wootton-Gorges SL,Coley BD, ACR Appropriateness Criteria{sup}®{/sup} Urinary Tract Infection-Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2017 May     [PubMed PMID: 28473093]


Yasuda M, Urogenital infections. Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2017 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 30549857]


Abrams P,Hashim H,Tomson C,Macgowan A,Skews R,Warren K, The use of intravesical gentamicin to treat recurrent urinary tract infections in lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2017 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 28503891]


Chernyak S,Salamon C, Intravesical Antibiotic Administration in the Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: Promising Results From a Case Series. Female pelvic medicine     [PubMed PMID: 31990805]


Wang H,Palasik BN, Combating antimicrobial resistance with cefiderocol for complicated infections involving the urinary tract. Therapeutic advances in urology. 2022 Jan-Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 35126672]


Bonine NG,Berger A,Altincatal A,Wang R,Bhagnani T,Gillard P,Lodise T, Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy on Patient Outcomes by Antibiotic Resistance Status From Serious Gram-negative Bacterial Infections. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2019 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 30665490]


Kaye KS,Bhowmick T,Metallidis S,Bleasdale SC,Sagan OS,Stus V,Vazquez J,Zaitsev V,Bidair M,Chorvat E,Dragoescu PO,Fedosiuk E,Horcajada JP,Murta C,Sarychev Y,Stoev V,Morgan E,Fusaro K,Griffith D,Lomovskaya O,Alexander EL,Loutit J,Dudley MN,Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 29486041]


Karve S,Ryan K,Peeters P,Baelen E,Rojas-Farreras S,Potter D,Rodríguez-Baño J, The impact of initial antibiotic treatment failure: Real-world insights in patients with complicated urinary tract infection. The Journal of infection. 2018 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 29128389]


Tamburrini S,Lugarà M,Iannuzzi M,Cesaro E,De Simone F,Del Biondo D,Toto R,Iulia D,Marrone V,Faella P,Liguori C,Marano I, Pyonephrosis Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Features: A Pictorial Review. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Feb 17;     [PubMed PMID: 33671431]


Limpawattana P,Phungoen P,Mitsungnern T,Laosuangkoon W,Tansangworn N, Atypical presentations of older adults at the emergency department and associated factors. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2016 Jan-Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 26323650]


Bima P,Orlotti C,Smart OG,Morello F,Trunfio M,Brazzi L,Montrucchio G, Norepinephrine may improve survival of septic shock patients in a low-resource setting: a proof-of-concept study on feasibility and efficacy outside the Intensive Care Unit. Pathogens and global health. 2022 Feb 9;     [PubMed PMID: 35138990]


Xu F,Zhong R,Shi S,Zeng Y,Tang Z, Early initiation of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: A propensity score-based analysis. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2022 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 35227959]


Shahrami B,Sharif M,Sefidani Forough A,Najmeddin F,Arabzadeh AA,Mojtahedzadeh M, Antibiotic therapy in sepsis: No next time for a second chance! Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2021 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 33710622]


Choi JB,Min SK, Complicated urinary tract infection in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy. 2021 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 34144904]


Lo TS,Hammer KD,Zegarra M,Cho WC, Methenamine: a forgotten drug for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in a multidrug resistance era. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2014 May;     [PubMed PMID: 24689705]


Golan R,Cooper KL,Shah O, Management of Small, Non-obstructing Renal Stones in Adults With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. Reviews in urology. 2020;     [PubMed PMID: 32760228]