Kernig Sign


Introduction

Kernig sign is one of the eponymous clinical signs of meningitis. This test is typically performed in patients while supine and is described as resistance (or pain) with passive extension of the knees. This resistance is thought to be due to meningeal inflammation in the setting of meningitis or other clinical entities that may irritate the meninges. Since its conception in the 19th century, the clinical value of the Kernig sign has been more thoroughly explored. It remains a commonly performed maneuver in cases of suspected meningitis.[1][2][3][4]

Background

Kernig sign was initially described in the 19th century by Russian physician Vladimir Kernig. Kernig observed that patients with bacterial or tuberculous meningitis could not wholly extend their legs while sitting upright. He continued investigating this finding over several decades of his career and first reported this sign at a medical congress in St. Petersburg in 1882. He presented his observations again in Copenhagen, Denmark, in 1884 and published the same year in Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift.

Kernig described a positive sign as the inability to extend the knees more than 135 degrees. In severe cases, patients could not extend their knees past 90 degrees. The maneuver was performed with the patient seated upright with the hips flexed 90 degrees to the trunk. Kernig also described instances where patients could not extend their elbows in cases of meningitis. Kernig did not use the pain as a marker for a positive test. The presence of contracture or extensor spasm at the knee was considered a positive finding. He noted, however, that the clinical severity of meningitis was not always associated with the severity of contraction of the extremities.[5][6][7]

Anatomy and Physiology

The brain is covered by three meningeal layers, dura mater, pia mater, and arachnoid mater. Meningitis is an inflammation of these meningeal layers, especially the pia and arachnoid.[8] In meningitis, there is hypertonia of lower limbs and increased sensitivity of lower limb nerves. According to a hypothesis, the Kernig sign is a protective response to prevent spasms and pain in the lower extremities that can be triggered by the maneuver performed for the Kernig sign. The maneuver causes a stretch to the hypersensitive and inflamed nerve roots.[9] 

A positive Kernig sign patient should undergo a CT scan followed by a lumbar puncture and antibiotics. Common causes of meningitis are inflammation due to infections, i.e., bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. These infections can be differentiated based on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, staining, and culture after a lumbar puncture. In bacterial and fungal infections, glucose is reduced in CSF. Lymphocytes are predominant in viral and fungal infections in the CSF. CSF opening pressure is increased in fungal and bacterial infections.[10]

Indications

The primary use of performing the Kernig sign in a patient is in the diagnosis of suspected meningitis. Approximately half of the meningitis patients may not present with typical meningeal signs on physical examination.[11] Therefore further investigations, such as lumbar puncture, should not depend entirely on the presence or absence of the Kernig sign, Brudzinski sign, etc.[12]

Contraindications

Infants with tense or high muscle tone are not good candidates for the Kernig test. The test is also unreliable for very lethargic, paraplegic, or comatose patients because these individuals may not have obvious meningeal signs. Further, there is no correlation between the Kernig sign and the severity of meningeal inflammation. Therefore, it should be avoided in patients with leg, knee, or hip injuries.

Equipment

No special equipment is needed. However, a bed is required to keep the patient supine for the examiner to perform the maneuver.

Personnel

Examiners can perform this maneuver alone without any helpers.

Preparation

In clinical practice, it is essential to have the infant relaxed at the time of the test. Therefore, babies who are highly irritable or tense do not make good candidates for the test.

Technique or Treatment

To elicit the Kernig sign, clinicians typically perform the exam with the patient lying supine with the thighs flexed on the abdomen and the knees flexed. The examiner then passively extends the legs. In the presence of meningeal inflammation, the patient will resist leg extension or describe pain in the lower back or posterior thighs, which indicates a positive sign.

Elicitation of the Kernig sign often is performed in conjunction with other examination techniques to detect meningitis in symptomatic patients, particularly the Brudzinski sign. The Brudzinski nape of the neck sign was described in 1909 by Polish pediatrician Brudzinski. A positive Brudzinski sign refers to the maneuver in which the clinician passively flexes the neck, resulting in the flexion of the hips and the knees of the patient.[13]

Complications

It is important not to rely on the Kernig test for meningitis. If meningitis is suspected, the infant must undergo a lumbar puncture.

Clinical Significance

The clinical signs associated with meningitis, including Kernig and Brudzinski, correlate with other diseases. The differential diagnoses in the presence of positive signs include spinal cord tumors, myelitis, intervertebral disc prolapse, sciatica, multiple sclerosis, trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and increased intracranial pressure from numerous causes or in the setting of stroke. When seen in meningitis, these signs are usually present acutely within 24 hours of symptom onset. The thought is that these findings are due to mechanical factors in the spine. When the meninges in the spinal cord and spinal nerves are inflamed, patients will resist stretching the cord and the nerves to prevent pain from this inflammation. These clinical maneuvers appear to provoke this stretching; this is why contractures occur when performed, resulting in a positive test.[14]

Bacterial meningitis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality across the world. It is among the top ten infectious causes of death, with a mortality rate of 20% to 30%, responsible for 135,000 deaths yearly. Physical exam findings, including nuchal rigidity, Kernig, and Brudzinski signs, are used at the bedside to help in the diagnosis of cases of suspected meningitis. Several studies have evaluated the utility and accuracy of these bedside exam findings for diagnosing meningitis. Both the Kernig sign and Brudzinski sign have a limited role in ruling out meningitis in their absence, with low sensitivities of 5%. However, the signs have specificities of 95% and are considered highly predictive of bacterial meningitis when present in the appropriate clinical setting. The jolt accentuation maneuver, described more recently in 1993, is a bedside maneuver to identify cases of meningitis with exacerbation of a headache caused by rotation of the head horizontally two or three times per second. The jolt accentuation maneuver is one of the most sensitive bedside exam findings, with a sensitivity of 97%.[15]

Although the presence or absence of the Kernig sign is not conclusive for the diagnosis of meningitis, in a patient with fever, recent onset of headache, and positive meningeal irritation signs, there is a high chance of bacterial meningitis.[3]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The diagnosis and management of meningitis are to be done with an interprofessional team that includes an emergency department physician, infectious disease specialist, neurologist, nurse practitioner, and pediatrician.

Meningitis is an important disease entity that carries high morbidity and mortality rates, requiring early recognition and management. Kernig sign is a bedside physical exam maneuver used since its description in the 19th century to help diagnose meningitis. A positive test is the elicitation of pain or resistance with passive extension of the patient’s knees past 135 degrees in the setting of meningeal irritation. Due to its low sensitivity, the absence of the Kernig sign does not rule out meningitis; however, with its high specificity, a positive Kernig sign is highly suggestive of the diagnosis.

Much of the literature on the Kernig sign is many years old, and no randomized studies have determined its validity. The healthcare practitioner needs to be aware that the gold standard test for meningitis is the lumbar puncture to assess the cerebrospinal fluid. No physical sign can replace this test.

The Kernig test is not very sensitive to meningitis, and if absent, it does not mean that the patient does not have meningitis. However, if the test is positive, then the test is highly specific for meningitis. Of course, a positive test must correlate with clinical and laboratory features.


Details

Author

Alyssa Karl

Editor:

Dov Brandis

Updated:

12/27/2022 9:37:55 PM

References


[1]

Vigil KJ,Salazar L,Hasbun R, Community-Acquired Meningitis in HIV-Infected Patients in the United States. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2018 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 29432047]


[2]

Mount HR,Boyle SD, Aseptic and Bacterial Meningitis: Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention. American family physician. 2017 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 28925647]


[3]

Forgie SE, The History and Current Relevance of the Eponymous Signs of Meningitis. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2016 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 27031257]


[4]

Nakao JH, Jafri FN, Shah K, Newman DH. Jolt accentuation of headache and other clinical signs: poor predictors of meningitis in adults. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2014 Jan:32(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Oct 16     [PubMed PMID: 24139448]


[5]

Tamune H,Takeya H,Suzuki W,Tagashira Y,Kuki T,Nakamura M, Absence of jolt accentuation of headache cannot accurately rule out meningitis in adults. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2013 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 24070978]


[6]

Curtis S,Stobart K,Vandermeer B,Simel DL,Klassen T, Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 20974781]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Attia J,Hatala R,Cook DJ,Wong JG, The rational clinical examination. Does this adult patient have acute meningitis? JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;     [PubMed PMID: 10411200]


[8]

Hoffman O,Weber RJ, Pathophysiology and treatment of bacterial meningitis. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2009 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 21180625]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Mehndiratta M,Nayak R,Garg H,Kumar M,Pandey S, Appraisal of Kernig's and Brudzinski's sign in meningitis. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2012 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 23349594]


[10]

Hersi K,Gonzalez FJ,Kondamudi NP, Meningitis 2020 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 29083833]


[11]

Akaishi T,Kobayashi J,Abe M,Ishizawa K,Nakashima I,Aoki M,Ishii T, Sensitivity and specificity of meningeal signs in patients with meningitis. Journal of general and family medicine. 2019 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 31516806]


[12]

Bilavsky E,Leibovitz E,Elkon-Tamir E,Fruchtman Y,Ifergan G,Greenberg D, The diagnostic accuracy of the 'classic meningeal signs' in children with suspected bacterial meningitis. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2013 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 22914116]


[13]

Stribos MP,Jones EB, Brudzinski Sign 2020 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 30969733]


[14]

MEITUS SS, [Induction of Kernig symptoms in children in practice]. Nevropatologiia i psikhiatriia. 1951 Mar-Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 14843327]


[15]

Afhami S,Dehghan Manshadi SA,Rezahosseini O, Jolt accentuation of headache: can this maneuver rule out acute meningitis? BMC research notes. 2017 Oct 30;     [PubMed PMID: 29084605]