Hollenhorst Plaque

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the United States. Eighty percent of all strokes are due to occlusion of a vessel secondary to atherothrombosis or embolus. In 1961, Dr. Robert Hollenhorst defined these plaques as emboli caused by plaques of cholesterol. Hollenhorst plaques are yellow and typically located at an arterial bifurcation. This activity reviews the presentation, evaluation, and management of Hollenhorst plaques and stresses the role of an interprofessional team approach to the care of affected patients.


  • Describe the risk factors for developing Hollenhorst plaques.
  • Summarize the management considerations for patients with Hollenhorst plaques.
  • Review the presentation of a patient with Hollenhorst plaques.
  • Describe the importance of collaboration and communication amongst the interprofessional team to enhance delivery of care for patients affected by Hollenhorst plaques.


Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the United States. Eighty percent of all strokes are due to occlusion of a vessel secondary to atherothrombosis or embolus. Hollenhorst plaques were discovered in 1961 by Dr. Robert Hollenhorst. He defined them as emboli cause by plaques of cholesterol. The appearance of these emboli indicate that they are yellow, refractile, and typically located at an arterial bifurcation.[1][2]


Hollenhorst plaques tend to originate from carotid arteries or the aorta. This finding is consistent with carotid disease originating from atherosclerotic lesions. The initial assumption, among eye care providers, upon discovering a Hollenhorst plaque is that it originated from the stenosed, ipsilateral internal carotid artery. The direct anatomical route between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and central retinal artery (CRA) supports this assumption. The ophthalmic artery is the first branch of the ICA, which then leads into the CRA.[3][4]


The Blue Mountains Eye study stated the prevalence of retinal emboli is 1.4% in the general population older than 49 years old. The prevalence increases with age. Retinal emboli are significantly more prevalent in men than in women. Hollenhorst plaques make up the majority of the retinal emboli at 80%. An estimated 10% of carotid emboli reach the retinal arteries.[5]


Ulcerated plaques just distal to the bifurcation of the common carotid artery into its external and internal branches may be a source of retinal emboli that can be asymptomatic or produce transient monocular blindness.[6][7]

A Hollenhorst plaque is a clinical sign. It is commonly a contributing factor in the diagnosis of retinal artery occlusion (RAO). In order for a Hollenhorst plaque to cause an RAO, the plaque must completely obstruct the vessel. RAOs can occur in the central retinal artery (CRAO) or one of its branches (BRAO). Hollenhorst plaques are only one possible cause of a CRAO/BRAO and should not be thought of as synonymous. As discussed in the differential diagnoses, other types of emboli exist with the ability to occlude. There are also non-embolic causes of retinal artery occlusion including nocturnal arterial hypotension and transient vasospasm. Hollenhorst plaques, like other types of retinal emboli, may not stay in one place. The plaque may dislodge and move to a smaller diameter vessel before it gets lodged again, or the plaque may dissolve completely. The presence of a Hollenhorst plaque is a confirming diagnosis; however, the absence of a plaque does not rule out the possibility of embolic occlusion.

If an RAO takes place, the most common symptom is sudden, painless vision loss. The fundus will display typical ischemic signs such as retinal whitening around the occluded vessel. The macular area will remain “cherry-red” due to its secondary outer retinal blood supply.If the plaque is only partially occluding the vessel, blood can still flow through the lumen, and no damage is currently occurring. This partial occlusion is what was taking place with our patient. This does not mean an RAO cannot occur in the future. A single eye can undergo more than one transient RAO as documented by Hayreh et al. in their clinical study of over 250 patients. Unfortunately, what the literature shows is that asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaques are a poor predictor of future embolic events.

History and Physical

Hollenhorst plaques serve as markers of past emboli events but are poor predictors of future events. These plaques may or may not cause an RAO. The discovery of asymptomatic emboli has a greater concern for a patient’s systemic health than visual health.


The prevalence increased with age: 0.8% visible in participants ages 49 to 60, 1.4% in ages 60 to 69, 2.1% in ages 70 to 79. This prevalence then dropped to 1.5% in the population over 80 years old.

Retinal emboli were significantly more prevalent in men compared to women: 67%. The presentation of a single embolism (88%) was more prevalent than a presentation of multiple emboli (12%). Lastly, the majority of the emboli were cholesterol (80%), followed by platelet-fibrin (14%) and calcific (6%).[8]


Ocular testing may involve fluorescein angiography (FA) as a supplemental test. Expected results for an occlusion include: delay in the retinal arterial filling, delayed arteriovenous transit time, and variable amounts of residual retinal circulation. It is very rare to see a complete lack of retinal filling even though the vessel is completely occluded. The choroidal filling should be normal since the occlusion has occurred anterior to the ophthalmic artery. There is also a restoration of retinal circulation within days/weeks after an RAO via anastomoses with the central retinal artery; therefore, an FA is of little benefit if delayed.[4][9]

Treatment / Management

Unless a Hollenhorst plaque completely obstructs a vessel causing an RAO, no ocular treatment is necessary. All patients with retinal emboli should be referred to the patient’s primary care provider for bilateral carotid duplex. Ocular testing may involve fluorescein angiography (FA) as a supplemental test.[10][11]

Differential Diagnosis

Calcific emboli:  White, dull (non-refractile), due to their larger size typically found in the central retinal artery close to the optic disc. This finding is consistent with cardiac disease originating from heart valve calcifications.

Platelet-fibrin emboli: White/gray, dull (non-refractile), elongated. This can be a finding for both cardiac and carotid disease; however, cholesterol emboli are more common in carotid disease.

Talc emboli­: Small, white/yellow, highly refractile, typically located in the macular region. This finding is associated with intravenous drug abuse.

Lipid/fat emboli:  Usually cannot visualize the emboli, cotton wool spots are often seen. This finding is associated with long bone fractures and chest trauma, i.e., Purtscher retinopathy.

Tumor cells: These proliferative neoplastic cells which can fall off the main the main lesion and lodge in the retinal arterioles.

Septic emboli:  These deposits are associated with bacterial endocarditis


Atheromatous disease of the internal carotid artery can be associated with these Hollenhorst plaques and is usually an indicator of potential stroke. Carotid stenosis increase in stroke risk as 1.18 times for every 10% increase in stenosis. This risk of stroke rises less than 1% per year for a vessel that is less than 80% stenosed. Whereas a vessel that is greater than 90% stenosed rises at 4.8% per year.


The most common complication is a stroke.

Pearls and Other Issues

Cholesterol emboli aka Hollenhorst plaque:  Yellow, refractile, typically located at the  carotid artery bifurcation. They tend to originate from carotid arteries or the aorta. This finding is consistent with carotid disease originating from atherosclerotic lesions.

  • Hollenhorst plaques are considered to be the most common form of emboli
  • Hollenhorst plaques are a common finding in the aging population
  • Approximately 75% of Hollenhorst plaques seen in ophthalmic practice are asymptomatic

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Even though there are several other causes of hollenhorst bodies, the most worrisome diagnosis is that of atherosclerosis of the internal carotid artery. Often the presence of a hollenhorst body is indicative of an impending stroke, especially in older individuals. Once a hollenhorst body has been diagnosed the management generally involves a neurologist, ophthalmologist, cardiologist, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, nurse, and a pharmacist, functioning as a cohesive interprofessional team. The patient should undergo a duplex ultrasound of the neck to determine the presence of atherosclerotic disease at the carotid bifurcation. If the lesion is ulcerated and more than 70% stenosis, the patient should be referred to the vascular surgeon or an interventional radiologist for stenting. The patient should be encouraged to lower his blood pressure and cholesterol, discontinue smoking and take aspirin while awaiting surgery. The nurse should educate the patient on the possible symptoms of a stroke and when to return to the emergency room. When patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis are managed with elective surgery or stenting, the morbidity and mortality rates are less than 3%. [4][9] THis type of interprofessional activity will drive improved results [Level 5]

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Hollenhorst Plaque
Hollenhorst Plaque
Contributed by Dr. Evan J Kaufman

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Hollenhorst Plaque
Hollenhorst Plaque
Contributed by Dr. Evan J Kaufman, OD FAAO University of Virginia, Department of Ophthalmology

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Hollenhorst Plaque
Hollenhorst Plaque
Contributed by Dr. Evan J Kaufman, OD FAAO The university of Virginia, Department of Ophthalmology
Article Details

Article Author

Evan J. Kaufman

Article Author

Navid Mahabadi

Article Editor:

Bhupendra C. Patel


8/8/2022 8:07:56 PM

PubMed Link:

Hollenhorst Plaque



Majstruk L,Giocanti-Aurégan A, [Multimodal imaging of a Hollenhorst plaque]. Journal francais d'ophtalmologie. 2016 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 27575573]


Coca MN,Palau AE,Morgan ML,Lee AG, Embolic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy associated with a Hollenhorst plaque. JAMA ophthalmology. 2015 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 25674893]


Lawlor M, Bakri et al.: is carotid ultrasound necessary in the evaluation of the asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaque? (Ophthalmology 2013;120:2747-8). Ophthalmology. 2014 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 24907057]


Bakri SJ,Luqman A,Pathik B,Chandrasekaran K, Is carotid ultrasound necessary in the evaluation of the asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaque? Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 24246827]


Tokoyoda T,Tsujimoto I,Sugiura Y,Sezaki R, A hollenhorst plaque in cholesterol crystal embolism. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2012     [PubMed PMID: 22246495]


Saric M,Kronzon I, Cholesterol embolization syndrome. Current opinion in cardiology. 2011 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 21993354]


Wolintz RJ, Carotid endarterectomy for ophthalmic manifestations: is it ever indicated? Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society. 2005 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 16340498]


Chawluk JB,Kushner MJ,Bank WJ,Silver FL,Jamieson DG,Bosley TM,Conway DJ,Cohen D,Savino PJ, Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease in patients with retinal ischemic syndromes. Neurology. 1988 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 3285240]


Dunlap AB,Kosmorsky GS,Kashyap VS, The fate of patients with retinal artery occlusion and Hollenhorst plaque. Journal of vascular surgery. 2007 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 17950567]


Schwarcz TH,Eton D,Ellenby MI,Stelmack T,McMahon TT,Mulder S,Meyer JP,Eldrup-Jorgensen J,Durham JR,Flanigan DP, Hollenhorst plaques: retinal manifestations and the role of carotid endarterectomy. Journal of vascular surgery. 1990 May     [PubMed PMID: 2335833]


Bunt TJ, The clinical significance of the asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaque. Journal of vascular surgery. 1986 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 3783831]