Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is a rare cause of stroke in the general population; however, represents one of the more common causes of stroke in patients younger than 45 years of age. Its signs and symptoms can be vague, and diagnosis can be elusive.  Spontaneous dissections have been reported. However, incidental minor trauma often precipitates this potentially dangerous condition. Often some neck distortion such as chiropractic manipulation, bending of the neck or blunt trauma causes the dissection. The dissection of the artery may ultimately lead to a stroke which often can be delayed for days following the acute dissection.
The majority of dissections are intracranial. It is estimated that vertebral artery dissection may be responsible for at least 20% of ischemic strokes in young people.
Patients typically report minor, rather innocuous precipitating events before the onset of symptoms. Coughing, vomiting, chiropractic procedures, and blunt trauma are likely initiating events. It is estimated that 1 in 20,000 cervical spine manipulations cause a stroke. Blunt trauma to the neck is the most common reported precipitating event. Patients with connective tissue disorders are also at increased risk. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is the most common connective tissue disorder that can cause vertebral artery dissection. When patients with serious cervical cord injury or spine fractures are screened for vertebral artery injury approximately 20% to 40% will demonstrate traumatic occlusion. Interestingly, this occlusion tends to be asymptomatic, as opposed to dissection, and its management is controversial.
Other risk factors for vertebral artery dissection include:
It is estimated that vertebral artery dissection is the cause of approximately 2% of all ischemic strokes. However, in middle-aged and younger patients (30 to 45 years of age) it is believed to be as high as 10% to 25%, representing a significant population affected by this condition. The combined incidence of both vertebral artery and carotid artery dissections is estimated to be 2.6 per 100,000. Carotid artery dissections are more three to five times more common than vertebral artery dissections. It should be noted that chiropractors dismiss the association between manipulation and vertebral artery dissection on the grounds that the dissection is the cause of the neck pain and the reason why the patients seek out chiropractic care. There is no conclusive evidence linking the two leading some medical associations only to suggest a causative link.
Vertebral artery anatomy
The majority of spontaneous dissections occur in segment 3, which may extend and involve segment 4.
The arterial anatomy consists of three layers named the intimal (innermost), the media (middle), and the adventitia (outermost layer). Dissection occurs when the structural integrity of the arterial wall is compromised. Intimal tears lead to arterial blood dissecting between the layers of the arterial wall. The blood within the arterial wall precipitates hematoma and clot formation. The subsequent compromise in arterial blood flow secondary to the stenosis then leads to the symptoms of vertebral artery dissection and ultimately, stroke. Vertebral artery dissection can be either extracranial or intracranial. Extracranial dissections usually involve the distal extracranial segment near the atlas and axis. Intracranial dissections are often associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage and carry a much worse prognosis. Neurological sequelae of both extracranial and intracranial dissections may result from cerebral ischemia due to thromboembolism, hypoperfusion, or a combination of both. However, thromboembolism rather than hypoperfusion is considered the major cause of ischemic symptoms.
Clinical presentation is typically acute and severe unilateral neck pain and/or a headache. Minor neck trauma often precipitates the pain. The pain is typically in the occipital-cervical area of the neck or head. Often the trauma is minor in nature.
Neurological symptoms are often delayed and may not be present at all. However, 70% of patients will have some type of neurological deficit which may present late
Lateral medullary syndromes (Wallenberg Syndrome) and cerebellar infarctions are the most common location for strokes. Wallenberg Syndrome is defined by sensory deficits affecting the trunk and extremities on the opposite side of the infarction and sensory deficits affecting the face and cranial nerves on the same side as the infarction. When neurological symptoms are present, dizziness, ataxia, dysphagia (cranial nerves 9 and 10), disequilibrium, unilateral hearing loss, dysarthria, diplopia, and vertigo are the predominant symptoms.
Extracranial dissections often have a bruit present. The bruit has even been reported on the contralateral side secondary to increased collateral blood flow. What often distinguishes this type of patient from those with cerebellar infarctions secondary to atherosclerotic disease is the age of the patient and the presence of pain. When the dissection is intracranial, a subarachnoid hemorrhage is present 50% of the time. This group of patients has severe neurological symptoms a much worse prognosis than those with extracranial dissections.
MRI rivals angiography for establishing the diagnosis but is not readily available to most. CT and CTA are often the first investigations obtained. CT scan can demonstrate posterior fossa ischemia or subarachnoid hemorrhage. It may also identify an occluded vertebral artery or mural thrombus. CTA, however, is superior to CT scan and should be performed. CTA more easily identifies irregularity of the vascular lumen or thickening of the arterial wall. CTA is the initial test of choice. Vascular Duplex scanning demonstrates abnormal flow in 95% of patients. However, it shows evidence specific to dissection in only 20% of patients.
MRI may detect an intimal flap and luminal thrombosis. Sometimes hyperintensity of the vessel wall may be visualized on T1 weighted images and are considered pathognomonic.
A cerebral angiogram may be required if the MRI and CT scan have failed to reveal any pathology
Routine blood work including coagulation profile should be obtained.
If CT reveals the absence of hemorrhage, then anticoagulation can be initiated.
For those patients that survive the initial dissection, the prognosis is usually good. Approximately 10% of patients die initially.
The goal of management is to prevent stroke, which is the complication of vertebral artery dissection. Management is done with anticoagulation, typically heparin.If there are no contraindications, then thrombolytic therapy can be started as long as the time is within 4.5 hours from the onset of symptoms.
In one clinical follow-up study, 80% achieved a full recovery. Death is typically secondary to extensive intracranial dissection, brainstem infarction, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Most dissections will resolve over time with no neurological deficits. Be advised however that when the dissection is intracranial or extends intracranially, the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage increases significantly and anticoagulation is contraindicated. Endovascular or surgical treatments are reserved for patients with concomitant complications or those whose maximal medical therapy has been unsuccessful.
Admission is required for all patients with vertebral artery dissection. Close monitoring of neurological deficits is vital.
Today technological advances have permitted the use of endovascular therapies to manage vertebral artery dissection. However, the role of this therapy does remain controversial as most patients can be managed with anticoagulation therapy. In addition, most dissections do a repair on their own. Thus, endovascular therapy is best reserved for patients who are not candidates for thrombolytics and/or have a subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Surgery in the form of bypass graft is rarely done and not always successful.
For patients who do survive the initial acute extracranial dissection, the prognosis is good with complete recovery in nearly 80-90% of patients. However, at least 10% will develop recurrent attacks, a major stroke or death. Patients who have severe neurological deficits at the time of presentation usually do have a poor prognosis. Follow up angiographic studies have revealed healing in about 60% of patients.
Patients who develop an intracranial dissection have a poor prognosis. Those who present with altered consciousness and neurological deficits do poorly. Intracranial vertebral dissections are often associated with brainstem infarctions, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and death.
Patients need to be followed every 3-6 months if they have symptoms or until imaging shows complete resolution. How long to administer anticoagulation therapy is not yet known but at least 6 months.
A headache or neck pain associated with vertebral artery dissection may precede the development of neurological symptoms by as long as 14 days. Patients may report vague neurological symptoms associated with the pain that may be transient. The problem for the emergency department physician is that when the workup is initiated for a severe headache or neck pain, the CT scan and lumbar puncture may be negative. These patients are often diagnosed with a headache or even transient ischemic attack (TIA), delaying diagnosis and treatment. The severe pain remains the hallmark and cannot be ignored. Further neurologic imaging with CTA or MRI must be performed if clinical suspicion is high. Patients with vertebral artery dissection must be admitted to the hospital for close neurological monitoring and if indicated, anticoagulation. Surgery is very rarely indicated.
The diagnosis and treatment of vertebral artery dissection is not simple and best managed by an interprofessional team that includes a radiologist, emergency department physician, nurse practitioner, neurologist, and vascular surgeon. Once imaging has made the diagnosis, the treatment depends on patient symptoms.
For those patients that survive the initial dissection, the prognosis is usually good. Approximately 10% of patients die initially. In one clinical follow-up study, 80% achieved a full recovery. Death is typically secondary to extensive intracranial dissection, brainstem infarction, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The goal of management is to prevent stroke, which is the complication of vertebral artery dissection. Management is done with anticoagulation, typically heparin. For those who have neurological deficits, appropriate rehabilitation therapy is necessary. The pharmacist should educate the patient on medication compliance, managing blood pressure and discontinuing smoking. The pharmacist should also monitor the INR to ensure that it is in the therapeutic range.
Endovascular or surgical treatments are reserved for patients with concomitant complications or those whose maximal medical therapy has been unsuccessful. Most dissections will resolve over time with no neurological deficits. Close communication with the team members is vital if one wants to improve outcomes.
|||Zhou Y,Wang L,Zhang JR,Zhou K,Shuai J,Gong ZL,Liu Y,Wei F,Han YF,Shen L,Yang QW, Angioplasty and stenting for severe symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2019 Mar 5; [PubMed PMID: 30850180]|
|||Kim MK,Lim YC, Conservative Management of Unruptured Spontaneous Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection. World neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 26; [PubMed PMID: 30822585]|
|||Markus HS,Levi C,King A,Madigan J,Norris J, Antiplatelet Therapy vs Anticoagulation Therapy in Cervical Artery Dissection: The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) Randomized Clinical Trial Final Results. JAMA neurology. 2019 Feb 25; [PubMed PMID: 30801621]|
|||Saw AE,McIntosh AS,Kountouris A,Newman P,Gaida JE, Vertebral Artery Dissection in Sport: A Systematic Review. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2019 Feb 13; [PubMed PMID: 30758815]|
|||Walsh BA,Gregorie WD,Whittle JS, Deconstructing Dissections: A Case Report and Review of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury of the Neck. Case reports in emergency medicine. 2018; [PubMed PMID: 30174964]|
|||Hu Y,Du J,Liu Z,Wu H,Ding J,Jian F, Vertebral artery dissection caused by atlantoaxial dislocation: a case report and review of literature. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 30109422]|
|||Yun SY,Heo YJ,Jeong HW,Baek JW,Choo HJ,Seo JH,Kim ST,Lee JY,Jin SC, Spontaneous intracranial vertebral artery dissection with acute ischemic stroke: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging findings. The neuroradiology journal. 2018 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 29565222]|
|||McNally JS,Hinckley PJ,Sakata A,Eisenmenger LB,Kim SE,De Havenon AH,Quigley EP,Iacob E,Treiman GS,Parker DL, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Factors Associated With Ischemic Stroke in Patients Suspected of Cervical Artery Dissection. Stroke. 2018 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 30355108]|
|||Turner RC,Lucke-Wold BP,Boo S,Rosen CL,Sedney CL, The potential dangers of neck manipulation [PubMed PMID: 29951644]|
|||Brukner P,Gara TJ,Fortington LV, Traumatic cricket-related fatalities in Australia: a historical review of media reports. The Medical journal of Australia. 2018 Mar 26; [PubMed PMID: 29562164]|
|||Urasyanandana K,Songsang D,Aurboonyawat T,Chankaew E,Withayasuk P,Churojana A, Treatment outcomes in cerebral artery dissection and literature review. Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences. 2018 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 29433365]|
|||Takahara M,Ogata T,Abe H,Higashi T,Morishita T,Takano K,Inoue T, The Comparison of Clinical Findings and Treatment Between Unilateral and Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissection. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2019 Jan 30; [PubMed PMID: 30711415]|