Plasmodium Vivax Malaria

The typical incubation period for vivax malaria is 12 to 17 days, but relapse may occur up to 2 years later from dormant hypnozoites.[7] Classic clinical signs and symptoms of malaria include fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, body aches, anemia, and jaundice. Making a clinical diagnosis of malaria is sometimes challenging because of the nonspecific symptoms and overlap of signs and symptoms with other febrile illnesses. Due to the parasite life cycle, patients with P. vivax malaria tend to have paroxysmal fevers every approximately 42 to 56 hours.[8] Thus P. vivax is sometimes referred to as “tertian fever.” Anemia is the most common presenting symptom in adults and children living in P. vivax endemic areas. Unlike falciparum malaria, vivax malaria does not tend to cause sequestration; thus multi-system organ failure is less common. However, there are reports of cases of severe vivax malaria.[7][8][9][10] ARDS can occur secondary to host inflammatory immune response to parasitemia.[6][8]

In 2010 the World Health Organization adjusted their guidelines, creating an edict that all cases concerning malaria undergo testing before initiating treatment. Two main diagnostic modalities exist to test for malaria in the clinical setting: Light microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is also available, with more utility in the research setting, it can be used to confirm malaria species after establishing a diagnosis.

Blood Smear

Direct visualization of P. vivax parasites on Giemsa-stained blood smears by light microscopy is considered the diagnostic gold standard for the diagnosis of vivax malaria. Three sets of both thick and thin smears should be obtained. Thick smears are more sensitive and are used to detect parasitemia. Thin smears allow for more clear visualization of parasites which helps with speciation. Thin smears can also be used to calculate parasite density. Light microscopy has good sensitivity and is low cost. Limitations to microscopy include the necessity for trained and experienced laboratory technicians, access to a microscope and electricity.[11]

Compared to P. falciparum, the number of parasites circulating in the blood of a person infected with P. vivax malaria is typically lower, making it more challenging to diagnose. Also, the dormant liver hypnozoite form is undetectable by current diagnostic tools.

Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) 

Since the 1990s rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become increasingly popular diagnostic tools, especially in the resource-limited setting.[11] RDTs detect one or more Plasmodium antigens in the blood. They offer the benefit of being fast, resulting in about 15 to 20 minutes and do not require a laboratory technician skilled at making and reading blood smears. RDTs are more sensitive at higher parasite loads and may be falsely negative at lower levels of parasitemia.[12]

Most RDTs test for the histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) found on Plasmodium falciparum. The sensitivity of these tests is as high as 93-99 percent.[13]

RDTs that can test for P. vivax may detect either the P. vivax-pLDH antigen specific to P. vivax or pan-pLDH or aldolase antigens common to all Plasmodium species.[14] Studies evaluating the utility of RDTs in detecting P. vivax have shown significantly lower sensitivities.[15][16][17]

In a 2014 Cochran Systematic Review of 47 studies enrolling 22,862 participants, looking at the use of rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated non-falciparum or Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic countries the authors found that RDTs that detect either pan-pLDH or aldolase had sensitivities for non-falciparum malaria that had a range in pooled analyses from 78% (Type 2) to 89%. They found better results for studies compared RDTs that detected a P. vivax specific antibody line to identify P. vivax.  Compared with microscopy, the RDTs had pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 86% to 99%) and showed pooled specificity of 99% (95% CI 99% to 100%).[12]

 RDTs can remain positive one month after successful treatment of malaria.[18] In the United States standard practice is to confirm all RDTs with light microscopy.

Chloroquine remains the mainstay of treatment for uncomplicated vivax malaria. Exceptions to this include infection acquired in areas of chloroquine resistance, primarily Papua New Guinea and Indonesia[8]. According to the CDC appropriate treatment of chloroquine-sensitive uncomplicated vivax malaria includes Chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine plus primaquine. Dosing is listed below.

1. Chloroquine phosphate: 600 mg base (=1,000 mg salt) orally immediately, followed by 300 mg base (=500 mg salt) orally at 6, 24, and 48 hours Total dose: 1,500 mg base (=2,500 mg salt) OR Hydroxychloroquine: 620 mg base (=800 mg salt) orally immediately, followed by 310 mg base (=400 mg salt) orally at 6, 24, and 48 hours
2. Primaquine phosphate: 30 mg base orally once daily for 14 days

In regions where P. vivax is chloroquine resistant the CDC offers three possible treatment options: atovaquone-proguanil, quinine plus either tetracycline or doxycycline or mefloquine. Providers should select one of these three options to combine with primaquine.

Because of the dormant liver phase of P. vivax, primaquine must also be added to treatment regimens to treat the hypnozoite phase. Two scenarios in which primaquine is contraindicated include patient with G6PD deficiency and pregnant women. In patients with G6PD deficiency, primaquine may cause severe hemolytic anemia. Decisions for its use in this patient population must occur on a case-by-case basis.[19] In pregnant women, primaquine is contraindicated because of the risk for fetal hemolysis.[20] Delay primaquine treatment until after delivery.[21]

For the treatment of severe malaria worldwide, the WHO recommends the use of intravenous artesunate (2.4mg/kg IV or IM at 0, 12, and 24h then daily). Multiple studies have shown improved efficacy and safety of artesunate in the treatment of severe malaria as compared to previously used intravenous quinidine.[22][23][24] Artesunate currently has no approval from the FDA. Current CDC recommendations for the treatment of severe malaria in the United States include intravenous quinidine plus tetracycline, or doxycycline, or clindamycin. When quinidine is administered patient require continuous cardiac monitoring because of the potential risk of arrhythmia. Intravenous artesunate is available in the United States as an investigational new drug (IND) protocol #76,725 via the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/artesunate.html) for cases of severe malaria refractory to alternative treatment or when IV quinidine is unavailable.

• Dengue fever
• Chikungunya
• Typhoid Fever
• Sepsis from bacteremia
• Viral hemorrhagic fever
• Leptospirosis
• Rickettsial infections
• Brucellosis
• Influenza
• Viral hepatitis

 If appropriately recognized and treated, Plasmodium vivax malaria has a good prognosis and causes significantly fewer complications than falciparum malaria. However, it is recognized that more severe disease can occur. (See below under complications)

While classically P. vivax causes lower parasitemia and less severe disease than P. falciparum, more recent publications suggest that P. vivax is responsible for more severe disease than it was initially attributed. Case reports have demonstrated P. vivax causing cerebral malaria, renal failure, acute respiratory distress, and shock.[7][8]

 Another rare complication is splenic rupture which carries a very high mortality rate of up to 80%.[25]

 Pregnant women are at increased risk of adverse outcomes from all forms of malaria and P. vivax is no exception. Malaria in pregnancy is associated with higher levels of parasitemia and increases the risk of prematurity, miscarriage, low birth weight, neonatal or maternal death.[8][21]

Malaria prevention takes a multifaceted approach. For travelers, adherence to appropriate malaria prophylaxis medications is key. Also, appropriate clothing (long sleeves and pants) and use of DEET and/or permethrin has been shown to reduce the risk of malaria transmission greatly.[26] Additionally, recognizing that the Anopheles mosquitos general bite around dawn and dusk, appropriate behavioral modification may avoid infection as well.  For patients living or staying in endemic regions the use of treated mosquito nets correlates with decreased infection.[27]

• Plasmodium vivax is the most widespread malaria species with predominance in Latin America and Southeast Asia
• The blood smear is the gold standard diagnostic tool for malaria, but in resource-limited clinical settings, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are a reasonable alternative
• Treatment decisions need to account for the severity of disease and local patterns of drug resistance
• The uncomplicated disease is treatable with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in combination with primaquine
• In the setting of severe disease outside of the United States, IV artesunate is the treatment of choice
• In the United States severe vivax malaria can be treated with intravenous quinidine plus tetracycline, or doxycycline, or clindamycin (artesunate is available in the United States as an investigational new drug (IND) protocol # 76,725 via the CDC)

Recognizing and diagnosing malaria can be challenging as the symptoms are nonspecific and the diagnosis is uncommon in non-endemic areas. Thus, it is vital that all members of the healthcare team including nurses, midlevel providers, and physicians receive education and training in malaria diagnosis and management. Additionally, skilled laboratory technicians, trained in malaria parasite recognition is key to diagnostic accuracy. If uncertainty exists, a pathologist review may be required. Consultation with infectious disease specialists is often warranted especially in the setting of severe disease. Communication and coordination between healthcare providers (primary care provider, nurse practitioner, pharmacist) are critical to patient care.