Cardioactive steroids (CAS) are medically important compounds historically used for conditions like edema and "dropsy." There is literature from the 17th century regarding their therapeutic effects. They are available in several plants, including oleander, foxglove, lily of the valley, red squill, dogbane, common milkweed plant, etc. Leaves of Digitalis lanata contain digoxin, while seeds of Digitalis purpurea may contain digitalin. Several Chinese herbal medications and aphrodisiacs may also contain cardioactive steroids. Historians believe the selection of yellow contrast in Van Gogh's painting was likely secondary to digitalis toxicity.
Digoxin is the most well known cardioactive steroid with application in the treatment of congestive heart failure and for the control of ventricular rate in atrial tachyarrhythmias. It is available in tablet form and liquid-filled capsules that can increase its bioavailability. Other less commonly used cardioactive steroids include lanatoside C, digitoxin, ouabain, gitalin, and deslanoside.
Digoxin toxicity manifests itself in acute and chronic forms. Acute toxicity is mainly the result of dosage errors, suicidal ingestions, and accidental ingestion of CAS containing plants. Chronic toxicity is usually due to drug-drug interactions, conditions that alter the protein binding resulting in increased free state CAS, changes in gut absorption of the drug, and impaired renal clearance of the drug. The usual victims of CAS toxicity as extremes of age and those with renal insufficiency issues.
CAS toxicity may also result from the ingestion of certain plants and animal products. Some plants that are known for this include Nerium oleander, lily of the valley, foxglove, and red squill. There are many tea and herbal products in the market that can potentially cause CAS toxicity. Bufo toad secretions used as aphrodisiacs contain bufotoxin that may cause toxicity by oral ingestion. Ch'an Su, a herbal medicine used in congestive heart failure contain bufadienolides, is also arrhythmogenic and can cause similar toxicity.
Digoxin toxicity is a worldwide phenomenon because it has therapeutic applications. Additionally, epidemics and sporadic cases have also been reported secondary to the consumption of oleander plants. The 2011 Annual report of the American Poison Control Center described 1376 cases of cardiac glycoside poisoning. Multiple accounts exist of yellow oleander leaves poisoning in India and Sri Lanka. Cerbera manghas fruits are also in use by populations in south India and Sri Lanka, resulting in reported fatal self-poisonings.
The chemical structure of a CAS contains a steroid nucleus and a 5 or 6-membered lactone ring. Cardenolides, which are 5-membered rings, are mostly from plants, while, bufadienolides, with a 6-membered ring, are mainly animal-based. Digitoxin and digoxin, extracted from foxglove, belong to Cardenolides, while bufadienolides like bufalin derive from mammals, amphibians, a few insects (lighting bug, Photinus spp.), and plant sources (red quill).
CAS primarily serve as inotropic agents in therapeutic settings. Apart from myocytes, they also have effects on vascular smooth muscle and sympathetic nervous system. The primary mechanism of action is the reversible inhibition of the sodium-potassium ATPase pump, which leads to increased intracellular sodium and decreased intracellular potassium levels, leading to the inactivation of sodium-calcium anti-porter pump, which in turn causes an accumulation of calcium intracellularly. This accumulation of intracellular calcium consequently triggers further calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and finally causes increased myocardial contractility. Besides increased inotropy, CAS causes increased vagal tone in SA and AV nodes decreasing conduction in the nodes with a decreased duration of the refractory period, which increases the risk of automaticity and arrhythmias.
Digoxin and digitoxin are the two main cardioactive steroids used in practice. Both have differences in their kinetics; digitoxin is more readily absorbed, more protein-bound, and with a lower volume of distribution. Digitoxin clears out mostly by hepatic metabolism (80%), whereas digoxin gets eliminated through the renal route. Considering that both the medications have a narrow therapeutic index, dose adjustments are critical, to titrate for any changes in factors affecting absorption, metabolism, protein binding, tissue distribution, or elimination. Drugs like quinidine decrease the renal clearance of digoxin by inhibiting the tubular secretion of digoxin, leading to increased plasma levels. Other drugs that might increase digoxin levels include amiodarone, spironolactone, diltiazem, carvedilol, and verapamil.
Eubacterium lentum, an enteric bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, inhibits digoxin absorption. Antibiotics that may inhibit the growth of these regulatory bacteria in the gut may cause increased digoxin absorption.
The signs and symptoms of CAS toxicity can be similar in both acute and chronic CAS toxicity, although it can be more subtle and challenging with chronic CAS toxicity. The clinical manifestations divide into cardiac and non-cardiac.
In acute toxicity, there may be an asymptomatic period of minutes to hours. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain, are often the earliest symptoms to occur. Neurological symptoms may range from generalized weakness to overt confusion. In chronic toxicity, the symptoms are more insidious and neurological symptoms, including lethargy, disorientation, drowsiness, headache, hallucinations, and rarely convulsions may occur. Visual symptoms like diplopia, photophobia, scotomata, photopsia, and color vision disturbances such as xanthopsia may also be an indicator of chronic toxicity.
While acute toxicity may cause electrolyte disturbance, hyperkalemia has prognostic implications in CAS toxicity. Potassium levels of over 5.5 mEq/L demonstrate 100% mortality, while levels between 5.0 to 5.5 have links with 50% mortality. Interestingly, hyperkalemia is only a marker of worse outcomes in CAS toxicity, and correction of hyperkalemia alone does not improve survival.
With CAS poisoning, virtually any arrhythmia can occur because of the AV node blocking properties of CAS. Increased automaticity combined with impaired conduction through SA or AV node should lead a physician to suspect CAS toxicity. Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia with alternating QRS axis is almost pathognomic for CAS toxicity, although it may also occur with aconitine toxicity and familial catecholaminergic polymorphic VT.
In younger, healthier individuals, accentuation of vagal effects manifesting as bradydysrhythmias is more common. In older people with cardiac disease, however, ventricular dysrhythmias and ectopy are more common. AV junctional blockade combined with increased ventricular automaticity is the most commonly seen arrhythmia in CAS toxicity.
In patients on chronic digoxin therapy, ECG may show scooped ST-segment depression, also known as Salvador Dali's mustache appearance, T-wave inversions or flattening, QT shortening, and increased U wave amplitude. These features suggest long-term digoxin use rather than acute toxicity.
In acute ingestion, the clinician should obtain digoxin/digitoxin levels at the time of presentation and more than six hours after the time of ingestion. Given the distribution phase, levels six hours post-ingestion better correlate with digoxin effects. For patients suspected of chronic toxicity, one group should suffice. Levels above 2 ng/ml for digoxin and above 40 ng/ml for digitoxin 6 hours after the last dose are often clinically toxic.
Electrolytes should require early monitoring to look for hyperkalemia. Prompt determination of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia is crucial, as they may contribute to cardiac toxicity. Assessment of renal function is of paramount importance given the renal clearance. In addition to basic lab workup, acetaminophen levels should be checked in cases involving intentional ingestion since acetaminophen among the most common over-the-counter medication, and the toxicity associated with it is initially subtle. Serial EKGs and cardiac monitoring are necessary to detect arrhythmias early and treat as it occurs.
As with any other case of acute overdose, initial management involves stabilizing airway, breathing, and circulation. Given rapid gastrointestinal absorption, decontamination should is a consideration if the patient presents early. Monitoring and treating arrhythmias, electrolyte imbalances, measuring the digoxin concentration and definitive care, which includes administering digoxin-specific antibody fragments, are the cornerstone steps in managing acute overdoses.
Activated charcoal administration is possible if the patient presents within 1 to 2 hours of acute ingestion, provided the patient is alert and is protecting the airway. Multidose activated charcoal can also be a consideration since both digoxin and digitoxin undergo enterohepatic circulation. The dose is 1 mg/kg orally that can be repeated every 2 to 4 hours up to four times. This regimen reduces the serum concentration of CAS by preventing enterohepatic circulation. Cholestyramine and colestipol may also help in decreasing the gastrointestinal reabsorption of digoxin, as a result of their steroid-binding capacity.
Antidotal therapy with Digoxin-specific Antibody Fragments
Early recognition of CAS toxicity and expeditious administration of digoxin antibody fragments is vital in managing acute overdoses. The indications for administration of antibody fragments include:
1) Life-threatening dysrhythmias.
2) Potassium of over 5 mEq/L in acute ingestions.
3) Non-digoxin cardioactive steroid toxicity.
4) Chronic digoxin toxicity with arrhythmias, altered mental status, or significant GI symptoms.
5) Digoxin levels over 10ng/ml 6hrs post-ingestion or 15 at any time during the course.
Asymptomatic patients with an elevated digoxin level is not an indication for starting antibody fragment.
The dose of DigFab to be given depends on the availability of information regarding how much digoxin the patient ingested and if the digoxin levels in the blood are available.
a) If neither the quantity ingested nor the digoxin levels are available, an empiric dose of 10 vials of digoxin immune fab is an option. In children, five vials are permissible. In very small children, be cautious of volume overload.
b) If the quantity ingested is known but not the levels, the number of vials of DigFab can be calculated by the following formula:
Number of vials = Dose ingested (in mg) x 1.6
c) If the levels of digoxin are known, then the number of vials to be given is derived by the following formula:
Number of vials = [(serum digoxin concentration in ng/mL) (patient's weight in kg)]/ 100
When using the formulae to calculate the number of vials, round up the result to the nearest whole number.
When CAS other than digoxin and digitoxin is the toxin concerned, the empiric administration of 10 vials for adults and five vials for children is the recommended therapeutic approach.
Hyperkalemia is an indicator of the severity of CAS toxicity. Both hyper and hypokalemia may potentiate digoxin toxicity. Hyperkalemia itself does not cause death, and its correction does not improve survival. Anti-hyperkalemic measures, including insulin/dextrose administration, require judicious use to avoid hypokalemia. Anti hyperkalemic measures along with digoxin immune fab can lead to hypokalemia as the reactivated Na-K-ATPase pump will draw the potassium into the intracellular compartment.
If hypokalemia exists, this needs to be corrected early as hypokalemia further exacerbates digoxin toxicity. Patients with hypokalemia may have underlying hypomagnesemia that needs repletion. Calcium administration for hyperkalemia had been traditionally discouraged in digoxin toxicity for concerns of "stone-heart." However, recent literature contradicts the "stone-heart" theory and suggests that it is safe to use calcium in digoxin overdose.
If Fab fragments are not immediately available, symptomatic bradycardia or bradyarrhythmia may are treatable with atropine (0.5 mg IV in adults; 0.02 mg/kg IV in children, minimum dose 0.1 mg) and hypotension can be treated with intravenous fluids. Lidocaine and phenytoin may be useful for the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to cardioactive steroids.
Volume depletion secondary to GI losses decreased oral intake, or concomitant use of diuretics can decrease the renal clearance of digoxin and lead to toxicity. Correction of the volume deficit by judicious fluid depletion, improving oral intake in patients with poor oral intake, and reviewing the patient's medications that can contribute to volume depletion (diuretics, laxatives, etc.) are important steps in the management of the condition.
All patients with signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity should be admitted to the hospital with continuous cardiac monitoring. Those with lethal arrhythmias, unstable vitals, or clinically significant comorbidities require admission to an intensive care unit.
Serial digoxin and potassium levels should be checked along with EKG monitoring to identify arrhythmias. The frequency of EKG monitoring should be more often if there are abnormalities.
Cardiac monitoring for at least 6 hours is the recommended interval for patients who have suspected CAS toxicity but are otherwise asymptomatic with a normal exam and labs. If repeat digoxin levels are down-trending, and the clinical course is improving, they may be safely discharged with follow-up instructions.
There are toxicological and non-toxicological conditions that can potentially mimic digoxin toxicity.
Toxicological causes include calcium channel blocker, beta-blocker, and clonidine overdose, which can present with bradycardia and hypotension, similar to digoxin overdose. Elevated digoxin levels will help in narrowing it down to digoxin toxicity. Hyperglycemia is seen with a calcium channel blocker overdose, whereas clonidine overdose has features of respiratory depression, CNS depression, and miosis. These features, however, should not be solely used to rule out digoxin toxicity.
Non-toxicology causes include hypothermia, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction, sick sinus syndrome, and hyperkalemia.
Patients with reduced renal clearance, volume expanded conditions, and increased inotropic need may have high digoxin levels secondary to endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) that cross-react with digoxin assay. There are reports of exogenous DLIS after ingestion of spironolactone, potassium canrenone, and certain Chinese medicines. Exogenous and endogenous DLIS interfere in the digoxin serum concentration, and this can be overcome by monitoring digoxin concentration in the protein-free ultrafiltrates.
The prognosis for patients with digoxin toxicity who receive appropriate treatment appropriately is good. Hyperkalemia is an important prognostic indicator. In a retrospective study of patients with digoxin toxicity, all patients with potassium levels above 5.5 mEq/L died. In contrast, no patient died in the group with potassium levels of less than 5 mEq/L. The mortality was 50% when the potassium levels were between 5 to 5.5 mEq/L. Patients who present with chronic digoxin toxicity and remain untreated, have mortality ranging from 5 to 13%. The increasing serum digoxin levels have associations with increased mortality.
VIgilence for cardiac arrhythmias and electrolyte imbalances is necessary. Any cardiac arrhythmia is visible with CAS overdose secondary to the AV node blocking effects of CAS. Electrolyte imbalances include hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and hypomagnesemia. CNS depression may also occur either due to the direct toxic effects of CAS or due to the generalized cerebral hypoperfusion. Although rare but mesenteric ischemia can also occur.
Patients should be appropriately educated by the caring physician or the clinical pharmacist before starting long-term digoxin therapy. Such patients are at risk of accidental overdoses and drug-drug interactions. Patients should be instructed not to take a "make-up dose" in case of missing a dose if the next scheduled dose is to be within 12 hours.
Children and their parents should be made aware of the toxic nature of plants such as Nerium oleander and Lily of the Valley.
The management of CAS toxicity requires teamwork. Physicians involved in managing these cases should take expert advice from a toxicologist or a poison control center. Initial management should involve:
The management of digoxin toxicity should continue after the patient is admitted to an appropriate level of care. Patients require admission to an ICU level of care for life-threatening electrolyte imbalances or arrhythmias, or if the presumed clinical course of the patient is predicted to worsen based on the dose of digoxin consumed or the blood level. Symptomatic but otherwise stable patients may receive therapy on a general medical floor. Asymptomatic patients may undergo observation for 6 hours in the emergency department.
The admitting team shall continue therapeutic interventions initiated in the emergency department in conjunction with the medical toxicologist. Consult with a mental health counselor or psychiatrist to assess the risk of self-harm and the potential need for psychiatric admission in intentional or self-injurious exposures.
|||Barrueto F Jr,Jortani SA,Valdes R Jr,Hoffman RS,Nelson LS, Cardioactive steroid poisoning from an herbal cleansing preparation. Annals of emergency medicine. 2003 Mar [PubMed PMID: 12605208]|
|||Brustbauer R,Wenisch C, [Bradycardiac atrial fibrillation after consuming herbal tea]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 1997 Jul 25 [PubMed PMID: 9280706]|
|||McRae S, Elevated serum digoxin levels in a patient taking digoxin and Siberian ginseng. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 1996 Aug 1 [PubMed PMID: 8705908]|
|||Chern MS,Ray CY,Wu DL, Biologic intoxication due to digitalis-like substance after ingestion of cooked toad soup. The American journal of cardiology. 1991 Feb 15 [PubMed PMID: 1994674]|
|||Jan SL,Chen FL,Hung DZ,Chi CS, Intoxication after ingestion of toad soup: report of two cases. Zhonghua Minguo xiao er ke yi xue hui za zhi [Journal]. Zhonghua Minguo xiao er ke yi xue hui. 1997 Nov-Dec [PubMed PMID: 9473822]|
|||Eddleston M,Ariaratnam CA,Meyer WP,Perera G,Kularatne AM,Attapattu S,Sheriff MH,Warrell DA, Epidemic of self-poisoning with seeds of the yellow oleander tree (Thevetia peruviana) in northern Sri Lanka. Tropical medicine [PubMed PMID: 10357862]|
|||Bose TK,Basu RK,Biswas B,De JN,Majumdar BC,Datta S, Cardiovascular effects of yellow oleander ingestion. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 1999 Oct [PubMed PMID: 10638101]|
|||Eddleston M,Haggalla S, Fatal injury in eastern Sri Lanka, with special reference to cardenolide self-poisoning with Cerbera manghas fruits. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2008 Sep [PubMed PMID: 18803087]|
|||Barrueto F Jr,Kirrane BM,Cotter BW,Hoffman RS,Nelson LS, Cardioactive steroid poisoning: a comparison of plant- and animal-derived compounds. Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology. 2006 Dec [PubMed PMID: 18072135]|
|||Eisner T,Goetz MA,Hill DE,Smedley SR,Meinwald J, Firefly [PubMed PMID: 9275191]|
|||Smith TW, Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and serum levels of cardiac glycosides. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1985 May [PubMed PMID: 3921586]|
|||Bismuth C,Gaultier M,Conso F,Efthymiou ML, Hyperkalemia in acute digitalis poisoning: prognostic significance and therapeutic implications. Clinical toxicology. 1973 [PubMed PMID: 4715199]|
|||Smith SW,Shah RR,Hunt JL,Herzog CA, Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia resulting from herbal aconite poisoning. Annals of emergency medicine. 2005 Jan [PubMed PMID: 15635326]|
|||Priori SG,Napolitano C,Memmi M,Colombi B,Drago F,Gasparini M,DeSimone L,Coltorti F,Bloise R,Keegan R,Cruz Filho FE,Vignati G,Benatar A,DeLogu A, Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2002 Jul 2 [PubMed PMID: 12093772]|
|||Mahdyoon H,Battilana G,Rosman H,Goldstein S,Gheorghiade M, The evolving pattern of digoxin intoxication: observations at a large urban hospital from 1980 to 1988. American heart journal. 1990 Nov [PubMed PMID: 2239670]|
|||Chan BS,Buckley NA, Digoxin-specific antibody fragments in the treatment of digoxin toxicity. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2014 Sep-Oct [PubMed PMID: 25089630]|
|||SHRAGER MW, Digitalis intoxication; a review and report of forty cases, with emphasis on etiology. A.M.A. archives of internal medicine. 1957 Dec [PubMed PMID: 13478196]|
|||Nola GT,Pope S,Harrison DC, Assessment of the synergistic relationship between serum calcium and digitalis. American heart journal. 1970 Apr [PubMed PMID: 5418023]|
|||Fenton F,Smally AJ,Laut J, Hyperkalemia and digoxin toxicity in a patient with kidney failure. Annals of emergency medicine. 1996 Oct [PubMed PMID: 8839532]|
|||Van Deusen SK,Birkhahn RH,Gaeta TJ, Treatment of hyperkalemia in a patient with unrecognized digitalis toxicity. Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology. 2003 [PubMed PMID: 12870880]|
|||Levine M,Nikkanen H,Pallin DJ, The effects of intravenous calcium in patients with digoxin toxicity. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2011 Jan [PubMed PMID: 19201134]|
|||Ordog GJ,Benaron S,Bhasin V,Wasserberger J,Balasubramanium S, Serum digoxin levels and mortality in 5,100 patients. Annals of emergency medicine. 1987 Jan [PubMed PMID: 3800074]|
|||Weil J,Sen Gupta R,Herfarth H, Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia induced by digitalis. International journal of colorectal disease. 2004 May [PubMed PMID: 14614629]|