Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Inhaled Ribs

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

The definition of somatic dysfunction is "impaired or altered function of related components of the somatic (body framework) system: skeletal, arthrodial and myofascial structures, and their related vascular, lymphatic, and neural elements." This activity describes the role of rib HVLA used by an appropriate healthcare provider in treating patients with somatic dysfunction.

Objectives:

  • Explain the importance of collaboration and communication amongst the interprofessional team to ensure the appropriate selection of candidates for the use of HVLA in rib somatic dysfunction.
  • Review the contraindications to using HVLA in specific populations.
  • Outline the steps to perform HVLA for rib somatic dysfunction.
  • Summarize the risks associated with using HVLA for rib somatic dysfunction.

Introduction

The definition of somatic dysfunction is "impaired or altered function of related components of the somatic (body framework) system: skeletal, arthrodial and myofascial structures, and their related vascular, lymphatic, and neural elements."[1] Andrew Taylor Still, MD, DO, was the founder of osteopathy in 1874.[2] Osteopathy, or osteopathic medicine, is practiced by osteopathic physicians licensed as a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO). A fundamental principle of osteopathic medicine is the treatment of somatic dysfunction by using osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT); the body will be capable of self-healing.[3] 

High-velocity low amplitude (HVLA) is one type of technique/procedure utilized by an osteopathic clinician that can be used to restore the body to health. Other types of OMT techniques include but are not limited to muscle energy, counterstrain, balanced ligamentous tension, cranial and myofascial release. In this article, the indications, techniques, contraindications, side-effects, and monitoring parameters of the HLVA technique related to the ribs as attachments to the thoracic vertebrae will be reviewed.

Anatomy and Physiology

Normally there are 12 ribs bilaterally in the human body. Each rib corresponds with each of the 12 vertebrae of the thoracic spine. The head of each rib articulates posteriorly with the bodies of the vertebra at its own level and of the one above it, except for the first rib, which only attaches to the first thoracic vertebra.[4][5] Ribs 1 to 7 are considered "true ribs" because they connect anteriorly to the sternum via costal cartilages. Ribs 8 to 10 are considered "false ribs" because they connect indirectly to the sternum through the seventh costal cartilage. Ribs 11 and 12 have the name "floating ribs" because they do not connect to the sternum at all.[5]

Muscles that are associated with rib movement include the diaphragm, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, external abdominal oblique, rectus abdominis, subclavius, serratus anterior, external intercostal, internal intercostal, innermost intercostal, quadratus lumborum, transversus thoracis, latissimus dorsi, anterior scalene, middle scalene, posterior scalene, serratus posterior superior, and serratus posterior inferior.[5][6]

Normal respiration is required for optimal lymphatic drainage to occur. The thoracic duct drains lymph from the left head and neck, the left thorax, the left upper extremity, and the rest of the lower body into the venous system at the junction of the left internal jugular vein and left subclavian vein. The right lymphatic duct drains the right head and neck, right thorax, and right upper extremity into the venous system.[7] A study by Noll et al. in 2016 suggested that OMT in reducing the length of stay (LOS) and mortality in a select population.[8] 

Osteopathic physicians describe ribs by their motion with respect to the thoracic spine. Ribs fall into three categories; pump handle motion (ribs 1 to 5), bucket handle motion (ribs 6 to 10), and caliper motion (ribs 11 and 12). The diaphragm connects to ribs 6-12 and is domed cephalad at rest.[9] During inhalation, the diaphragm contracts resulting in increased lung volume and displacement of the rib cage.[10] Optimal respiration may be affected by any disturbance in the normal motion of these musculoskeletal structures. Rib somatic dysfunction can result from excessive physical activity, cough, poor posture, and increased kyphosis.[11] In an inhalation dysfunction, the dysfunctional rib will move freely cephalad but will have restriction to moving caudally during exhalation. Conversely, in an exhalation dysfunction, the dysfunctional rib will move freely caudal but will have restriction to moving cephalad during inhalation.[9] 

The inferior scapular angle (ISA) can serve as a landmark for the spinous process of the T7 vertebra, but in a literature review of anatomical studies by Cooperstein et al., it was concluded that the ISA is not an acceptable landmark for identifying spinal levels.[12] 

Indications

HVLA is indicated to treat somatic dysfunction of the thoracic cage, the thoracic vertebrae, and the ribs at the posterior rib angles. Somatic dysfunctions of the ribs are described as either inhalation and exhalation dysfunctions. Acute chest pain is a frequent chief complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department; however, the leading cause of chest pain is musculoskeletal in origin in patients without evidence of acute myocardial ischemia or infarction.[13] 

HVLA, solo or in combination with other OMT techniques, is another option when conventional treatment such as pharmaceutical pain medications are either contraindicated or not tolerated well.[14]

Contraindications

HVLA has the most contraindications of all OMT techniques. The following are contraindications for HVLA techniques, including its application to the ribs:[15]

  • Anticoagulant therapy (relative contraindication)
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Fracture
  • Malignancy (if local metastasis)
  • Osteoporosis
  • Patient uncooperative
  • Severe rheumatoid arthritis 
  • Surgery (if local)

Indirect OMT techniques such as muscle energy, myofascial release, rib raising, and soft tissue techniques are a few alternative options to consider when HVLA is contraindicated. For example, in a recent study by Chin et al., the rib raising technique was used in 87 hospitalized non-intensive care unit patients admitted for respiratory issues, and the procedure was well tolerated.[16]

Personnel

The technique requires a doctor of osteopathic medicine, a doctor of chiropractic, or a doctor of medicine certified to perform OMT. To successfully perform OMT, the patient must be cooperative and also comfortable enough to be placed in the proper positioning for treatment set up and execution. Also, the physician should be cognizant of the patient's position and set up to not injure themselves.

Preparation

OMT is considered a procedure and thus must have consent from the patient prior to the procedure.

Technique or Treatment

Kasten et al. best describe the use of HVLA for rib somatic dysfunction. and Pierce-Talsma et al. describe it for ribs 2 to 10:[9][11]

  • The patient is placed in a supine position with the physician on the opposite of the dysfunctional rib; the angle of the rib will feel more posterior since it is "stuck" either up or down in comparison to the rib above and below.
  • The patient crosses their arms across their chest such that the arm on top is the same side as the posterior rib.
  • The healthcare provider then rolls the patient towards them and places their thenar eminence on the dysfunctional rib between the transverse process and the rib angle.
  • Then the patient is rolled back onto the thenar eminence. The clinician flexes the patient to the posterior transverse process just below the dysfunctional rib with their opposite hand.
  • The patient takes a deep breath in, and as they exhale, apply force from the healthcare provider's abdomen through the patient's elbow to the posterior rib.
  • At the end of exhalation, just prior to the patient inhaling, apply an HVLA thrust from the healthcare provider's abdomen straight down to the posterior rib.
  • The thenar eminence against the posterior rib will feel a thrust, and the articulation may be palpated.
  • A "popping" or "cracking" sound may also be heard
  • After the HVLA technique is complete, the healthcare provider should reassess the area of somatic dysfunction.
  • The technique may be repeated if additional somatic dysfunction is found.

Complications

Most patients tolerate OMT well if they have adequate screening for contraindications.[17][18]

Common side effects can include tenderness or soreness to the area of treatment. The recommended approach is for patients to take a warm shower and drink plenty of water after a treatment session.

Two previous reviews by Terrettl and Laughlin concluded that manipulation was very safe if performed by skilled practitioners.[19]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Respiration is a biomechanical wonder that requires normal motion of fascia, diaphragm, ribs, and other thoracic cavity structures to function optimally. Somatic dysfunction may negatively affect respiration, especially if other disease processes are present such as musculoskeletal disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, and asthma. HVLA, which is a type of OMT technique, can be utilized by a proficient healthcare provider when somatic dysfunction is present. In a pilot study by Zanotti et al., OMT was shown to improve exercise capacity in patients with severe COPD compared to soft manipulation.[17] However, in another study by Noll et al., elderly patients with COPD were found to have increased air trapping 30 minutes after receiving OMT. The results of having air trapping post-OMT were likely secondary to their use of a technique called thoracic lymphatic pump with activation that includes taking multiple deep breaths.[18]

One major weakness of both of these studies was that the number of patients receiving HVLA was not reported in their publication. Furthermore, in the study by Noll et al., a thorough description of how they performed HVLA was not reported, unlike seven of the other techniques that they used.

All doctors of osteopathic medicine and doctors of chiropractic receive training in performing OMT. Doctors of chiropractic commonly use HVLA.[20] Allopathic physicians can become certified to perform OMT if they take the appropriate steps. The curriculum for physician assistants, for example, does not include osteopathic principles.[21]

An osteopathic physician is a graduate of an osteopathic medical school. A survey done in the United States by Teng et al. found that third and fourth-year medical students that had additional OMT clinical exposure increased their comfort level with the underlying topic of musculoskeletal disorders and their comfort level with OMT.[22] Another survey in Michigan found that 57.1% of osteopathic students thought their musculoskeletal curriculum was adequate compared to 26.8% of allopathic students.[23]

Musculoskeletal pain remains a major reason patients present to emergency departments and primary care settings in both developed and developing countries.[23][24] When it comes to treating disorders of the thorax, HVLA is another tool in the toolbox of treatments. Nursing can help by monitoring hospitalized patients for improvement in symptoms or complications of OMT. Pharmacists can refer patients to an appropriate healthcare provider for OMT when conventional pharmacologic agents are not enough to control symptoms. Respiratory therapists who see patients for pulmonary rehabilitation can refer to an appropriate clinician for patients that need additional support. In conclusion, HVLA can be utilized by a proficient healthcare provider to treat rib somatic dysfunction. [Level 2]


Details

Editor:

Susan Ratay

Updated:

7/31/2023 8:29:39 PM

References


[1]

Bicalho E. The Intraosseous Dysfunction in the Osteopathic Perspective: Mechanisms Implicating the Bone Tissue. Cureus. 2020 Jan 24:12(1):e6760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6760. Epub 2020 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 32140328]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[2]

Lesho EP. An overview of osteopathic medicine. Archives of family medicine. 1999 Nov-Dec:8(6):477-84     [PubMed PMID: 10575385]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Shubrook JH Jr, Johnson AW. An osteopathic approach to type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2011 Sep:111(9):531-7     [PubMed PMID: 21955532]


[4]

De Troyer A, Kirkwood PA, Wilson TA. Respiratory action of the intercostal muscles. Physiological reviews. 2005 Apr:85(2):717-56     [PubMed PMID: 15788709]


[5]

Safarini OA, Bordoni B. Anatomy, Thorax, Ribs. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30855912]


[6]

ENGLAND RW. The first rib: some clinical and practical considerations. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1961 Oct:61():89-101     [PubMed PMID: 13890274]


[7]

Ilahi M, St Lucia K, Ilahi TB. Anatomy, Thorax, Thoracic Duct. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30020599]


[8]

Noll DR, Degenhardt BF, Johnson JC. Multicenter Osteopathic Pneumonia Study in the Elderly: Subgroup Analysis on Hospital Length of Stay, Ventilator-Dependent Respiratory Failure Rate, and In-hospital Mortality Rate. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2016 Sep 1:116(9):574-87. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.117. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27571294]


[9]

Pierce-Talsma S, Talsma J, Ferrill H. An Osteopathic Approach to Rib Somatic Dysfunction in Respiratory Disorders. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2018 Oct 1:118(10):e94-e95. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.152. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30335880]


[10]

Troyer AD, Wilson TA. Action of the diaphragm on the rib cage. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985). 2016 Aug 1:121(2):391-400. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00268.2016. Epub 2016 Jun 9     [PubMed PMID: 27283911]


[11]

Kasten KM, Lewis DD. High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Management of Posterior Rib Somatic Dysfunction. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2020 Jan 1:120(1):e1-e2. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.013. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31904779]


[12]

Cooperstein R, Haneline M, Young M. The location of the inferior angle of the scapula in relation to the spine in the upright position: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Chiropractic & manual therapies. 2015:23():7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0050-7. Epub 2015 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 25729566]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Spalding L, Reay E, Kelly C. Cause and outcome of atypical chest pain in patients admitted to hospital. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003 Mar:96(3):122-5     [PubMed PMID: 12612112]


[14]

Licciardone JC. Osteopathic research: elephants, enigmas, and evidence. Osteopathic medicine and primary care. 2007 Feb 8:1():7     [PubMed PMID: 17371583]


[15]

Roberge RJ, Roberge MR. Overcoming barriers to the use of osteopathic manipulation techniques in the emergency department. The western journal of emergency medicine. 2009 Aug:10(3):184-9     [PubMed PMID: 19718381]


[16]

Chin AJ, Fischione AD, Shilian R, Walter LM, Ratay SM, Bejanishvili TY, Wynbrandt JH, Rowane MP. Tolerance of Rib Raising Among Hospitalized Patients: A Pilot Study. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2019 Jan 1:119(1):19-23. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.003. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30556829]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[17]

Zanotti E, Berardinelli P, Bizzarri C, Civardi A, Manstretta A, Rossetti S, Fracchia C. Osteopathic manipulative treatment effectiveness in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot study. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2012 Feb-Apr:20(1-2):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 27     [PubMed PMID: 22305244]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[18]

Engel RM, Vemulpad SR. Immediate effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2008 Oct:108(10):541-2; author reply 542     [PubMed PMID: 18948637]


[19]

Vick DA, McKay C, Zengerle CR. The safety of manipulative treatment: review of the literature from 1925 to 1993. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1996 Feb:96(2):113-5     [PubMed PMID: 8838907]


[20]

Gudavalli MR, DeVocht J, Tayh A, Xia T. Effect of sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture high-velocity, low-amplitude lumbar spine manipulation. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2013 Jun:36(5):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jun 18     [PubMed PMID: 23790603]


[21]

Kauffman M, Ferretti SM. The accelerated physician assistant pathway: a three-year medical school curriculum for physician assistants to obtain DO degrees. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2014 Dec:89(12):1645-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000307. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24826846]


[22]

Teng AY, Terry RR, Blue RJ. Incorporating a Mandatory Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) curriculum in clinical clerkships: impact on student attitudes toward using OMM. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2011 Apr:111(4):219-24     [PubMed PMID: 21562290]


[23]

Sabesan VJ, Schrotenboer A, Habeck J, Lombardo D, Stine S, Jildeh TR, Meiyappan A. Musculoskeletal Education in Medical Schools: A Survey of Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews. 2018 Jun:2(6):e019. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00019. Epub 2018 Jun 28     [PubMed PMID: 30211396]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[24]

Lin I, Wiles LK, Waller R, Goucke R, Nagree Y, Gibberd M, Straker L, Maher CG, O'Sullivan PPB. Poor overall quality of clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2018 Mar:52(5):337-343. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098375. Epub 2017 Nov 25     [PubMed PMID: 29175827]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence