Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn

Earn CME/CE in your profession:

Continuing Education Activity

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a red blood cell mismatch between mothers and their fetuses that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, fatal consequences from this disorder have become rare with the appropriate use of immunoprophylaxis. However, to avoid the fatal consequences of this disorder, prompt recognition and treatment are vital. This activity reviews the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn by the interprofessional team.


  • Describe the etiology and epidemiology of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

  • Review the pathophysiology of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

  • Outline the management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

  • Summarize interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to advance the care of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn and improve outcomes.


Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is an immune-mediated red blood cell (RBC) disorder in which maternal antibodies attack fetal or newborn RBCs.[1][2] HDFN can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in limited healthcare resource settings. Effects of HDFN range from mild anemia to hydrops fetalis in the fetus and hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus in the newborn.[1][3] Through early detection, management, and prevention of this disease, the incidence, and prevalence of HDFN have exponentially decreased in the past 50 years.[1]


There are two main mechanisms by which maternal antibodies target fetal or newborn RBC antigens:

  • ABO incompatibility
  • Fetomaternal hemorrhage

ABO incompatibility is a congenital, inherent mismatch between maternal and fetal blood types.[4] Conversely, alloimmunization due to fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is an acquired immune-mediated mechanism that typically affects subsequent pregnancies rather than the pregnancy in which the FMH happens.[2][5]


Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn was first described by Dr. Louis K. Diamond in 1932 when he wrote about erythroblastosis fetalis in the newborn based on peripheral smears.[6] Rhesus D-negative (RhD) immunoprophylaxis was first introduced in 1968, which dropped the incidence of HDFN from 1% of all newborns worldwide (with 50% mortality) to 0.5%.[1] The incidence of HDFN decreased even further to 0.1% with the administration of antepartum RhD immunoprophylaxis.[2] However, despite adequate RhD immunoprophylaxis, an estimated 1 to 3 in 1000 Rh-negative women still develop alloimmunization today. Thus it is important to stay vigilant for the development of HDFN.[1]

Rh incompatibility varies by race, ethnicity, and risk factors. The Rh-negative blood type is most predominant in white races (15%) compared to African Americans (5% to 8%) or Asians and Native Americans (1% to 2%). Among white women, an Rh-negative woman has an 85% chance of mating with an Rh-positive man.[1] This frequently occurring Rh-incompatibility increases the risk of HDFN with any FMH event.

As little as 0.1 mL of fetal blood entering maternal circulation is sufficient to cause alloimmunization.[7] In fact, 15 to 50% of gestations have sufficient fetomaternal hemorrhage to cause alloimmunization, and only 1 to 2% of all Rh alloimmunization is caused by antepartum FMH.[7] As such, it is important to consider HDFN at all stages of the pregnancy where FMH may occur.


As mentioned, there are two mechanisms causing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. First, the fetomaternal pair can have inherent ABO incompatibility, which occurs in 15 to 25% of pregnancies.[8] Only about 1% of those pairs, those with high IgG titers, will develop HDFN due to ABO incompatibility.[8] In ABO incompatibility, naturally occurring antigens against A or B blood types are present in mothers with O blood type. If the mother's fetus has an A or B (or AB) blood type, maternal anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies, respectively, will attack the foreign blood type of the fetus. The anti-A and anti-B antibodies are IgG, which can cross the placenta and affect the developing fetus.[9] Compared with FMH, ABO incompatibility generally causes a less severe form of HDFN. Postulated theories for this include fetal RBCs express less ABO blood group antigens than adult levels and that ABO blood group antigens are expressed by many tissues, which reduces the chance that antibodies specifically target the antigens on fetal RBCs.[4]

The second mechanism most commonly causing HDFN is through fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH), where maternal antibodies develop after exposure to fetal blood. When fetal RBCs enter the maternal blood circulation, maternal antibodies can develop to an antigen presented on the fetal RBC surface. The most common antigen involved in this mechanism is the Rhesus D antigen.[10] It is estimated that 1.5 to 2.5% of obstetric patients will develop antibodies to other "minor" antigens. While most of these cases of alloimmunization do not cause significant hemolytic disease of the newborn, some can cause severe anemia at low titer thresholds. Antibodies against the antigens of the Kell blood group, for example, are associated with an increased risk of severe anemia and/or death of the fetus. These patients should be monitored very closely throughout the pregnancy.[3][7]

Antigens in fetal blood that are foreign to maternal blood are inherited from paternal genes. For example, an Rh-negative woman can have an Rh-positive fetus due to her partner being Rh-positive. Antibodies that develop due to FMH put subsequent pregnancies at risk for HDFN as the first antibodies to develop are of IgM type, which cannot cross the placenta. In subsequent encounters with the Rh-D antigen, maternal antibodies rapidly develop IgG antibodies, which do cross the placenta.[11]

As infant RBCs are attacked and broken down, infants develop hemolytic anemia. The breakdown of heme leads to bilirubin, which is removed by the placenta in utero. At birth, the liver begins processing the bilirubin. Indirect bilirubin, or unconjugated bilirubin, is conjugated to direct bilirubin using the enzyme uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UDP-glucuronosyltransferase). This conjugated bilirubin is excreted in bile, where it ultimately will be excreted in feces and urine.

In infants, especially preterm infants, liver processing is less efficient, which often leads to natural physiologic jaundice.[12] With excess breakdown products from HDFN, these immature processing mechanisms are overwhelmed, and the resulting hyperbilirubinemia can be prominent. The accumulation of unconjugated bilirubin can lead to neurologic dysfunction as the unbound bilirubin crosses the blood-brain barrier and deposits in the brain of the developing newborn.[13] Prompt recognition and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia and HDFN are paramount to avoiding long-term neurologic dysfunction in these infants.

History and Physical

An in-depth history can be essential in raising suspicion for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Emphasis should be placed on identifying any events that may have led to fetomaternal hemorrhage. These include previous pregnancies with HDFN or hydrops fetalis, miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, early pregnancy terminations, blood transfusions in the mother, chorionic villous sampling, amniocentesis, or documentation of bleeding in pregnancy.[7]

Early in the first trimester, blood typing should be done on all pregnant women. Those with blood type O naturally express antibodies to A and B blood types; thus, they should be monitored for the development of HDFN, especially at delivery and directly postpartum. The antibodies expressed in mothers with O blood type are typically immunoglobulin G (IgG) and can cross the placenta. Conversely, mothers with blood type A have antibodies against blood type B, which are predominantly immunoglobulin M (IgM) and do not cross the placenta.[8] It is generally standard practice to check the blood types of infants born to mothers with blood type O at birth, whereas blood types of infants whose mothers have blood types A, B, or AB may not be checked (if the Rhesus factor is positive).

The main signs of hemolytic disease in the newborn (HDN) are anemia and hyperbilirubinemia, which may present as lethargy, jaundice, conjunctival icterus, pallor, hepatosplenomegaly, tachycardia or bradycardia, increased oxygen requirement, and/or apnea.[9][13]


Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn should be considered in the differential diagnosis of newborns with jaundice/hyperbilirubinemia and certainly in the case of neonatal anemia. Diagnosis of HDFN can be made by identifying the presence of maternal RBC antibodies (agglutination in an indirect antibody test) and/or a positive direct antibody test (DAT) in the infant's serum.[4] If a pregnant woman is identified to have alloimmunization, the first step in further evaluation is to determine the paternal RBC antigen status. If positive, the next step is to identify the fetal blood type, typically done through amniocentesis.[7]

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), "if a mother has not had prenatal blood grouping or is Rh-negative, a direct antibody test (or Coombs' test), blood type, and an Rh (D) type on the infant's (cord) blood are strongly recommended."[13]

Treatment / Management

If hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is identified or suspected in utero, a consult with maternal-fetal medicine should be placed as early as possible in the pregnancy. Affected pregnancies can be managed by monitoring antibody titers, and fetal middle cerebral artery velocities, intrauterine transfusions, and possibly early delivery, as infants with severe anemia may not tolerate term labor well.[7]

Hemolytic disease of the newborn is managed by treating hyperbilirubinemia with phototherapy and exchange transfusions if needed. Routine universal screening with transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) often occurs at 24 hours of life, but screening should be conducted as soon as hyperbilirubinemia is suspected. An elevated TcB should always be verified with a serum total bilirubin (TB). The hour-specific Bhutani nomogram is then used to risk stratify the amount of bilirubin in the infant's blood.[13] This nomogram provides a recommended threshold for starting phototherapy versus early transfusions depending on the infant's risk level.

Phototherapy was introduced in the 1970s and has become the mainstay of hyperbilirubinemia management in newborns. Photo isomerization causes the transformation of bilirubin into a water-soluble isomer that can then be excreted by the kidneys and stool without the need for processing in the liver. The main determinants of phototherapy efficacy are the wavelength of light used, the intensity of that light, the total light dose (time exposed and surface area exposed), and the threshold at which phototherapy is initiated. The AAP recommends the use of intensive phototherapy in HDFN. The optimal light used for phototherapy has a wavelength of 460-490nm. The light should be at a close distance (about 20cm above the infant), and double phototherapy has proven to be more efficacious than single. There is limited data on the efficacy of continuous versus intermittent phototherapy for infants >2000g.[1] During the use of phototherapy, mothers should be encouraged to breastfeed their infants at timely intervals despite needing to remove them from phototherapy to do so.

An exchange transfusion may be needed for severely anemic newborns, which involves replacing infant RBCs with antigen-negative RBCs, thereby preventing further hemolysis. 5mL/kg aliquots are removed and replaced over several minutes for a total of 25-50mL/kg exchange of RBCs. Exchange transfusions are recommended by the AAP if total bilirubin levels remain above the transfusion threshold despite intensive phototherapy or if signs of bilirubin encephalopathy are present. If an exchange transfusion is being considered, an albumin level should be measured. Albumin of 3.0 g/dL or less is considered an independent risk factor for hyperbilirubinemia and lowers the phototherapy threshold. Without sufficient albumin to bind bilirubin, the amount of free, unconjugated bilirubin increases, thereby increasing the risk for kernicterus.[1]

Anemic infants may require blood transfusions with ABO-matched packed RBCs. If immediate transfusion is thought to be needed, O-type, Rh-negative blood that has been leukodepleted and irradiated should be available at delivery.[1]

Other treatment modalities have been considered but are still controversial. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the infant may block Fc receptors on macrophages, thereby decreasing the breakdown of antibody-coated RBCs. IVIG is recommended by the AAP if total serum bilirubin continues to rise despite intensive phototherapy or is within 2-3 mg/dL of the exchange transfusion level. Administration of IVIG to mothers prior to delivery has not been shown to be efficacious and is not currently recommended. Other agents such as albumin, phenobarbital, metalloporphyrins, zinc, clofibrate, and prebiotics have been studied as possible treatment options for hyperbilirubinemia, but none are currently recommended.[14] In a recent randomized control trial of 70 infants with Rh-alloimmunization, delayed cord clamping was shown to improve anemia without increasing the incidence of adverse events. Delayed cord clamping had no significant impact, however, on the need for exchange transfusion or duration of phototherapy.[15]

Differential Diagnosis

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn should be included in the differential diagnosis of infants with early, severe, or prolonged jaundice and anemia. Other etiologies of jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn include physiologic jaundice, prematurity, breast milk and breastfeeding jaundice, G6PD deficiency, thalassemia, sepsis, birth trauma, Gilbert syndrome, and hypothyroidism.[3] The history and physical, as well as simple laboratory evaluation, as described above, can help differentiate these causes.

Treatment Planning

The American Association of Blood Banks recommends repeat antibody screening prior to administration of Rh-D immunoprophylaxis (Rh-D IgG) at 28 weeks of gestation, postpartum, and in FMH events.[5] In a network meta-analysis conducted in China, the most effective protocol for preventing maternal alloimmunization was the administration of Rh-D immunoprophylaxis at 28 and 34 gestational weeks in Rh-negative women.[16] 

The standard dose of anti-RhD administered in the second and third trimesters and postpartum, if needed, is 300mcg. If needed in the first trimester, the recommended dose is 150 mcg. A one-time dose of 300 mcg anti-RhD should prevent isoimmunization when 15mL or less of fetal RBCs (or 30mL of whole blood) enters maternal circulation. A rosette test is a qualitative test to assess potential FMH. If positive, the rosette test should be followed by the Kleihauer-Betke test to quantify the amount of fetomaternal blood mixing to then determine if additional doses of Rh-D immunoprophylaxis are needed.[10]


The overall prognosis of HDFN is good if identified and treated promptly. While permanent neurologic dysfunction may result from delays in care, this is now a rare occurrence with the advancements in monitoring as well as prophylaxis against HDFN.


Acute bilirubin encephalopathy from the buildup of bilirubin in an infant's brain may manifest as hypotonia or poor suck reflex, which then progresses to irritability and hypertonia with retrocollis and opisthotonos. Long-term consequences of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy may lead to cerebral palsy, auditory dysfunction, paralysis of upward gaze, and permanent intellectual dysfunction.[13] Thus, early recognition and treatment are imperative to prevent the detrimental progression of HDFN.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patient education regarding routine lab testing and Rh-D immunoprophylaxis in Rh-negative women is necessary to ensure possible FMH events are reported and appropriately treated in pregnant women. Additionally, parents of newborns can be educated on the signs and symptoms to be aware of hyperbilirubinemia to assist the interprofessional team in the early identification of possible HDFN cases.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Enhancing interprofessional team outcomes for patients with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn requires close collaboration between both OB/GYN and pediatric providers, nurses, pharmacists, and blood bank personnel. With HDFN, there are two patients to consider at all times - the mother and the fetus/newborn. When HDFN is identified in utero, the delivery team should be well-versed and prepared ahead of time to identify signs and symptoms of HDFN, as these infants may need timely transfusions at birth. Pharmacists and providers must identify if and when Rh-D immunoprophylaxis is indicated to prevent future HDFN cases throughout the pregnancy. Through the development of Rh-D immunoprophylaxis and newborn work-up protocols, the incidence of HDFN has dramatically dropped in the past 50 years. Still, it will take continued interprofessional collaboration to ensure the incidence of HDFN remains low.



Victoria Hall


11/22/2022 10:44:28 PM



Ree IMC, Smits-Wintjens VEHJ, van der Bom JG, van Klink JMM, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Neonatal management and outcome in alloimmune hemolytic disease. Expert review of hematology. 2017 Jul:10(7):607-616. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1331124. Epub 2017 Jun 5     [PubMed PMID: 28503958]


Basu S, Kaur R, Kaur G. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: Current trends and perspectives. Asian journal of transfusion science. 2011 Jan:5(1):3-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.75963. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21572705]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence


de Haas M, Thurik FF, Koelewijn JM, van der Schoot CE. Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Vox sanguinis. 2015 Aug:109(2):99-113. doi: 10.1111/vox.12265. Epub 2015 Apr 20     [PubMed PMID: 25899660]


Metcalf RA,Khan J,Andrews J,Mayock D,Billimoria Z,Pagano MB, Severe ABO Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn Requiring Exchange Transfusion. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2019 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 30044350]


Noronha SA. Acquired and Congenital Hemolytic Anemia. Pediatrics in review. 2016 Jun:37(6):235-46. doi: 10.1542/pir.2015-0053. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27252179]


Naiman JL. On Dr. Louis K. Diamond's 1932 article and subsequent contributions to erythroblastosis fetalis. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2001 Nov:23(8):550-3     [PubMed PMID: 11878786]


. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 192: Management of Alloimmunization During Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Mar:131(3):e82-e90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002528. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29470342]


Murray NA,Roberts IA, Haemolytic disease of the newborn. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2007 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 17337672]


Delaney M, Matthews DC. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: managing the mother, fetus, and newborn. Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program. 2015:2015():146-51. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.146. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26637714]


. Practice Bulletin No. 181: Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Aug:130(2):e57-e70. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002232. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28742673]


Moinuddin I, Fletcher C, Millward P. Prevalence and specificity of clinically significant red cell alloantibodies in pregnant women - a study from a tertiary care hospital in Southeast Michigan. Journal of blood medicine. 2019:10():283-289. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S214118. Epub 2019 Aug 20     [PubMed PMID: 31692490]


Mitra S, Rennie J. Neonatal jaundice: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005). 2017 Dec 2:78(12):699-704. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.12.699. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29240507]


Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 15231951]


Li S, He Z, Mo C, Ji Y, Luo Y, Fang Q, Gao Y. Hyporegenerative anemia in anti-M-associated hemolytic disease of the fetus. Transfusion. 2021 Jun:61(6):1908-1915. doi: 10.1111/trf.16350. Epub 2021 May 3     [PubMed PMID: 33938570]


Sahoo T, Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Gupta SK, Agarwal R, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Delayed cord clamping in Rh-alloimmunised infants: a randomised controlled trial. European journal of pediatrics. 2020 Jun:179(6):881-889. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03578-8. Epub 2020 Jan 23     [PubMed PMID: 31974670]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence


Xie X, Fu Q, Bao Z, Zhang Y, Zhou D. Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis. PloS one. 2020:15(3):e0230073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230073. Epub 2020 Mar 12     [PubMed PMID: 32163467]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence