For many men, an adequately sized chest is psychologically significant. The constant exposure of large and well-defined pectoral muscles in media makes this a desirable standard for males. As a result, pectoral implants have become increasingly popular. However, some men are not able to achieve muscle tone as easily as others, whether it is from lack of exercise, congenital absence of the pectoralis muscle, or from injuries.
Pectoral implants were first developed for male patients in 1988 as a way to correct a pectus excavatum deformity, which results when the sternum has a sunken-in appearance relative to the rest of the chest wall. These early patients had models of their deformity cast in paper mache from which a custom cohesive silicone gel implant was created. This implant was then placed using a pre-sternal incision in the subcutaneous plane. By the early 1990s, surgeons had begun to use these implants in the cosmetic realm for chest augmentation in male patients. These early surgeons also used a pre-sternal incision and noted a high risk of implant exposure due to minimal tissue coverage in this area. After noticing this complication was all too common, they began placing the implant in the sub-pectoral plane using a trans-axillary approach. The trans-axillary approach has proved useful and has become the standard for pectoral implantation today.
The pectoralis muscle is a thick, broad, fan-shaped muscle situated on the chest underneath the breast. The primary function of this muscle is adduction, internal rotation, and flexion of the humerus. It originates on the medial half of the clavicle, the anterior surface of the sternum, and the superior six costal cartilages, and inserts on the bicipital groove of the humerus. The pectoralis major muscle receives innervation from the lateral and the medial pectoral nerves, while the medial pectoral nerve innervates the pectoralis minor muscle.
In two-thirds of patients, the medial pectoral nerve courses through the pectoralis minor to innervate the lower portion of the pectoralis major, while in one-third of patients, this nerve courses along the lateral aspect of the pectoralis minor. The lateral pectoral nerve runs under the pectoralis major muscle to innervate the proximal portion of this muscle. Given these anatomic relationships, dissection between the two pectoralis muscles can cause partial denervation of the pectoralis major.
Poland Syndrome is a condition in which some or all of the pectoralis muscle is absent on one side. Other causes of a deformed pectoralis muscle include denervation injury or muscle tears after excessive training.
Surgeons will often have multiple sizes and shapes of implants available. For the surgical procedure, a blunt dissector is necessary to develop a sub-pectoral plane for implant placement. Otherwise, a standard surgical suite and instrumentation are adequate for this procedure. Drains are not standard and are not needed.
Before surgery, implant size and shape must be selected with the patient. First, the pectoral muscle is measured as follows: the width at the lower border and infra-clavicular border of muscle, the height at the midportion of muscle, and the distance between the chondrosternal angle and the axilla. With these dimensions, an implant volume is selected that will achieve the patient’s desires for a larger, more proportional chest.
The pocket for implant placement tends to be about 2 cm smaller than these measurements. If the reconstruction is unilateral, the surgeon must make attempts to match the implant to the contralateral side. If the implant is custom-made, a cast can be used to create the implant.
The patient should also understand the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the procedure to make an informed decision. He should also be made aware of the expected postoperative course and limitations following the procedure.
Markings are made with the patient standing. Marking the borders of the pectoralis muscle will assist in determining the extent of sub-pectoral dissection. The incision to be used for implant placement is in the axillary fold. It is curvilinear in shape, parallels a skin crease, and is 4.5 to 6.0 cm long.
Prior to the incisions, the axilla should be shaved using an electric shaver to minimize skin trauma. The patient is then placed supine and arms abducted out to 90 degrees. After the patient's skin is prepped and draped, an anesthetic solution with epinephrine is then infiltrated in the area of the incision. The incision is made, and the dissection is carried down until reaching the lateral tendon of the pectoralis muscle. At this point, the dissection changes to the submuscular plane - first using sharp dissection and then using a long, blunt dissector, which can be facilitated using a fiberoptic light retractor. The extent of the submuscular plane should mirror the previously-made external markings.
It is critical that the dissection is carried no more than 1 to 2 cm below the areola and that no sternal or pectoralis insertions become disrupted, as this can give the patient feminine-appearing breasts. Meticulous hemostasis is necessary to avoid potential hematoma formation. The pocket is soaked in either triple antibiotic solution or betadine and allowed to sit while performing the contralateral dissection. The implants are then placed through the incision, taking care to avoid contact with the skin as much as reasonable to avoid possible contamination. The patient must sit up to confirm symmetry. A multi-layered closure is then performed. It is up to the discretion of the plastic surgeon and the anesthesiologist if they wish to perform a medial and lateral pectoral nerve block after the procedure to help minimize post-operative pain.
A light compressive dressing is recommended for about a month, after which time the patient can discontinue this and begin mild physical activity. Surgeons do not typically utilize drains in this procedure.
Complications after pectoral implantation are similar to those for breast augmentation. These include bleeding or hematoma formation, infection, poor cosmetic outcome, asymmetry, shifting or rotation of the implant, seroma, implant rupture, capsular contracture, and poor scarring. Any time implant placement is under the pectoralis muscle, the patient may develop muscle spasm. This condition can be treated with muscle relaxers, or for persistent spasms, botulinum toxin can be a possible treatment modality.
Other less common complications include anesthetic complications and resulting paresthesia of the inner arm. Although there are no reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) with pectoral implants, they have a textured surface, which can theoretically cause this rare condition.
Pectoral implants have been in use for over 30 years in both the cosmetic and reconstructive realms of plastic surgery. Whether used to treat a congenital or acquired chest wall asymmetry, or to enhance the appearance of the chest, pectoral implants are an essential component in the plastic surgeon's armamentarium. They not only enhance the appearance but also the self-image of those who receive them.
Pectoral implant placement is a procedure that can be associated with many complications, of which one is a poor cosmetic outcome and patient dissatisfaction with the result, which can lead to prolonged patient and surgeon distress, and lead to an increase in healthcare costs. It is, therefore, imperative to identify the risk factors for patient dissatisfaction and perform a thorough assessment of the patient before any surgery. A team approach is an ideal way to limit the complications of this procedure. Prior to surgery, the patient should have the following done:
|||Benito-Ruiz J,Raigosa JM,Manzano-Surroca M,Salvador L, Male chest enhancement: pectoral implants. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2008 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 17676376]|
|||Horn G, A new concept in male chest reshaping: anatomical pectoral implants and liposculpture. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2002 Jan-Feb; [PubMed PMID: 11891593]|
|||Flores-Lima G,Eppley BL, Body contouring with solid silicone implants. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2009 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 19123020]|
|||Hoffman GW,Elliott LF, The anatomy of the pectoral nerves and its significance to the general and plastic surgeon. Annals of surgery. 1987 May; [PubMed PMID: 3579399]|
|||Pereira LH,Sabatovich O,Santana KP,Picanço R, Pectoral muscle implant: approach and procedure. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2006 Jul-Aug; [PubMed PMID: 16855891]|
|||Chavoin JP,Taizou M,Moreno B,Leyx P,Grolleau JL,Chaput B, Correcting Poland Syndrome with a Custom-Made Silicone Implant: Contribution of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2018 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 30045173]|
|||Grappolini S,Fanzio PM,D'Addetta PG,Todde A,Infante M, Aesthetic treatment of pectus excavatum: a new endoscopic technique using a porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2008 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 17851713]|
|||Leiman D,Barlow M,Carpin K,Piña EM,Casso D, Medial and lateral pectoral nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine for the management of postsurgical pain after submuscular breast augmentation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. 2014 Dec; [PubMed PMID: 25587516]|
|||Kuzmiak CM,Damitz L,Burke R,Hwang M, Male Pectoral Implants: Radiographic Appearance of Complications. Journal of radiology case reports. 2016 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 27200162]|
|||Senior MA,Fourie LR, Botox and the management of pectoral spasm after subpectoral implant insertion. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 10883646]|