Electrodiagnostic Evaluation Of Tarsal Tunnel Neuropathy

Continuing Education Activity

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is a relatively rare mononeuropathy of the lower extremities that can be difficult to diagnose. Clinical evaluation, electroneurography (ENG), and electromyography (EMG) are used to diagnose this neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve, thereby allowing for more accurate treatment and management plans to help alleviate the patient’s symptoms. This activity will briefly discuss the etiology and pathophysiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome in addition to describing how ENG and EMG can be used to identify this condition.


  • Describe the diagnostic findings of tarsal tunnel syndrome found on ENG and EMG.
  • Identify common pitfalls when conducting ENG of the tibial nerve and its branches, and EMG of the intrinsic foot muscles.
  • Review the appropriate recording and stimulation sites of the medial and lateral plantar nerves.
  • Discuss the importance of communicating the findings of the electrophysiological study with the interprofessional team to better enhance patient outcomes.


Often, it is difficult to fully elucidate a neuromuscular diagnosis with history and physical examination alone. Furthermore, many neuromuscular diagnoses cannot be identified on an MRI or CT scan and thus require an alternate modality to identify—this is the role of the electrodiagnosis techniques: Electroneurography (ENG) and electromyography (EMG). Specifically, ENG and EMG are useful in identifying peripheral neuropathies caused by compression of the tibial nerve. Neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve is a relatively rare condition that causes foot and ankle pain, paresthesia, and even weakness of the intrinsic foot muscles.

When this neuropathy occurs in the tarsal tunnel, it is known as tarsal tunnel syndrome. This condition is most frequently caused by external compression by ill-fitting footwear or tight plaster casts. Other causes are posttraumatic fibrosis and acute trauma (such as those from sprains, strains, fractures) but can also result from lipomas, cysts, tumors, soft tissue infection, and inflammatory arthropathies. A true entrapment from a thickened flexor retinaculum is rare.[1][2][3]

Electromyography can be used to identify the specific muscles affected by a nerve lesion. If a nerve lesion localizes to the tarsal tunnel, the practitioner must determine the cause of the compression.[4]

Anatomy and Physiology

The tibial nerve is the continuation of the medial trunk of the sciatic nerve. At the ankle, it runs posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus passing through a tunnel created by the flexor retinaculum. Distal to the tunnel, the tibial nerve divides into the calcaneal sensory branches and the two plantar nerves, which are mixed nerves (contain both motor and sensory fibers). The calcaneal nerves are two sensory branches (medial and lateral) that provide sensation to the heel of the sole. The two mixed motor and sensory branches are the medial and lateral plantar nerves.

These nerves provide sensory innervation to the two-thirds of the sole and motor innervation to the intrinsic foot muscles: the lateral plantar nerve supplies motor innervation to the abductor digiti quinti pedis and sensation to the lateral plantar aspect of the foot, including the lateral 1.5 toes. The medial plantar nerve supplies motor function to the abductor halluces brevis, flexor halluces brevis, and flexor digitorum brevis. It provides sensation to the medial plantar aspect of the foot sole and the first three toes. Tibial nerve compression at the level of the tarsal tunnel will lead to sensory and motor disturbances according to its branches' distribution.[5][6]


The patient complains of unilateral pain in the foot and ankle and numbness in the sole. Besides, calcaneal sensory brunches are affected in lesions within or proximal to the tarsal tunnel, presenting sensory loss in the heel. A physical examination may reveal a positive Tinel’s sign over the tibial nerve at the medial malleolus and sensory changes along the plantar surface of the foot. Gastrocnemius normal strength and normal ankle reflex with weakness of the intrinsic foot muscles help localize the lesion.[7]


Contraindications for EMG include skin or soft tissue infections at the anatomic study site, cardiac pacemaker, coagulopathies, lymphedema, and low patient tolerance.


  • ENG/EMG machine
  • Surface electrodes for ENG
  • Disposable concentric EMG needle.
  • Needle cable
  • Ground electrode


Electrophysiological studies must be performed by certified and specialized in clinical neurophysiologist physicians. 


Discussion of the procedure, including anticipated sensations and duration, should be discussed before scheduling the electrophysiological test. It is also essential to discuss with the patient the rare risk of infection and bleeding as a needle will break the skin and the need for not using skin cream previous to the test.

Further preparation includes the location of anatomic landmarks and reviewing with the patient how to contract the target muscles. It is equally crucial to ensure the ambient room temperature of the examination room. Just before beginning the exam, it is essential to clean the skin with an alcohol swab with time to allow for air drying.[8]


The patient should be in a supine position with the legs resting comfortably on the examination table. Following, the EMG study of the intrinsic foot muscles will complete the test.

Nerve conductions show the reduced amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the tibial nerve stimulated at the ankle and recorded from the abductor hallucis and abductor digiti minimi. Sensory conduction studies and mixed conduction techniques are performed, usually with averaging techniques. Due to the wide range of normal values, comparing the results with the other foot (only if it is unaffected) is useful.

Following needle EMG analysis of muscles innervated by medial and lateral plantar nerves must be performed. These muscles are the intrinsic foot muscles and include abductor digiti minimi, abductor hallucis brevis, flexor hallucis brevis, and flexor digitorum brevis. Some neurogenic findings may appear in these muscles in normal subjects, so it is best to compare the findings with the unaffected foot. Additionally, to complete the study, EMG examination of proximal muscles in the calf innervated by the tibial nerve (proximally to the tarsal tunnel) and the peroneal nerve, such as the gastrocnemius and the tibialis anterior muscles respectively, must be normal.[9][10]


Risks associated with EMG include bleeding, infection, and nerve injury. Technical complications can include differentiating between normal and abnormal intrinsic foot muscle activity. 

Clinical Significance

If tarsal tunnel syndrome is identified early in the disease course, the patient can benefit from a conservative treatment plan depending on the cause, if found. If the syndrome is due to tight foot-wear, the simple fact of changing it may be sufficient. For progressive tarsal tunnel syndrome, surgical exploration of the nerves in the tarsal tunnel and distally may be necessary. ENG and EMG, when done efficiently and effectively, can lead to the early diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome.[11]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

In many instances, the disease progression of this mononeuropathy is reversible if addressed early on. Efficient interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication is a crucial component of treating patients with neuropathy. Appropriate referral by the first medical professional who encounters a patient’s complaint can be the difference between an acute disease process and a chronic complication.

By identifying the location of the nerve lesion to the tibial nerve at the level of the medial malleolus, the EMG practitioner can address the causative agent. Initially, conservative measures require clinical attention—these include changes in footwear, physical therapy, and anti-inflammatory medications. Through effective interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication, the patient’s medical providers can monitor the patient’s progress.

If the patient does not demonstrate adequate progress, surgical intervention is needed. Ultimately, it is through collaboration and shared decision making that allows the patient to have the best possible outcome. The earlier the signs and symptoms of neuropathy identified, and the electrodiagnosis test performed, the better the prognosis and outcome.[12][4] [Level 4]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Nursing or health auxiliary collaboration, depending on the concrete circumstances, with the clinician, to hand in technical material, assure the correct humidity of electrodes and alcohol swab, prepare the patient, etc. is of great help.

Article Details

Article Author

Daniel Scura

Article Editor:

Beatriz García-López


3/24/2021 9:30:34 PM



Meadows JR,Finnoff JT, Lower extremity nerve entrapments in athletes. Current sports medicine reports. 2014 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 25211617]


Hong CH,Lee YK,Won SH,Lee DW,Moon SI,Kim WJ, Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by an uncommon ossicle of the talus: A case report. Medicine. 2018 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 29923985]


Kiel J,Kaiser K, Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome 2020 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 30020645]


McSweeney SC,Cichero M, Tarsal tunnel syndrome-A narrative literature review. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2015 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 26546070]


Bailie DS,Kelikian AS, Tarsal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis, surgical technique, and functional outcome. Foot     [PubMed PMID: 9498577]


McKeon PO,Hertel J,Bramble D,Davis I, The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. British journal of sports medicine. 2015 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 24659509]


Pasku DS,Karampekios SK,Kontakis GM,Katonis PG, Varicosities as an etiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome and the significance of tinel's sign: report of two cases in young men and a review of the literature. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2009 Mar-Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 19299352]


Tankisi H,Burke D,Cui L,de Carvalho M,Kuwabara S,Nandedkar SD,Rutkove S,Stålberg E,van Putten MJAM,Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Standards of instrumentation of EMG. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2020 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 31761717]


Daube JR,Rubin DI, Needle electromyography. Muscle     [PubMed PMID: 19145648]


Rubin DI, Needle electromyography: Basic concepts. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2019;     [PubMed PMID: 31277852]


Mahan KT,Rock JJ,Hillstrom HJ, Tarsal tunnel syndrome. A retrospective study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 1996 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 8714673]


Doneddu PE,Coraci D,Loreti C,Piccinini G,Padua L, Tarsal tunnel syndrome: still more opinions than evidence. Status of the art. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 28664501]