Digitalis Toxicity

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Digoxin is a well-known cardiac glycoside and one of the oldest drugs used today in cardiovascular medicine. It has wide-ranging beneficial effects and continues to play an important role in the contemporary management of appropriately selected patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Although considered safe, digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window, and its proper dosing requires the clinician to be mindful of various patient characteristics including age, gender, kidney function and concomitant use of other drugs to avoid potentially life-threatening toxicity. This activity reviews digitalis toxicity, its pathophysiology, presentation and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in its management.


  • Identify the pathophysiology of digitalis toxicity.
  • Discuss the history and physical findings expected in a patient with digitalis toxicity.
  • List the treatment and management options available for digitalis toxicity.
  • Discuss interprofessional team strategies for improving care in patients with digitalis toxicity.


Digoxin is a well-known cardiac glycoside and one of the oldest drugs used today in cardiovascular medicine. It has wide-ranging beneficial effects and continues to play an important role in the contemporary management of appropriately selected patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Although considered safe, digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window, and its proper dosing requires the clinician to be mindful of various patient characteristics including age, gender, kidney function and concomitant use of other drugs to avoid potentially life-threatening toxicity.[1][2]

Over the past two decades, the use of digoxin has declined significantly and toxicity cases cases are rare. The few sporadic cases are often managed with digoxin specific antigen binding antibody.


Digitalis use was first described in 1785 and was derived from the foxglove plant. Poisoning with digitalis can occur with acute over-ingestion of medication or as chronic toxicity most commonly due to decreased renal clearance. Some metabolic disturbances such as hypokalemia and hypercalcemia can make one more prone to toxicity as well as some drug interactions. Chronic toxicity is more common than acute intoxication.[3]

The most common trigger of digoxin toxicity is hypokalemia, which may occur as a result of diuretic therapy. Dosing errors are also a common cause of toxicity in the younger population.

Factors that increase the risk of digoxin toxicity include:

  • Hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism
  • Advanced age
  • MI
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Alkalosis
  • Hypoxemia
  • Acidosis

Medications that are associated with digoxin toxicity include?

  • Diuretics
  • Amiodarone
  • Beta-blockers
  • Benzodiazepines
  • Calcium channel blockers
  • Macrolide antibiotics
  • Propylthiouracil
  • Amphotericin


Over time, the use of digoxin has become less common, and as a result, the incidence of digoxin toxicity has also been on the decline. This can also be attributed to improved technology in the detection of digoxin levels as well as increased knowledge of various drug interactions. Nevertheless, digoxin use is prevalent enough with a narrow therapeutic window, and toxicity continues to be a significant problem. In 2011 as per United States poison control, 2513 cases of digitalis toxicity were reported of those 27 resulted in death.[4][5]


The main mechanism of action of digitalis is on the sodium-potassium ATPase of the myocyte. It reversibly inhibits the ATPase resulting in increased intracellular sodium levels. The build-up of intracellular sodium leads to a shift of sodium extracellularly through another channel in exchange for calcium ions. This influx of intracellular calcium assists with myocyte contractility. Digoxin also has direct effects on conduction through increased vagal tone. Digoxin stimulates the vagus nerve leading to prolonged conduction through the sinuatrial (SA) and atrioventricular (AV) nodes. Overall, digoxin slows the conduction and increases the refractory period in cardiac tissue by enhancing vagal tone. These actions of digoxin can result in almost every type of arrhythmia possible such as:

  • Extrasystole
  • Nonparoxysmal junctional tachycardia
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Premature ventricular contractions
  • Atrial fibrillation and flutter
  • Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia
  • SA and AV node block

The major electrolyte complication in acute digoxin toxicity is hyperkalemia.


Distribution of digoxin to various tissues normally takes several hours; therefore, levels of digoxin should me measured six hours after last ingestion for the most accurate measurement. A steady-state of dioxin can take up to seven days with a half-life of digoxin being anywhere between 36 to 48 hours. Increased intracellular calcium seen with digitalis use may lead to premature contractions of the myocytes. Repolarization time for both the atria and ventricles are reduced. This decreased refractory period leads to increased automaticity and makes the myocytes more prone to the induction of arrhythmias. Digoxin is primarily renally excreted with chronic toxicity commonly seen in those with renal impairment. Many drug interactions lead to decreased clearance of digoxin. Well-known offenders include verapamil, macrolides, and antifungals. There is very little difference between sub-therapeutic and toxic levels of digoxin. The therapeutic window for digoxin is narrow and difficult to determine. The accepted range is between 0.5 ng/mL to 0.9 ng/mL. What is important to consider is that concentration does not necessarily correlate with toxicity. There have been documented cases of clinical toxicity with digoxin levels in the therapeutic range. Electrolyte disturbances such as hypomagnesemia, hypercalcemia, and hypokalemia lead to increased sensitivity to digoxin making toxicity more likely even with a lower concentration of serum digoxin. This makes diagnosis difficult and has led to the declining use of digoxin over the last several years. Diagnosis is primarily based on clinical presentation in the setting of suspected digoxin intoxication.

History and Physical

History of exposure is necessary to determine if poisoning is acute or chronic. Most reported poisonings result from chronic toxicity. Clinical signs of toxicity include gastrointestinal, neurological and the most concerning cardiac. Most symptoms are non-specific findings and include a headache, malaise, insomnia, altered mental status, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Of note visual changes especially changes involving colors such as seeing a yellow hue are better known and specifically seen in digitalis toxicity. Cardiac manifestations include arrhythmias and rhythm disturbances. Other visual problems include photophobia, photopsia and diminished visual acuity.

There is no specific arrhythmia for digoxin toxicity rather a range of arrhythmias can be present such as various degrees of AV block, premature ventricular contractions, bradycardia, and even ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac arrhythmias are the main cause of death for those with digoxin toxicity.

Some patients may have hemodynamic instability depending on the type of arrhythmia and others may have dyspnea and altered mental status.


The difference between toxicity and therapeutic range is small for digoxin and is determined to be between 0.5-2 ng/mL. Diagnosis is difficult and usually made clinically, as levels of digoxin in the blood do not necessarily correlate with toxicity. Digoxin is primarily cleared by the kidneys and declining renal function is a common cause of chronic toxicity. Therefore, renal function must be assessed. Electrolytes must also be evaluated; hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, and hypomagnesemia are known to worsen the effects of toxicity. The inhibition of the sodium-potassium ATPase leads to hyperkalemia and can be used as a marker of toxicity severity.  Serial electrocardiograms should be performed and the use of continuous cardiac monitoring may be considered as fluctuation in rhythms is commonly seen. EKG findings sometimes referred to as the digitalis effect may be seen. These changes commonly involve the T wave and include flattening, inversion, scooped appearance of ST-segment and ST depression in the lateral leads.[6][7]

It is important to know that endogenous digoxin like immunoreactive proteins can result in a false-positive result. This is more likely to occur in patients with:

  • Liver or renal disease
  • Chronic heart failure
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Acromegaly
  • Diabetes
  • Pregnancy

The other problem is that there are several types of assays to measure digoxin and its metabolites, but these assays do vary in sensitivity. Further, the tests are hampered by cross-reaction with steroids and cholesterol-like substances.

Treatment / Management

Treatment involves early recognition and the administration of antibodies specifically against digoxin also known as Fab fragments. Digoxin concentration does not necessarily correlate with clinical symptoms of toxicity however digoxin concentrations may be used for calculating the amount of antidote therapy. Although guidelines are unclear, treatment with digoxin immune Fab is also known by the trade name Digibind, is considered first-line therapy for dysrhythmias including AV block and ventricular tachycardia caused by suspected digoxin toxicity.   Fab fragments are highly effective in binding the digoxin molecule with minimal detrimental side effects.  The antibody fragments form complexes and are secreted via the urine. Empiric treatment consists of 10 vials of Fab fragments for adults and five vials for children. Treatment with digoxin-specific antibodies will lead to hypokalemia, and serum potassium should be monitored frequently. Activated charcoal can be considered in the treatment of acute ingestion within two hours. Further treatment is supportive.  More research is needed for optimal dosing and whether or not the use of digoxin-specific antibodies are cost-effective for use in non-life threatening toxicities. [8][9]

Hydration, oxygenation, and close monitoring are necessary. The ECG has to be continuously monitored for dysrhythmias. All electrolyte disturbances need to be corrected.

One should remember that if digoxin is neutralized with antibodies, the patient may develop heart failure and lead to worsening of the arrhythmias. Other issues related to the antibody include serum sickness and anaphylaxis.

Supraventricular need to be managed with short-acting beta-blockers. Phenytoin as been shown to suppress digoxin induced tachyarrhythmias. Another option is lidocaine when managing ventricular arrhythmias. Atropine may be used to managed bradycardia. The use of magnesium is not recommended as it can worsen bradycardia or an AV block. Cardioversion is not recommended as it can precipitate ventricular arrhythmias; instead, defibrillation may be used according to ACLS protocol.

Differential Diagnosis

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Beta-blocker toxicity
  • Calcium channel blocker toxicity
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Hypernatremia
  • Hypoglycemia
  • Hypokalemia
  • Hyponatremia


The prognosis depends on the time of presentation, age and associated comorbidity. The mortality is usually increased when the toxicity is associated with a heart block or a new arrhythmia. Deaths may occur in 1-5% of patients despite optimal care.


  • Heart failure
  • Nodal block
  • Anaphylaxis associated with digibind


  • Toxicologist
  • Nephrologist
  • Cardiologist
  • Poison control

Deterrence and Patient Education

  • Avoid drug interaction
  • Assess renal function
  • Monitor Digoxin levels
  • Avoid use of digoxin when possible
  • Check electrolyte levels regularly

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Even though the use of digoxin has declined over the past 2 decades, toxicity from this medication still is quite common. Because of the numerous risk factors and varied presentation of digoxin toxicity, the management is best done by an interprofessional team that includes a cardiologist, emergency department physician, intensivist, nephrologist, neurologist, ICU nurses, and a toxicologist. Most patients with digoxin toxicity are at risk for arrhythmias and need ICU monitoring. Nurses looking after these patients need to be fully aware of the potential problems associated with digoxin toxicity and notify the team when there is a deviation from normal parameters. More important, the pharmacist needs to educate the patient on the prevention of another episode by knowing the dose he or she is supposed to take. In addition, the pharmacist has to ensure that the correct dose of digoxin has been prescribed by the physician. Patients should be warned not to start or change the dose of any medication without first consulting with the primary care provider. The parent should store the medication safely away from the reach of children. For patients with an intentional overdose, a mental health nurse consult is recommended before discharge.  Only through an interprofessional team approach with open communication can the morbidity of the disorder be lowered.


The outcome following digoxin toxicity depends on the patient age and other comorbidities. Seniors tend to have worse outcomes as they often develop recalcitrant arrhythmias and advanced degree heart block. While death rates have started to decline, digoxin toxicity is also associated with high morbidity. The key to preventing digoxin toxicity is patient education. Patients need to be educated about the signs and symptoms of toxicity and when to return to the ED.



Rameez Rehman


Ofek Hai


5/1/2023 5:48:09 PM



Shi L, Sun LD, Odel JG. Colored floaters as a manifestation of digoxin toxicity. American journal of ophthalmology case reports. 2018 Jun:10():233-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Mar 2     [PubMed PMID: 29780940]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Barold SS. Alternans during fascicular ventricular tachycardia due to digitalis toxicity. Journal of electrocardiology. 2018 May-Jun:51(3):450-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 29477502]


Gurel E, Karvar S, Yucesan B, Eker I, Sameeullah M. An Overview of Cardenolides in Digitalis - More Than a Cardiotonic Compound. Current pharmaceutical design. 2017:23(34):5104-5114. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170825125426. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28847302]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


Vyas A, Bachani N, Thakur H, Lokhandwala Y. Digitalis toxicity: ECG vignette. Indian heart journal. 2016 Sep:68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-S225. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 27751296]


Lin CC, Yang CC, Phua DH, Deng JF, Lu LH. An outbreak of foxglove leaf poisoning. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA. 2010 Feb:73(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70009-5. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20171590]


Dec GW. Digoxin remains useful in the management of chronic heart failure. The Medical clinics of North America. 2003 Mar:87(2):317-37     [PubMed PMID: 12693728]


Marik PE, Fromm L. A case series of hospitalized patients with elevated digoxin levels. The American journal of medicine. 1998 Aug:105(2):110-5     [PubMed PMID: 9727817]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence


Abu-Amer N, Priel E, Karlish SJD, Farfel Z, Mayan H. Hypermagnesuria in Humans Following Acute Intravenous Administration of Digoxin. Nephron. 2018:138(2):113-118. doi: 10.1159/000481468. Epub 2017 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 29169235]


Abdul-Rahim AH, MacIsaac RL, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, Lees KR, McMurray JJ, On behalf the VICCTA-Heart Failure Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of digoxin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction according to diabetes status: An analysis of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial. International journal of cardiology. 2016 Apr 15:209():310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.074. Epub 2016 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 26913372]